service uses Sign of Satan (Baphomet) as logo for a campus music talent search.
Brazil is experiencing a turf war between the two globalist groups, the Western Illuminati with Neves, and the Russian/Chinese group with the WP, much like what is happening in Ukraine, Syria and West Africa.
"For the common Brazilian citizen, there is no doubt that Neves is the better alternative. It is the choice to slowly die of poison versus dying in the fire that was set in the house by Rousseff's Worker's Party."
Brazil should be studied closely by conspiracy researchers and political analysts. It is not often that we see Illuminati social engineering strategies being applied with so much success, as now during the 2014 presidential campaign. Full of sudden changes and even a plane crash, this election feels more like a thriller movie than a boring political dispute. Three candidates had real chances of winning: Marina Silva, Dilma Rousseff and Aécio Neves. After the first round of votes on October 5th, the fight is now between Neves and Dilma, to be decided on October 25th. Polls show a technical draw.
MARINA SILVA, THE ECONAZI WILDCARD
Marina was the vice-president candidate for the Socialist party. When presidential candidate Eduardo Campos died in a plane crash August 13, she was catapulted to the top of the polls. This woman is an ecology militant, a darling of Prince Philip, Greenpeace, WWF and the UN. She used to be the Minister of Ecology for the Worker's Party, when she launched the UN's Agenda 21 plan in Brazil.
After weak performances in the presidential debates and a perception that she is still a Workers Party zealot at the core, she lost second place to Neves, who performed a last minute comeback seldom seen. After much resistance, de Silva finally threw her support to Neves.
In the end, Marina's role was only to push Neves' agenda to the left, by "forcing" him to subscribe to many proposals coming straight from UN's Agenda 21.
DILMA AND THE WORKERS PARTY (WP)
Dilma Rouseff's Workers Party (WP) is basically a criminal foreign organization, loyal to the Cuban-style radical kind of Marxism that has swept up Latin America through the Forum of Sao Paulo group, with the objective of creating a continent-wide Marxist Federation under the influence of the Russian/Chinese block and directed by the Cuban secret service.
During her mandate, President Dilma Rousseff destroyed the Brazilian economy sending health and education to the bottom of every international ranking. Citizens here have witnessed a huge government scandal every week for the last four years, topped by the ransacking of the largest Brazilian company, Petrobras.
Tens of billions of dollars were stolen through a 3% kickback on every purchase made. Part of the money ended in the pockets of politicians, and part was reserved for the Party election campaign funds.
(Left, The President as young Marxist terrorist)
Banks and billionaires received all kinds of benefits during Dilma's tenure, in spite of her image of a "champion of the poor". People are fed up with her.
The only people voting for Dilma are the illiterate people in the most miserable states, because the Party has spread the lie that Neves will end their food stamps and dole programs. He won't. Instead, he wants to turn the programs into law.
AECIO NEVES, THE FABIAN SOCIALIST
Neves, scion of a rich family of politicians, is a modern Fabian socialist who promises to end the corruption and modernize the government. Good looking and intelligent, he has a successful record as the governor of Minas Gerais, an important state in Brazil. Unfortunately, he seems to be Lord Rothschild's chosen candidate and has already chosen Armínio Fraga, a former über-globalist George Soros' associate, to be the country's next Minister of Finance.
It is interesting to notice that the WP often attacks Fraga for his economics free-market approach, but never touches the main issue of his having been a partner of Soros! Also, it has been disclosed that the WP itself actively sought the help of Fraga in 2002 in the government. There is no disagreement between the candidates regarding globalism or the new world order.
(left, Fraga, seen here with George Soros )
Fraga, a brilliant Princeton PhD, sold his investment fund to J P Morgan in 2010 for $550m, so he claims he is rich enough and only wants to help Brazil. That would be great if it were true: an Illuminati insider suddenly turned selfless and patriotic, but this would be the most impressive conversion since the Apostle Paul's in the road to Damascus.
Fraga is also a member of the globalist think tank "The Group of Thirty", which was founded in 1978 by Geoffrey Bell at the initiative of the Rockefeller Foundation, which also provided initial funding for the body.
There are no genuine conservative political alternatives left in this world. After the successful application of Antonio Gramsci's Cultural Marxism in the western world, we are left only with the choice of revolutionary marxism or Fabian socialism. Both sing to the tune of global governance, interventionism and end of individual freedom.
