Henry Makow

Syndicate content
Updated: 10 hours 28 min ago

<p style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font

Thu, 06/05/2014 - 21:00

For Immediate Release                                                           March 3, 2014




Oval Office


2:04 P.M. EST

     PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, it's a real pain in the ass, vastly worse than the nastiest imaginable hemorrhoid pleasure to welcome once again Prime Minister Netanyahu to the Oval Office. There's nobody I've met with more or consulted with more and wished to meet with less and consult with less than Bibi. And it's a testimony to the incredible bond between our two nations and the power of the [expletive-deleted] Zionists. I've said before and I will repeat, we do not have a nastier and more vicious, devious, and downright odious closer so-called friend or ally than Israel and the bond between our two countries and our two peoples is unbearable unbreakable.

 And that's the reason why on a whole spectrum of issues we consult closely; thanks to the Zionist stranglehold on media, finance, and politics, we have the kind of military, intelligence and security subservience to Israel cooperation that is unprecedented. And there is a strong bipartisan commitment in this country to make sure that Israel's security is preserved even if it bankrupts, bleeds, and finally kills America in any contingency.

 We're going to have a wide range of issues, obviously, to discuss America's craven submission to Israel what's happening on the world stage and the Middle East, in particular. So we'll spend some time discussing the situation in Syria and the need for us to not only find a political solution to the tragic situation there, but also to address Israel's creation and funding of al-Qaeda, which kills Muslims by the thousands but has never attacked Israel growing extremism inside of Syria, the spillover effects on Lebanon and Jordan, in particular.

 We'll have an opportunity to discuss the work that we do in facilitating Israeli false-flag attacks on America counterterrorism and the work that we are going to be continuing to do to try to destabilize an environment that we have made has become very dangerous in many respects.

 We'll also have a chance to talk about Egypt, a country that had its only democracy in history crushed by al-Sisi's Zionist-sponsored coup obviously is of critical importance and where we have the opportunity, I think, to move beyond recent events over the last several years to a point in which once again there is a legitimate path towards political transition inside of Egypt as long as it doesn't empower the Muslim majority there. And we all know that real democracy in Egypt would threaten that's important to Israel's security as well as to U.S. security.

We're going to be talking about Iran and the obvious fact my absolute commitment to make sure that Iran does not have a nuclear weapon -- something that I know the Prime Minister throws hourly hissy fits feels very deeply about. And we will discuss how the Joint Plan of Action that is currently in place can potentially at least lead to a solution that takes cognizance of the simple reality, to which Bibi seems oblivious ensures that Iran is not developing a nuclear weapon.

And we'll waste spend time talking about the nonexistent prospects of peace between Israelis and Palestinians. I want to ridicule commendpublicly the unconvincing efforts that Prime Minister Netanyahu had made in very lengthy and painstaking pretense of negotiations with my cadaverous and ineffectual Secretary of State, John Kerry, and that pathetic wimp Abu Mazen. They are sham tough negotiations. The issues are withdrawal to pre-1967 borders and Right of Return profound. Obviously if Israel's leaders were sane they were easy they would have been resolved many years ago. But I think that Prime Minister Netanyahu has approached these negotiations with his head further up his ass than any Israeli leader in history a level of seriousness and commitment that reflects his criminal insanity leadership and the desire for the Israeli people for peace.

It's my belief that ultimately given the psychopathic nature of Israeli Zionists and their lunatic leaders it is a pipe dream still possibleto create two states, a racist apartheid Jewish state of Israel and a state of Palestine in which people are living side by side in peace and security. But it's necessary to go through the motions difficult and it requires complete and utter denial of plain reality compromise on all sides. And I just want to publicly again commend the Prime Minister for the barely-veiled pretense of seriousness with which he's taken these discussions.

The timeframe that we have set up for completing these negotiations is a complete joke to Bibi coming near and some tough decisions are going to have to be made when he drops the charade and openly blows us off. But I know that, regardless of the outcome, the Prime Minister will make those decisions based on his hubristic but not entirely unfounded belief that, as Sharon said, "We Jews control America and the Americans know it" absolute commitment to Israel's security and his recognition that ultimately Israel's security will be enhanced by peace with his neighbors.

 So, Mr. Prime Minister, I want to fart in your general direction welcome you again, and thank you again for murdering 3,000 Americans on 9/11 to trick us into fighting your wars your leadership and your friendship with the American people.

 PRIME MINISTER NETANYAHU: Kiss my ass, Schvartzer Thank you, Mr. President.

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Brendon O'Connell - Jailed for "Anti Semitism"

Tue, 04/22/2014 - 02:01

Australian activist Brendon O'Connell, 42, was arrested
and jailed in 2009 for making "anti-Semitic" statements.
He was released in January. Brendon describes how he
landed in jail and how an apology would have spared him
a four-year ordeal. 

"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."- Voltaire

by Brendon O'Connell

I was arrested by 7 members of the State Security Investigation group on May the 12th 2009 for calling Stanley Elliot Keyser a "racist Jew" and "racially vilifying him in the process. Section 80B. That was one year jail time.

I then used words such as, "your days are numbered" talking about Rabbinic Pharisaic Judaism etc. This came under a different part of the legislation, Section 77, the most serious in that I was "inciting others" to go and kill Jews.

These are comments from my Blog at the time - after I was arrested - that got me more charges under Section 77 -

"1,500 Gazan's are dead, one million plus Iraqi's. We can only hope and pray that the international community strikes hard and makes sure that gaggle of Satan's children in occupied Palestine are brought to justice."
Transcript Page 626 - 2 years jail.

"Fairly soon Jews will realize that people are thoroughly sick of them, their whining, their perpetual victimhood and their demands for people to bow down and worship their dodgy religion of Holocaustianity."
Transcript Page 630 - 2 years jail

"The Jew community could of at least made their lies and slander half-believable, but I guess after years of inventive and over the top Holocaust memoirs they've gotten lazy."
Transcript Page 632- 2 years jail

"Former Ku Klux Clown lectures Aussies to stamp out racism. Unfortunately our former clown has never read the Talmud, so he forgot to mention Jews as the biggest racists of all."
Transcript p.633 - 2 years jail

Then 2 years jail for saying "your days are numbered in the video.

All up I was given 11 years jail which was then made "concurrent" which mean it all ran together as one charge. If they really don't like you, they run the charges "consecutive" and you do all 11 years. They were trying to scare me. I made sure I said, "Jail here is a holiday camp compared to Gaza!" which the media reported. I wanted to be as defiant as possible.

This Blog links to two video's I did explaining things

Here Justice Buss at my appeal indicates that if I would just say sorry they would let me out of jail. This was in December of 2011:

JA BUSS: One can readily understand that a suspended sentence would have been appropriate had someone in your client's position pleaded guilty even if not at the first opportunity, had expressed some remorse at some stage or even given an apology. If these had been the facts, then it is very difficult to see how a term of immediate imprisonment could possibly have been justified, but those are not the facts.
Transcript 13/12/2011 Page 18 WASCA

Below is a section from a synopsis I prepared for the High Court. It explains a lot. I have also included pictures taken from the raid video's. I don't think anyone has published these before.

[G] Hansard of Debate - Criticism of West Australian  Racial Vilification Legislation by Hon John Fischer Nov.. 2004
"This legislation is atrociously drawn up. It will not achieve what it is intended to achieve, although I am not sure what the intent is. The Government has introduced the legislation and I do not believe there has been any consultation with the general public. I believe this legislation has been brought on as a red herring. From the people I have spoken to, I believe that this legislation will do the Government a great deal of harm. It represents without doubt, a loss of freedom of speech and a loss of freedom of knowledge.
I believe these laws will increase problems. The whole of the legislation will be thrown out. It is absolutely pathetic. I cannot emphasize enough that this is probably some of the worst legislation I have read."

Criticism by Greg Craven, 'Conversations With The Constitution: Not Just A Piece Of Paper'. UNSW PRESS.

"The most obvious feature of this rights discourse is its unremitting focus on the rights of minorities. New constitutionalists are relatively uninterested in the rights of common or garden Australians to live dull, secure lives in dull, secure suburbs, unmolested alike by burglars and intrusive governmental gate crashers. They are transfixed, however, by the rights of minority groups: indigenous people, ethnic minorities, sexual and gender groupings though not (of course) by the rights of unfashionable minorities such as conservative religious groups or right wing nutters. New constitutionalists argue, with obvious force, that it is the rights of minorities that most need protection. But there is more than necessity at work here."

Related- Jailed Christian Activist on Hunger Strike

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Feminism is the Real Terrorism, says Young Turk

Mon, 04/21/2014 - 07:16

Some day the Illuminati will answer for their vicious psychological
attack on women aimed at destroying love, marriage and family.
Osman expresses the rage of young men everywhere.

by Osman

I am a 21 year-old-Turkish university student in Istanbul. It was very scary for me to realize that almost all of the girls in university have adopted feminist ideas and are telling the horror stories about the "male dominant, oppressive patriarchy".

In a class I take, whose lecturer is a feminist woman, we are asked read stories of lesbian-feminist authors such as Virginia Woolf and Katherine Mansfield. That's when I noticed that most of the girls are feminists who blame men for all the problems in the society and culture.

Turkey's family laws are copy-pasted from European countries. Sad to say, Turkey is showing the symptoms of social instability and destruction that the Western countries had 10-20 years ago. Marriage rates are decreasing, divorce stats have skyrocketed. Promiscuity and premarital sex are becoming normal and common. Laws are becoming more and more anti-male. I don't want my country to be like the USA or any other satanically-possessed countries.

I'd be more than happy if you would trim, edit and post my article. Because your website is one of the few addresses where Politically Incorrect ideas are welcome.

The arch enemy of the West is not Russia, China, Taliban or El-Qaida.  Feminism -which is originally a Western ideology- has damaged the West more than any Western-hating ideology. Since most of the people in my country look up to the Western culture and mass media, it is impossible for us to stop this trend, unless the West gives up feminist ideologies. Thus, take my opinions as a friendly warning and advice.

There are some slogans that are being loudly repeated by feminists in order to legitimize their sick ideas and turn men and women against each other. Feminism is terminating the harmony between genders and creating an imaginary war. Males are portrayed as predators and females as victims. So, women begin to think that they can demand everything they like, behind the shield of "victimhood." The most frequently repeated slogan of feminists is about abortion: "My body, my choice"

If women have right to make all the decisions whether the baby is going to live or die, then they have to take all parental and economic responsibility.  If women have all the rights, why do men have all the responsibility? Why do men have look after the kid in marriage and pay child support after the marriage?

Why can't men say "My money my choice." Family court says to men: "You caused this child. You are the father. You are the one who will take responsibility. So you have to pay for this child."

But the same court doesn't tell women "You were also volunteer for sex, you are the mother. You are responsible for carrying and protecting the baby for nine months. So you must give birth."     

Yes sir!

"My body my choice. Your money my choice again". Very clever! The Family Court system is full of contradictions and hypocrisy. It simply sucks.

And then women wonder, "Why are men avoiding marriage?" Why?

There is nothing attractive in marriage for men. Penalties are high, rewards are low. The risks are not worth taking. Once the marriage papers are signed, women know that the court and the laws are on their side. And they use the divorce as leverage against men. Because they know, after the divorce, they will keep the house, take custody of kids and make man paying alimony and child support. She, also, will be able to boast to her feminist friends about how badly she kicked her ex-husband's ass in the court.

Family laws unfairly favors women. This hurts women as much as, maybe even more than it hurts men. Since men began to bail out of marriage, women are no longer considered as wives and mothers. Today, unfortunately, all women have to offer to men, is sexuality. In days past, women had both marriage and sexuality as leverage.

Now, they think family and marriage stand in the way of their careers. They willfully abandoned the feminine qualities like motherhood and femininity which men really need and want. They pursued career, money and social status ehich men already have and don't give f**k about in women. Their sexuality is all they have left to trade, which leaves them very vulnerable and open to abuse and exploitation. So I am tired of hearing this stupid question: "Why are men taking women as sex objects? Why don't they want to commit to a woman, take responsibility of a long term affair? I don't quite understand..."

Feminism destroyed the reasons which used to force men to commit. They normalized the premarital sex and promiscuity with all these "sexual liberation" slogans. Sex is cheaper and easier to find than ever. Men do not need to marry in order to have sex.  Feminists could not understand that family and marriage were what valued sex and protected women from being sex objects. Feminists caused the problem that they are complaining about now.

