Henry Makow

 
left. Queer as Folk was a Showcase TV series that ran from 2000-2005 and portrayed the lives of five gay friends living in Pittsburgh. PA.)



The showtime series "Queer as Folk" was part of the Illuminati (Satanist) program to replace heterosexual institutions (marriage, family) with  homosexuality and perversion. This is done to destabilize society as children need to be born & raised in a wholesome environment. Our contributor Sasha Spencer checked the TV show out (of the library) and was appalled. Here is her review.










WHILE CHRISTIANITY UPHOLDS THE HIGHEST IN MAN, HIS DIVINE SPIRIT, LUCIFERIANS WORSHIP THE LOWEST, WHILE PRETENDING IT IS THE HIGHEST


"One of the men being banged from behind is Brian's mother's ( a staunch Christian) minister.  Later in the show, Brian confronts the minister for being a hypocrite and the minister's reply was, "I only teach love".  Brian's response is, "I've had the minister down on all 4's squealing like a pig, taking it up the ass"."


By Sasha Spencer
(henrymakow.com)


     Browsing for DVD'S at the library, I came upon the series, "Queer as Folk".  Queer as Folk was produced for Showtime Entertainment, developed and written by Ron Cowen and Daniel Lipman.  Originally based on a British series, the show was the first hour-long drama on American television to portray the lives of gay men and women.

The American version quickly became the number one show on the Showtime roster.  The series was targeted at gay males but, surprisingly a large segment of viewers were straight females.  (Trying to understand, like me?).  The series was groundbreaking in being the first American series to show anal sex scenes, masturbation and shaved full frontal naked males.  

The series follows the lives of five gay men, Brian, Justin, Michael, Emmett and Ted; a lesbian couple, Lindsay and Melanie; along with Michael's mother Debbie, (played by Sharon Gless), and his uncle Vic, who has AIDS.

To give you an idea of what you are in for, the opening musical theme is called "Spunk" by Greek Buck.

Let me state for the record, I am not against gays in any way, shape or form.  I have family and loved ones who are gay.  With that said, these are my impressions.

Queer as Folk is very explicit.  It was a bit shocking to see men having very perspicuous anal sex constantly.  The bath house scenes were raw and urgent.  The men were predatory and hovering.  It reminded me of the time I visited Christopher Street in NYC with a gay friend.  Trying to be invisible, I observed the behavior of gay men in various bars.  The intense drive, compulsion and desperation for sex could be cut with a knife.  It was very disturbing.

After my initial nausea at the extremely graphic sex scenes, I began to feel numb.  Three DVD'S in, it wasn't so shocking to see men taking it up the ass or rimming each other [licking ass].  And isn't numbness exactly what the Illuminati controllers want us to feel? Men trolling for anonymous sex with men in a predatory fashion, living for sex and the next big conquest -- no big deal, it's normal.

 I DON'T NEED AN EXCUSE TO F*CK

I found the series to be depraved and immoral.  Everything seemed to be focused on the male organ.  The bathhouse scenes had copious amounts of anal sex, group sex and loud orgasms, leaving little to the imagination.  Why does this bother me so much?   It must be the promiscuous, self-indulgent loveless lifestyles.  Watching this made me feel empty.

An opening scene starts out with Brian and Justin (a couple) having extremely vigorous anal sex with two other men from behind and kissing each other while doing it.  This was their DATE NIGHT!  As it turns out, one of the men being banged from behind is Brian's mother's ( a staunch Christian) minister.  Later in the show, Brian confronts the minister for being a hypocrite and the minister's reply was, "I only teach love".  Brian's response is, "I've had the minister down on all 4's squealing like a pig, taking it up the ass".

This series tries to make the constant obsession with sex seem normal.  It's the right of every gay to act in this depraved way. It's OK to f*ck guys constantly and the more the better.    Everything revolves around boners, dicks, f**ING, scoring...Ugh!  If you want to see plenty of anal sex and erections, this show is for you.

(As usual, lesbian appearance is not portrayed realistically.)

In contrast, the lesbians, Lindsay and Melanie shadow the gay men.  The sex scenes between them are not as offensive because they are more gentle and loving.  Brutishness is absent in their sex scenes, however their morality is also in question as they cheat on each other and have a threesome.  Lindsay has a baby with Brian's sperm and Melanie with Michael's seed.  It's all so confusing.

In the fifth season, the premise is that the boys have become men.  Hardly.
Michael loves comic books and sleeps on Captain Astro sheets.  Brian, having a testicle removed has to haunt the bath house to prove to himself his masculinity is not diminished and he is still "hot" and ever so desirable.

Other questionable themes are the relationship of Brian and Justin, beginning when Justin was just 17 and Brian 29.  This show pushes the boundaries. Seventeen is almost 18 so it's not really pedophilia.  Controversial story lines in the series include: drug use/abuse, gay adoption, artificial insemination, underage prostitution, (Michael and Ben adopt a teen gay hustler who is HIV positive), drag queens, (Michael's biological dad is a drag queen), internet porn and bug chasers...HIV-negative individuals who actively seek to become HIV-positive...why?

I'M A TOTAL HETEROPHOBE  (Brian Kinney)

IN CONCLUSION,  this series left me feeling completely upside down.  There was little I could relate to from my world.   The characters were emotionally indulgent creatures who lost the ability to relate in a normal way to others.  Their lifestyles were obsessive-compulsive and addictive.  
 
The characters were self-absorbed narcissists and all leaned heavily to overcompensation. I felt the take-home message was that society at large (heterosexual) should celebrate their sexual exploits and neurosis.

I feel this series is another form of human Terra-forming.  Molding the masses to the Illuminati grand plan.  My only hope is that there are those of us who remember what a moral, just, and pure life can be. A life absent of the obsessive pursuit of carnal desires.  Where tenderness, respect, generosity and real affection rule.
 ---
Also by Sasha Spencer

Feminism Leaves Bitter Taste When You are Unemployed

Insider Reveals Hollywood's Satanic Underside

Why is Organized Jewry Promoting Homosexuality?

Nancy Allen's Guide to Gay Sex

Insider: Gay Marriage "a Total Farce"

My wife and I got a kick
 out of this cartoon
in the latest New Yorker

(left, Stalin & FDR, two sides of the same coin)

"Romerstein & Evans give the impression that Roosevelt himself was left in the dark about the nest of spies around him."
Even historians of Communist subversion cover up for FDR, says Dave Martin. Whittaker Chambers was a GRU (KGB) agent who in 1938 told Assistant Sec of State (for National Security)  Adolf Berle the Roosevelt administration was crawling with Soviet agents, including FDR's key adviser Alger Hiss. 

FDR told Berle to f**k himself.  Clearly Roosevelt (and Stalin) were traitors,  puppets of the Illuminati Jewish banker cabal. But no historian can admit "anti-Communism" (or rather US patriotism) was and is a charade.  






Stalin's Secret Agents: The Subversion of Roosevelt's Government
by Dave Martin
(abridged by henrymakow.com)

(Whittaker Chambers, left )

Isaac Don Levine, the man who set up and took part in the Whittaker Chambers-Adolf Berle meeting confirms that FDR dismissed evidence of Soviet spy infiltration. 

"When I called on Berle a couple of weeks later, he indicated to me that the President had given him the cold shoulder after hearing his account of the Chambers disclosures.  Although I learned later, from two different sources who had social relations with Berle, that Roosevelt, in effect, had told him to "go jump in a lake" upon the suggestion of a probe into the Chambers charges, I do not recall hearing that exact phrase from Berle.  To the best of my recollection, the President dismissed the matter rather brusquely with an expletive remark on this order: "Oh, forget it, Adolf."   Eyewitness to History: Memoirs and Reflections of a Foreign Correspondent for Half a Century, pp. 197-8 (1975)

It is very, very hard to come to any other conclusion than that [Evans and Romerstein,] who could well be described as America's leading surviving Red hunters, are covering up for Franklin D. Roosevelt.  That impression is greatly reinforced by Evans in a presentation he made to The Heritage Foundation, which one can listen to here.   He is asked specifically about Roosevelt's complicity in permitting his government to be laced by Communist agents, and Evans attributes it all to FDR's naiveté.   Perhaps someone should have also asked him about the failure of the FBI in all this, the people who have the national responsibility for counter-espionage.  But the FBI ultimately works for the president.  He had the power to make them stand down, and there is every indication that that is just what he did.

Further indication that the authors are covering up for Roosevelt is their failure to mention at all the Soviet defector Walter Krivitsky,left.   Krivitsky, as former chief of Soviet intelligence in Europe, knew a good deal more about Soviet infiltration of the U.S. government than Chambers did.  But instead of being embraced and welcomed by the Roosevelt administration, he was harassed by them.  In February of 1941 he was found dead of a gunshot wound to the head in a Washington, DC, hotel room.  The District police ruled the death a suicide after only a cursory investigation.  Who would have had the power to, in effect, make the DC police stand down on this one?

The authors do talk about the very well connected Soviet spy, Michael Straight, who as publisher of The New Republic hired Henry Wallace as editor, but they have no reference to the extremely revealing biography Last of the Cold War Spies: The Life of Michael Straight, by Australian journalist Roland Perry.   Perhaps that is because Perry, like Levine in his similarly ignored book, has a lot to say about Walter Krivitsky.  Perry even suggests that Straight, a family friend of the Roosevelt's working for the State Department at the time and feeling threatened, was involved in Krivitsky's assassination.  (See the review by Wes Vernon.)

First Comment by Dan:

What Whittaker Chambers tried to give Berle was the facts and names of the entire GRU network in DC, all of them Federal employees embedded in New Deal bureaucracy. Chambers wrote in his autobiography 'Witness' that weeks after the meeting and nothing happened, it dawned on Chambers that Berle wasn't to do anything at all because FDR's liberals knew they were working with the Communist party. The joke was on the Communists.

Chambers explains further that to fully understand you have to look deeper to see the hidden agenda of the New Deal.

"And with astonishment I took my first hard look at the New Deal. . . . All the New Dealers I had known were Communists or near-Communists. None of them took the New Deal seriously as an end in itself. They regarded it as an instrument for gaining their own revolutionary ends. I myself thought of the New Deal as a reform movement that, in social and labor legislation, was belatedly bringing the United States abreast of Britain or Scandinavia."

"I saw that the New Deal was only superficially a reform movement. I had to acknowledge the truth of what its more forthright protagonists, sometimes unwarily, sometimes defiantly, averred: The New Deal was a genuine revolution, whose deepest purpose was not simply reform within existing traditions, but a basic change in the social, and above all, the power relationships within the nation."
...the basic point of the revolution -- the shift of power from business to government -- the two kinds of revolutionists were at one; and they shared many other views and hopes. Thus men who sincerely abhorred the word Communism, in the pursuit of common ends found that they were unable to distinguish Communists from themselves".

It's too bad that only the elite coterie of the modern conservative movement represented by the National Review could appreciate the subtlety of Chamber's insight into the scope of the New Deal. The New Deal was Plato's Republic masquerading as social justice liberalism. Crises were used to leverage massive changes affecting most aspects of social and individual life in America. New Deal policies changed the way people did things. It took women out of the homes and put them to work in factories, it moved youth to the cities, and young men out of the country.
-------

Makow - Communism is a ruse and its agents were traitors and dupes.  
Its aim is total Talmud-like control by  Cabalist central bankers. What only Jews suffered in the past, everyone will suffer. They create "terrorism" as a pretext to install their police state.

Related - FDR - Fellow Traveler  
Makow ---- Banker Plot to Remove FDR Was a Ruse
Makow ---   FDR Exposed by Son-in-Law

With 1,219,510 men serving in 2010, if only 17 percent of all male "rape" victims reported, does this mean 62,941 military men were sexually assaulted by other men that year?


Proportionally, attacks on women are much greater; but there are more male victims by number.
And this was before "Don't Ask; Don't Tell" was repealed.

"Shock Report; 10,700 Men Raped in US Military"
By Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., and Thomas R. Hampson
(Edited by henrymakow.com)


The best-kept military secret is that most sexual assaults in the US military are now homosexual, male-on-male sexual exploitation.