In Brazil, the radical Cuba-style Marxists have already paved the way for Fabian socialism, by destroying family values, the work ethic, the concept of individual responsibility and merit. The "government as a father" ideology of the Piven-Clowen strategy is in place and almost all Brazilians under the age of 40 think like Marxists to some degree. Their work is done.
What we see in Brazil is a turf war between the two globalist groups, the Western Illuminati with Neves, and the Russian/Chinese group with the WP, much like what is happening in Ukraine, Syria and West Africa. Like Mafia bosses, they divide their territories among themselves, but skirmishes are likely to happen at the borders. The real threat is that the WP will steal the election by fraud with the electronic voting machines, as in Venezuela. They already said they would "do the devil's work" in order not to see their South America Marxist federation plan be spoiled.
For the common Brazilian citizen, there is no doubt that Neves is the better alternative. It is the choice to slowly die of poison versus dying in the fire that was set in the house by the WP.
Neves at least is against censorship and the Bolivarian dictatorship such as the ones in Bolivia, where Evo Morales was illegally elected for a third term, dedicating his victory to Chavez and Fidel Castro, or Venezuela, where 60K Cubans run the country by proxy. Give us London instead of Havana, please.
It is hard not to be cynical when dealing with Brazil, a land that has always been a colony and probably always be. However, when we face the alternative of being more like Australia or Canada, instead of Cuba or hellhole Venezuela. The choice is obvious.
First Comment by Henrique:
Yes, Dilma and her party have the analphabet northeast as a stronghold, but it`s interesting to note that she won even in Neves`s own turf http://eleicoes.uol.com.br/2014/raio-x/1-turno/presidente#resultado-indicadores-socioeconomicos/candidato-1 and also did well in the Germanic, "civilized" extreme south ( bordering Uruguay and Argentina ). Did you know, by the way, that party-alliances are now FORCED by law to enroll 30% female candidates ? And the the Superior Electoral Court even financed ( with taxpayer cash ) TV ads inviting people to vote for women ? Quite bizarre, and an unacceptable intrusion on people's subjectivity. But again, this is Brazil.
In PetroBras there are people of both sides involved in the game, and it's widely known that the largest state-owned company ( possibly of Latin America ) is a hotbed of corruption and always was, used by everyone in power. All the Neves camp did was try and capitalize as much as possible in the latest scandal. During Neves party's last mandate in the presidency, the orgy of privatizations was probably the most grotesque ever seen, profitable companies funded by the people for decades practically given to foreign interests.
I don't think that from a broken people, unsure of it's own identity due to centuries of slavery, misery and miscegenation, kept in ignorance and dependance ( the Portuguese wouldn't even allow industry in the colony, as well as high education, first university was built in the 20th century ) much could ever be expected in terms of "work ethic and individual responsibility", but the left sure augmented the hopelessness. The country was primed for this since it's beginning.
About Marina, the "crash" ( and how a law was passed that forbids plane accidents to be publicly investigated days afterwards ) check the the words of " AdamNeira " in some related comment sections, including this: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/oct/02/dilma-rousseff-win-brazil-presidential-election ( an obvious esoterist, saying interesting stuff on the net ).
Between the playboy Neves ( slow death ) and the lesbian butch Roussef ( fast death ) , I would vote for Roussef, just to see the circus on fire at once; I don't have much patience for this country.
Long live Gabrovo's daughter!
Left. Erin Green Hicks aka Erin Rothschild claims to be a diabolic-human hybrid. She relates her experience growing up as a Rothschild being tortured and put through Illuminati mind control and satanic rituals.
An Exorcist and Catholic Priest suggests
Illuminati are Human-Devil Hybrids
(EDITOR'S NOTE: I reserve judgment and present this article for purposes of discussion.)
"So who are the Illuminati? They are simply part of the manifestation of the Devil ("Lucifer") and his minions in our dimension and in our historical moment, dedicated to the destruction of the human race out of hateful vengeance against the God who had cast the same devils out of heaven, the God after whose image and beauty, He had created us. Why this persecution of humans? Because Lucifer cannot hurt God except by hurting what God loves, that is, by hurting us." - Edgar
Ms Connie Fogal does not close the gap between the "Aliens", thought to be "extra terrestrials", and our concrete reality on planet Earth. To do that it is necessary to correctly identify the supposed ETs as devils. Yes, I wrote it: devils. The sort of devils that we find in Genesis 3 under the figure of the ("reptilian") serpent that tempted Eve and caused the original fall of the human race, if you want to accept that "lore". Perhaps you're ready to press the delete key with my apparently flippant suggestion? Before you do, I would ask you at least to remember this book by Chuck Missler and Mark Eastman: "Alien Encounters: The Secret Behind the UFO Phenomenon".