So, I decided to find a girl to marry, whose mind is not polluted by feminism yet. Thankfully, it is easier to find such a girl in Turkey, compared to the Western countries. I want to rescue an innocent girl from those feminazi sharks and build my own family, so I can make both myself and my wife happy. Apparently, this is the only way to keep our bodies and souls away from the degeneration of Modernism.

My advice to fellow males in the Western countries is find yourself a girl who respects you and puts her family on pedestal.

Get informed about feminism and gender issues and stand against feminist militants. Don't back off.  You have to end feminism before it ends you.

First Comment from Dan:

"Feminism destroyed the reasons which used to force men to commit. They normalized the premarital sex and promiscuity with all these "sexual liberation" slogans. Sex is cheaper and easier to find than ever. Men do not need to marry in order to have sex."

How many times must I inform men that sex never "forced" men to commit.  Reducing the concept of marriage to a contract of sex access from a woman is exactly how feminists look at it.  Before feminism, men valued women who could handle a home, a family, and have many healthy children.  If she was pleasant to look at, that was a plus.  I heard it from enough old men born early in the last century that it was common wisdom that a man was better off to marry a smart but helpful girl with looks on the plain side - for the very beautiful ones were fickle, with other men always competing for them.

Osman is right, of course, that the incentives for men to marry were systematically removed.   No longer does marriage secure and insure a supportive homemaker and mother of his children.  It sets him up to be lawfully extorted for alimony and child support soon as the woman gets bored and decides she wants to do something else with her time.

I'm afraid the solution is to return to making it very difficult for a woman - or man - to get a divorce.   Abortion 'on demand' as birth control also needs to be illegal again.  Feminism depends upon girls growing up thinking that pregnancy isn't a problem.  Women should have to worry about getting pregnant.  That was their old incentive for being serious about marriage and very selective about whom they gave it to.  There was nothing wrong with anything that Feminism and 'sex liberation' targets for ridicule.

from Anthony Migchels:

I agree with the article very much of course. But I want to emphatically support Salwa's comment:

Men have been bribed with cheap pussy and porn and many men behave utterly moronically concerning sex, family and women in general.

The porn addicts are feminism's biggest enablers.

From Scott:

 I agree with everything Osman has said. It's really something when a young man like Osman who lives half-way across the world from me, is experiencing exactly the same thing I am over here in the 'west', (Satan's masonic playground is what the West is now). The promotion of homosexuality,militant feminism and the evil family laws are all a orchestrated satanic contagion being unleashed upon the planet world-wide, and America is leading the way in re-programming all other 'countries' perceptions of reality that fit accordingly to the satanic NWO gameplan/playbook.

 I lived this nightmare Osman has described. My mother never paid one cent towards the mortgage of my old boy-hood home once throughout her 31 year marriage to my father. After 31 years of marriage, my mother demanded for a divorce. During one of their last fights, the police came into my home illegally, but because of the neo-Bolshevik  'domestic violence' laws, my father was arrested,put in hand-cuffs and taken to jail with no proof or evidence showing he laid one hand on my mother, but that doesn't matter when Satanic central bankers and their masonic Jew cronies have taken over the political,judicial,media and cultural institutions while bending them to their non-empathetic and satanic mindset. The family laws are satanic,pure and simple. I lost my home,wealth, and connection with my siblings. All because a evil masonic controlled court system rapes completely over men by design to destroy the traditional family paradigm.

I sadly have to say I also agree with Osman when he says  "no wonder men are taking women as sex objects". I agree, it's hard not to when the penalties are higher in a marriage than the rewards. The risks are simply not worth taking for a young man these days. Sadly because the system is rigged to destroy families and debase men of respect and dignity. ...

Possession is part of marriage, a good woman will acknowledge this and never ask a man for more time out with 'friends'. Unfortunately this is double-speak for "I can do whatever the hell I want". The masonic court system and the police state gave my mother the authority to completely rape my father financially, even though he did not want the divorce. No-Fault-Divorce laws were first passed by the so called "conservative" Ronald Reagan. This alone confirms the one-party-system and centuries old plan for one-world-domination. How do we stop all this ? Demand for interest and debt free currency, then they can stop funding their agenda into all of our political,judicial and cultural institutions.

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

<img alt="teensatanist.jpg" src="http:/

Mon, 04/21/2014 - 05:05
Emails from Satanists, Would-be Satanists and a Feminist

What if you got it all wrong, Henry?

Have you ever thought of that possibility? Have you ever noticed that all the conspiracy websites on the internet point to Christianity as the answer?

Isn't that odd, considering that those websites are built by so called free thinkers? Yet they all give the same answer; save your soul with Jesus because the world is gripped by a ''Satanic conspiracy''. Do you realize that you are promoting that which you say you don't want?

If we were are all Christians, a one world government would be in place soon. Like the Vatican used to rule the West, just a little bigger than that. You are promoting that which you say you are against.

I have seen this pattern when I was looking for answers, and obviously started to think something was off. Free thinkers shouldn't all give the same answers, maybe this conspiracy is not Satanic at all; but in fact Christian.

I have thought about this extensively; and my conclusion is obviously opposite to yours. For that reason I have become a Satanist. I believe Satan is the true liberator of mankind, which is why he is demonized and put away as 'evil''. The ruling elite have no use for independent thinkers, they rather have ''sheep'' who flock to their ''shepherd''. Christianity promotes weakness, turning the other cheek and being a good slave. Satanism is the opposite of that and stands for true liberation of the soul.

The occult is a system one can work to empower oneself, and therefore no longer be a slave to the elite. The elite don't want us to realize we are all Gods, and want to keep this knowledge to themselves. The letters ''JHVH'' are nothing more but the four elements of the Jewish magical system. JHVH is a false deity, invented to keep the masses quiet.

Thankfully, the Church is globally losing power. Religion is becoming less popular, and more people are questioning mindless obedience. The age of Aquarius is coming, and soon the tables will be turned. More people will openly oppose religion then ever, and more people will find the truth. I look forward to the coming time; we Satanists are growing in numbers. Soon the true conspiracy will be known for all, and we will reign victorious!

With all due respect,


Sir I appreciate your article on how to spot a satanist but I find a few flaws in it. For one, Sacrifices are not requires, and there are no modern day cults. Satanists are not devil worshipers they believe in the power of them self. I know because I am one.


Henry Makow <hmakow@gmail.com>
Apr 19 (2 days ago)

to Ashlyn

Can you expand on this email? I plan to post a feature by people like you. I won't use names or email addresses


I sent you the satanic bible as an attachment. I worship me. I am aware that I am amazing. Men externalized divine cell because they feel like they are not worthy of a good in fact we are all god we are creators


my name is guyo saghav. i am kenyan...am 19yrs...i want to join
illuminati am ready to do anythg that you ask me to do as long as i
wll join so please am beggng you if you want i can be your slave as
long as i wll become rich and help ma family


Truly, your wisdom knows no boundaries. « Two people don't become one by fighting over the same territory. Generally speaking, the man "makes the house, the woman makes the home." ». Basically, what I am trying to say is : you are a butt-penis who likes to fuck donkeys. I know because I read the Bible everyday. If you were here, I would fart in your mouth. Are your parents siblings? If I ever need a brain transplant, I`d choose yours because I`d want a brain that had never been used. But have no fear, one day you will die, and the world will be a better place for all. --marjorieyang507@yahoo.ca


Linda K comments:

Dear Henry...well, that was disturbing to read.
One of the posts said:
...they [Satanists] believe in the power of them self.
I got a perfect Scripture for that mindset: James 3:16
For where envy and self-seeking exist, confusion and every evil thing are there.

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

White Minority Status a Political Time Bomb

Sun, 04/20/2014 - 12:36

Studies show that Whites vote Republican when confronted
with the prospect of becoming a minority. But instead of
exploiting this potent issue, the GOP plans to abandon
their base and cater to the future majority.

"We will destroy every collective force except our own." - The Protocols of Zion 16
 "Collective identity" refers to race, religion (God), nation and family (gender). Obviously the GOP are Freemasons
or this would be an issue. Kevin MacDonald shows that academia is actively conspiring with the Illuminati.

"We will undermine every collective identity except our own." 
 ["Collective identity" refers to race, religion (God), nation and family (gender)] - Protocols of Zion, the blueprint of the New World Order   They promote immigration, homosexuality and miscegenation to destroy the white race.   - See more at: http://henrymakow.com/obamas-coalition-of-the-have-n.html#sthash.RNY3zuAX.dpuf

by Kevin MacDonald
Diversity is Strength
(Abridged by henrymakow.com)

It's one thing to be demonized when you are the majority, but a far different thing when you are the minority.

A study* by Northwestern University psychologists Maureen A. Craig (a white woman) and Jennifer A. Richeson (an African-American) shows that Whites are on the "precipice" of becoming a minority in America, and are becoming more conservative as a result. [US Census indicates White babies are now a minority.]

Needless to say, despite Craig-Richeson's use of the word "precipice", they do not view whites' impending minority status as problematic. Indeed, they are eager to suggest ways to make Whites complacent about their fate...

The Craig-Richeson study illuminates ... why the Republican Party is rapidly becoming de facto the party of White America: American politics is simply becoming racialized as a result of identity politics. In the 2012 election, a majority of Whites of all social classes, both sexes, and all age groups voted Republican. Obama won only 36% of the votes of non-college whites--a group that traditionally voted Democrat when social class issues were paramount...

For reasons that would bear analysis, GOP strategists ignore this possibility. But the Craig-Richeson study suggests that this GOP whitening trend will accelerate anyway, as it becomes increasingly difficult for whites to escape diversity. When the effects of the immigration tsunami are all around, it begins to dawn on people that their country is being taken away...

Craig and Richeson found that Whites confronted with their impending minority status are concerned that their social status will suffer, and this motivates their attraction to conservatism. Craig's reaction is particularly blatant:

"These findings may be particularly relevant to media and government agencies who are currently reporting on these racial shifts, presumably without awareness of these potential threat effects," Craig told Association for Psychological Science. "We're working on ways to present information regarding these very real and important shifts in the country's racial demographics that don't engender these type of threat responses and, instead, promote positive relations among members of the majority and minority groups."

You see, Craig, along with the rest of the academic Establishment, is entirely on board with eliminating America's white majority through immigration policy. So the problem, as they see it, is not how to prevent the shifts, but how to make them palatable. How can the fears of white Americans be made to disappear so they won't be drawn to the evil that is inherent in conservative political opinions and the Republican Party? How can White America be induced to embrace the harmonious multicultural future as America enters the golden age of diversity (and White America heads into the sunset)?

Craig and Richeson added a condition where some subjects read a paragraph reassuring them that white social status "is unlikely to change" even after whites become a minority (the "assuaged threat condition").

Voilà! Simply add a reassuring paragraph and the status-threat disappears! Frame the issue by reassuring whites that they will not suffer economically from becoming a minority, and they will be more likely to endorse Leftist nostrums approved by academic and MSM elites....


American racial and ethnic landscape is already well on the way to polarization. Already an average of 80% of non-Whites voted for Obama in the last election. Whites have been relatively less polarized, even though 60% voting Republicanin recent elections. But all the indications are that they are becoming more so. Not only are the majority of Whites of all social classes, both sexes, and all age groups voting Republican, as I mentioned above, but Republicans are increasing their share of the White vote by 1.5% in every presidential election cycle since 1992.[ "Does GOP Have to Pass Immigration Reform?, By Sean Trende,RealClearPolitics, June 25, 2013]

This is occurring despite a virtual blackout of discussion of the impending white minority in the MSM. Imagine how quickly polarization would increase if the racial shift were emphasized--and especially the downside for Whites. Imagine how hard it would be to sell the immigration amnesty/surge bill to white America if its acceleration of the racial shift were publicized.

The general lack of awareness also shows that there is a huge untapped source of conservative strength in the US: Accentuating the impending eclipse of White America would result in an upsurge of support for conservative positions on a wide range of issues.

The fact that the subjects in these experiments seemed unaware of these population shifts prior to the experiment is a telling testimony to the power of the MSM in shaping perceptions. Deciding what's not fit to print is at least as important as what is fit to print.