The Washington Times reported  March 13: "The Defense Department estimates 19,000 sexual assaults occur each year, but only 17 percent are ever reported. In 2010 ... 8,600 victims were female, and 10,700 victims were male."

Navy Petty Officer 3rd Class Brian Lewis stated he "was raped by a senior petty officer ... told by a commander not to report it, and later was diagnosed with a personality disorder and discharged."

Lewis says, "As I demonstrated, men are a majority of the victims in the military. DoD's infamous 'Ask her when she's sober' marginalizes male survivors and sends a message that men cannot be raped and therefore are not real survivors."

With 1,219,510 men serving in 2010, if only 17 percent of all male "rape" victims reported, does this mean, that 62,941 military men were sexually assaulted by other men that year?

Does this mean "only" 5.16 percent of our bravest and best male servicemen were sexually violated by other lust-dominance-driven servicemen in 2010?

Were these damning data widely known and debated before the ban on homosexuality was lifted in 2011?

If not, why not? Precisely when did this traumatic rate of military sodomism abuse begin? Did it begin increasing when the "don't ask, don't tell" policy was implemented?

Indeed, whether or not such outrageous male sexual assault estimates are 10,700 or 62,941, these crimes ...could be a significant cause for the massive increase in military suicides - and revengeful violence.

True, "The military is 85 percent men and 15 percent women." Still, according to the Naval Personnel Command (2012 Sexual Assault Awareness Month Training Guide), "about 56 percent of estimated sexual assaults in our military are men, and 44 percent are women."

PORNOGRAPHY

The politically correct Naval report ignores the Big Porn Elephant in the room as normalizing the homosexist assaults on fellow servicemen.

While "heterosexual" pornography has commonly been used to arouse and then seduce "straights" into homosexual sex, "gay" pornography is widely available in mainstream homosexist publications like The Advocate Classified.

And, buff, "straight" military men are regularly depicted there as preferred, sexual targets.

Now (May 7) comes the Military Times reporting that Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel ordered inspection of all military offices and workplaces worldwide to root out any "materials that create a degrading or offensive work environment."

Last year, Air Force officers searched "troops' desks and cubicles in search of photos, calendars, magazines, screen-savers, computer files and other items that might be considered degrading toward women."

There was no mention of confiscating pornographic items degrading toward men.

The cleanup is a long time a comin'. In 1998 the U.S. Supreme Court upheld The Military Honor & Decency Act partly due to "the special circumstances of the military environment, in which the appearance of professionalism and proper conduct is critical."

On July 1, Frank Rush, acting assistant secretary of defense for force management, signed DoD Instruction 4105.70, banning "Sale or Rental of Sexually Explicit Material on DoD Property."

"We need a cultural change where every service member is treated with dignity and respect," said Secretary Hagel, announcing new initiatives to prevent sexual assault.

"Hagel also unveiled the Defense Department's annual report on sexual assault, which estimates that about 26,000 troops experienced some form of "unwanted sexual contact" during the past year. That's roughly one in every 50 troops in the active-duty force.

But, if 10,700 men and 8,600 women reported the euphemized "unwanted sexual contact" - and if only 17 percent of victims report, how does this reduce to 26,000 military victims? The official reports seem contradictory.

Secretary Hagel wants to eliminate pornography to "really drive the cultural change." Of course, we can have no honorable or trustworthy military until all vestiges of pornography - from cartoons to Internet adverts, videos, films, calendars and phones, and the rapists and sodomites it trains and justifies - are excised from military service, from the Pentagon elites to the privates under them.

Now, does this mean the elite 5,200 child pornography users at the Pentagon will finally be arrested and tried? For, indeed there are "charms By which the property of youth and maidhood may be abused."
---

Kay Griggs, wife of Marine Colonel describes homosexual initiations required for advancement
Sex Abuse Prevention Officer Pimped Female Soldiers at Fort Hood
Hagel Orders Re-cerfication of Sex Abuse Personnel

Knights of Columbus are NOT Masons     says Hernando, a Spanish Reader


I have just seen this article saying that The Knights of Columbus are Masons?
Come on!
Here you have the web and the history of the Knights of Columbus, founded by a priest and giving honours to the Virgin Mary (Mother for Us, the Catholics), to the Pope, etc.
http://www.kofc.org/en//index.html
According to this point of view, even all the Catholics could be "secret or infiltrated" Masons.

The priest of my Parish Church could be a secret mason.
The Bishop of my diocese could be mason.
And all the 1.000 millions of Catholics could be masons. The world upside-down!
This person says that the Klu-Klux-Klan was catholic or christian?
Not at all, sir. The fact that they burn a cross in their meetings or rituals don't mean that they were Christians as an association. Perhaps some of the KKK members could be covert Catholics or Christians but NOT the association officially.

The symbols.

Here in Spain, the Civil Guard (a Police Corp) also has the FASCIO, as a symbol, but is not a mason society. The fascio comes from the Romans and in Spain, my country, there were Romans, and called this country HISPANIA.
Probably the Civil Guard (Police, Police, Police) took this symbol as precedent from the Romans or simply as a group symbol, meaning that this Police would be united and grouped as a corp to prosecute the delinquents, NOT AS MASONS, PLEASE!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Guard_(Spain)

One could ask then: Do they have the crown in their logo because they only serve the King and Queen? NOOO!! They have this symbol of the crown because in Spain we have as a political system a Parliamentary Monarchy and even our shield in Spain has a crown, though many people would prefer to have a Republic.

Conclusion:

Some people, IGNORANT of the real and authentic meaning of things don't interpret things adequately. What I have to hear today is:

1) The Knights of Columbus, founded by an Irish priest who wanted to help the inmigrants to New England, and that forms a society with good relationships with the Church, within the orthodoxy of Catholics belief (faith, Virgin Mary, Pope, etc) is... MASON ?

2) A symbol as the "fascio", the Roman fascio (unknown in the other side of the Atlantic Ocean because the Romans weren't there, is interpreted as... MASON? when there is a Police Corp in Spain called "Guardia Civil" (or Civil Guard) that has the same symbol. Perhaps the Civil Guard is also... MASON?  I don't think so, because dozens and dozens of members of the Civil Guard in Spain have been assassinated by the terrorist group ETA (this is not, as in USA think, a separatist group of the Basque Country, but a TERRORIST GROUP who has murdered around 1.000 people (police, judges, politicians, journalists, civil people, children...)

Pfc. Eugene Dinkin, a cryptographic code operator for the US Army stationed in France
 may have seen planning for JFK assassination more than a month before it happened.
 The mass media stymied his attempts to sound an alarm and he was placed in a mental hospital.




"The journalists who heard Dinkin's story in Switzerland may have had it within their power to prevent the assassination of President Kennedy. By writing nothing about his documented allegations, they failed to exercise that power. In addition, they knew that he had been detained after coming forward--but in the wake of the assassination with the investigation proceeding, they remained silent.  How many other cases like Dinkins remain unreported?"

No pictures of Eugene Dinkin are extant online. This adds credibility to this story.


JFK Assassination Enablers?
 by Hugh Turley
http://www.dcdave.com/
 
This year marks the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, and stories about that fateful day in November 1963 have already started appearing in the American media.  It is a popular belief that if there were a conspiracy, someone would come forward and the press would tell us.
 
Then why is there still no news about Pfc. Eugene Dinkin, a cryptographic code operator for the Army?   Declassified CIA and FBI documents released in the 1990s reveal a strange tale that raises the question: Could Dinkin have learned the details of an assassination plot from the classified documents he handled, or was he a paranoiac who somehow made a number of amazingly accurate prophecies?
 
On October 16, 1963, when Dinkin was stationed in Metz, France, he wrote a letter to Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy warning that the president would be assassinated on or about November 28 and requesting an interview by the Justice Department.  Dinkin sent the letter registered mail, and to prevent it from being intercepted, used the return address of an Army friend, Pfc. Dennis De Witt. He did not receive an answer. 
 
Dinkin later changed the predicted assassination date to November 22 and said it would happen in Texas.  He believed the military was involved in the plot and that a Communist would be blamed.  The day after the murder, the Washington Evening Star reported that the alleged assassin Lee Harvey Oswald was a "pro-Castro Marxist."
 
On October 25, 1963, Dinkin traveled to the United States Embassy in Luxembourg to apprise a Mr. Cunningham, the Charge d'Affaires, of the plot to assassinate President Kennedy.  He was turned away.
 
Dinkin was scheduled for a psychiatric examination on November 4, and fearing confinement as a psychotic, he went absent without leave from his unit.  He traveled to Geneva, Switzerland, using a false Army identification and forged travel orders. There, he appeared in the press room of the United Nations office on November 6 and 7 and "told reporters he was being persecuted." Among those who heard his story were the editor of the Geneva Diplomat and representatives of Newsweek and the Time-Life media group.
 
The AWOL Dinkin was the subject of CIA cables on November 18 and again on November 29, 1963.  The latter cable advised the White House, State Department, FBI, and Secret Service of Dinkin's assassination predictions and of his trip to Switzerland.
 
ARRESTED

Upon returning to his unit in Metz, he was arrested by Army intelligence officers and soon transferred to Walter Reed Army hospital in Washington, D.C., where he was treated for "paranoia," according to an FBI report.  Afterwards, he was discharged from the Army.
 
The FBI interviewed him on April 1, 1964.  By then, perhaps fearing prosecution for revealing classified material, Dinkin said his theory came from newspaper articles and acknowledged that it "was extremely 'wild' and could be construed [as] 'crazy'."
 
FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover and CIA Deputy Director Richard Helms informed the Warren Commission about Dinkin's predictions about the assassination, but his name was never mentioned in the encyclopedic official record.
 
The journalists who heard Dinkin's story in Switzerland may have had it within their power to prevent the assassination of President Kennedy. By writing nothing about his documented allegations, they failed to exercise that power. In addition, they knew that he had been detained after coming forward--but in the wake of the assassination with the investigation proceeding, they remained silent.  How many other cases like Dinkins remain unreported?
 
Pfc. Dinkin miscalculated when he went AWOL to contact journalists whom he mistakenly believed were liberty's guardians.  The Roman poet Juvenal asked, "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" ("Who will guard the guards themselves?") It's still a good question.
________________________________________________________________________________
This article appeared originally in the May 2013 Hyattsville Life and Times with the more sweeping title of simply "Assassination Enablers?" 
 
Makow Comment:  It's obvious that treasonous crimes like the JFK assassination, 9-11, Newtown and Boston Bombing could not take place with a free press. But this little known story is a reminder that the function of the mass media is deception and mind control.

Related - Media Helped Sell the Lie of Lone Assassin
---------    News Media Collaborated in 9-11 False Flag
-----------   Background information, possibly designed to discredit Dinkin
Youtube --  Mass media Lying About 9-11

P { margin-bottom: 0.21cm; }

Was the murder of priests and destruction of churches confined to Judeo Masonic (Bolshevik) Russia?   No.

In the 1920's, hundreds of priests were tortured and murdered in Mexico when the Freemason President Plutarco Elias Calles ordered the suppression of the Catholic Church. "For Greater Glory" a superb film released last year, now available on Netflix, documents the Cristeros uprising where thousands of Christians took up arms against the Government of Mexico and forced it to compromise. The rebellion, from 1926-1929, claimed  57,000 government soldiers and 30,000 Cristeros "insurgents" plus civilians.



Never heard of this rebellion? Neither have Mexicans.  Freemasons, who espouse freedom and tolerance (for their own evil), don't want you to know about armed resistance to their tyranny. According to historian Ruben Quezada, "As recently as the 1980s it was difficult to find a single book that mentioned anything substantive about the Cristiada. If it was mentioned, it usually was no more than a single sentence in President Calles' biography.  School systems did not include the Cristiada as part of its history so that future generations would soon lose any knowledge of it... There is more freedom of the press today, and a large volume of untold stories about the Cristiada -- testimonies and images that were illegal to print or publish for many years -- are finally emerging. There are literally thousands of testimonies coming to light that reveal an inspiring history that has been hidden for decades under a dark shadow of fear and denial."