In this book, the authors review and (I think) sufficiently confirm the existence of the UFO realities. Then they take their analysis two steps further and (1) scientifically and (2) theologically identify (1) their origin not to be extraterrestrial, but extra-dimensional, (2) hence diabolical. Their reasoning is quite articulate and compelling. Of course, it presupposes some faith in the existence of non-material beings such as "devils" that perhaps you do not share.
As a Catholic priest who, out of charity for the unfortunate possessed/oppressed by these things, actively picks fights with them, I certainly have no trouble believing in their existence. It's part of my daily life. Why, just last night I had to fight some off with prayer... No big deal, it happens almost daily, often more than daily. Ready to delete this email? I hope not.
So who are the Illuminati? They are simply part of the manifestation of the Devil ("Lucifer") and his minions in our dimension and in our historical moment, dedicated to the destruction of the human race out of hateful vengeance against the God who had cast the same devils out of heaven, the God after whose image and beauty, He had created us. Why this persecution of humans? Because Lucifer cannot hurt God except by hurting what God loves, that is, by hurting us.
The gap between our dimension and that of the putative extraterrestrial aliens is filled by the overarching reality of the diabolical hosts and their pretentious prince, Lucifer, who uses deluded and manipulated, malicious men to achieve his ends. Lucifer is at the top of this real, extra-dimensional world, but his influence reaches into our time and space especially through his minions.
Now who are these minions? They all form one army, but it has two principal branches: the human agents at his bidding, and the fallen angelic agents no less his slaves. However, between these two branches, there is a continuum from being that is more human, material and hence less spiritual-diabolical, to being that is more spiritual and diabolical and less human.
To understand how this spectrum comes about, we have to consider something quite astonishing: hybrids between human beings and devils. This is inherently difficult to accept, for our Western habits of thought have been formed since the time of Plato and his "second navigation" to think that spirit ("non material reality") exists, and that there exists a great fissure between the realm of the spiritual and that of the material.
Notionally, we are unprepared to deal with something like sexual reproduction between a pure spirit like an angel, and a material being like that of a woman: our minds are asked to ford the unfordable, so we think. Yet, this is exactly where we have to go to account for the origins of "demons" and "aliens". Paradoxically, the genetic manipulation going on in our most advanced laboratories may have prepared us somewhat to make this leap. We read news accounts of human-animal and human-plant hybrids... Why not angelic-human hybrids(!)?
Genetic manipulation is, if you want to believe Genesis 6, not new in history. We read that the "Sons of God" (a certain kind of heavenly angels, "watchers") decided to leave their estate and have sexual relations with the daughters of men. This event is recorded in Genesis 6 as noted, but the "Ancient Book of Enoch", goes into much greater depth, and apparently, the author of Genesis drew his account from Enoch, according to which this intermixing of the angelic and the human was the beginning of witchcraft, as these fallen angels taught the women how to be their "brides", and bear hybrid children, the "nephilim" (cf wikipedia) or "the fallen" (less than angels) also translated into Greek as "giants", for indeed they where corporeally immense. This is decisive because hybrid, angel-men are the "Aliens" of the UFOs. They are not extraterrestrial at all but very terrestrial, even sub-terrestrial in the sense of hell-bound. If we can accept all this apparent nonsense, then we can fit the ETs into the proper scheme of things.
The Illuminati are the avant-garde of the more human part of the diabolical army. Lucifer has duped them with promises of power and unending suzerainty for their family lines, and it does not surprise me that the royal lines of Europe such as the Hapsburg and the Windsors claim their lineages go back through Charlemagne all the way to Nimrod, king of ancient Babylon and builder of what was then the "New World Order" around the Tower of Babel (Genesis 10, etc). It's just possible that their family lines do extend that far.
It has always been Lucifer's interest to maintain an elite and use them to enslave the rest, ultimately to destroy both elite and slaves together (much to the coming surprise of our contemporary Illuminati -- they forget that Lucifer lies even to them, and hates them no less than his other slaves; and will share power with no one).
Although the universal deluge of Noah's time is supposed to have destroyed the giants, the interbreeding between fallen angelic beings has not ceased because witchcraft has not ceased, and many, perhaps most of the Illuminati, have "demonic genes" in them. The blood lines in which they take pride are in fact corrupted and putrid with demonic genes, and endure only because of special diabolical assistance and God's mysterious plan that has withheld judgement until now.