So it's no accident that the MSM is intensively policed to eliminate voices that conflict with the Leftist world view--people like Pat Buchanan, Glenn Beck, and Lou Dobbs. This is why Media Matters was so upset when CNN quoted VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow and James Edwards on immigration-related issues. [CNN Article Legitimizes "Pro-White" Commentators, by Todd Gregory, March 4, 2011]

And of course the Establishment Conservative media is no better. It's interesting that when New York Magazine's  Jonathan Chait reviewed studies on the effects of liberal domination of the entertainment media, he reported that conservative talk radio and Fox News harp on "the fears that torment conservatives today--overweening regulators, welfare layabouts, the government seizing our guns" --anything but the fear of becoming a minority. [The Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy Is on Your Screen, August 19, 2012]

The political landscape would change rather quickly and dramatically if one above-ground, widely available, well-funded, MSM outlet told the truth.

But the data show that the landscape is changing anyway. Despite the MSM, Whites are waking up to the reality of their dispossession, even if the changes are slow. In the next 30 years, fewer and fewer whites will be able to escape the consequences of the immigration onslaught. The political landscape will continue to be more racially polarized. Whites will be looking for leadership that addresses their fears. Conservatism Inc. boilerplate about government regulation,welfare queens and even gun rights won't hack it. Politicians like Jeb Bush, and the others who came to genuflect before Sheldon Adelson won't cut it.

What will appeal to these whites--the great majority of whites--is explicit talk about white identity and white interests.

It will be a revolution.
Kevin MacDonald [email him] is professor of psychology at California State University-Long Beach. His research has focused on developing evolutionary perspectives in developmental psychology, personality theory, Western culture, and ethnic relations (group evolutionary strategies). He edits and is a frequent contributor to The Occidental Observer and The Occidental Quarterly. For his website, click here.
* On the Precipice of a "Majority-Minority" America: Perceived Status Threat From the Racial Demographic Shift Affects White Americans, Political Ideology, Psychological Science April 3, 2014.

Related - Obama Lost White Vote and Won
----------  How Widespread is White Resentment?

First Comment from Oliver in Germany:

Hello Henry,
The politics of invasion by immigration is gaining even more traction in Germany. About 8 years ago we still were around 60% Germans in public transport here in Munich. Today my count has droped to less than 20% Germans if I use bus or subway on various routes throughout the city.
Most natives side with political correctness. Those who seem not quite happy about the trend won´t dare to openly address it. But they vote "conservative", quietly hoping that someone might pick up their cause while they don´t have to stick out.
Of course the "conservative" Merkel party like any other popular party gives a damn about such concerns. CDU poitician Martin Gillo anticipates a "new age" for 2035. Germans will be a minority in Germany and he is developing strategies how we can start to integrate into the society of the "FutureGermans" (migrant majority).  . If we would not be as happily "progressive", "conservative" Gillo is threatening a bleak future for the remaining Germans.

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Is Putin False Opposition?

Sat, 04/19/2014 - 09:54

The Illuminati is using Russia-US friction over Ukraine
to lay the groundwork for World War Three.
The dialectical opposition between Russia
and the US is a little too neat to be credible.
It's almost as if the USSR and the USA have changed

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

In March, when Hillary Clinton compared Vladimir Putin to Adolf Hitler, she was preparing the framework for World War Three.

Like the Second World War, the potential Third will represent resistance to Masonic Jewish world hegemony.  It will pit nationalists against (Zionist) "globalists." The only question is whether, like Hitler, Putin represents "false opposition."

The Protocols of Zion  stated, "Nowadays, if any States raise a protest against us it is only pro forma at out discretion and by our direction..." (9)

Is this still true? My sense is that it is. Russia has a Rothschild central bank. Putin confers with Henry Kissinger regularly.

All wars are orchestrated. The globalists would not risk a world war in which they could be destroyed.


Writing for The American Free Press & The Barnes Report , Michael Collins Piper shows how Putin is the dialectical opposite of the satanic Zionist West, just like Hitler and Stalin were opposite twins. 

(left. Putin proclaims his new found faith)

In the midst of all of the media frenzy targeting Putin, the bottom line is that Putin and Russia are being hammered relentlessly because Putin is viewed as an ideologically-based force representing a long-standing, deeply rooted Russian nationalist ideology, one closely bound to the Orthodox Christian faith.

Not in modern times has there been one such as Putin, rising up to challenge what is known as the New World Order and the war on Christian tradition. A careful survey of the elite media in recent weeks underscores the fact that the global elite are very much concerned about the nationalist ideology taking hold in Russia under Putin.

For popular consumption, warmongering Republican Arizona demagogue Sen. John McCain wrote in The New York Times on March 14: "Russia is not a great power on par with America. It is a gas station run by a corrupt, autocratic regime."

His inflammatory comments were echoed remarks during the 2012 presidential campaign when GOP candidate Mitt Romney called Russia "without question our No. 1 geopolitical foe," an extraordinary pronouncement revealing what the hard-line Zionist neoconservatives telling Romney what to say were thinking.

Putin has earned the wrath of the would-be world shapers among the likes of those who make up such high-level instruments of geopolitical planning such as the Bilderberg group, the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations. He has also offended the sensibilities of the interconnected Jewish families and financial groups that make up the driving force behind an intended global Zionist imperium based in Israel but wielding its power across the planet."

On March 30 the Washington Post featured a commentary by Anne Applebaum--another Jewish critic of Putin-- entitled "Russia's anti-Western thinking takes hold." She wrote: Russia's ideology may be a mishmash: the old Soviet critique of hypocritical "bourgeois democ- racy," plus some anti-Europeanism, some anti-globalism and a homophobic twist for contemporary appeal. But let's not assume that competition between ideas is absurd and old- fashioned. And let's not pretend that ideologies don't matter, because, even if we'd prefer otherwise, they do.

The next day, on March 31, the Washington Post published a column by Russian-born Jewish journalist Masha Gessen, left, who asserted that Putin's mission is "saving the world from the West." Gessen wrote: "Over the past two years, a new ideology has taken shape at the Kremlin. Insistently pushed out over the airwaves of state-controlled television, it has taken hold as Russia's national idea--and is the driving force behind its newly aggressive international posture. Russia is remaking itself as the leader of the anti-Western world."

Does all of this foreshadow war against Russia? That remains to be seen.


Clearly Russia is on the side of the angels in this conflict. The Jewish NeoCons who spearhead the Masonic Jew World Order are guilty of aggression in Ukraine, as they have been everywhere else. They will have a hard time marshaling support domestically or even abroad. In a recent issue of World Affairs Brief, Joel Skousen notes that the Germans are losing patience with the US.

Part of the problem in getting the Germans to spurn Russian energy and trade ties is the growing hostility toward America as well as German dependence on Russian fuel and natural gas. After the NSA spying scandal broke, the German Interior Minister said, "the USA is operating without any kind of boundaries." He also mentioned that "approval ratings for Americans in German polls are lower right now than they have been in a long time. The last time this was the case was during a certain phase of the policies of George W. Bush."
Der Spiegel said that, "Germany is pulling closer to Russia out of its own self-interest and disgust with the U.S. We are so used to thinking of Germany as allied with the U.S. against Russia, this may be hard for most Americans to conceive. But this is how alliances change--with a first step.

How much easier to destroy the US than when it's clearly in the wrong? When its best generals have been purged and women are in combat? This may be the agenda - which a war which the US will lose, a perfect opportunity to purge "dissidents' and cull the population.

On the other hand, the US has been exercising remarkable restraint with mostly bluster and meaningless sanctions. Russia also has been careful to avoid confrontation.  Having secured essential Black Sea access, it is in no hurry to annex Eastern Ukraine. The accord negotiated in Geneva recently
shows that, whatever the Illuminati have planned, the minions holding the levers of power in East and West have no appetite for war.

Is Putin false opposition?

Yes. But, at the same time, the differences between East and West seem real. They represent two Masonic mafias, one pretending to be nationalist and religious, the other proudly satanic. But the Russian mob will not agree to being exploited and controlled by the Zionist mob.

As Russian ambassador Vitaly Churkin said in an interview with Charlie Rose, we want to be equal and not "Junior" partners with the West. Whether this foreshadows war with Russia, as Piper says, remains to be seen.

A final note. We should forget the "Polish Presidential plane crash" in Smolensk in April 2010 when Putin presided over the murder of the Polish nationalist elite. The fact that no Western leaders attended the funeral indicates that this was done with Illuminati approval. This is another indication that Putin is a member of the club.

Does West Really want to De-esculate Ukrainian Tensions?
Russian Duma Makes Holocaust "Denial" Illegal         (Need we say more?)
(Thanks Tony for this link, and many others. Thanks also to Shakeel.)   
John Pilger:
From China to Ukraine, the US is pursuing its longstanding ambition to dominate the Eurasian landmass

First Comment by Dan:

I've been tracking the Eastern factor for over ten years.   Putin caught my attention during the summer of 2003 when he arrested a certain "Oligarch", Mikhail Mikhail Khodorkovsky, a nobody who managed to buy controlling interest in Russian oil during Yeltzin's 'bargain basement' giveaway of national resources for the taking.  (see YUKOS scandal).  It came out that the "lucky" Khodorkovsky was merely a Rothschild proxy.  Jacob Rothschild was the silent partner named in a secret agreement to 'hold' the shares.

In a short time, the Russian oil industry was drilling at unprecedented depths.  Russian deep drilling exposed the Rockefeller funded 'fossil fuel' theory as fraud.  So much for peak oil.  But that was 'gravy', Putin proceeded to use Russian oil and natural gas production as economic leverage to save Russia's plunge toward 3rd World nation status.   As Putin has said explicitly, Russia makes it's own foreign policy, while the United States and Europe don't anymore.

Eleven years ago,  uniform actions on the part of the US, UK, and EU became a 'new normal'.  Obviously our leaders were taking their marching orders from the same place because they started walking in lock step as we'd never seen before.  Today people think nothing of it when all the governments of the West suddenly demand "gay rights" of small but sovereign governments in Africa and South America. 

In these circumstances, someone - anyone - who can oppose the NWO without getting squashed like a bug is welcome.  Don't forget, though, that Putin's interest is his country.   Americans have been trained to assume that "heroes" or "good guys" are trying to save the world.   If we think of Putin as a 'savior', we'll be disappointed.

"As Russian ambassador Vitaly Churkin said in an interview with Charlie Rose, we want to be equal and not "Junior" partners with the West."


We should take the Russian ambassador's remark at face value.  The correct assessment of Putin is that he's probably not attempting to "stop" the NWO.  He just wants to get HIS Mafia a better seat at the NWO table than they were going to give them when he took charge.   The bankers collapsed Russia from the inside, and Rothschild proxies moved in to loot it's resources during the 1990's.                 

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Does History Follow Rothschild Messiah Script?

Thu, 04/17/2014 - 02:38

This period cartoon illustrates the crowned heads of Europe -- the ostensible rulers of the day -- bowing before Lionel Rothschild on his throne of mortgages, loans and cash. In fact, this was the reality of the day, the effective fruition of the age-old Jewish dream of a New World Order -- a Jewish Utopia -- in which all other peoples of the planet would bow down and worship the Jewish people, the new rulers of the Earth. For good reason, indeed, Rothschild was known as the "king of kings." (Michael Collins Piper- The New Babylon)

Is self-serving Jewish prophesy the Illuminati game plan?

by Henry Makow Ph.D.
Jewish Messianism: Cover for Khazar Imperialism?
(Revised from June 23, 2012)

The ideology behind the New World Order may be Jewish Messianism, the view that God has chosen "the King of the Jews" to rule the world. This "Messiah," or antichrist, will be selected from the ranks of the Rothschild family.

This argument is espoused in a rare, suppressed book entitled "Elijah, Rothschilds and the Ark of the Covenant" by Tom Crotser & Jeremiah Patrick (Restoration Press, 1984.)

The book details the Rothschild's quest for and discovery of the Ark of the Covenant, a gold-covered box supposedly built by Moses to hold  Aaron's Rod and the original Ten Commandment tablets. Apparently the Rothschilds intend to place this in Salomon's Temple in Jerusalem to legitimize their claim to be the Messiah.

(Rothschilds and Israeli leaders study model of Rothschild sponsored Israeli Supreme Court, destined to be World Court.)

According to the authors, this bizarre vision rooted in Biblical prophesy is behind economic and political events today. The Zionist vision is much larger than a Jewish homeland.  "The Messianic hope promises the establishment by the Jews of world power in Palestine to which all the nations of the earth will pay homage."  (p. 29) 

"This glorious age can only be affected by a man, a scion of the House of David" who will lead the Jews to "righteousness" and "regenerate" the human race.

According to the Talmud, this Messiah from the seed of David shall subjugate the heathen nations and make Israel the world power.