American Christians are facing persecution from the Judeo Masonic (Illuminati) government of Barack Obama. They may get inspiration from this story which defines the true occult nature of the tyranny enslaving mankind.

--- --- ---

<See this half-hour documentary

20th Century Mexico's Catholic Uprising

by Olivier Lelibre

(Abridged by henrymakow.com)

In 1924, Plutarco Elias Calles became President. For this descendant of Spanish Jews, a 33rd degree Mason, "the Church is the unique cause of all Mexico's misfortunes." For him, too, she had to disappear. [He was a tool of the Illuminati bankers, the masters of the Mexican economy in 1914: Rockefeller (rubber), Goblentz (textiles), Guggenheim (mines), Hearst (alias Hirsch) who owned 3 million metric acres, and the Kuhn-Loeb bank, which financed Lenin.]

In 1926, the president (left) and his clique launched a new offensive which they hoped to be definitive: "Now there must be a psychological revolution," Calles declared. "We must penetrate and take hold of the minds of the children and the youth because they must belong to the revolution."

The Catholic schools were shut down, the congregations expelled, Christian trade unions forbidden, numerous churches confiscated and profaned (turned into stables or halls) or destroyed. Public school attendance became mandatory, atheism was officially taught, and religious insignia (medals, crucifixes, statues, and pictures) were forbidden, even at home. God was even chased from the language! The use of such expressions as Adios, "If God wills," or "God forbid," was subject to a fine.

Lastly, the priests were "registered": some states (Mexico is a federal republic) required them to swear not to proselytize, others tried to command them to marry if they wished to continue in their function! Msgr. Carvana, the Apostolic Nuncio, protested; on May 12, 1926, he was expelled. Throughout the country, Catholic public figures were assassinated, girls coming out of church were kidnapped, imprisoned, raped. Msgr. Curley, the Archbishop of Baltimore, vented his indignation: "Calles persecutes the church because he knows that he has Rome's approval. Our government has armed Calles's killers. Our friendship has encouraged him in his abominable enterprise: to destroy the idea of God in the minds and hearts of millions of Mexicans."17

On May 28, Calles received the Masonic medal of merit from the hands of the Great Commander of the Scottish rite in Mexico. On July 12, the following communique appeared in the press: "International Masonry accepts responsibility for everything that is happening in Mexico, and is preparing to mobilize all its forces for the methodic, integral application of the agreed upon program for this country."18

On July 26, an elderly shopkeeper was coldly struck down by two policemen in civilian clothes. His crime? In his shop he had posted a sign reading Viva Cristo Rey! Long live Christ the King! The Mexicans peacefully reacted to the persecution: they boycotted state-owned enterprises (tobacco purchases and railroad traffic were reduced by 74%, and in just a few weeks, the national bank suffered a 7 million peso loss), and they also circulated a protest petition signed by 2 million (out of a population of 15 million).

But Christians have something even better than that, they have prayer, and the country was crisscrossed by gigantic penitential processions: 10,000, 15,000 faithful, barefooted, crowned with thorns, implored God for their country. The powers that be could not tolerate that; their heavy machine guns dispersed the processions, and the first martyrs fell, singing.

("FOR GREATER GLORY" - A rare, frankly pro-Catholic film has excellent production values. It was a success in Mexico but had a muted reception in the US)

THE RISING

In January 1927, Catholic Mexico rose: 20,000 combatants (30,000 by the end of the year, and 50,000 in 1929); few arms (a few rifles and carbines, but mostly hatchets, machetes, and sometimes simply sticks); few horses; but all the people supporting them, offering them their money, and necessaries. A Cristero peasant recounted how they set out with songs and prayers on their lips: "We were 1,000, then 5,000, then more! Everyone set out as if to go to the harvest....We firmly intended to die, angry or not, but to die for Christ."

 Against them were 100 mobile columns of 1,000 men each, veritable "infernal columns" financed by the US (light armored cars, tractor-drawn artillery, combat aircraft...). The first clashes were bloody massacres. An officer of Calles wrote: "They are more like pilgrims than soldiers. This isn't a military campaign, it's a hunting party!" The president himself predicted: "It will be wrapped up in less than two months."

But when a pilgrimage takes up arms, it becomes a crusade! The Cristeros were able to equip themselves from the adversary, profiting from their cowardice or their corruption. The "Federales" were more like pillagers, drunk on tequila and marijuana, rather than soldiers worthy of the name. On March 15, 1927, they were defeated at San Julian; at Puerto Obristo, they left 600 dead. In November, the military attache of the US began to worry about the success of the "fanatics," 40% of whose troops were now equipped with excellent Mausers recuperated from the enemy. How was it possible?

THE MYSTERY OF INIQUITY

The year 1928 was terrible: the infernal columns had received the order to deport the rural population to "concentration camps"26 where famine and epidemics decimated them. At the least show of resistance, the Federates would massacre them. Harvests and flocks were seized, grazing land burned, and villages destroyed by the thousands. Despite this scorched earth policy, the Cristeros stood fast like latter-day Machabees.

In 1929, the government renounced its policy of governing the countryside. Three-fourths of inhabitable Mexico was in the hands of the troops of Christ the King, victory was in reach especially as the riffraff in Mexico were fighting each other, and in the United States Hoover, who was not a Mason, was elected! Then they learned that the secret negotiations between the Mexican government and the Vatican had resulted in an accord. On June 21, the Mexican episcopate (except for one of its members, His Excellency Jose de Jesus Manriquez y Zarate) signed a "resolution" of the conflict with the ruling power on bases "negotiated" by a US Jesuit, a Fr. Walsh. The accord provided for: (1) immediate, unconditional cease fire; (2) the resumption of public worship beginning the next day (June 22).

That was all. It restored them to the same situation that prevailed in 1926 with all the anti-Catholic laws then in effect, including the registration of priests! In the text, the Cristeros are called fanatics directed by a few third-rate priests; their revolt was an error, an imprudence, even a sin: they must lay down their arms under pain of excommunication...

VATICAN BETRAYAL

Enrique Gorostieta Velarde, commander in chief of the Cristeros, addressed his troops, his voice breaking from sorrow:

"His Holiness the Pope, by the intermediary of the most excellent Apostolic Nuncio, has decided, for reasons which are unknown to us but which, as Catholics, we accept, that public worship will be resumed tomorrow without the law being changed...This arrangement...has wrested from us that which is most noble and most holy on our flag, at the moment when the Church has declared that she will resign herself to what she has obtained...Consequently, the National Guard assumes responsibility for the conflict....As for ourselves as men, we have a satisfaction that no one can take from us: the National Guard does not disappear defeated by its enemies, but rather abandoned by the very ones who were to be the first to receive the fruit of our sacrifices and abnegation! Ave, Christ! Those who for You are going to humiliation, to exile, and, perhaps, to an unglorious death,...with the most fervent love salute You, and once more proclaim You as King of our country."

Six thousand Cristeros obeyed, and were immediately massacred. In three years, they had only lost 5,000 men in combat! The Mexican episcopate decreed the excommunication of the Cristero priests, but those who had not been killed during the war (180) had already been martyred...All was lost.

The new president, the Masonic lawyer Fortes Gil, rejoiced. At the summer solstice banquet, he acknowledged his astonishment at the unconditional capitulation of a victorious army, and his intention to continue the fight: "The fight did not begin yesterday. The fight is eternal. The fight began 20 centuries ago." Indeed, but the novelty was that the Vatican was not on the right side.

Freemasonry, condemned by all the popes from the 18th century (Clement XII, in 1738) to the end of the 19th (in 1892, Leo XIII equated Freemasonry with Satanism), had infiltrated the Church at the highest levels of the hierarchy: Were not G. della Chiesa (the future Benedict XV) and A. Ratti (the future Pius XI) the "proteges" of Cardinal Rampolla? In 1926, was it not Pius XI who condemned Action Frangaise in accordance with the sect's desires. In 1928, was not Fr. Vallet expelled from Spain and his work suppressed by a hierarchy that preferred to favor the Opus Dei.28

When, from 1934 to 1937, a new Cristiada was launched, Pius XI let the Mexican episcopate excommunicate the Cristeros and then waited until they were all dead before daring to write (in his Letter to the Mexican Episcopate, 1937):

When power rises against justice and truth,...one cannot see how one could condemn the citizens who unite to defend the nation and themselves-even by the use of arms-against those who, by means of the state's power, devise their misfortune.

The same year, in Divini Redemptoris, he blamed Communism for the atrocities perpetrated against the Christians of Mexico...but he did not mention Freemasonry.  (Complete article)

--

Related- 

Calles was a Communist pawn like Fidel Castro later was, at the the same time as he served the Illuminati bankers in Wall Street. They are identical.

"Under Calles, Mexico became the first country in the world to recognize the new Soviet Union, and the Soviet embassy that was established in Mexico City grew to be one of Moscow's largest in the world and a key center for NKVD/KGB subversion, espionage, and terrorism throughout the Americas. However, even before Calles came to power in 1924, the new Communist regime in Moscow had begun exercising its influence in Mexico. Soviet dictator Lenin sent top Comintern (Communist International) agent Mikhail Borodin to Mexico in 1919 to coordinate a growing Communist-Socialist movement that was heavily larded with foreign elements, mostly American and European intellectuals. --- Movie Exposes Mexican Gov't Anti-Christian Campaign

also, Viva Christo Rey 

Examples of Masonic attack on religion- forcing gay sex on children.       Gay Marriage

----

First Comment from Henrique -

It's beautiful indeed, but don't forget that this movie was produced by the Knights of Columbus, a Catholic para-masonic organization that works for the same agenda and carries the same symbols as all the other Orders and factions.

It's one same group, with many factions, out to capture the affection of all sorts of people. Their aim is to control the whole of Mankind, and more, to get people to AGREE to their dominance. What better way to win hearts and minds than through these beautiful and tear-jerking stories of heroism and sacrifice in the name of what one believes? I pity the peasants, and admit it's quite moving, but let's never put reason aside. The Catholic Church is controlled opposition to radical/materialistic Jewish sects; if not, why the hell would it ever charter Orders like "Priory of Zion" and sponsor so many Crusades to "take back the Holy Land" ( a facade to ferment rancor against Islam )?

The whole of history is a con game, Alan Watt calls it "Conology", I use a more specific term: "Piety Manipulation".

Notice how they always organize some kind of opposition/conflict between their puppets, like the KKK opposing the KofC's efforts to gain sympathy for the cause in America - two supposedly Christian groups.

Check the main symbol of the Knights, with the Fascio, representing the union of the Elite ( one stick is easy to break, but not a whole bunch together ), plus the typical crossing of objects in an "x", also very common; many other details a better trained eye would find, I've no doubt about it.

--

Thanks Henrique- but the rebellion wasn't sponsored by the Knights as well, was it? 

Henrique -- From their own website: http://www.kofc.org/en/columbia/detail/2012_05_cristero_war_knights.html

"Just five years after the first Knights of Columbus council was established in Mexico in 1905, the country was catapulted into a long period of armed conflict, now called the Mexican Revolution."
Coincidence?  Maybe.
"Despite these challenges, the Order in Mexico not only survived this period; it thrived. Membership grew from 400 Knights in 1918 to almost 6,000 in 51 councils just six years later."
Martyrdom has certain appeal, one would say, especially among humble folk. But what raised my eyebrow was this:
"The Caballeros, as the Knights are known in Spanish-speaking countries, "attracted leaders in society, including doctors, lawyers and businessmen, bringing a new dimension, energy and vision to combating the persecution."
Why would "leaders in society", in a time of Civil War, join a quasi-clandestine Order, declared enemy of the establishment? And why didn't the State forces attack THEM directly, instead of wasting time with insignificant country hicks?
"Likewise, hundreds of thousands of Mexicans immigrated to Texas, and the Knights' Mexican Fund provided direct assistance to many of the refugees."
Great opportunity to flood the US with immigrants too, and who would be cold-hearted enough to deny them refuge?
"Although the Knights as an organization did not provide support to the Cristeros' military efforts, it remained a target"
Rally the peasants, but don't risk your own skin, or the soft skin of those "leaders in society".
Obviously none of this proves anything, just data to consider before choosing the good guy.
The peasants were obviously fighting to mantain their traditions ( whichever they were ) and way of life from intrusive government, they would never think about all-encompassing, mind-blowing conspiracies. To them, all we're doing here is idle speculation - the conspirators always count on that.
Once one of their fronts has captured the simpletons' sympathy ( even if the opposing front is demonized ), they've succeeded. The human mind works in dialectics, and unfortunately they know that.