Here's a video (above) that presents an Illuminati testifying to being a diabolic-human hybrid. No, this video proves nothing, except that one who claims to be an Illuminati believes what I am relating. Yet for me, who two or three years ago would already have deleted this note you are reading, the video does have confirmatory value.
I said I was a Catholic priest in the ministry of freeing people from diabolical possession and other forms of spiritual bondage. I have a prayer group of spiritual people to whom God often reveals the names of devils and the paths of sin or witchcraft by which the diabolical entered the lives of their victims, and even the dates of entry.
They are so right so often in revealing the names and dates of entry, confirmed by the sometimes almost unbelievable effectiveness I have had in kicking the devils out of these afflicted people's lives, that I hesitate to disbelieve something else these people have also received from above: the reality of hybrids living among us today.
PUTIN, HITLER HYBRIDS
You know some of these hybrids. One of them is named Vladimir Putin. They tell me that he is a diabolic-human hybrid from 2 generations back. One of his grandmothers conceived him in some sort of occult copulation with a devil or demon. Poor Vlad, but it does help to explain him and other Illuminati. Adolph Hitler was a hybrid from four generations back. Nero likewise was a hybrid from I don't recall how many generations back. You do not have to believe this, but I, who would have laughed at this before I started my ministry with the possessed, hesitate to reject this now.
So if the Illuminati (and other less elite occultists, devil worshipers and their sects) represent the mostly human branch of the Luciferian army, the "extraterrestrials", who are quite terrestrial, represent the more diabolical and purely spiritual portion of his army: essentially they are devils or demons who have taken a body manufactured for them in a laboratory or otherwise spawned using genetic manipulation: here science and diabolism merge. Genesis 6 is unfortunately not at all out of date.
The point is that it's all one army under Lucifer, at war against God, in the most bitter and only real war -- the other wars are mere theatrical performances to distract us. What matters to Lucifer is that all these members of his army are visible, dwell in our time and space and can influence in it. Therefore, they are apt puppets he can manipulate to "act out" before us in this theater of "the world" (as interpreted by the New York Times) to deceive us with "the Great Deception".
WAR OF THE WORLDS
Ms Connie Fogal errs in thinking that the so called aliens are really extraterrestrial, and she errs as many of us do when we accept the apparently sharp divisions between "warring" factions: Republicans versus Democrats, Conservatives versus Liberals, Communists versus Capitalists, Traditionalists versus Progressives, etc. These fake wars, patterned after Hegel's dialectic, will eventually give way to the war of the worlds, the one between Terrestrials and Extraterrestrials.
Lucifer will want to scare us so much that all us human sheep-for-the-slaughter will run into the arms of a "savior" that he will be so kind as to provide. Probably this savior will take the form of some "ET" descending from the clouds as Christ ascended into the clouds, but in an updated version: I'll venture to guess that he'll come riding cowboy on a flying saucer. Christian tradition has branded this ET as "Anti-Christ". But it will all be a sham, for the humanoid elites and the supposed ETs are really on the same team. It is essential to close this gap between the apparently opposing armies, to see it for what it is, nothing more than the machinations of Lucifer and his slaves.
Ms Fogal, probably unwittingly, fosters this ultimate and most fatal delusion. It bears mentioning that Hollywood is an enthusiastic promoter of this Great Deception. Does the theme of superheroes, such as portrayed in the Spiderman, Superman, Batman, the Transformers, Prometheus, and other films, seek to mentally prepare us for such a world-wide calamity, so that we will be primed to seek out in like circumstances one who will appear just in time to save us?
Lucifer can reasonably expect that a humanity, cowed by fear, will gratefully throw itself into the saving arms of such "superheroes" and of such an "Anti-Christ". For my part, I do believe that Hollywood is avidly committed to a psy ops program to prepare us for just such a greatest-of-all-historical-events; and to be shepherded into Satan's mill through the mediation of genetically engineered humanoids and elites. Yes, it sounds far fetched, but in the final analysis, the plan is not to provide such a reality; it will suffice to deceive us into believing such is reality, and that may not be so difficult to do.
First Comment by David K:
I would have to agree almost entirely with your latest article by Edgar. The ET's are in fact inter-dimensional so you can call them demons but with our scientific understanding today it is not so simple because these beings do use technology and science and they have flying saucers, large space ships, labs for genetic engineering etc. They can extract someone from our dimension, take them to their dimension and make adjustments then put them back. Most people when they think of demons do not see it this way, possession is accepted but actual technology which functions inter-dimensionally is not usually included in demonic ideas. The truth is in between, they are demonic in their relationship to humans but their technology functions far more closely with science fiction ideas of aliens. In the past when people lacked any kind of scientific explanations the same beings looked like demons, now they look more like Aliens but they are the same.