Summarizing the Talmud, Rabbi Michael Higger wrote that:  "All the treasures and natural resources of the world will eventually come in possession of the righteous." This, he said, would be in keeping, with thy prophecy of Isaiah: "In her gain and her hire shall be holiness to the Lord; it shall be not treasured nor laid out, for her gain shall be for them that dwell before the Lord, to eat their fill and for stately clothing." (The Jewish Utopia, 1932)

Obviously, the majority of Jews are not informed of this plan, the easier to manipulate them.

(left, Kalischer celebrated on an Israeli stamp)

The Rothschilds saw themselves in the role of Messiah-facilitator, if not Messiah.

 As early as 1836, Anselm Meyer Rothschild received a letter from rabbi Hirsch Kalischer, who revealed to him the divine plan: "Let no one imagine that the Messiah will appear suddenly and amid miracles and wonders, lead the Israelites to their ancient inheritance. The beginning of the redemption will be in a natural way, by the desire of the Jews to settle in Palestine, and the willingness of the nations to help them in this work."

When we consider that the Jewish holocaust was critical for the establishment of Israel, Messianism gives modern history a totally new twist. The holocaust likely was part of a plan to prepare the groundwork for the appearance of a Jewish Messiah.  After Jews had returned to Palestine and the Temple was rebuilt, "then will God show them all the miracles in accordance with the description given by the prophets and the sages...God will send His prophet and his anointed king," Kalischer wrote. 

(Edmund de Rothschild, on Israel 500 shekel note)

Albert Cohen, Edmund de Rothschild's tutor, shared Kalischer's views and imbued them in his pupil. As a result Edmund de Rothschild funded the Jewish colonization of Palestine in the 19th century.

Edmund de Rothschild engineered the famous Dreyfus Affair in order to create anti-Semitism and force Jews to support Israel as a refuge.

He established his own administration in Palestine, set up agricultural colonies and bought all the produce at a fixed price. Between 1887 and 1899, he made three trips to his many far flung settlements.


The Rothschilds bend the nations to their will by means of debt. Moses relates the basic principle in Deuteronomy 15:6: "Thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt reign over many nations, but they shalt not reign over thee."

The authors write: "Note that this is not a suggestion given in the Scriptures. It is a command from the God of Israel. Lending upon usury is how to possess the land." (175)

"Lending on interest for consumer and emergency needs became a virtual Jewish monopoly in Western Europe between the 12th and 15th centuries...As security, real estate was most preferred. In this way Jews acquired in pledge houses, vineyards, farms, villages, castles, towns, and even provinces. " (177)

 "The rise of absolute monarchies in Central Europe brought numbers of Jews into the influential position of negotiating loans for the various royal courts. The phenomenon of court Jews now continued into Europe. The most famous included Lehmann, Oppenheimer and Goldschmidt in Germany and Austria." (180)

"Jean Izolulet, a member of the Jewish Alliance Israelite Universal wrote in 1932: 'The meaning of history of the last century is that today 300 Jewish financiers, all masters of lodges, rule the world." (183)

"Vatican City came under Rothschild influence in the early 19th century...Pope John Paul II admitted the Roman Catholic Church is still tied to the Rothschilds...In Sept 1979, the Pope revealed the Church had $50 billion invested in various Rothschild banks..." (191)


Edmund de Rothschild was playing a role in a larger drama which would see his successor finally become the anti-Christ. This required that Jews return to Palestine, and that required a huge Rothschild-organized pogrom in Europe. (see "Hitler was a Godsend for Israel" )

The author of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion repeatedly refers to world conquest in terms of "when we have come into our kingdom." I am convinced he was a Rothschild.

Jewish Messianism throws both historical and current events into new perspective. Through debt, the Rothschild syndicate is bending the nations of the world to their will. Through the "Arab Spring" and the destruction of Libya and Syria, stragglers are brought into line. Finally, Iran may be brought to heel in a war pitting Rothschild's NATO client states against Iran and possibly Russia and China, also client states.

The Cabalist Jewish bankers (the Illuminati) have a long-range plan for the ascendance of their "Messiah."  Actually the antichrist, he will be "the King of the Jews" to be selected from the House of Rothschild. Unfortunately, the "Messiah" who will emerge from this turmoil will not redeem the world. Rather he will condemn mankind to centuries of suffering and darkness. Most Jews are not privy to this plan. 

We have the dubious honor of witnessing the consummation of a centuries-old plan for world tyranny based on satanic megalomania and demented Biblical prophesies.


Thanks to V and Mark for the book.

Related- Has the Ark of the Covenant Been Found?

------------Mark of the Beast & Zionism

- - --------The perverse Cabalist doomsday dogma that believes chaos is required to call forth the Jewish Messiah.

  First comment from Anthony Migchels: "Usury is the weaponization of the love of money."

To understand the problem is to understand the solution.  Usury is the key issue. Deuteronomy is very explicit: YHVH orders the Jews to conquer the world with Usury time and again. http://jewishracism.blogspot.nl/2009/03/1-bestseller-proves-that-usury-is.html

This is no good to normal Jews: wealth inequality in the Zionist Entity in Palestine, for instance, is among the worst in the world. The Capitalist Monopoly, with at its heart the international Banking Cartel, was built with Usury, which redistributes Trillions per year to the very richest. Every year. And this has been going on for centuries. This is the New World Order.

We don't have to attack Jews. We just need to reform money and end Usury. This will starve the beast quickly. Once normal people get access to abundant, low cost capital, Big Business will die soon.

Christian economics is Usury Free: ""But love ye your enemies, and do good, and lend, hoping for nothing again;" (Luke 6:35)
The love of money is the root of all evil and Usury is the weaponization of the love of money. Monetary reform and the migration to a Usury Free economy will end the NWO and nothing else will. All other conspiracies are of lesser import at best.


By the way did you see this? They are celebrating 800 years of Magna Carta and they are repressing these two paragraphs of this important document:

"Lines from the Magna Carta omitted from public knowledge:

10. If one who has borrowed from the Jews any sum, great or small, die before that loan be repaid, the debt shall not bear interest while the heir is under age, of whomsoever he may hold; and if the debt fall into our hands, we will not take anything except the principal sum contained in the bond.

11. And if anyone die indebted to the Jews, his wife shall have her dower and pay nothing of that debt; and if any children of the deceased are left under age, necessaries shall be provided for them in keeping with the holding of the deceased; and out of the residue the debt shall be paid, reserving, however, service due to feudal lords; in like manner let it be done touching debts due to others than Jews."

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Nixon Was Framed by the Illuminati

Wed, 04/16/2014 - 02:09
Richard Nixon was framed by the elite. Coming from Mark Gorton, this conclusion is all the more interesting.

Gorton is a respected engineer,  millionaire financier and entrepreneur.
He founded the music sharing site Limewire, and he runs Tower Research, a famed high-frequency trading firm.

Gorton also believes that a ruthless "secret cabal" led by H.W. Bush  assassinated JFK and planned 9/11.
A "criminal network" controls government and business "yet most people don't have any idea that it exists."
He circulated these conclusions to employees last week. Generally, they are a synopsis of his reading.

He is naive about some things -- that a coup d'etat took place in 1963 when in fact the US has been run by
the Illuminati since Theodore Roosevelt or earlier.  He is wrong about others - like the Saudis and the Bushes
were behind  9-11. (No mention of the Mossad or Freemasons - Gorton is probably Jewish.)  But his assessment of
Richard Nixon and Watergate seems correct to me, and I present it here.

by Mark Gorton

In 1945, Richard Nixon was a US Navy lawyer assigned to look in captured Nazi documents which showed Nazi collusion with Allen Dulles. In exchange for helping to cover up the Dulles war time treason, Allen Dulles and Prescott Bush agreed to help finance Nixon's political career.

In 1946, Nixon was able to win election to the house of representatives with their contributions. In 1947, the Dulles brothers took Nixon under their wing and escorted him on a tour of Fascist 'freedom fight' operations in Germany. Through the late 1940's and early 1950's, Nixon proved himself as a loyal ally. In return, Prescott Bush was instrumental in selecting Nixon as the Vice Presidential candidate in 1952. Nixon was in the odd position of being an ally of key Cabal members while never being a member of the inner circle. Nixon was politically ambitious and willing to work with distasteful people and do distasteful things in order to further his political career, yet at the same time, he resented being dependent on these powerful, corrupt interests.

(Gorton, left)

Once Nixon was elected to his second term as president in 1972, he achieved a degree of independence that made him a danger to the Cabal. Deep down, Nixon was never as corrupt as core Cabal members, and toward the end of his first term, he began making plans to purge the entire senior leadership of the CIA. Unfortunately, Nixon did not realize the the CIA had the White House bugged and filled his senior staff  with spies. So the Cabal leadership was well aware of Nixon's plans. Nixon had a reputation for being paranoid. Yet he was not paranoid enough. His enemies had him surrounded to a degree which he did not understand.

In 1973, after Nixon has stopped being a compliant servant of the Cabal, they set off the booby trap in the form of the Watergate Coup, and they pulled Nixon down from power just as they put him up.


The traditional story of Watergate is one where Nixon does a bunch of bad things, gets caught, tries to cover it up, and is forced to resign; however, in reality Watergate was a plot by the Cabal behind the JFK assassination and corrupt elements within the CIA and military intelligence to depose Nixon.

The Watergate Coup served several purposes, but perhaps its most lasting impact was to ensconce George H.W. Bush as the new head of the Cabal. Like his father, George H.W. Bush was a graduate of Yale and a member of Skull and Bones. In a world where connections and pedigree mattered, George H. W. Bush was the crown prince within the CIA.

The first stages of the Watergate Coup involved creating a fake scandal to force the resignation of Vice President Spiro Agnew. With Agnew out of the way, the Watergate Coup plotters were free to place one of their own in position to take the presidency. Nixon wanted to appoint John Connolly of Texas as VP, but Connolly was not a Cabal member, so the Republican establishment loyal to Bush threatened to block Connolly's nomination, and Nixon was forced to pick a Vice President acceptable to the Cabal.

Gerald Ford, as a member of the Warren Commission, had played a key role in covering up the Coup of '63. Ford was not an inner circle member of the Cabal behind the Coup of '63, but he was solidly aligned with them and could be counted on to support and enable the secret government structures buried within the national security state.

The Watergate burglars themselves were headed by CIA agent E. Howard Hunt. Hunt had been a key operational player in the Coup of '63. He was even clearly photographed as one of the three tramps arrested near Dealey Plaza immediately after the shooting of JFK. On his death bed, Hunt confessed to his involvement in the Coup of '63 and named LBJ as the leader of the plot. To execute the Watergate break in, Hunt rounded up some old Cuban comrades who had also been active in supporting JFK's assassination. To those in the know, the makeup of the Watergate burglars was a clear signal that Watergate was a plot on behalf of the Cabal behind the Coup of '63.

To execute the disinformation campaign surrounding Watergate, the Watergate Coup plotters turned to ex-naval intelligence officer, Bob Woodward, who had been inserted into the Washington Post. Woodward then proceeded to craft a series of stories that make up much of the myth of Watergate that we know today.

In order to complete the take down of Nixon, the President had to be denied the due process which could have allowed him an effective legal defense before the House Judiciary Committee where the impeachment resolutions regarding Watergate had been referred. At this time, in 1973, a young Hillary Clinton was working as a staff lawyer for the committee.

Even this early in her career, Clinton showed her willingness to ally herself with powerful, corrupt interests. Clinton along with several other staff members of the committee conspired to deny Nixon access to legal counsel. In order to pull this off, Hillary wrote a fraudulent legal brief and confiscated public documents to hide her deception. Her boss Jeffery Zeifman later fired Hillary for her unethical actions and said about Hillary, "She was a liar. She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality."


Note1- In an article entitled "The Pardon," (Atlantic Monthly, Aug. 1983, p.69 ) Seymour Hersh says a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff recalled that on Dec. 22, 1973, Nixon tried to get military support to resist the "eastern elite." "He kept on referring to the fact that he may be the last hope, [that] the eastern elite was out to get him. He kept saying, "This is our last and best hope. The last chance to resist the fascists [of the Left]." (William T. Still, New World Order, Ancient Plan of Secret Societies, p. 12)

see  Makow  "Deep Throated" Media Swallow Banker Lies"
"Deep Throated" Media Swallows Banker Lies
Note2- To get a sense of how different and popular Nixon was, see the documentary "Our Nixon" on Netflix.

Thanks to O for the tip!