--

Knights of Columbus are NOT Masons     says Hernando, a Spanish Reader

No? Look at this, Henrique replies

A Canadian Jew Wakes up by S

I grew up in a traditional Conservative Jewish home in Toronto (USDS day school, shul, etc).

My parents made Aliyah with our family in 1982, and I finished high school in an Orthodox school.

As we were planning on staying in Israel I volunteered for the army after highschool to serve 3 years in the Golani Infantry Brigade. The first year was great and I actually was awarded outstanding cadette after basic training.

Then things went downhill after we were sent to serve in the West-Bank (Ramallah, Schem, Jenin).

One night we were sent out to arrest "troublemakers" who'd been seen attacking Israeli patrols. The troublemakers in question turned out to be 2 youths, aged 10 & 13. After arresting them (moms screaming) we took them to the municipality, and the first was sent up while we guarded the second (13 year old) whose hands and feet were bound and was lying on the floor of our truck. The driver started to beat him mercilessly, and I stepped in to stop, saying "he's only a boy".

This guy then grabbed a night stick and came at me calling me a "dirty traitor of the Jewish people" and other expletives.
My friends in my unit separated us, but I was shaken to the core.

Then several months later the first Intifada broke out (Dec 1987) and all hell broke loose in the "shtachim". My ideological anchors of Zionism-Holocaust-Jewish people were shredded in the violence that was being perpetrated on innocent women and children. I could not make sense of what was happening and had a bit of a psychological breakdown that my family (then back in TO) couldn't relate to (and still can't 25 years later).
 
After many years of spiritual and political searching through psychotherapy, Buddhism, West-African and Native-American shamanism I finally came to a realization that God was still knocking on my door. But this is another story that I'd be happy to share later (I'm a single dad- go to get up for work/school in the morning).
 
Keep up the great work- more people are starting to "wake up" & God Bless,

(left. Goldwin Smith, 1823-1920, Regius Professor of Modern History at Oxford University.  Many incorrectly identify him as a contemporary Jewish supremacist for saying 'The Jew alone regards his race as superior to humanity, and looks forward not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them all and to its final ascendancy under the leadership of a tribal Messiah.' ) 

SINCE WW2, IT HAS BEEN GETTING HARDER TO ASK THIS QUESTION IN THE WEST, A MEASURE OF TOTAL ILLUMINATI JEWISH HEGEMONY.  THE LAST MOMENT OF LUCIDITY MAY EVEN HAVE BEEN 1921. HERE IS HOW GOLDWIN SMITH PUT THE QUESTION IN 1891.


Mark Weber Introduction: "The recurring friction between Jews and non-Jews through the ages, Smith persuasively argues, is due primarily not to the defects or iniquities of non-Jews, but rather is an... understandable reaction to Jewish behavior. The most galling features of this behavior, he contends, are rooted in the distinctively tribalistic character of the Jewish religion as laid out in the Talmud and the Old Testament.

As a solution to this seemingly interminable problem, Smith proposes that Jews should "de-nationalize" themselves by renouncing Jewish tribalism and particularism. In other words, he urges comprehensive Jewish assimilation into society -- a "solution" to the "Jewish question" that is also implicit in traditional American liberalism."



Makow - To be acceptable today, you must collude in the central banker fraud, i.e. Illuminati Jewish ownership of the national currency & the money supply. Our politicians are all fronts for this "Money Power." Jews are not going to "de-nationalize" as Goldwin Smith recommended in 1891 because Organized Jewry (as well as Freemasonry) are the main levers in the bankers' long term agenda, i.e. to translate their credit monopoly into a world monopoly over everything, (i.e. power, wealth, culture and especially information & thought.)  Those who challenge this thought monopoly have committed thought crimes, (i.e. "hate crimes.") The West is a pathetic, hypocritical, morally bankrupt hand puppet of Illuminati Satanists.

By Goldwin Smith

The Vexing 'Jewish Question': A Nineteenth-Century Scholar's View  (1891)

(Excerpt by henrymakow.com)


Mr. Laurence Oliphant, in his book The Land of Gilead (1880), dwells more than once on the great advantages which any European government might gain over its rivals by an alliance with the Jews. He writes:

"It is evident that the policy which I proposed to the Turkish government [that is, the restoration of Palestine] might be adopted with equal advantage by England or any other European Power. The nation that espoused the cause of the Jews and their restoration to Palestine, would be able to rely on their support in financial operations on the largest scale, upon the powerful influence which they wield in the press of many countries, and upon their political co-operation in those countries, which would of necessity tend to paralyze the diplomatic and even hostile action of Powers antagonistic to the one with which they were allied. Owing to the financial, political, and commercial importance to which the Jews have now attained, there is probably no one Power in Europe that would prove so valuable an ally to a nation likely to be engaged in a European war, as this wealthy, powerful, and cosmopolitan race." (p. 503)

Perhaps the writer of these words hardly realized the state of things which they present to our minds. We see the governments of Europe bidding against each other for the favor and support of an anti-national money power, which would itself be morally unfettered by any allegiance, would be ever ready to betray and secretly paralyze for its own objects the governments under the protection of which its members were living, and of course would be always gaining strength and predominance at the expense of a divided and subservient world.

The allusion to the influence wielded by the Jews in the European press has a particularly sinister sound. In the social as in the physical sphere new diseases are continually making their appearance. One of the new social diseases of the present day, and certainly not the least deadly, is the perversion of public opinion in the interest of private or sectional objects, by the clandestine manipulation of the press.

A NATION WITHIN A NATION

Such a relation as that in which Judaism has placed itself to the people of each country, forming everywhere a nation within the nation, cherishing the pride of a Chosen People, regarding those among whom it dwelt as Gentiles and unclean, shrinking from social intercourse with them, engrossing their wealth by financial skill, but not adding to it by labor, plying at the same time a trade which, however legitimate, is always unpopular and makes many victims, could not possibly fail to lead, as it has led, to mutual hatred and the troubles which ensue. Certain as may be the gradual prevalence of good over evil, it is a futile optimism which denies that there have been calamities in history. One of them has been the dispersion of the Jews.

As was said before, it is incredible that all the nations should have mistaken a power of good for a power of evil, or have been unanimous in ingratitude to a power of good.

A FRESH INVASION

None of them want to hurt the Jew or to interfere with his religious belief; what they all want is that if possible he should go to his own land. As it is, Western Europe and the western hemisphere are threatened with a fresh invasion on the largest scale by the departure of Jews from Russia.

American politics are already beginning to feel the influence. A party, to catch the Jewish vote, puts into its platform a denunciation of Russia, the best friend of the American Republic in its day of trial. Jews are becoming strong in the British House of Commons and one of them the other day appealed to his compatriots to combine their forces against the political party which had been opposed to Jewish interests.

That the Jew should be de-rabbinized and de-nationalized, in other words that he should renounce the Talmud, the tribal parts of the Mosaic law, and circumcision, is the remedy proposed by M. Leroy-Beaulieu, a writer by no means unfavorable to Israel.

There seems to be no other way of putting an end to a conflict which is gradually enveloping all nations. This being done, whatever gifts and graces may belong to the race of Moses, David, and Isaiah, of the writers of the Book of Job and of the Psalms, of Judas Maccabaeus and Hillel, will have free course and be glorified.

 If Israel has any message for humanity, as he seems to think, it will he heard. Jewish merit will no longer be viewed with jealousy and distrust as having a sinister confederation at its back; and no man need fear in the present age that in any highly civilized community he will suffer persecution or disparagement of any sort on account of his religion. But the present relation is untenable. The Jew will have either to return to Jerusalem or to forget it, give his heart to the land of his birth and mingle with humanity.

 From The Journal of Historical Review, Jan.-Feb. 1998 (Vol. 17, No. 1), pp. 16-37.


Related -

Goldwyn Smith:    The Talmud - "An Ocean of Nonsense"

Interesting that another Jewish commentator posted this essay just last week. Does this suggest an awakening on the part of some Jews?
Lauryn Hill Ordered to take Counseling for "Conspiracy Theories"

Buenos Aires resident Adrian Salbuchi
has watched the former Archbishop Bergoglio for decades.
Salbuchi finds both hopeful and worrisome signs.

 



Francis makes an interesting list of Catholic Church "firsts": the first non-European pope; the first Jesuit; the first to choose Francis as his name; the first to succeed an abdicating pope in six centuries. Will he also be the first Pope in decades to reform the church?


by Adrian Salbuchi
"Opposition Cardinal" in Argentina
(excerpted from New Dawn, Jan-Feb 2013)


As Archbishop of Buenos Aires, Bergoglio championed the plight of the poor in a very hands-on manner, which set him at loggerheads with the now ten-year-old increasingly left-wing Nestor and Cristina Kirchner Regime.  His criticism of their failed government got stronger as the years went by, specifically targeting the Kirchner's corruption, political mismanagement and hypocrisy. 

Since Msgr. Bergoglio would persistently lash out at the Kirchners during the solemnities of the Te Deum marking the anniversary of Argentina's 25 May 1810 Revolution in Buenos Aires Cathedral, traditionally attended by the President, his family and cabinet, starting in 2005 the Kirchners decided to celebrate this anniversary elsewhere in the country to avoid Msgr. Bergoglio. In fact, President Cristina Kirchner refused to meet with him over the past three years... until now, obviously!

Though a moderate in many aspects - especially in his drive for Ecumenical inter-faith relations (he is very much liked by Israel and Argentina's powerful Jewish community), and in his embracing of Second Vatican Council reforms - he has however systematically opposed same-sex marriage which became legal in Argentina in 2011, and strongly opposes abortion laws that are being promoted locally by both the left and the "liberal" right...

Msgr. Bergoglio is an ardent devotee of the Blessed Virgin Mary whose protection he invoked in his very first message urbi et orbi.  The first place he went to pray as pope was Her Chapel at Santa Maria Maggiore where he promptly kicked out Cardinal Bernard Law from the US, one of the bishops associated with covering up child abuse cases which ended up costing the Church hundreds of millions of dollars in US Courts.

The local left also speak of his alleged involvement in the crimes of Argentina's civilian-military regimen from 1976 to 1983, a false and totally unsubstantiated accusation pointing to the Kirchner government's extreme uneasiness with the new pope.

A HOUSE CLEANER IN THE VATICAN?

As a sign of times to come, Francis is also the first pope in history to choose a name that honours one of Christendom's most important saints: Saint Francis of Assisi, a 13th century reformer who preached by setting the example for all.

Although of a wealthy family, Saint Francis chose to live in poverty and austerity telling his followers that a good Christian's duty is to "Preach the Gospel always, if necessary use words"; meaning thereby that the best preachers are those setting the best examples, something the Church seems to have increasingly forgotten in modern times.

Saint Francis founded the Franciscan Order and its female counterpart founded by his spiritual sister St. Claire, both of which made poverty vows.  His preaching got him into trouble with local secular and Church authorities even landing him in jail.   As today, the Church during St. Francis's time was very much in need of a major internal clean-up.   Francis of Assisi reproached the pope in front of all his cardinals for their excessive attachment to luxury, their banality and mundane ways.  Later, Pope Innocent III would finally approve his predication and approved the founding of the Franciscan Order.

So, will Pope Francis do as his spiritual predecessor and wage a veritable war for greater austerity inside the Church, requiring its highest authorities to set the example, both inside and outside the Church? 
 
Will he really do something about all the prelates involved in proven sexual misconduct, cutting them off fully and completely from the Church, and not just "transferring" them away to some quiet place hoping their immoralities and perversion will just go away, as if by magic?
 