Edgar says that Lucifer hates god and so hates all of us which may well be true but from what I have experienced it is his devouring of souls which is most important. He needs to feed on the energy of souls or he will die. It is his desire for immortality and total control that has lead to this necessity for him and his minions. So yes he hates us but he needs us, he needs our souls and he must control them or he will die. I must again say that the true goal is to create a hybrid body which can contain both the human soul and the ET/ Demonic spirit at the same time and which can live for a very long time.
Our lives are short because they can only control the soul if it is in a state of amnesia, the current human body is therefore given a very short life and esp is purposely shut down. When the body dies the soul is taken through a tunnel into a bright light where it meets its so called spirit guides and it reviews its life. Then it meets a type of council and is basically tricked into taking another life of suffering in another human body. The lie is that life on Earth is a school and the soul just seems to keep failing the lessons so must come back to further "evolve". The soul is tricked into choosing to come back and gives itself a new mission each time. But the mission always fails because the soul forgets the mission upon entering the body and then life on Earth is fully controlled by the ET's/ Demons. This is how they lock down the soul, its all through lies, virtual reality and a genetically tampered, short lived human body which then undergoes poisoning and brainwashing from birth.
I cannot prove it but if one looks at all the evidence at hand this scenario does actually have a lot of weight. Of course if one has been consciously abducted by aliens and lied to directly by them and also remembered abductions that they were not supposed to (showing their truly diabolical nature) it is easier to connect the dots. Remembering the between lives period and past lives brings the picture squarely into view.
"I started to believe what he was saying but then it went to the absurd. It's a shame I could not bring myself to read the last few chapters."
This is reader's reaction on Amazon to this book by a former Canadian Defence Minister who says the Illuminati are using alien technology to subjugate us. The review below is written by his supporter, Connie Fogal, who was President of a respected patriotic party that has since gone defunct.
The take-away is that patriots must remain rational and calm. There are no aliens, unless you include the Illuminati bankers. Although we are just discovering our predicament, it has always been this way. We will continue to muddle through.
by Connie Fogal
Paul Hellyer bookreport by Connie Fogal 17.1o. 2014.doc
(Excerpt by henrymakow.com)
In my many years of learning about the evil side of globalization, its power structure and agenda, and sharing what I learned, the common question always came back, "But what can we do about it?" Those of us communicating on the issues answered: "Learn! Be informed! Know that power is within each of us."
A recurring response was, "Well, what does that mean? How do we find our power, and how do we use it to halt the evil overtaking the world?" I struggled with how to answer. Now I think I know. Hellyer's The Money Mafia gives me confidence that what I think on this is the way. His information therein about visitors from "starry realms", and full disclosure about them, and their technology, and the disclosure of the usurpation of that technology by the "money mafia" is the key...
(Paul Hellyer, left, was Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister in the 1960's)
The power and control of this planet is totally out of the hands of responsible government. It is totally in the hands of unaccountable privatized military, and industrial and banking cartels. The source of their incredible power is the extremely advanced technology at their disposal from downed spaceships which they have co-opted, studied, and reverse-engineered for decades funded by taxpayer trillions. This is the biggest secret of all time. They use the technology in military conquest for world domination and power and greed which process is killing the earth and its peoples. Deals have been made with other world beings which our side have breached respecting the disclosure of the technology which could save this planet from the environmental destruction the military industrial banking complex is creating. The technology could be used for housing, transportation, health, energy--providing earth's creatures with comfort and peace and happiness as exist elsewhere in the cosmos. But it is used for destruction and conquest.
Here is the crunch. There exists a Galactic Federation. Earth is a tiny part of the cosmos but is a jewel in its capacities as a planet. Earth humans are one kind of Being. The Galactic Federation is concerned that those in control of earth are rapidly destroying it by the military use of the technology they have reverse engineered. Their rapacious use of nuclear technology is a threat not only to earth but to space.
It is said that the Galactic Federation has the power to intervene on earth to assist in transferring the power into the hands of those who will share for the benefit of all, but a policy of non interference in free will and self determination exists. We cannot sit around twiddling our thumbs waiting for a knight in shining armor. We have to show our own mettle. Humans have to decide we will not tolerate the power being held and used as it is. We have to decide we do not want that destruction, and we will not allow it. We must show our intention to live otherwise, and to share the technology for the benefit of everyone, not for a few.