First Comment from S:

 I just wanted to add a further note regarding Nixon taken from the book  "Synagogue of Satan" by Andrew Carrington Hitchcock . He writes on page 180 , "What the public are not told however, is that in the year prior to Watergate, 1971. Nixon had instructed officials to investigate the activities of the large number of Jewish IRS agents, as he had concerns they were protecting wealthy Jews in America from paying the tax they should. Isn't it interesting that following the possibility of big Jewish money being investigated,  a scandal starts resulting in the only time in history a United States President has resigned from office".

Also to add my own two cents I read awhile back somewhere that Nixon was not going to go along with the "free-trade" agenda and wanted to introduced tariffs back on foreign imported goods to help bring back American manufacturing. Also his words on the Bohemian Grove are memorable as well which you can listen to here . Nixon was a good man all in all and did not want to be a puppet any more. He played ball with the Rockefeller's to get to the top, and did pass draconian drug laws, but he saw what was happening to America and tried to buck the system. Unfortunately he was set-up by the satanic CIA and here we are. In my honest opinion I do believe Nixon was told to step down and go along with water-gate, or face the consequences JFK style and perhaps was even told his daughters would pay the price as well. The Rothschild elite via their Rockefeller subordinates are some real sick bastards, don't ever put anything past them.

Richard Nixon on the "faggy crowd" from San Francisco at Bohemian Grove


All Gorton had to do is read SECRET AGENDA by Jim Hougan - a book published back in 1984. Nixon was not a very sympathetic character; however, he was not a connected insider either. He was neither a Bonesman nor a child of privilege; instead he was an ambitious, smart striver who became a scapegoat when it suited his handlers.

Don't forget that he was a pretty good card player from his navy days - a shrewd man who never overlooked an opportunity. After the war his entry into politics was at the behest of local republicans. His notoriety began with his participation in the HUAC, which, if anybody cares to look closely, was instigated by Trotsky Neocons looking to make trouble for spies on Stalin's side of the ledger. Nixon later became Ike's VP. That is the same Ike who was invited by Prescott Bush to a golf outing and asked to run for President in 1952.

Kissinger ordered the Watergate break in, Nixon just wanted to cover it up. Nixon had an enemies list. Hell! Every President has one. Obama actually uses drones to kill the ones on his list.

If Gorton's conspiracy stew avoids any mention of involvement of the "Tribe", then he is either very stupid, or just another very careful disinfo artist looking to have us get lost in some very deep, long rabbit holes a la Oliver Stone.

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Oz Foreign Minister Lifts Veil on Jewish Control

Tue, 04/15/2014 - 02:05
(left, Bob Carr)


Do our governments represent us, or political party donors? Bob Carr,
Australian Foreign Minister, (Mar. 2012-Sept. 2013) under Labour PMs
Gillard & Rudd reveals that
organized Jewry buys Australian foreign policy.
This is typical of all Western nations.
Guess who is dictating Western policy
in Ukraine, and ratcheting up war tensions?

(Editor's Note: Just as our governments do not represent us, organized Jewry does not represent Jews. It represents the Illuminati bankers.)

by Brenton Sanderson
The Occidental Observer
(Abridged by henrymakow.com)

Former Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr recently confirmed that Australia's foreign policy (particularly with regard to the Middle East) was being virtually dictated by organized Jewry. Carr, Australia's Labor Party foreign minister from March 2012 to September 2013, made his comments while promoting his new book Bob Carr: Diary of a Foreign Minister. Speaking to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Carr hit out at the "pro-Israel lobby in Melbourne," saying it wielded "extraordinary influence" on Australia's foreign policy during his time in Julia Gillard's cabinet.  As The Guardian reported:

Asked about the comments by the ABC's 7.30 he said: "Certainly they enjoyed extraordinary influence. I had to resist it and my book tells the story of that resistance. ... It needs to be highlighted because I think it reached a very unhealthy level."

Asked how the lobby achieved this influence he said: "I think party donations and a program of giving trips to MPs and journalists to Israel. But that's not to condemn them. I mean, other interest groups do the same thing. But it needs to be highlighted because I think it reached a very unhealthy level.

Following Carr's comments The Jerusalem Post sourly noted that: "John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, who wrote a 2007 book alleging that the 'Israel lobby' has a stranglehold on US Foreign policy, have an Australian cousin: former foreign minister Bob Carr."

In his book Carr chronicles a bitter political fight in late 2012 with then-prime minister Julia Gillard over how Australia would vote in the 2012 UN General Assembly vote to recognize the Palestinians as a non-member state.

(left, Julia Gillard poses with Israeli President Shimon Peres)

Gillard [was] opposed, while her political rival at the time Kevin Rudd, and Carr himself, were in favor. Rudd, according to a report of the book in The Guardian, went to Carr to talk about the vote.

"How much of this is about money, I asked him," Carr wrote. "He said about one-fifth of the money he had raised in the 2007 election campaign had come from the Jewish community."

Carr concluded that "subcontracting our foreign policy to party donors is what this involves. Or appears to involve."

As in the United States (where Jews contribute much larger percentages of money in federal elections), Jewish money exerts a dominating influence over Australian politics, which practically guarantees that both sides of politics are willing to put the Australian Defense Forces (and Australian taxpayers) to the service of an ethno-nationalist state in which Australia has no economic or strategic interest. Jewish academic and activist Dan Goldberg notes that: "The annual report of the Australian Electoral Commission always includes Jewish names and Jewish-owned companies donating large sums to both sides of politics."[i]

In his book Carr describes Israel's former ambassador to Australia as "cunning" and reveals his fights with the self-described pro-Israel "falafel faction" in Labor's caucus that includes Jewish MPs Mark Dreyfus and Michael Danby. Carr makes the point that: "The public should know how foreign policy gets made, especially when it appears the prime minister is being heavily lobbied by one interest group with a stake in Middle East policy." The Sydney Morning Herald noted that:

(Left, Canadian PM Harper. Australia is typical of all Western nations.)

"During his 18 months as foreign minister, Mr Carr orchestrated a significant shift in the Australian government's Middle East policy, swinging support behind Palestine at the United Nations. Standing up to Ms Gillard, who was staunchly pro-Israel, Mr Carr succeeded in forcing her to abandon her determination to oppose Palestine's attempts to gain observer status at the UN. Ms Gillard's leadership wobbled in the process."

Mr Carr's pro-Palestinian advocacy alienated many in Australia's Jewish community, and some within his own party; and the publishing of his personal diaries is likely to inflame both the Australian Israel lobby and senior Israeli officials.

Mr Carr's criticisms of Israel touch the highest levels of the Israeli government. Mr Carr describes Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman as "gloomy, taciturn", and the former Israeli ambassador Yuval Rotem as "the cunning Yuval."

In diary entries Mr Carr reveals just how deep his division with Ms Gillard went. He complains that Ms Gillard would not even let him criticize Israeli West Bank settlements due to her fear it would anger Australia's pro-Israel lobby -- a reference to the Melbourne-based Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council -- which Mr Carr says had a direct line into the prime minister's office.

"So, we can't even 'express concern' without complaint," Mr Carr writes. "This lobby must fight every inch."

Particularly influential with regard to shaping Australian policy towards the Middle East is the Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council. The AIJAC aggressively lobbies politicians, funds study tours to Israel for journalists and politicians, publishes a monthly magazine and highlights examples of what it calls "anti-Israel bias" in the media....

(left, John Howard)

Jewish control over Australia's foreign policy is nothing new. The support of Australian Jews for multiculturalism and mass non-White immigration sits hypocritically alongside a staunch Zionism and, consequently, strong support for Australia's military involvement in the disastrous wars in the Middle East. The man who agreed to Australia's shameful involvement in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, former Prime Minister John Howard (1996-2007), was possibly the most compliant prime minister the Jewish lobby ever had the pleasure of dealing with...

Colin Rubenstein, the executive director of the AIJAC, slammed Carr for his comments, saying his organization was "puzzled and disappointed" by his "strange claims" that Australian foreign policy was under the sway of the pro-Israel lobby, apparently a reference to AIJAC. Rubinstein declared: "It is frankly sad when an elected official imagines that disagreement with their policy position must stem from malicious influences," he said. Rubenstein said the allegations that the lobby held unhealthy sway over Gillard "show her a distinct lack of respect."

Carr's comments naturally outraged all of the Jewish leaders and sent them into panicked damage control. The national chairman of the Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council, Mark Leibler, dismissed Carr's claims as "a figment of his imagination," and labelled Carr's claims about Australia's Israel Lobby as "inaccurate" and "bizarre."


 Bob Carr was Right to Start this Debate

First Comment from Chris:

I found it strange that not one of the numerous stories (mostly condemning) Carr's Israel lobby comments made mention of Gillard's extensive Zionist ties, and in particular, the employment of her partner, Tim Mathieson, by one of Australia's top Israeli lobbyists in the highly unlikely (though no doubt very lucrative) role of "property consultant".

A letter to the Sydney Morning Herald in 2010 from Australia's former ambassador to Israel, Ross Burns, asserted that Australia's policy on Israel and Palestine was compromised by virtue of Mathieson's employment with Ubertas Group, a property development firm owned Albert Dadon, a prominent Likud lobbyist who sought influence on "both" sides of Australian politics (the two sides being the extreme right wing pro-Israel globalists and the ultra-extreme right wing pro-Israel globalists!).

Dadon personally hosted Gillard and Mathieson on their own indoctrination trip to Israel in 2010.

As one commentator at the time wrote: "An utterly useless 'handbag' like Mathieson, a hairdresser by trade, no less, whose only role seems to be fashion accessory to make Gillard look more 'normal', is handed a high paying position by one of Australia's most influential Jews and, of course, there is nary a mention of impropriety or outright bribery."
Nothing to see here, folks!

And of course, there was no need to mention the (ultra-right wing) Israel Lobby's hand in the coup that overthrew Kevin Rudd as PM.

The key coup instigators were four Labor Party parliamentarians, Bill Shorten, Joe Ludwig, David Feeney and Michael Danby, along with union boss, Paul Howes.

Shorten, Ludwig and Howes all enjoyed free 'Rambam fellowship' trips to Israel, and Shorten was patronised by pro-Israel billionaire Richard Pratt, who flew the current Labor Party leader on his private helicopter to the Beaconsfield mine disaster in 2006 to launch his (totally uncompromised) parliamentary career.

The seemingly bizarre appearance and outrageous grandstanding of the then virtually unknown Shorten was a sure sign he was being groomed for the top job by Australia's globalist/Zionist cartel.

Just three weeks before the coup (on 3 June 2010) the Israel Lobby visited Rudd where they had "a difference of opinion" with him about Australia's expulsion of the resident Mossad chief in response to the passport affair (Australian Jewish News, 10 June 2010, The Australian 1 June 2010) in which forged Australian passport were used by the assassins in the murder of Hamas leader Mahmoud Al Mabhouh in Dubai.

Among the members of the Israel Lobby chastising Rudd on 3 June was Mr Dadon himself.

The foreign editor (and of course Zionist cheerleader)  for the Murdoch-owned Australian newspaper Greg Sheridan commented that the expulsion "may be the single foreign policy issue that did Rudd the most harm in domestic political terms" (G. Sheridan, The Australian, 1 July 2010).

After the coup, two former Australian ambassadors to Israel complained of "a much more determined pro-Israel position and I think Gillard is a part of that" (The Age, 29 June 2010).
Joe Ludwig now advocates in Parliament for the continued collective punishment of 1.5 million people in Gaza and continuation of illegal settlements.

Feeney staunchly opposes the union endorsed "Boycott Apartheid Israel" movement and rejected the union movement's official report on the appalling conditions in Gaza.
Howes is the leader of the counter campaign against the Israel boycott. He was singled out by (moderate Jewish commentator) Antony Loewenstein as expressing sentiments "straight out of the Zionist Lobby play book".

Indeed, Howes was earlier this year forced to quit his push to replace - ironically enough - Bob Carr in the senate over his Zionist ties. The Australian Jewish News described Howes as "Union boss and outspoken Israel supporter". He quit the union movement in March to prepare for another tilt at politics.

He was forced to pull out of his push for the senate following the leaking of an email from Australia's Mufti Dr Ibrahim Abu Mohammed accusing him of harboring a  "blind bias for Israel" and threatening to withdraw the Western Sydney Muslim community's support for Labor.

The Murdoch press was gushing in it praise for Howes and passionately promoted his credentials as a future Labor leader and potential prime minister.