Will Francis fully and thoroughly clean up the Vatican Bank (Institute of Religious Works) forcing it to cancel shady financial deals, reject usury-based financial income, and put its monetary wealth to work for the poor?
 
Again, will he identify and weed out the truly guilty of such crimes and perversion, severing all Church ties with them?

In short, will Francis do something that none of his predecessors seems to have had the courage and will to do over the past fifty years, which is to stop sweeping all this ugliness under the carpet, but rather cleaning the place up for real?  That all remains to be seen...

WHICH FRANCIS?

But we're not really sure whether Msgr. Bergoglio chose his papal name only because of the Saint from Assisi.  It may have been to honour other Francis's like St. Francis Javier, or even 16th century St. Francis de Borja both of whom were, like himself, Jesuits. 

The Jesuits - The Society of Jesus - are a 16th Century order founded by Spaniard St. Ignace of Loyola as a militia to defend the Church against the forces of reformation and other dangers to the Faith.  The Jesuit's strong-willed militancy got them expelled several times from the American colonies and also from Europe.  Even the Church itself suppressed them.
 
They have a highly autonomous leadership under its Superior General whom many refer to as the "Black Pope" alluding to both the color of their robe as well the Order's great leverage inside the Church.  Jesuits are known for being shrewd and sharp intellectuals with a keen sense for political and social strategy, and a very strong will to promote and drive their goals and objectives.
 
Today's Jesuit Superior General, Adolfo Nicolás, allegedly forms part of the "Committee of 300" who are said to be the Illuminati's upper echelon running things on planet Earth.  Since Jorge Bergoglio/Francis is a Jesuit, one wonders whether or not he owes obedience to his Superior General.  In other words, will the supreme authority in the Church be a white or a black Pope?

Perhaps Msgr. Bergoglio is honoring all of these Francis's. But the one that has caught the Catholic world's imagination is clearly St Francis of Assisi, in which case much will be expected of Pope Francis.  No pope - until now - had ever chosen that name which many perceive as emblematic of a key enemy of certain castes of mischief-makers inside the Vatican.
 
-----------------

Adrian Salbuchi is a political analyst, author, speaker and radio/TV commentator in Argentina.
www.asalbuchi.com.ar

First Comment by Dan:

A generally balanced article, except the writer shows an odd lack of knowledge about Jesuit history and the Papacy to even ask this question,
Salbuchi - "Since Jorge Bergoglio/Francis is a Jesuit, one wonders whether or not he owes obedience to his Superior General."

That's like asking "is the Pope Catholic"? People who only know Catholic hierarchy from reading "Vatican Assassins" are under the wrong impression that the "Black Pope" (ooooooooooo!) is the real boss of the Vatican.   No, the Holy See - the Office of Peter - trumps all the bishops, cardinals, mafiosos and major domos -- it even trumps the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, that American bastion of octogenarian  radical feminist nuns.

The Church isn't exactly a government like Britain or the United States.  The Pope's authority is in matters of Church doctrines and dogma.   The "CEO" authority of running the Vatican and global organization is delegated to the Secretariat of State, a cardinal.   He's what Americans think of as 'boss'.  There are no equivalents of what the Pope is in secular culture.  He's like the Dalai Lama, the leader of one of the world's major religions, with a billion members.

There is no human office or authority above the Pope in the Catholic hierarchy.  He has the power to remove cardinals, bishops.  He can shut down orders and departments.   The question is, will Francis actually use that authority?  

Well, he hasn't used it yet.   And if he follows the example set by the the last two popes, they never seriously tested or challenged the bishops to obey a direct Papal order: they never gave one.  Bishops in their own diocese have been doing pretty much as they please since the 1960's. 

Let's backtrack to Benedict's resignation 4 months ago.  Remember "VATILEAKS"?  Flashback to early 2012, when..
1.  the Pope's butler Paolo Gabriele was arrested in possession of confidential Vatican correspondence. 
2.  Months later, shortly before Benedict's resignation, the leather bound dossier of the investigation was presented to Pope Benedict. 
3. Benedict's last official act was locking the unopened dossier in the Papal safe with instructions "for the Pope's eyes only" to be opened by the new Pope,

That would be Pope Francis.   We've heard nothing further about this since February 25th.

Vatican rumors said Vatileaks revealed that the high level homosexual network in the Church had been the target of blackmail all along.  It was they who compromised the Church to it's enemies for decades.   It was speculated that the physically fading Josef Ratzinger stepped down so a fresh horse could take on the arduous task of removing 5 cardinals, 10 Archbishops, and 20 bishops world wide.  Benedict XVI fired the Archbishop of Scotland shortly before his exit.

But since then, nothing's happened.  Speculation is a wasted motion at this point.  We're waiting for something definite to happen.  

'Vatileaks' 2012

Results of 'Vatileaks' Probe For 'Pope's Eyes Only'

COMIC RELIEF

left - Caught in the Act!

Unrelated joke- THE GAY COWHAND

A successful rancher died and left everything to his devoted wife.
She was a very good-looking woman and determined to keep the ranch, but knew very little about ranching, so she decided to place an ad in the newspaper for a ranch hand..

Two cowboys applied for the job. One was gay and the other a drunk.
She thought long and hard about it, and when no one else applied she decided to hire the gay guy, figuring it would be safer to have him around the house than the drunk.

He proved to be a hard worker who put in long hours every day and knew a lot about ranching.
For weeks, the two of them worked, and the ranch was doing very well

Then one day, the rancher's widow said to the hired hand, "You have done a really good job, and the ranch looks great. You should go into town and kick up your heels." The hired hand readily agreed and went into town one Saturday night.

Finally he returned around two-thirty, and upon entering the room, he found the rancher's widow sitting by the fireplace with a glass of wine, waiting for him.

She quietly called him over to her..
"Unbutton my blouse and take it off," she said.
Trembling, he did as she directed. "Now take off my boots."
He did as she asked, ever so slowly. "Now take off my socks."
He removed each gently and placed them neatly by her boots.
"Now take off my skirt."
He slowly unbuttoned it, constantly watching her eyes in the fire light.
"Now take off my bra.." Again, with trembling hands, he did as he was told and dropped it to the floor.
Then she looked at him and said, "If you ever wear my clothes into town again, you're fired."

"We have Operation YewTree [investigating Jimmy Savile, et al]  in Britain. The idea that the British Investigators who all work for the Freemasons who work for Evelyn Rothschild  who controls the people by getting them to commit obscene acts on video are going to come up with something, well I think it's unlikely!"


- OUR CORRESPONDENT ASSISTS POLICE BY NAMING NAMES


[EDITOR'S NOTE: While not in a position to confirm these claims, I present them for your consideration.]


Previously by Red Ox

Sex Cult Runs UK Government
Royal Arch Sociopaths that Rule UK
UK Leaders are Brainwashed Torture Victims -

by Red Ox
(henrymakow.com)


If you ask a local Mason about "The Royal Arch," they might be scared, assuming they know what goes on. Maybe they joined Masonry to progress up the career ladder, get told what to do by a semi-official government official and call it a day.

(left, Lucifer's UK enforcer, Evelyn de Rothschild)

You can join The Royal Arch after joining the friendly and relatively insignificant local lodge. It is for the people who "will do anything, absolutely anything to get on". A British Intelligence Officer involved - an ex Director General - told me "we have our fair share of sociopaths".

Indoctrination is by degree, but if you are caught by the Royal Arch as a child, as I was,  you will be subject to such deliberately traumatic rape, torture and "mind control" that a normal person disassociates.

Injections are administered to prevent recall, and drugs such as Rohypnol are used along with electroshock punishment. Most of the people involved in the Royal Arch would have been through this at the hands of their own "Illuminati" or "multi-generational-Satanic" family. For example, Douglas Hurd (Foreign Secretary) and his son Thomas Hurd ('Diplomat'/MI-6 Officer) Hurd. They will then often suffer displacement - meting out similar punishments to others - and cognitive dissonance identifying with the organization that abused them.
 
The best way to understand how they work together is to see the agenda as "a force". They are Luciferian but some take it more seriously than others. Either way they all agree that the way to prove one's power is to cause suffering to others and that "do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law". If you can imagine what 'normal' people regard as the worst possible philosophy, you will also be pretty close.

In a previous article, I went through the torture techniques of electroshock with cattle prod. My parents were not Satanists, but those who are in with the Royal Arch can let their offspring be 'treated' with electroshock therapy three times a week. At the extreme, Miley Cyrus's father (left) used to rape her live at Bohemian Grove as one of the leading attractions.

MUSIC & ENTERTAINMENT TOTALLY SATANIC

Today, I want to be specific about actual pedophiles in music, entertainment and politics.  I can confirm from my experience that the cult is everywhere. I mean literally everywhere: you will not be successful in "Allied" music or entertainment industry without being part of it. If you know that, it should make turning off MTV entirely rather than have your unconscious or subconscious mind subverted.

When people watch Royal Arch music videos/live performances or watch entertainment programs, the information is "hidden in full view".  The most obvious recent example for British readers is Jimmy Savile, whose cathphrase "Jim'll Fix It For You" was also used in child rape sessions with all his British government chums. "Has Jim Fixed it for You?" an enthusiastic Thomas Hurd would ask a child rape victim.

Another prominent child rapist who was then forced to do Rothschild bidding is the former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown. An Intelligence minion like Hurd would ask him if he wanted a go with a boy, and the PM would say "that's very prudent of you". Planned in advance, he then used this phrase an inordinate  amount of times in the mass media to millions. Easy to understand when you know how.

Tony Blair was introduced to me as "the future Prime Minister" in about 1992 by Douglas Hurd and Mandelson, although Hurd told me Mandelson was more important (Rothschild direct contact). Hurd told me that Tony Blair wasn't into rape as much as others, same as Evelyn Rothschild usually didn't get involved directly. "Sometimes my brother does" Evelyn told us.

There was Kathryn Blair's suicide bid after being raped by friends of her father. There's also rumours Tony Blair is the actual illegitimate son of a Rothschild. Either way you can see how timely that "heart attack" was for Labour Leader John Smith. Blair said  "I had a funny feeling it would be me."

Some of these people are more victim than perpetrator. For example in the music industry you can take most famous women and young men. Is there much doubt that Justin Bieber and the dude from N Sync have been subjected to it?

From personal experience being flown by MI-6 to Bohemian Grove I met Nicole Scherzinger [lead singer Pussy Cat Dolls] who was being subjected to "ugly duckling" programming by having affection withheld in favour of Jessica Simpson.

Alizee the Corsican French singer, left, who could speak English (not very well in my opinion as a boy but was told "better than your French") was raped a thousand times and went on to be one of the largest names on the international stage singing "I'm  a Lolita" and "I'm Not 20". I was asked to rape this girl which makes me feel guilty even though I was too young for it to be my decision. "You'll have to take the lead with this one, Reggie" The Royal Arch sneered "as Alizee doesn't know what she's doing".



NAMES THAT MAY BE OUTED

I said specific: that was pretty specific. We have Operation YewTree in Britain. The idea that the British Investigators who all work for the Freemasons who work for Evelyn Rothschild who controls the people by getting them to commit obscene acts on video in the first place are going to come up with something, well I think it's unlikely!

But here's some names that may be outed (check back in a few weeks to see if I'm right):

First two new ones who may be revealed as they're not important members of Rothschild's circle like Hurd, Gordon Brown and Ted Heath.

Pete Burns- (music industry):- Involved in frequent Satanic gay orgies with boys (so unconsenting) run by MI-6/Thomas Hurd. Burns likes being a "top" (penis) and when the KGB was monitoring him raping a boy he started saying "you're a little runt aren't you. That's what my mother would have called you. She wouldn't have liked you" and throwing the child around. Putin thought this was obvious displacement and offered to help Pete out with his problems (to avoid him killing anyone) but Pete said "I'm not going to speak to your imaginary friend Pooka". Putin, Peter, not Pooka. He later got his face almost taken off by absolutely inexplicable surgery (continued injections even when there was a problem) by an Italian surgeon. Don't want to instantly link Italy to KGB - but KGB revenge!?