So, back to the fundamental question: how do we do this? Be informed! Say "No More"! The outrage of a fully informed public will terminate the "end game" of the cabal. A fully informed public will end the rule of the military /industrial /financial complex. Iceland has done it. Iceland jailed its fraudulent bankers and said NO to the IMF. Iceland is thriving.
Hellyer has taken a major step in writing this book. First, we must have knowledge. He gives us knowledge. What he and others like him have been telling us seems incredible. We must satisfy ourselves by studying the evidence presented. I am satisfied.
Hellyer tells us at page 172 to fulfill our responsibilities as citizens by going to www.paradigmresearchgroup.org and watch the proceedings until we are convinced of the reality of UFO's and the ET presence. This is important to do because the next step of the cabal is to fake an attack from space. They can do this because they have perfected the reverse-engineering of spaceships to the extent that they have duplicated them. Hellyer advises us to ignore that whole new show as being one more monstrous deception. In so doing, he says we can finally strike out the New World Order Pretenders.
Next, I say we must follow all the other excellent, fascinating work ongoing exposing the evil in process by the power structure, like mind control which suppresses thought and resistance. Activists say that is part of what chemtrails are about (as well as climate manipulation). Orwell's thought-police apparatus is being implemented. A conference in Brussels on this Agenda is set for 20 November, 2014. http://CovertHarassmentConference.com/
ALIEN TECHNOLOGY USED ON 9-11?
Further, we must inform ourselves of what really happened on 9/11. At pages 167 and 168 Hellyer sets out the evidence of Dr. Judy Wood that the buildings were not crushed or pulverized, nor were they heated to the point where they vapourized. They mostly were turned to dust in midair, or dustified. This proves that a technology that can cause such a thing to happen does exist. It is a technology that is capable of providing enormous quantities of free energy. We can be free from being slaves to the energy industry. Free energy is already here, but it has been used for evil purposes, not good. The buildings did not come down because they were hit by planes. "They did not collapse from fire nor from bombs in the building,(or conventional controlled demolition)," said an eye witness. "They were turned to powder in mid-air."
Dr Judy Wood wrote in Where Did the Towers Go? "There were 14 survivors in Stairway B of WTC1; when the dust cleared they looked up to see blue sky and walked out on their own. If the building had collapsed, they would have been crushed. If fires or high heat had caused the destruction, they would have been cooked to death and people in southern Manhattan would have been blinded by the light from the tremendous heat required to destroy the building."
Hellyer tells us that the events of 9/11 were "an attack on human consciousness that affected the whole planet. Hundreds of years of hard won victories against the arbitrary rule of tyrants went down the tube in an infamous day that crowned and confirmed the cult of deceit and disinformation that had become endemic since WW2."
Why follow all this and keep learning? Because the cabal will run when they know we know; when we say, "No! No more!"
Where is the action or activism in that? The action is in the process of your will and determination being set to live a different way - a way of peace and prosperity for all, not a few. This intention that is building around the world is a way to transmit our request for Galactic Assistance in our reach for a better and different world. (My words, not Hellyer's). Our will to live otherwise on this planet is manifested by our learning and our intention.
This is how we access the Galactic aid--by peaceful intent fueled by our knowledge, and by our refusal to submit to fear and mind control. This is not just thinking thoughts. We are acting when we learn and share and participate in conferences and talk about the truth. To refuse to stand down or submit is action. In other words, we carry on our various forms of activism! I do not deny that there have been and will be circumstances that extract a great personal sacrifice from some. The whistle blower, Snowden, has not had it easy, but his contribution has been phenomenal. How each of us deals with any efforts to force vaccinations on us may be difficult.
(Left, Connie Fogal, a lawyer, was President of the Canadian Action party, which Hellyer founded.)
We must resist with knowledge and the refusal to accept the lies as we did for H1N1. We need knowledge before we can take any action wisely. Alternative medicine sites tell us that colloidal silver and vitamin C prevent and cure Ebola. The inhumanity of CODEX that limits and criminalizes natural supplements is part of the agenda of the cabal to eliminate many of us "useless eaters" as Brezinsky (I think it was) called the masses. .
We face an evil future of subservience and suffering for those of the masses who will be allowed to live as slaves to the elite few, (provided the cabal does not blow up this earth in its abuse of power and technology.) The movie Elysium portrays such a world, one with the elite living off-planet in an abundance with phenomenal technology including machines that cure all diseases all of which is denied to the surviving servile masses who occupy an environmentally ravaged earth.