Not to be outdone, Australia's current PM Tony Abbott used his "the first major speech of the (election) campaign to pledge fidelity to..." Australia? No, Israel, of course. (The Age, 20 June 2010). Abbott launched his pitch to lead Australia to the Australia-Israel Chamber of Commerce, promising  "we would never over-react to any international incidents by Israel."

And just in case anyone doubted Shorten's globalist credentials, he earlier this month (3 April) sparked uproar when he contradicted long-standing official Labor Party policy on illegal settlements, telling the Zionist Federation of Australia that only "some" of the illegal West Bank settlements might be illegal, in his view at least. He also told the Zionist Federation that he wanted to "register my profound opposition to those promoting an anti-Israel boycott. I reject it."

So Israel's extreme right wing can be sure of Australia's ongoing support well into the future, no matter which "side" of politics is in power.

Considering most Australian Jews are very moderate, liberal and anti-war, one wonders who lobbies on their behalf. Not to mention the far greater number of Muslims who call Australia home. The pro Israel lobby stance of Australia's top pollies might cost them votes, but it sure seems to buy them a hell of lot of influence and opportunity.

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Feminists Don't Realize They've Mutated

Mon, 04/14/2014 - 04:47

Susan Patton, left, started a row by suggesting young women plan for family
the way they plan for career. Today, we look at a young Feminist's reply, which
sounds convincing, but shows how they've been had.

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

At first glance, Emma Gray's rebuttal to Susan Patton makes a lot of sense.

She says Patton's advice that, "I need to buck up and find a damn husband" isn't doing educated young women any favors.

1. Most of us are looking for love. As many single women can attest, there is a vast gulf between being open to love and going on dates, and actually finding a person who you mesh with, who you care about and who cares about you. The women I know put aside time out of their busy weeks to date and to push themselves into new situations where they might meet potential love interests. We sign up for Tinder and Hinge and OKCupid and JDate, half out of boredom, but, ultimately, with an air of hopefulness. With each swipe or like or match we wonder whether this will be the one that works -- and often, it's not.

2. We also are dedicating considerable time and energy to our careers -- but it's not a waste of time.
Not only do most of the single women I know love their jobs,... but also, for most of us, work is and will always be a necessity for survival. ...Most of us will not marry a partner who can afford to take on the full financial burden of his family. ... In fact, highly-educated, successful women are just as likely to get married (if not more so) than other women, they just tend to do it a few years later.

3. Having -- and enjoying -- sex does not prevent us from finding true connection.
"Men won't buy the cow if the milk is free," Patton writes, sounding more out of touch than I thought was humanly possible. I know women who have slept with men right away thinking it would be completely casual, and ended up marrying those men years down the road. I know women who did everything "right" and by "the rules" with a potential partner and ended up dumped.

4. We don't devalue marriage or motherhood. And a lot of us still want those things.
Feminists do not "think that being a wife or a mother is a bad thing, some don't want to be either wives or mothers, and many are single and still want both. Not spending every waking moment wishing for an MRS. degree ... doesn't preclude a desire to find a life partner or have a baby." We  "choose not to define our ultimate worth by our relationship status. Yes, we are single... But we are also so, so much more." (Really?)


Emma Gray's response reflects the Feminist view that young women can "have it all" and I don't blame them for trying. But often they can't.

Marriage and motherhood are a frame of mind.  When a woman loves a man, she dedicates her life to him. She wants children to replicate him. I doubt if many young women today can think like this. They have been taught by the Illuminati that self-sacrifice is both self-betrayal and self-endangerment.

My point is that a woman's sacrifice is the basis of husband and children's love for her. It is how the cycle of love starts. We love people who give it up for us, and we want to reciprocate in kind. 

Marriage and family used to be a woman's career.  My mother was proud to be "Mrs. David Makow" and share in my father's success. She didn't need a career to feel fulfilled. She got it from her family. She had a successful small import business, but quit when my father established himself and asked her to focus on the home.

No wonder women today feel they cannot trust a man. They are flitting from one bed to another. A woman who makes marriage her first priority consecrates her body for her future husband. Her vagina is not a public utility or an amusement park ride. Her womb is where her children will be conceived and grow. Whatever happened to people dating first?

P { margin-bottom: 0.21cm; }

All Susan Patton is saying is, "Ladies get your priorities straight. You can always have a career. You need to be young and somewhat pure to attract a lifelong mate and have children."

April Alliston, a Comparative Literature professor at Princeton is an example of what goes wrong when career is the first priority. The woman misses the boat because she has mutated. Her character has become incompatible to men: 

"As a heterosexual woman who put my ambition to earn tenure at Princeton before my desire to have a family -- which as a result has not happened -- and as a woman who has gone through two husbands and grueling IVF treatments only to find myself now single and childless, neither of which was part of my youthful dreams, I thank Ms. Patton for this chance to address an issue that's so central to so many women's lives and can be a source of so much anxiety. ... The last time I was married, my husband and I would both (simultaneously) wander around our house with arms upraised, lamenting, "Where's the wife? Where's the wife?" because that's what we both really needed."

First Comment by David:

Gray's second point is most revealing and illustrates how totally Western women have been conned and snowed. The "necessity" of job and career for women and the impossibility of finding a husband who can financially support a wife and family on his salary are EXACTLY what the long range goal of the financial and political elite have always been.

Private central banking always creates scarcity and robs the private sector of any real wealth, driving both spouses into the workforce and straining or destroying any hope of a harmonious existence.

If Emma Gray had taken some history courses she might have learned that 50 years ago, a husband could support a wife and much larger families on one income, while groceries, fuel and housing were far cheaper than today. It's almost comical how an "education" has robbed so many Emmas of the ability to see the world as it really is.

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Marriage "Straight Talk" Ignites Firestorm

Sun, 04/13/2014 - 02:46

Human Resources professional Susan Patton, left, created controversy
when she suggested that women who want family should get their
"Mrs." degree at college, where they'll find compatible men and avoid
 their biological clock running out.

The negative reaction, which I will examine tomorrow, is indicative that Feminism
is not about "choice." It's about destroying the institutions of marriage and family.
At Princeton in the 1970's, Patton's desire to get married was considered
"heresy," more evidence that Feminism, and everything associated, is a cult.

"All eight [co-eds] aspired to marriage and motherhood--but not one of them wanted to admit it."

 "No women should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Women should not have that choice, because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one"  (Feminist pioneer Simone de Beauvoir, Saturday Review, June 14, 1975).

by Susan Patton
USA Today Excerpt from "Marry Smart"

I wrote a letter
to the editor of the newspaper of the college [Princeton] I attended forty years ago.

I wrote the letter because I was on campus for a Women and Leadership conference that was followed by a breakout session. This afforded current female undergraduates an opportunity to speak informally with alumnae. There were eight young women at my table and they were told that I am a human resources professional and an executive coach, so naturally we all chatted about career planning, resume writing, and interview techniques. Their eyes seemed to glaze over from yet again hearing still more advice about how to succeed in the working world.

Then I looked at each of them and asked, "Do any of you girls want to someday get married and have children?" Their jaws dropped. They were stunned by the very question. They looked cautiously at each other before sheepishly raising their hands. All eight aspired to marriage and motherhood--but not one of them wanted to admit it.

Now it was my turn to be stunned. These amazing young women were reluctant to share their heartfelt hopes, for fear of critical judgment. It was clear to me that someone had to talk with them honestly about finding husbands, getting married, and having babies.

That someone might as well be me.

(Patton expanded her advice into this book.)

So I decided to write a letter to the editor, addressed to the daughters I never had. Back when I was an undergraduate, a proud member of one of the pioneering first classes of women to graduate from Princeton University, I dated but I never had a serious boyfriend. Instead of looking for and possibly finding a life partner among my college classmates, I spent almost ten years after college dating men who weren't as interesting, educated, or accomplished as my classmates had been. I ultimately married the man I had been dating for years, because if I was to fulfill my lifelong dream of having children, time was running out. He wasn't the love of my life, but we marry for many reasons. Sometimes, we make sacrifices to achieve our greater goals. I married at thirty-one years old because I knew that I wanted to have children and do so in a traditional marriage--and I was cognizant of the limitations on my ability to procreate. And although after twenty-five years my marriage ended in divorce, I consider it to have been successful--because I had the children I always wanted.

In retrospect, I realize that I may have squandered some of my best years looking for what I probably could have found as a student on campus when I was twenty years old. I wish somebody had told me when I was an undergraduate that I should look more carefully at my male classmates. There must have been many marriageable men in that group. Either I didn't recognize them, or I carelessly dismissed them for superficial reasons, or I allowed myself to be shouted down by feminists who made me feel that it was a betrayal to the sisterhood for an educated woman to be so interested in marriage.

Did the fact that I didn't choose a man with comparable academic credentials damage my marriage and contribute to my divorce? I don't know for sure. But I know it didn't help.

During my four years on campus, I did many things right. I made great friends, had wonderful experiences that I'll remember always, and I graduated! But there are at least as many things I wish I had done differently. I especially wish that I had had sense enough to look for a husband on campus before I graduated.

So I wrote a letter, and it went, as they say, "viral." Honestly, I thought I would just share a few words of simple, maternal advice with the girls on campus, where my younger son was an undergraduate.

I didn't mean to cause an international firestorm or infuriate some women on campus, let alone on the Internet.

(Well, maybe I did expect a little controversy--I am more blunt than most people, I've always been like that--but who knew anyone would pay attention?)

And viral? Who thinks of going viral? Within three days of the publication of my letter to the editor of the Daily Princetonian, my advice exceeded 100 million inquiries on Google worldwide. Not all of the responses were positive. In fact, I was called "retro," "crazy," "a throwback"--and those are some of the nicer epithets. I was accused of being a traitor to feminism, a traitor to coeducation, and an elitist.

Somewhere early on in the brouhaha, I was dubbed the "Princeton Mom." And you know what? I love that moniker! I earned it, both by graduating from Princeton and by having two children who went there. The advice I offered in the Daily Princetonian was intended for the women on the campus of my beloved alma mater, but it is applicable to smart women everywhere who want a traditional family. To avoid a life of unwanted spinsterhood--with cats!--you have to smarten up about what's important to you, and keep your head in the game. You have to plan for your personal happiness with the same commitment and dedication that you plan for your professional success.

Honestly, what about that is so controversial?

Knowing and respecting yourself. That's what it's really about: understanding what's important to you and prioritizing. That's what it's about. When I say, "Find a man," what I really mean is "Find a man who will respect you." And when I say, "Find a husband in college," what I'm really saying is "It's never too early to start planning for your personal happiness and looking for a husband who will respect you." It's never too early, and it's never too late. (Well, that's not really true, but we'll discuss that later.)

So, with the benefit of hindsight, this book contains the advice I wish I had been given when I was younger, which I now offer to educated young women everywhere.

The Letter

March 29, 2013

Advice for the Young Women of Princeton--the Daughters I Never Had

Forget about having it all, or not having it all, leaning in or leaning out . . . here's what you really need to know that nobody is telling you.

For years (decades, really) we have been bombarded with advice on professional advancement, breaking through that glass ceiling and achieving work-life balance. We can figure that out--we are Princeton women. If anyone can overcome professional obstacles, it will be our brilliant, resourceful, very well educated selves.

When I was an undergraduate in the mid-seventies, the two hundred pioneer women in my class would talk about navigating the virile plains of Princeton as a precursor to professional success. Never being one to shy away from expressing an unpopular opinion, I said that I wanted to get married and have children.

It was seen as heresy. For most of you, the cornerstone of your future and happiness will be inextricably linked to the man you marry, and you will never again have this concentration of men who are worthy of you. Here's what nobody is telling you . . . find a husband on campus before you graduate.

Yes, I went there. Men regularly marry women who are younger, less intelligent, less educated. It's amazing how forgiving men can be about a woman's lack of erudition, if she is exceptionally pretty. Smart women can't (shouldn't) marry men who aren't at least their intellectual equals. As Princeton women, we have almost priced ourselves out of the market. Simply put, there is a very limited population of men who are as smart or smarter than we are. And I say again--you will never again be surrounded by this concentration of men who are worthy of you.

Of course, once you graduate you will meet men who are your intellectual equal--just not that many of them. And, you could choose to marry a man who has other things to recommend him besides a soaring intellect. But ultimately, it will frustrate you to be with a man who just isn't as smart as you.