Bruce Forsyth - A beloved entertainer on British television with many catchphrases. The SVR has footage of Bruce and Thomas Hurd (MI-6) conducting a double rape of a child. In fact the SVR have thousands of hours of footage of Hurd that I saw the one time the Russian agency tried to attract my attention to it on their laptop (they cover up the brand for some reason with paper is something I remember?!). Bruce was told "you remind me of Grandad" in about 1990 and didn't react too well. He carried on touching the boy and was told "Grandad doesn't touch me like that". Thomas Hurd was finding it funny being young at the time and Forsyth told him off saying "this is for both our pleasure, Thomas, not just yours".

In fact Bruce,left, is a very poor pedophile since at a charity golf day he actually casually made reference to a gangbang to his friend Boycie from Only Fools and Horses - actor John Challis. "be quiet you're giving it away" Bruce laughed out of earshot when Challis commented at a "celebrity golf day" to the audience that he thought he recognized a child. "You're giving it away, Bruce" Challis said quietly. When the Dad wanted to know where Challis would know his son from, Challis did his famous Boycie laugh   which, despite being asked numerous times, until that moment he was steadfastly refusing to do.
 
OTHER NAMES

Those other names: McAlphine (he is now pedophile that is pretending not to be pedophile in full view), Savile, rocker Gary Glitter (arrested in Vietnam in 2006 for child sex) , Comedian Jim Davidson, [comedian] (accused of sexual assault yesterday) Jimmy Tarbuck (arrested for child abuse last week are all known to us.) [PR flack] Max Clifford I mentioned before.

Other names I mention but nothing has happened (guess they're too important):  Piers Morgan, [ad mogul] Charles Saatchi, [magazine publisher] Felix Dennis, Trevor Kavanagh (The Sun Political Correspondent), Theo Paphitis, [lingerie retailer], but you could go on to Gordon Brown, Ted Heath... it goes right to the top because it's deliberately run in that fashion by Rothschild. Some of the main "minions" are the British Security Services. Thomas Hurd didn't want to sign in when we visited Savile in his studio at the BBC for obvious reasons, but I did anyway on his behalf and crossed out his name a few times when he complained.
 

(Anti gun crusader Piers Morgan)

I'm sure that must be terriblly difficult for the Rothschild-controlled British Police to find: the signing in book from 1992. Also, of course, the Russian Federation could put away half the British Government for life by sending a videotape to the right person. Or even simply revealing it on RT. Consider it a polite request?

Not as important as Rothschild, but one for your US audience. When I was at Bohemian Grove I met the US guys like Bush, Clinton, Cheney and Greenspan. There's some tedious joke they do with Dick Cheney "that's why he's called Dick" --such a large penis. One of the chaps I met was your current President Mr Obama.

The KGB on radio asked me to do a joke with him: "Say, Sir, you look different from the others". Obama paused for a moment nodding his head to himself.. and then said "Is it because I am Black!?" with a smile.

 Angela Merkel didn't have such a good sense of humour when some Russian scamp wanted me to say, "Hello Sir I take it the operation was a success!".
  --
Related-

Police Decide No Police Cover Up

David Icke - Pedophile Ring Is Everywhere -

Ben Fellows - Many Leading Actors are Illuminati Pedophiles
QUOTE: "Johnny Depp, Nicholas Cage, Tom Cruise, Collin Farrel. Outed as rent boy sceners by Ben Fellows to take on VIP paedo. Andrew Lloyd Webber

Makow-- Crazed MI-5/6 Wreak Havoc for Illuminati -

(l. Connecticut blogger Deborah Bohling, mother of four.)

Today is Mother's Day.


A mother's love is the glue that holds the world together. 
We salute mothers by posting two short articles by Deborah Bohling,
from her blog "Mothers in the Trenches." Her  mother mettle
was tested when one son contracted cancer and, later, a daughter
suffered from a psychological disorder. 



"What defines me as a mom are those experiences I have had because of my children. Those sacred moments where the world doesn't exist.  In the quiet of the night, when it's just me and my child. What defines me is not what I do, but what I know."



What Do You Do All Day?
Posted on February 8, 2013   

by Deborah Bohling

"What do you do all day?"

I used to cringe at that question. It was never asked in a kind, curious way. It was always asked with a sneer. Usually by people who lived in the world defined by the mantra "if I'm busier than you, I'm better than you" and who incorrectly assumed that my life was filled with leisurely strolls in the park, reading romance novels, and taking naps.

Unfortunately, as a young, stay-at-home mom, I had neither the quick wit, nor the confidence to respond to this question. Instead I internalized it and in doing so I gave it power.

I started to ask myself that question. What do I do all day? And if I couldn't come up with a long enough list I would add more. So I joined things. I joined the PTA, and I became a room mother. I sat on the Little League board, organized fund raisers, chaired Vacation Bible School and even became a volunteer firefighter.  All of this in an effort to respond to that all important question.

I had a general insecurity about myself as a mom who didn't work outside the home. As though I had to justify my choices and even my existence. After all, in a world ruled by the almighty dollar, what value does a person have who brings in no paycheck?

Of course a great deal of lip service has been paid to the virtues of motherhood and if I add up all the services I provide in a given day,  I can calculate what my yearly income would be, but none of that mattered to me.

That looming question was too big and too deep. I just could not answer it as fully as I wanted. So I kept moving. And I kept adding more to my to-do list. I hosted parties, and opened my house to all the kids. I cooked and cleaned. I was a 24-hour-taxi service.  I was a frenzy of activity, and all to prove to the world that I did something all day.

But none of that defines me as a mom. Not anymore. What defines me as a mom are those experiences I have had because of my children. Those sacred moments where the world doesn't exist.  In the quiet of the night, when it's just me and my child. What defines me is not what I do, but what I know.

I know what it's like to comfort a child who gets pushed into a locker or has to use his lunch money to "pay" for passage in the halls.

I know what it's like to sift through therapists to find just the right one to help a child who can't go to school because her fear of germs is so great she can't put her hand on the door handle.

I know what it's like to get a phone call alerting me to the fact that my son has been in a car accident.

And I know what it's like to hold a child's hand night after night in a hospital room, silently praying for the chemotherapy to work.

These are the unsung moments. The moments that make up a life of mothering, and the moments that only another mother would appreciate.  It is in these moments that I've learned to be strong. In these moments I've learned to think clearly in an emergency and I've learned more about anxiety and cancer than any professor could ever teach in a college classroom.  It is from these moments that I have learned the difference between knowledge and wisdom.

So don't ask me what I do all day. Because if you have to ask, you have no capacity to understand the answer.

 -----


The Mommy Wars
Posted on February 8, 2013    

I remember the first time I read the headline "The Mommy Wars" on some magazine at the checkout stand. It was an article about stay-at-home moms vs. working moms and the animosity between the two.

I never thought there was a war between us but upon further introspection I had to admit I was at one time in my life contributing to the dissention. I can recall having  a smugly superior attitude because I was home taking care of my own kids, not allowing a nanny or daycare to take the reins.

That attitude helped me deflect what I believed their attitude to be about me. That I wasn't working because I wasn't smart enough, or capable enough to juggle home and office.

I had harsh words to say about working moms who sent their sick kids to school because they couldn't take a day off to tend to them. Or who called me to cart their kids around because they couldn't get out of a meeting and they knew I was home and available.

I wanted to believe that I was doing a better job than they were. That because I was home to greet my kids when they got off the school bus, I was the better mom. But in actuality I didn't believe that. In fact, I envied my working friends although it took me years to admit that to myself.

I envied the clothes they wore, and the business trips they went on. I envied that they carried briefcases instead of diaper bags and that they had something else to talk about besides life with children. I envied their confidence and take-charge attitude. They always seemed pulled together and organized.

So I was surprised one day while chatting over a glass of wine with my friend, a working mom with 2 children, when she admitted to me that she envied me.  She went on to say that she often wondered if her choice to work was the best choice for her family. She wanted to be able to provide a good life for them and the dual income helped served that purpose. But there were so many things she felt she missed out on. So much time away from her kids that could not be brought back.

And she felt guilty.

I shared with her that I envied her professional life. That there were days I had wished so hard for someplace exciting to go. That running errands and going to endless soccer games, cleaning the house and carpooling was not always stimulating.  I admitted that sometimes I felt bored just raising kids, that I wanted to do more with my life than just be a mom.

And I felt guilty.

And in that moment we truly connected.  And we saw each other's lives perhaps for the first time. We realized that she wasn't a "working mom" and I wasn't a "stay-at-home mom".  We were just moms. Both of us doing the best we could to be the best we could be for our kids.

And I said goodbye to that flippant attitude I used to have. I softened my heart toward my working comrades and made a conscious decision to support them and help them when I could.

There should be no war between us. There is enough of a war out there. The war on drugs, the war against drunk driving, the war against bullying and the list goes on. We can't fight this war if we are divided amongst ourselves. For if there is ever going to be any change in our culture, it will come from a united group of mothers working together.
--

See also- "Even Cool Mothers Aren't Cool to their Kids"

First Comment from Linda:

Dear Henry...thank you for posting the article Mothers - Unsung Heroes. I too have been asked "what do you do all day" - a rather unkind and truly ignorant question, particularly when asked by another mother.
 
I have the college degree, worked in the corporate world and chose, or rather was led, to stay at home with my children and homeschool them. Our daughter has almost completed her Bachelor of Science degree in Nursing, our son is almost through his junior year in high school - still homeschooled by mom.  I could never, ever quantify the blessings I have received by staying home with my kids - they are two of the most godly and wonderful people I know. They are bright and articulate, they have manners and are gracious to others, they are a treasure to me and their dad. I thank God every day for the privilege to be their mom and care for them. There is nothing the world can offer that could replace the calling of being a  mother.
 
It is nice to see the positive comments to this article from men. I know my husband would wholeheartedly agree with their opinions (Adrian and Al Thompson). My husband is a wonderful and godly man - his support is so important to me. God is good...life is good.
 
 

 
 

THE DEMISE OF MY NIECE   By  B


I've been following the demise of my one and only niece since she left Pittsburgh in 05 to move to Seattle.  Her story is a simple one. She had some rejections from boys, she never felt good enough because she has body scars from severe acne conditions throughout her teen years; thus her interest in disfiguring her entire body with tattoos... She is not a lesbian, never has been. She was boy crazy when she was in her early teens, that I can testify to. It was her move to Seattle and encounters with the extreme feminist culture that took her down, and I've watched her progression into extremism through the years, via what she posts to the public domain in images.
 
She was immediately scooped up by the rejected, sick lesbian culture out there, that took her in and convinced her she had gender issues! She has never had a gender issue in her life. She has mental health issues for sure, but not gender issues. She now strongly identifies with herself as a butch lesbian, fights for their causes and professes that she worships serial killers and Lucifer.  This philosophy I attribute to her severe self loathing....I guess...I'm not an educated PHD on the subject, but I am a logical thinker.
 
The poster of Pat Robertson (below) is interesting, and under it she had posted..."Oh really?"...well, I have to say in her case, he is CORRECT, but the part that I always (personally) reject is the extreme left or the extreme right. I reject extremism in any form....as I feel extreme agendas from either side are unbalanced and unnatural.  Just my take...
 
In my niece's case, I have observed how a child loses their faith. Pittsburgh is a strong family town, and although our family had some issues, I think that hers all stemmed from when her biological mother rejected her, and then my brother sank into alcoholism and self loathing also. She was left with no stability in her life and fell victim to gangs of other mentally ill people out in Seattle.
 
All very sad to me, as I don't see much hope for her anymore, and I fear her having an untimely end.
 

 .
(left, Ciara Jackson, 23)


"The first medication I took was Haldol. I had never been Bipolar in my life and had someone taken  the time to listen to me, and answer my questions adequately, I would have been fine. Little did I know my diagnoses would do all the speaking for me. My voice was left unheard."

There are more than 400,000 children in foster care in the US. More than half are medicated. Ciara Jackson pleads for government to stop medicating "wards of the state" like herself.