But it does not have to be. That is Hellyer's message.
REACHING OUT TO THE ALIENS
We can learn how to communicate telepathically to the Galactic Federation in order to be a part of a peaceful existence of abundance on this earth which is capable of such a bounty. We can demonstrate our intent by accepting no excuses from the vapid politicians, and by refusing to be ruled by fear even though we may feel it deeply.
Despite the evil perpetrated against the earth and human beings, extraterrestrials recommend against retribution. Hellyer refers to a message from extraterrestrials to grant amnesty to the "civilians and members of the armed forces who have broken numerous laws in the course of what they were led to believe was their duty". This comes from a book by Jim Sparks in an interview with many extraterrestrials entitled The Keepers: an Alien Message for the Human Race .
Hellyer says that the extraterrestrials admitted that serious crimes had been committed, but not by them. "They urged amnesty in the interests of disclosure," writes Hellyer. But he says, "While a total amnesty may be appropriate for most misdemeanours, it may be considered inappropriate in cases of murder, or complicity in mass murder like 9/11 where lack of some punishment could not be justified."
Hellyer contends that the year 2014 is the Year of Decision for Humankind. He quotes some key points from the story of Charlie Paz Wells and his brother who had been in direct contact with several species from afar. "...there are more than 80 different civilizations interacting within our solar system, all of which have gone through an evolutionary process. Now there is peace in the universe and they want to keep it that way. Earth and human beings are going through their own evolutionary process and are unstable. Humans risk destroying themselves and their planet. Humanity is not in balance with the universe, and the universal laws that control it. The extraterrestrials explained that they want to help us realize that we are not alone and that there is a better way of living and evolving that is sustainable. But before they give us the tools and technology to continue our evolution, they need to be assured that whatever they do for us must be used for ALL humanity. Not just for those in power who will use it to further their own agenda."
Hellyer says they were told in 1974 that in 30+ 10 years we would reach our own year of decision, our watershed when we would have to change our ways dramatically or it would be too late to reverse the trend and we would be subject to great calamities.
Hellyer says, "We are writing our own history day by day, and will determine our future by the choices we make and the actions that we take or fail to take."
First Comment by MS:
re: "There are no aliens" (http://henrymakow.com/2014/10/have-some-patriots-gone-crazy.html)
I've reading your work for quite some time, but with such pieces I'm willing to remove any and all links to your articles and consider yourself a very arrogant, ignorant person. You are mixing things which are Psyops (e.g. "Galactic Federation of Light") with your opinion / lack of knowledge about the topic and creating a piece (i.e. http://henrymakow.com/2014/10/have-some-patriots-gone-crazy.html) that isn't worth much.
People actually involved with exploring these topics, scientists with deep knowledge about the vastness of which Earth is only a small part of, claim to the contrary - common sense also dictates that. You come off as very arrogant with this latest piece.... Highly recommended to actually study this topic in more depth, otherwise your "opinions" aren't worth much...
It is well known, among those who actually DO some research on these matters, that the first head of NASA, Nazi rocket scientist Wernher von Braun, informed several assistants of future plans to exploit an "alien threat" (from another world) - in order to (psychologically) unite people globally.
This is what Reagan's famous "Aliens Speech", at the UN, was about: "Perhaps we need some outside, universal threat to make us recognize this common bond." It is what the repeated 'War of the Worlds', and all similar sci-fi (on radio and film) is/was really about. It's called predictive programming.
The only real threats from "aliens" come from the illegal ones (gang members and the infected spreading contagious diseases), from south of the border; given carte blanche to come into the U. S. and do what they want. This is by design.
Regarding 9/11: It is WELL DOCUMENTED that thermite was used on the upper sections of the buildings, and mini-nukes went off in the basements. Ergo: Nothing but dust, ejected/floating papers, and heaps of metal were left (no furniture, etc.). And water is still cooling the foot prints of the former buildings. [Building 7, however, was simply "pulled" (to quote Giuliani), in the standard manner. Never mind that nothing ever hit it. And that the BBC announced the destruction of Building 7 BEFORE they pulled it.] The fires burned for MONTHS. The ONLY thing that could make fires (on and in a pile of pulverized rubble and metal beams) last that long are nukes... No "alien" tech needed for any of it, just evil treason.
Simply because the public has been misdirected, does not mean clear and copious amounts of evidence are false. As for the rest, there are better scripts in the ORIGINAL Star Trek, which - by the way - was quite fascist/NWO; and patriots SHOULD go crazy, but not over fictional aliens or cheesy predictive programming.