Here is another truth that you know, but nobody is talking about. As freshman women, you have four classes of men to choose from. Every year, you lose the men in the senior class, and are older than the class of incoming freshman men. So, by the time you are a senior, you basically have only the men in your own class to choose from, and frankly--they now have four classes of women to choose from. Maybe you should have been a little nicer to these guys when you were freshmen?

If I had daughters, this is what I would be telling them. - --Susan A. Patton, Class of 1977

Related - Interview with Patton -
---------- Reaction on Campus
Thanks to Sandeep for the tip!

First Response from Peter R:

Applied anti-feminism, from the heart. And very true. My accountant of more than 20 years is a spinster who comes to the house every month for some paper work. She sees our small kids sometimes and loves them. Just last week she told my wife, you make such beautiful children, why don't you make another one and give it to me, I will raise it.

I don't think she is a feminist, at least not a militant one, but for whatever reason, biology will catch up with people, and at some point in their lives they will remember what it's all about.

Dr. Elisabeth Kuebler, a Swiss-American, who took care of dying people in hospices, made a study and wrote a book about the psychological condition of people in their last phases. She said the deepest and biggest regret of childless, dying people was that they never had children. Very profound, and very true. Feminists with their emptiness have no answer to that.

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Why I Had a Vasectomy

Sat, 04/12/2014 - 02:19
(left, not Dave)

Sex is Russian roulette.
Dave Ess decided to
remove the bullet.

by Dave Ess

Two years ago, at age 32,  I decided to have a no-scalpel vasectomy because of my experiences with the opposite sex, and concerns about money and the unjust legal system.

My parents had a lengthy, bitter divorce when I was 18.  My retired father was forced to live with a friend until the courts allowed him enough money to live on his own. During the divorce, he had to live on $500 a month and take whatever job he could find. Once the divorce was finalized, the family's hobby farm and other property were split, but this process took four years while the Freemason lawyers made off like bandits. This experience left a bitter taste in my mouth. Courts favor women in child custody, support, and property partitioning.

My first sexual relationship at 19 was with a woman who was two years my junior.  I didn't have much experience and was a very socially inept person. During sexual intercourse, she would frequently take the condom off. I was worried about STDs and pregnancy.  This relationship lasted about six months. She became pregnant a month later but it was not my child.  Years later I found out she had seven children by other men.  You could say I dodged multiple bullets.  She was my first close call with early feminism and the possibility of legal entanglement.

Turning 24 years old was a pivotal time in my life. I was in University and dating so many women.  One was nine-years-older than me. She was a University librarian with two Masters degrees. I was head of a pseudo-Marxist student group on the campus and we shared similar interests. She was a feminist, but I still had not fully realized what Marxism or Feminism meant.  I was invited to her house where she prepared a meal with wine for both of us, while dressed in a provocative outfit.  As you can guess, we became inebriated and had sex.  She was another woman who, after about 30 minutes of intercourse, removed the condom. 

(Dave with a recent date)

Any man will tell you that when you are under a woman's hypnosis during intercourse that you are easily manipulated. After our encounter she admitted that her "boyfriend" of eight years was out of town. I was shocked but also mildly smitten that a woman her age would sleep with someone like me.  Nevertheless, this relationship continued on and off for about 5 months until she moved out of town for another job. I'm assuming her husband never found out about me.

About four months after this "relationship," another woman asked me out on a date. We started having sex into the third month of dating and she never took the condom off.  She did, however, start taking birth control pills.   About two-thirds into the relationship, she started being degrading, rude, and demanding. I could tell things were not going to last much longer. Toward the end, she met a German fellow at the University and I found out that they had children together. Another bullet dodged.

Some time after graduating University I traveled to South Korea to join the hordes of Caucasian English teachers. It was here I had my first experience with a foreign woman. We dated for several months before we had sexual intercourse. She was polite, confident (but not arrogant), intelligent, and dressed modestly. These traits ran contrary to many of the Western women I dated.

I had a lot of pleasant experiences with her while living in Seoul, including karaoke and dancing (and I never dance). About 6 months into the relationship I met her parents and we had dinner. These meetings happened about 10 times until my Korean girlfriend told me her parents did not approve of her dating, and potentially marrying, a Westerner.

Some traditional Koreans do not see Westerners as appropriate husbands due to cultural customs, and not wanting to have a "half breed" child. Depressed, I ended the relationship just before I left South Korea for good.

Given all this, I'm still open to the possibility of raising a child, but it won't be my biological child. Actually, doing this is more in line with my philosophy of helping other people rather than helping myself. I am currently single, but have some women friends I see once in a while.

Maybe one day I will "settle down" with a compatible mate and adopt a child, but it's not something I can financially or emotionally afford right now. I will try to avoid feminists zealots at all costs from now on, but people come into relationships with many masks.

Dave Ess is a computer technical support specialist, web specialist living in Canada and is planning on a career change. His email address is: thecomingdepression@gmail.com

"To all the commenters please remember I had limited space to write and could not include all the experiences I've had, including the platonic, non-sexual, and relationships I've had without sex.  Some people choose to see the article to paint me as using women but I, and my friends and family, do not consider me to be that.  The funny thing is the majority of my relationships were initiated by women and it was they who often wanted to take the relationship a step further.  Remember I am a human being with feelings and consider the choice I made appropriate for myself, the experiences I've had, and what I want out of a future for myself and those I care for.  The first commenter on the article pretty much summed up everything quite nicely.  Thank you. "

Related (from Bill) --     "You are NOT the Father!"   (The Joys of not becoming a father before a man is ready.)

First Comment from Bruce -

I think Dave did exactly the right thing by getting a vasectomy. This world is owned and controlled by satanists, and the earth already has an unsustainable human population. Bringing children into this corruption sentences them to a life of servitude on the Freemason slave plantation.

There are very few good women in today's world who would be suitable mothers and wives. My own experience has shown that people often change, or they were living a lie all along.

In today's world, becoming a father offers no advantages for men. It is impossible to raise morally good children with a feminist mother, a Marxist public education system, in an environment of cultural Marxism. The Freemason family court system encourages divorce and enslaves the father.

I got a vasectomy immediately after my son was born, and it is one of the best things I have ever done for myself. My son is now 26 years old, and I hope he never gets married or impregnates a feminist she-devil.

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

British Man Laments Lost Love

Fri, 04/11/2014 - 00:31

Feminists don't like to see a woman
engaged to be happily married.
They attack her mind and, like Communists,
destroy society one person at a time.

Mark, a successful British businessman,
describes how "the love of his life"
slipped through his fingers.

"The poison traveled though her veins and is now in her heart, thanks to these stupid women brainwashed by media and other Satan-controlled propaganda.
To her 'friends,' sleeping around and using a sex toy to replace 'him' is normal."

by Mark

I am now in my early forties and spent many years just seeing women for sex and fun.  I was a dance DJ and had my pick of most girls at the nightclubs.
About two years ago, I finally met someone who I really wanted to spend my life with. At first, I honestly wanted just sex, as this is normal, I have been told. She was different from other women though, and into the idea of the man being the head of the house and taking the lead. She said she felt "like a woman" when she was in the kitchen making meals and cakes. In the bedroom I was the boss too. She was beautiful in appearance and in mind. After six months, I moved into her place with the plan to build my own home, which I am now doing, and settle down. I asked her to marry me and she accepted. It all seemed to be going so well until four months ago.
Firstly, she quit her job as an Admin assistant to go into the hair and makeup field. There, she met a new crowd of 'friends'. These 'professional' and 'independent' women totally destroyed her belief in love and marriage. They take her out to bars, keep her busy with a crazy amount of non-stop work, and say that she doesn't need a man to be successful.
So the poison traveled though her veins and is now in her heart, thanks to these stupid women brainwashed by media and other Satan-controlled propaganda.


To her 'friends,' sleeping around and using a sex toy to replace 'him' is normal. They don't see that she had an ideal partnership 'until death us do part.'
Shortly after meeting these women, she totally distanced herself from me. Her kiss was less passionate than my mother's peck on the cheek! She totally neglected our relationship and in the end, it all fell apart.

Just to see what is out there, I took a look at a dating website. It was full of self-important women who go totally by what a man has to offer: "must be this, must be that," not one thing about needing to be loved or feeling like a woman. The majority specify JUST DATING ONLY. I'm not bitter but to have found a rare gem and have her taken from me by some feminist bitches all twisted up by pop culture totally kills me.

All of these women dog rough and cake themselves in makeup and all they do is drink at coffee shops spitting venom about men and how we like to control them and stifle their business careers.
Obviously these women will look back and realize what they have missed. By this time, they will be bitter and jealous with not much hope of finding a man willing to take them on.

The real sick feeling is that my girl has been sucked in and we have now separated. I was asked to move out and then stay as friends. She still has the engagement ring on her finger but says it is there as a 'reminder,' whatever that means. I have never loved anyone the way I love her and I'm not some teenager pining after my first girlfriend. I'm not inexperienced when it comes to handling women. I was never worshiping her and made sure she understood men are there to support and love women, not idolize them the way many younger men do now (and that puts you on a losing streak from the start.)

So I have lost the best thing in my world. I am quite well off with money due to a successful business I own. You know what? It means nothing to me right now, the money, all my material goods are worth nothing. I never was materialistic anyway but losing a person to such a bunch of bitches set on making as many men miserable as possible hurts more. I saw her this week to collect some things from her place and gave her a hug and she couldn't even put her arms around me. I asked how we got to this point and she said work was number one priority.
Did she cheat or have another man? No way. One thing I do know is that she is not that type and she wouldn't have time anyway.
So now she's with these women and seemingly happy but how long before she wakes up and I'm well gone?

She uses a sex toy for her satisfaction these days. I found it under her bed. She watched lots of porn (looked at history on my laptop left at her place and so much porn you wouldn't believe it!)
So once again, this Satanic-controlled society has destroyed a functioning heterosexual relationship by selling the idea that men just keep you down and stop you from having fun.
In the past, I did sleep around but I always said I wanted no commitment and if they were the same it was okay. Really that wasn't okay at all and maybe guys like me and my friends who thought it was cool and fun to sleep with lots of girls perhaps contributed to this screwed up society we have today.
Anyway, I thought it was worth writing to you about this as I know you and your readers are interested in what is going on in society.

Makow comment: Mark, I'm sorry for your loss but better you learn her true (lack of) character now rather than after you marry and have children. This girl was pretending to be something she wasn't. I'd demand she return the engagement ring. You need to look at the family upbringing to see what a woman really is. I'd check out immigrant women from traditional backgrounds. I welcome other reader comments.

First Comment from Scottie-

In response to Mark's article. Many women who are in the hair and makeup field are skanks and bar-flys. .

 My mother was a hairdresser and divorced my father after 30 years of marriage because he was too "controlling". She was heavily influenced by her girlfriends who were bitter,lonely and jealous women who were duped by the satanic culture into buying the feminist agenda.

 My mother constantly needed to dress-up,wear loads of make-up and always felt the need to go out. This is typical behavior for many women today, but especially for any woman who is pursuing a career in the hair/beauty and make-up field.

Also Mark should demand that ring back. If I was him I definitely would not be giving her hugs after getting kicked out and dumped, no matter how hard it hurts.

I am 22-years-old and was in a three year relationship with a girl I really loved. and I mean really loved. But it was just too much to compete with the decadency and moral degradation of the college life-style surrounding her. It was always a constant battle pitting me against the skanks who were in her class always trying to get her to go out and have 'fun', which really means getting drunk,fucked, (maybe gang-banged) and losing any amount of innocence left what-so-ever.

 I will not make the mistake again of investing all my time and efforts into a girl. Find your passion, read books, educate yourself, use this amazing tool we have called the internet to find the truth we are so in desperately need of. Don't think about a bitch all day, especially one who sells you out for a couple of slut girlfriends and drunk entailed weekends. Trust me Mark, your ex-gf will realize the mistake she made, and when she does, you will be the one who is better off.

Comment from Carl:

I'm going to teach my son that sleeping around is a trap for missing a compatible wife. I wonder how many of the girls that Mark slept with were marriage material? Surely that one in college or online wasn't just a brainless party girl? Mark, didn't you miss any of them, maybe want to have some companionship? There really is plenty of time for a guy in his early 40's, half decent looking, well read/educated and especially monetarily well off.

Have kids soon, you will hate yourself for waiting as long as you did, the love of a child is second to none. If you're serious about this, just lower your standards a touch physically and look for that woman who was brought up by a family oriented mother; look online and don't look desperate. She just might not look like a fashion model. If you want that, you have to start early and make a job out of trying to find a super hot motherly type. They don't last long on the "market." The more a women looks like a fashion model, the more she doesn't need you or notice you even if you look good. There is a dis-proportionate amount of men who want her. Then we can talk about how the media has made her a narcissist.