"A Voice Silenced"
By Ciara Jackson
(henrymakow.com)

Child Protective Services in the US is a Federal Agency. Each state has a branch of their own. In Colorado, its called Department of Human Services and pretends to help children, but almost every department has become corrupt.

Being a child in DHS, I became a ward of the state, once my mother had her rights relinquished. My family didn't fight to get me out. My grandma did.

When she saw what the system was doing to me, she began to give me money to run away to her house. She rather me run away to her house, then be out somewhere and have no clue where I was. When I got to her house, she would tell my case manager from the Department of Human Services that I was with her.  I was not a fugitive.  Give me a few days and then come and get me. My case manager did what she could.
 
It got so bad where I was. I was in places where they would drug the children. More than half of the children are medicated to control the child. I was personally diagnosed  Bipolar/ not otherwise specified. At the time I was diagnosed, I had been abandoned by my parents not once but three times, I was going through puberty and no one wanted me.  It's natural for a normal child to act out when becoming a teenager. It happens all the time. Now imagine that plus being giving up by your family. You can understand why I acted out.

The Department of Human Services put me in a Detention Facility because a foster home said I had ran away. Not that I actually ran away, but that was their way of getting me out of their house because the mother and I didn't get along.

Truth is, I never ran away. I had just moved to Colorado that summer and lived in literally one area. This was my first experience of being a runaway and was sent to spend a week in The Filmore Detention Facility. From there I was sent to a "treatment facility." A treatment facility is designed to rehabilitate children.

This is where they stick from 20 to 500 or more children of all different backgrounds. In some places, I lived with children who were labeled as sex offenders; children who have been molested by their parents; children who were already having sex with random men on the streets; children who were in gangs, the list goes on and on. These were things I had never experienced in my life. I was still into playing in the park and riding bikes. The majority of these children grew up fast, way too fast.

In the places, they have staff members who are put into certain roles in authority. I have seen staff members who would sleep with the girls; staff members who would become emotionally or mentally abusive towards the children. I would see staff who are now homeless or on drugs. I would see staff who would abuse their power. I would see staff who are genuinely good people.

The treatment facility is often tied to a psychiatrist. These so-called psychiatrists are there to dope the children. By doing this, they need to come up with a diagnoses for the child, but a lot of the time, the false-diagnose the child and put them on drugs.  I was a child they could not control. I asked way too many questions and when things did not make sense, I questioned them more. There were times when I would ask to sit in my court proceedings and because I was only 13, the social workers would tell me I am not old enough. I would ask to see my files but according to the social workers I was too young.

I was a child beyond my time. Too young to ask questions but old enough to have them.   I figured my questions should be answered because they pertained to me.

The more I got told no, and the more these so-called professionals refused to answer my questions, I began to act out. I was taken away from my family, held in a lock down facility like a prisoner. No more going to take a walk to the store, or playing in the creek. No more staying up all night with my cousins, no more being a normal teenager and no one would explain why. In 2003, Denver Health diagnosed me with being Bipolar (Not otherwise Specified).

MEDICATED JOURNEY

The first medication I took was Haldol. I had never been Bipolar in my life and had someone taken the time to listen to me, and answer my questions adequately, I would have been fine. Little did I know my diagnoses would do all the speaking for me. My voice was left unheard.

Years passed with me on all types of medications. I gained weight, lost weight. When people saw me they would say, that with my medication I was doing so well. When really I felt isolated, ignored, and grew angrier with the system as time went by.

I always believed that there is a way to help children cope with their problems without the use of medication, if they can at least think and do things for themselves. Injecting their bodies with chemicals is not the way to teach someone how to become self-sufficient, because when the drugs run out, then what?

The entire time I was in the system, I battled and refused to take medication after I realized the symptoms I was having. I was always drooling, I was so slow mentally and physically. I had went from wearing a size 5 in juniors to a size 18. The more I refused the drug, the more defiant social services labeled me and the angrier I became.

I finally gotten to an age where I could emancipate. I continued to refuse the medication. This is a time when my diagnoses changed. I was no longer Bipolar; I had "a mood disorder." If you had been in my surroundings and seen the things that I witnessed, your moods would change rapidly too.

From the time I was 13 until 17,   I had no choice but to be surrounded by inconsistency and instability.

When I emancipated, my last caseworker told me to sue the County of Denver because they false diagnosed me with being Bipolar all those years. To me, being emancipated was enough. I would never have to deal with those people again. I stopped taking the medication, and am now a college student, a civilized adult with friends and family who genuinely love me.

I still have stretch marks on my arms from being given medication, and the battle wounds of all the things I went through in the Department of Human Services, but I was determined to prove to them that their diagnoses of me was wrong, and I have.
-----

Related:
"Psychotropic drugs, SSRIs, a frequently prescribed class of medications, generates close to 200 million prescriptions in the United States that approaches a cost of 20 billion dollars a year." - Dan Abshear - former drug rep

(Left, gay family)

All religious-based adoption agencies in the UK have closed
because they would not sanction child abuse,
i.e. placing heterosexual children in an homosexual environment.
This gratuitous harm is the result of government edict and further confirms our belief that governments  are controlled by Satanists (Illuminati).









"LGBT activists are content to mess up the whole adoption system, then vanish and leave misery for thousands of children."



by Jack S
(henrymakow.com)


Before the laws on gay discrimination, there were many adoption agencies operating across the United Kingdom. These charities, many of them Catholic, used to handle more than half of all the adoptions in the UK. They were more successful than the local authorities in finding adoptive families that "worked" because they took more time to vet the prospective parents and because, unlike state officials, really had the welfare of the children at heart.

None of these societies ever had a policy of "anyone can adopt". They placed children only with legally married couples and took many other factors into account  - whether the parents were physically healthy, whether they had any history of crime or mental illness in their family, whether they had a regular job and so on. References and recommendations had to be obtained, records scrutinized. In some cases, these charities had been operating for hundreds of years.

Then along came the LGBT fanatics and demanded to adopt. They claimed that this was somehow their "right". When the adoption societies replied that they believed it was in the best interests of the children to be placed in a home where there is a mother AND and father, the aggressive homosexuals went to court and claimed "discrimination".

All these religious adoption societies one by one have been forced to close down. It started in 2005, under the Labour government that brought in the law, and the last one is closing this year.

Now what is the result? A crisis in adoption. Across England alone there are now 4,600 children waiting to be adopted. Some of them are orphans and others have been taken into council "care" because their parents are incapable of looking after them. They are kept in hostels or placed with temporary foster-families at huge expense to the tax-payer.

These children grow up to be very vulnerable. They perform poorly in school and a very high number of them later live on state benefits, or drift into crime or drug abuse while still in their teens. Many of the girls are lured into prostitution, and even if not, their own children are likely to be born out of wedlock.... so the whole cycle of uncared-for children repeats itself.

The government, slave to permissive anti-family notions, has no solution. The Minister for Children and Families, Edward Timpson, left, has issued a circular telling local authorities they must do better in finding adoptive parents, or the responsibility will be taken away from them! 

And where exactly will it be shifted to? Er... that remains to be seen.

The local authorities have been told that they must improve the situation or the government will deal with them sternly. Councils will be offered incentive payments for success in finding childless couples willing to adopt!!!

Local authorities are now advertising in newspapers and on the radio for adoptive parents or even foster-parents and they are running some of their advertisements in homosexual magazines and websites.

Same-sex couples are urged to come forward and claim the surplus children living in "care"....which is now their "right". Unfortunately, there are very few of them. Homosexuals are only 2% of the population and most of them are not interested in adopting children. Most of them do not live in couples.

Those who do would, for the most part, far rather follow their self-indulgent, promiscuous, drug-fueled lifestyle with luxury homes and few responsibilities. There are only 6,000 same-sex couples who have taken advantage of the civil partnership laws, and most of them do not want children. In the 2011 census, 1.1 per cent of the surveyed UK population, approximately 545,000 adults, identified themselves as Gay or Lesbian,

The LGBT activists cannot solve the problems they have caused. They are content to mess up the whole adoption system, then vanish and leave misery for thousands of children.

Related -

Gay Adoption is Child Abuse  - 

Satire on Gay Adoption is Exhilarating
Stripping councils' adoption role 'a reckless gamble'First Comment from Richard Evans:


A real story about gay adoption that happened in 2009, just before the censorship lock on such news: then-Associate director of Duke University's Center for Health Policy, Frank Lombard, left, was  arrested by the FBI and charged with offering up his adopted 5-year-old African American son for sex to an undercover cop. Lombard's chat handle was "PervDad4Fun" for cryin' out loud. When he thought he was talking to another pedophile, Lombard bragged that he doped the 5 year old black boy and sodomized him all the time.

This man wasn't some trailer trash psychopath; he was a poster boy of the politically correct gay elite. He was in charge of promoting the gay lifestyle as a healthy alternative at an ivy league university. He and his 'partner' lived in an upscale gated community that specifically promoted it's 'gay friendly' atmosphere as a 'wholesome, free environment for children'.

This story didn't get broadcast like the Sandusky case, because Sandusky was posing as a heterosexual, so he was made famous to frame pedophiles as a 'heterosexual thing'. Lombard was an outright gay activist.

The gays are really just tools being used to kick in what's left of natural human culture. The real goal of the hidden cabal that's actually running things is disintegration of family, clan, tribe and nations. Bertrand Russell, Lenin and Trotsky worked all this out by the 1920's. The need to reduce each individual to emotionally isolated creature that's lost the human ability to bond with others. Russell scientifically experimented with children at his Royal Chartered school and plainly wrote that all it takes to erase the bonding ability is to promote masturbation and sex stimulation to children.

We must be honest, the Elephant in the Room is that gay adoption WILL place children in the midst of an openly obsessive/ compulsive sex addiction lifestyle of homosexuals. Lesbians have other problems, but sexual warping is always involved on some level.

It is part of the self-absorbed Narcissism of homosexual overcompensation that what they mean by 'acceptance' is really that society must 'celebrate' THEIR sexual exploits. They want FLAUNT it.

When a young woman and man think of marriage, they think of things like what their child would look and be like. Homosexuals don't have the physiology to make children as male and female. So there's no chemical instinct for parenting from homosexual attraction. They're attraction boils down to seeing each other as suppliers of that 'ol drug like feeling of horniness and orgasms. "Bottom" homosexuals describe a feeling of a emptiness in them where a male identity should have been. The sex partner gives them a delusion of bonding with an absent or abusive father.

We must never forget that what the Global Government wants to do is hand boys over to homosexuals giving the men (or lesbians) the same power and primacy over them that was reserved for bonded parents that cared for them.

This information adds weight to the view
that Hitler was a Sabbatean Frankist (Illuminati) Jew
whom the bankers put in power to destroy Germany
and sacrifice other Jews to provide a rationale
for the State of Israel.













by David Livingstone
(from his upcoming book, Black Terror, White Soldiers: Islam, Fascism & the New Age)

There have been widespread rumors that Hitler was himself Jewish. It has been suggested Hitler was the illegitimate grandchild of a Rothschild. But, according to Rabbi Marvin Antelman, these theories are incorrect. Rather, he claims, Hitler was the deliberate creation of a ritual participated in by his mother, Klara Polzl, and a Sabbatean Frankist.

The ritual was held on the 9th of Av, known as Tisha B'av, which is observed by Jews as a fast day commemorating the destruction of the First and Second Temples, but commemorated by Frankists as Sabbatai Zevi's birthday, which they celebrate with their sex rites. [Other views trace Hitler's Jewishness to the Rothschilds through his grandmother who purportedly was a servant. She received child support from a Jewish man for Hitler's father.]

In fact, Hitler's Jewish and African ancestry has been confirmed through recent genetic studies.

Like Napoleon, Hitler belonged to the Y-DNA haplogroup E1b1b, which is rare in Germany and even Western Europe. According to Ronny Decorte, genetics expert at Katholieke Universiteit Leuven who sampled Hitler's current living relatives, "the results of this study are surprising" and "Hitler would not have been happy."10

10 E1b1b is presently found in various forms in the Horn of Africa, North Africa, parts of Eastern, Western, and Southern Africa, West Asia, and Europe, especially the Mediterranean Spain and the Balkans.

E1b1b is quite common amongst populations with an Afro-Asiatic speaking history, where a significant proportion of Jewish male lineages are E1b1b1, including that of Albert Einstein.

 E1b1b1, which accounts for approximately 18% to 20% of Ashkenazi and up to 30% of Sephardi Y-chromosomes, appears to be one of the major founding lineages of the Jewish population. 11

As Abraham Duker noted, given the extent of their assimilation into Christian societies, "It is not by accident that the Nazi encyclopedia, Sigilla Vrei had nothing to say about the Frankists. Evidently the Nazi genealogists preferred to leave them alone, fearful that such revelations might embarrass many persons of importance."12

Contrary to conventional views, Mark Rigg, author of Hitler's Jewish Soldiers, reveals that a surprisingly large number of German military men were classified by the Nazis as Jews or "partial-Jews" (Mischlinge) in the wake of racial laws first enacted in the mid-1930s. Numerous "exemptions" were made in order to allow a soldier to stay in the service or to spare his family or other relatives from incarceration or extermination. Hitler's own signature can be found on many of these "exemption" orders.

Rigg demonstrates that the actual number was far higher than previously suspected. As many as 150,000 Jewish men served the Nazi regime, including decorated veterans and high-ranking officers, even generals and admirals.

In Adolf Hitler: Founder of Israel, Hennecke Kardel quotes a book called Before Hitler Came, by a German Jew named Dietrich Bronder, which claims that not only Hitler, but his leading associates were all also Jewish:

Of Jewish descent, or being related to Jewish families were: the Leader and Reichschancelor Adolf Hitler; his representatives the Reichsminister Rudolf Hess; the Reichsmarshall Hermann Goering; the Reichsleader of the NSDAP Gregor Strasser, Dr. Josef Goebbels, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, Heinrich Himmler; the Reichsminister von Ribbentrop (who pledged close friendship with the famous Zionist Chaim Weizmann, the first head of the State of Israel who died in 1952); von Keudell; field commanders Globocnik (the Jewish destroyer); Jordan and Wilhelm Hube; the great SS-Leaders Reinhard Heydrich, Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski and von Keudell II, who also were active in the destruction of Jews.13
---
Footnotes

9 Allan Hall. "DNA tests reveal 'Hitler was descended from the Jews and Africans he hated' The Daily Mail. 24 August 2010.
10 "Hitler verwant met Somaliërs, Berbers en Joden," De Standaard, Wednesday 18th August 2010; "Hitler was verwant met Somaliërs," Berbers en Joden Knack, 18th August 2010.
11 Nebel; Filon, D; Brinkmann, B; Majumder, P; Faerman, M; Oppenheim, A (2001), "The Y Chromosome Pool of Jews as Part of the Genetic Landscape of the Middle East," American Journal of Human Genetics 69 (5): 1095-1112.
12 Abraham G. Duker. "Polish Frankism's Duration," p. 331.
13 Adolf Hitler, Founder of Israel. (San Diego: Modjeskis' Society, 1997). p. 11.

----
David Livingstone is the author of Terrorism & the Illuminati: A Three Thousand Year History.


Related -

His grandmother received child support from a Jewish businessman who was probably an intermediary for his grandfather. Bridget Hitler quotes Hitler's sister Paula: "Since [Adolf] started the race laws we have no grandfather, Adolf and I. Certainly anyone who wished could make a good deal out of that." (Memoirs, p. 175) - See more at: http://www.savethemales.ca/001399.html#sthash.RPjObLDv.dpuf"His grandmother received child support from a Jewish businessman who was probably an intermediary for his grandfather. Bridget Hitler quotes Hitler's sister Paula: "Since [Adolf] started the race laws we have no grandfather, Adolf and I. Certainly anyone who wished could make a good deal out of that." (Memoirs, p. 175) - See more at: http://www.savethemales.ca/001399.html
and Makow, Hitler's First Murder

Makow ---Hitler was a Godsend for Israel

--- 1924 French Police File Card for Adolphe Jacob Hitler
---- Bormann Ran Hitler for the Illuminati

First Comment from Dan:
 
It's important that the demographics of the vast majority of Jews the Germans rounded up and deported to the camps were working class assimilated Jews of modest means. Hundreds of photographs document that fact.    It's obvious from their clothing. 

Also specifically targeted for death were Jewish converts to Catholicism.

Where were the Chabad Lubivitchers, and the Rebbe Yosef Yitzchok Schneersohn ? (aka "the Rayyatz") 

He skipped lightly out of Europe in 1940 on a pass from the US State Department, and set up World Headquarters in Crown Heights, Brooklyn, Manhattan.  During the war the Rebbe did not contribute to the Vaad Hatzolah rescue organization that saves hundreds of thousands of Jews.  Instead, he raised money directly through ad campaigns targeting American Jews, but he spent the money supporting the Brooklyn yeshiva.

He condemned Vaad Hatzolah for working with non-Orthodox Jewish leaders and rescuing non-Orthodox Jews.

The Chabad-Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson (1902  - 1994) described the Holocaust by comparing G-d to "a surgeon who amputates a patient's limb".   This, referring to the millions of assimilated and secular Jews of Europe.

http://www.chabad-mafia.com/holocaust.php

[1] July 26, 1942, the Reichskommissar of the Netherlands, Arthur Seyss-Inquart, ordered the arrest of all Jewish converts, who had previously been spared.  This was in retaliation against the Dutch Bishops' Conference which had a public statement read in all the churches of the country on July 20, 1942, condemning Nazi racism.

(Left- Rothschild lackeys swear allegiance)


According to Rabbi Higger, in Jewish tradition Jews are destined to govern mankind.  The "non-righteous," i.e. everyone who resists Jewish domination, shall perish.


Recent Israeli attacks on Syria can be seen in this light.

Ordinary Jews have a choice: Disown this demented ideology or take the blame.







by Michael Collins Piper
(Excerpt from The New Babylon, edited by henrymakow.com)

In 1932, [Rabbi] Michael Higger, Ph.D., [1898-1952] published a book entitled The Jewish Utopia, ...[based on] "the sum total of the prophecies, teachings and plans and interpretations of the foremost Jewish rabbis and tribal leaders over a period of some 2,500 years..."

The books talked of "the righteous" and "the non-righteous." In the end, according to Higger, the "non-righteous" shall perish...

And it is clear, throughout Higger's writings that the "righteous" shall be the Jews and the servants of the Jews; and the "wicked" will be those who are perceived by the Jews to be standing in opposition to their interests!

The words of Isaiah will be fulfilled: "Behold, My servants shall eat, but ye shall be hungry. Behold, My servants shall drink, but ye shall be thirsty; Behold, My servants shall rejoice, but ye shall be ashamed." ...


(This article is an excerpt from this book.)

Higger continues: "All the treasures and natural resources of the world will eventually come in possession of the righteous." This, he said, would be in keeping, with thy prophecy of Isaiah: "In her gain and her hire shall be holiness to the Lord; it shall be not treasured nor laid out, for her gain shall be for them that dwell before the Lord, to eat their fill and for stately clothing." ...

In short, this is the massive extermination of those who stand up to the Jewish Utopia -- the New World Order. It continues:

"All of these unrighteous nations shall be called to judgment before they are punished and doomed. The severe sentence of their doom will be pronounced upon them only after they have been given a fair trial when it will become evident that their existence would hinder the advent of the ideal era.

"Thus, at the coming of the Messiah, when all righteous nations will pay homage to the ideal righteous leader and offer gifts to him, the wicked and corrupt nations, by realizing the approach of their doom, will bring similar presents to the Messiah. Their gifts and pretended acknowledgment of the new era will be blunted rejected, for the really wicked nations, like the really wicked individuals must disappear from the earth before an ideal human society of righteous nations can be established."

And when one considers the fact that the Jewish concept of the Messiah is often reckoned to be that the Jewish people themselves, what Higger has described takes on even more consequence.

ARMAGEDDON

 Armageddon, in Jewish tradition, is the final battle in which the Jews will once and for all establish their absolute rule over the earth.


(left. Meanwhile Illuminati Jewish-controlled DHS stocks up on guns and ammo)

According to Higger, "Israel and the other righteous nations shall combat the combined forces of the wicked, unrighteous nations under the leadership of Gog and Magog.  Assembled for an attack on the righteous nations in Palestine near Jerusalem, the unrighteous will suffer a crushing defeat and Zion will thenceforth remain the center of the kingdom of God. The defeat of the unrighteous will mark the annihilation of the power of the wicked who oppose the Kingdom of God, an establishment of the new ideal era." ...

There will be no room for the unrighteous whether Jewish or non-Jewish in the Kingdom of God. All of them will have disappeared before the advent of the ideal era on this earth. Unrighteous Israelites will be punished equally with the wicked of other nations. All the righteous, on the other hand, whether Hebrew or Gentile, will share equally in the happiness and abundance of the ideal era.

In contrast to what the average American Christian would think, or perceive in the context of his Christian faith, which looks forward to a universal kingdom of God in Heaven, the paradise referred to throughout The Jewish Utopia describing the "new ideal era" -- the New World Order -- is "a universal paradise of mankind ... established in this world," with no reference to the future world whatever.

Who will rule this New World Order? According to Higger's assessment of the Jewish tradition: "He will be a descendant of the House of David."

RULER

Talmudic tradition says that "a descendant of the House of David will appear as the head of the 'ideal era' only after the whole world will have suffered, for a continuous period of nine months, from a wicked, corrupt government like the historically traditionally wicked Edom."

(Note: Today there is a formally organized international Jewish organization, Davidic Dynasty, openly working to track down and reunite all of the descendants of the House of David. This is no "conspiracy theory." It is fact. Knowing what the Talmud teaches about who shall rule the globe, we can perhaps understand the motivation of this group.)

The whole world will "gradually come to the realization that Godliness is identical with righteousness," and that God "cleaves to Israel and that Israel is the ideal righteous nation."

According to these rabbinic teachings which are the foundation for the age-old Jewish dream of the establishment of the New World Order, the peoples of the earth will then proclaim to the Jewish rulers: "We will go with you, for we have heard that God is with you."

So it is that, as the rabbis proclaim: "The people of Israel will conquer spiritually the peoples of the earth, so that Israel will be made high above all nations in praise, in name and in glory."

Note the concept of "conquer" -- as in battle. Note the concept of Israel raised above all others -- as in supremacy and superiority. Violence and racism toward the non-Jews: as simple as that.

GLOBAL RELIGION = JUDAISM

There will eventually be a global religion. This has been part of the prophecy: "The nations would first unite for the purpose of calling upon the name of the Lord to serve him."

In other words, there would be a world government and one global religion, and as Higger and others have noted, that international religion would be Judaism. That would be the "spiritual conquest" of the world...

(Is this too harsh condemnation of a man who serves the NWO & covers for 9-11, Newtown and numerous other false flag attacks?)

Indeed, it will be the Jewish power, seated in Jerusalem, headed by a descendant of the House of David-referred to as "the Holy One" -- who will divide up the property of the world.

Who will get this property?"To the righteous will belong all the wealth, treasures and industrial gains and other resources of the world. To the unrighteous will belong nothing."

The unrighteous nations "will not share in the ideal era." Their rule will be destroyed and disappear before the ushering in of the New World Order. The "wickedness" of these nations will consist mainly in accumulating money belonging to "the people" and of oppressing and robbing "the poor."

Although Higger does not state this emphatically, those familiar with Talmudic tradition, the "people" and the "poor" are the Jews: The Talmud teaches that only Jews are humanity and all others are animals, thus, of course, only Jews can be "people." The "poor" are -- of course -- the Jews who have forever painted themselves as the victims and the oppressed -- as in "the poor, persecuted Jews."
----

Also by Michael Collins Piper on this website:  Illuminati Bankers Controlled McCarthy

Related - Brother Nathaniel - Gentile Race, Religion, Nation & Family Come Under Illuminati Jewish Jackboot