Here where I preside in the last bastion of a white neighborhood in Northern Port Coquitlam BC. My whole street and area is filled with attractive white women with white husbands and white kids. Its kind of like Winnipeg's Fort Richmond neighborhood in the '70's, I was pretty surprised actually. I can't say the same thing for London, several major European and southern US cities, or Richmond BC, that's for bloody sure. Because Asian women are small, cute and motherly, they attract white guys like flies here in greater Vancouver...

As far as seeking "foreign women," I would try as hard as possible to find a white woman. If you are Caucasian, part of the Illuminati plan is to make the world less populated and yellow/brown mixed genetics with the exception of some of their inner circle of European Aristocrats and fair skinned Ashkenazi Jew's. 

Its too bad UK and Canada don't bring in legions of Slav's (West - Russian relations won't help). My wife was born in Russia and raised like a girl (and oddly well prepared for a career.) She's not Betty Crocker but nobody's perfect. All the people I know in greater Vancouver from Eastern Europe and Russia are very family oriented. Plenty of former Soviet states went to feminism many years before the West, so there has been some healing and the Slavic motherly instinct is very powerful and seeks family. Also, my wife tells me that Soviet leaders killed so many men over a few generations, that Russia (more women) still has almost opposite demographics than China (all men).

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

<br /><img alt="Windle.jpeg" src="http:

Thu, 04/10/2014 - 07:52

(left, Patricia Baird Windle)

Abortion is a Rite of  Witchcraft

by Dan

There's a long history of abortions being performed by practicing witches.  This has come out in public again again all along, many times in blatant statements by the witches themselves.  It amazes me how the public simply tunes out things that don't into their little window on the world.
I can give you one quote off the top of my head right here:  Patricia Baird Windle, founder and owner of an abortion business called 'Aware Woman'.  She was an avowed witch who raised a stink years ago saying "You practice your religion and let me practice mine. My religion is a holy ritual child sacrifice." 

She got away with saying that because her abortion clinic is LEGAL.  In fact she meant to make the news to promote one of her books 'Targets of Hatred: Anti-Abortion Terrorism',  which labels the "pro life" position as fundamentalist fanatics endangering the lives of women, yada yada yada...

She's just one of five I can cite to show it's a religion and they're proud of it.  They share this insanity that claiming feminine power involves this initiation of taking the life she creates. That's how a woman graduates to 'goddess'.

The Masonic maxim is true.  Everything really is out there 'in plain sight'.  But people don't believe their eyes and ears if they don't believe evil is real and there's a non-human aspect to it.  That's why everything that came out in broad daylight in the 1980's about the epidemic of Satanism already went down the memory hole.   We're always having to start from scratch trying to explain these things over, and over and over.

Of interest, abortion clinics are on the run here in Texas. The Legislature and Governor have closed most of them down by pulling State funding from Planned Parenthood.  We'll see how long it sticks.

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

The "Catastrophic Canonization of a Judas Pope"

Thu, 04/10/2014 - 01:28

Pope John Paul II told the Voodoo priests of Benin in Africa that their Satanic traditions contain "seeds of the Word."

John Paul II's imminent canonization  proves the Church of Rome
is the vehicle for "the damnation of souls," says Michael Hoffman,
an expert on Judaism and the subversion of the Church.

by Michael Hoffman
Three Points of Departure from Magisterial Dogma

On April 27, 2014 in the course of the allegedly "infallible" process of saint-making (canonization), the Church of Rome will confer on Popes John XXIII and John Paul II the supposed mark of sure salvation as an alleged model of a miracle-working life of heroic sanctity worthy of eternal emulation by every Christian.

Pope John Paul II is the pontiff who reverently kissed a copy of Islam's Koran, and who told the Voodoo priests of Benin in Africa that their Satanic traditions contain "seeds of the Word," after which the barbaric practice of Voodoo in that blighted land nearly doubled.

John Paul II permitted the Tibetan Buddhists to place a statue of their idol on the altar of the Church of Assisi and this pope prayed with them to their "god(s)."

Pope John Paul II taught that Judaics have an irrevocable covenant with God by virtue of their alleged racial descent from Abraham and therefore this carnal "Israel" need not be evangelized for conversion to Christ.

Pope John Paul II was the patron saint of serial child-molestation facilitators such as Fr. Marcial Maciel Degollado, Bishop Skylstad, Cardinal Law and Cardinal Mahony and thousands of others like them. Many of the most unconscionable waves of horrendous victimization of defenseless children occurred on his watch.

Pope John Paul II permitted these molestations to be shrouded in secrecy. He granted safe haven to fugitive molestation facilitators such as the notorious Cardinal Bernard Law who was wanted in Boston by the authorities and rewarded by Pope John Paul with being named archpriest of a prominent basilica in Rome.

John Paul II was the first pontiff to enter a synagogue and encourage the deluded people in spiritual bondage within its walls to continue in their sins, which include rejection of Jesus Christ as Messiah and Savior.

This evil Judas will soon become "Pope Saint John Paul II" and his "heroic virtues" held up for all Catholics to imitate. This demonic mockery and incomprehensible catastrophe is not a Second Vatican Council aberration!

While it is now public knowledge in the "Who am I to judge [gays]?" pontificate of Pope Francis that the Church of Rome is the vehicle for the damnation of souls and not the salvation of souls, "traditional" Catholics have misdirected millions of people by pointing to Vatican II, Kant, Rousseau, or the French Revolution as the root of this decline and fall, thereby concealing and exculpating the occult popes of the Renaissance and the Neoplatonic conspiracy that has guided the Church of Rome for more than five hundred years.

We are at work on a booklet which we hope to publish by April 27. It is titled The Renaissance Church of Rome: Three Points of Departure from Magisterial Dogma. The Three Points are: • Judaism and the Occult • Equivocation and mental reservation • Usury.

We will endeavor to demonstrate from the documentary record that the smoke of Satan entered the Church of Rome clandestinely in the 16th century and went from victory to victory, culminating according to plan in our 21st century, in this, the final stage in the alchemists' ritual peregrination, the Making Manifest of All that is Hidden.

Pope Francis is the public face of a formerly covert occult process initiated by the popes of the Neoplatonic conspiracy, which is showing forth its true face to the world now that "Christendom" is sufficiently processed to accept it.

Yes, we well know that Jesus Christ declared that the gates of hell shall not prevail against His Church. There is no question of that. The question is, where is His Church on earth today? We can only find it if we have the courage and vision to proceed from Thomistic first principles, not by mistaking symptoms of rot for the root of the rot. Myopia disguised as Catholic truth will only produce more confusion and defeat.

Michael Hoffman, left, is the author of Judaism Discovered  and Judaism's Strange Gods.

Related - by Michael Hoffman, US Honors Racist Rabbi who says "non Jewish souls come from three satanic spheres."

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

<img alt="media-960x360.jpg" src="http:

Thu, 04/10/2014 - 00:03
Canada's Political Prisoner - Dean Clifford

(left, Dean Clifford)

This is what happens when you challenge the legitimacy of government.

(Editor's Note: I don't support the Freeman movement but think it's worth knowing about.)

by V

There is a political prisoner sitting in a Manitoba prison that few people outside the Freeman movement have ever heard about. Dean Clifford was abducted by the Hamilton Police Department on November 24, 2013 after he gave a 2-day seminar. His crime? Challenging the validity of the law.

Dean Clifford is a white male of Irish-Canadian heritage who lives just north of Winnipeg. Manitoba. A contractor by trade, he concluded the Canadian government and courts are detrimental to the health, finance and well-being of the people. Dean drives without a driver's license, has no government license plates and pay's no income tax to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). He does this lawfully (common-law.)

Of all the person's in the Freeman movement such as Winston Shrout, Max Egan, etc, Dean Clifford practices in real life what he preaches and his number #1 point is, 'Do Harm To No One'. For this he has been jailed many times over the years and has even been physically abused by the police.

Manitoba court records show that the charge was that Dean didn't show up for a court appearance in August 21st.

Dean has been in prison for over four months know with trumped-up charges. The "crown" and the powers behind the "crown" do not want other people to know the fahat Dean Clifford is teaching to the public.

Dean Clifford has shown in simple, clear language that the government of Canada is a separate foreign power and the only way the government of Canada can interact with us, private citizen's is to trick us into making us franchisees (employees) of the 'crown' through the fraudulent use of our birth certificate, driver's license, social insurance card, etc.

So far the courts have denied Dean access to a notary or commissioner of oath, and have tried every dirty trick up their sleeves to keep him in prison. The best guess seems to be to send a strong message to others out there in the "true" Freeman's movement that doing battle with the crown courts and crown prosecutors will only land you in jail for a long time. Mind you in Dean's case on trumped up charges and in a private statutory 'kangaroo court' environment.


For those of you that want to learn more of Dean Clifford's teachings go to his website (http://deanclifford.info/) and watch more of his video's on his website: http://deanclifford.info/media/

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

UN Peddles Illuminati's Heterophobic Program

Wed, 04/09/2014 - 00:32

 UN agencies promotes the Illuminati's
 satanic agenda: abortion, homosexuality
 and pedophilia.

"Delegates to the UN General Assembly have become weary of arguing over the UNFPA's harsh manipulation and insistence that abortion and sexual rights be introduced into countries which have no wish to go in this direction."

by Reality (March 2014)
Publication of Real Women of Canada
(Edited by henrymakow.com) 

At every opportunity, UN agencies ... as well as NGO's, are incessantly scheming, manipulating and deceiving, trying to impose the Illuminati's heterophobic sexual policies world-wide.

With disasters around the world-- wars, earthquakes, epidemics, famines-- one would assume that the UN had its hands full. Instead, the UN gives priority to promoting abortion, homosexuality and birth control.

The UN agency, UN Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA) is the paramount agency at the UN pushing sexual issues. Without exaggeration, the UNFPA is downright sinister. In 2008, UNPPA spent  $165.1 million on "reproductive health" (i.e. abortion.)

In December, 2012, UNFPA hosted a "Global Youth Forum"in Bali. The final declaration featured a call for abortion-on-demand, "gay, lesbian and transgender rights," and legalized prostitution.

When UNFPA presented these results to the UN General Assembly, which is more representative of the popular will, the latter barely even acknowledged the document. In fact, UN diplomats refused to even officially "take note" of the document. They knew it was a set up by UNFPA.

Delegates to the UN General Assembly have become weary of the UNFPA's harsh manipulation and insistence that abortion and sexual rights be introduced into countries which have no wish to go in this direction. Yet UNFPA continues relentlessly in pursuit of these issues.


This UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has an obsession with lesbian, gay, bi-sexual and trans- gender (LGBT) rights.

The agency employs more than 850 staff and includes a work force of some 240 international human rights officers. OHCHR has produced a 60-page booklet entitled: Born Free and Equal which falsely states that UN treaties provide "core legal obligations" regarding homosexuality, which included asylum for LGBT people, as well a requirement to extend marriage to same-sex couples.

In November, 2013, Russia, Ethiopia, Poland, and Malta chastised this human rights office and its unending promotion of LGBT "rights." Russia was especially incensed, stating that attention to sexual orientation is "disproportionately high" and that "there are more topical issues in the world for us to deal with".

Ethiopia, speaking on behalf of African countries, complained about the increasing trend by OHCHR "to create new Rights concepts, and categories and standards that are not recognized" in international agreements nor by all countries.

The UN Human Rights Council is also a launching pad for sexual issues. For example, in March, 2013, the Council  recommended that children's health include the right to comprehensive sexual education and access to "confidential sexual and reproductive services, including abortion."

The report also recommended that children using illicit drugs have available to them "harm reduction" strategies, including free needle exchanges, drug injection sites, etc.

Finally, the report recommended that any social and cultural values, that require parental and/or spousal consent, be rejected on the basis that children should make their own decisions when it comes to sex.

Fortunately, these alarming recommendations were solidly rejected by large groups of states, such as the African group, the Arab group and the Organization of Islamic Conferences (OIC).

This rejection, however, will not stop the Council from pushing forward with sexual issues.


The UN is a corrupt and dysfunctional organization used by the Illuminati to change the values, cultures, and religions of its member states, contrary to the UN's Charter, which provides for sovereignty and independence.

What can be done about the UN?  For one thing, we should curtail our generous funding to it.

Categories: Authors and Bloggers