A virus for brainwashing?
Kraig writes: From within our Abel Danger group someone found this video.
It appears to show a Pentagon briefing in which the idea of lobotomizing terrorists to remove their religious fanaticism using a manufactured virus containing a vaccine is seriously proposed, although debate has raged about whether the clip is authentic or not.
The footage shows a speaker giving a lecture to a handful of attendees and is also accompanied by authentic-looking Department of Defense project ID numbers. According to the text on the clip, the lecture took place inside a Pentagon briefing room.
The speaker discusses how certain people are predisposed to be religious fundamentalists because they have an aggressive VMAT 2 (God) gene which causes them to act on their beliefs in fanatical ways.
After a member of the audience asks the speaker if the idea is to "by spreading this virus....eliminate individuals who are going on to a bomb fest, who are going into a market and blowing it apart," the speaker confirms, "by vaccinating them against this, we'll eliminate this behavior."
The question of how to implement the vaccine is answered by the speaker when he responds to the man in the audience, who raises doubts over the feasibility of performing CT scans on suspected terrorists rather than just "putting a bullet in their head".
"The virus would immunize against this VMAT 2 gene and that would....essentially turn a fanatic into a normal person, and we think that would have major effects in the Middle East," states the speaker.
The audience member then asks, "How do you suggest this can be dispersed, via an aerosol?" -- to which the speaker responds, "The present plan and the tests we've done so far have used respiratory viruses such as flu and we believe that's a satisfactory way to get the exposure of the largest part of the population."
The speaker confirms that the name of the proposal is "Funvax -- the vaccine for religious fundamentalism."
Kraig found this debunk which should not be overlooked.
Caroll Quigley (1910-1977) taught at Princeton, Harvard and Georgetown Universities. In his book, Tragedy and Hope, (1966) he confirmed that private merchant bankers create money out of nothing and control world affairs. He didn't mention social engineering but they are behind gender bending (feminism, homosexuality,) and sexual "liberation".
"There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the ... Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records." Tragedy and Hope p. 960
Excerpts from Tragedy and Hope
Selected by henrymakow.com
In effect, this creation of paper claims greater than the reserves available means that bankers were creating money out of nothing. The same thing could be done in another way, not by note-issuing banks but by deposit banks. Deposit bankers discovered that orders and checks drawn against deposits by depositors and given to third persons were often not cashed by the latter but were deposited to their own accounts. Thus there were no actual movements of funds, and payments were made simply by bookkeeping transactions on the accounts.
(left, David Rockefeller, Jacob Rothschild)
Accordingly, it was necessary for the banker to keep on hand in actual money (gold, certificates, and notes) no more than the fraction of deposits likely to be drawn upon and cashed; the rest could be used for loans, and if these loans were made by creating a deposit for the borrower, who in turn would draw checks upon it rather than withdraw it in money, such "created deposits" or loans could also be covered adequately by retaining reserves to only a fraction of their value. Such created deposits also were a creation of money out of nothing, although bankers usually refused to express their actions, either note issuing or deposit lending, in these terms. William Paterson, however, on obtaining the charter of the Bank of England in 1694, to use the moneys he had won in privateering, said, "The Bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing." This was repeated by Sir Edward Holden, founder of the Midland Bank, on December 18, 1907, and is, of course, generally admitted today.
Pg. 51: The merchant bankers of London had already at hand in 1810-1850 the Stock Exchange, the Bank of England, and the London money market when the needs of advancing industrialism called all of these into the industrial world which they had hitherto ignored. In time they brought into their financial network the provincial banking centers, organized as commercial banks and savings banks, as well as insurance companies, to form all of these into a single financial system on an international scale which manipulated the quantity and flow of money so that they were able to influence, if not control, governments on one side and industries on the other.
The men who did this, looking backward toward the period of dynastic monarchy in which they had their own roots, aspired to establish dynasties of international bankers and were at least as successful at this as were many of the dynastic political rulers. The greatest of these dynasties, of course, were the descendants of Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) of Frankfort, whose male descendants, for at least two generations, generally married first cousins or even nieces. Rothschild's five sons, established at branches in Vienna, London, Naples, and Paris, as well as Frankfort, cooperated together in ways which other international banking dynasties copied but rarely excelled.
Pg. 52: The names of some of these banking families are familiar to all of us and should be more so. They include Raring, Lazard, Erlanger, Warburg, Schroder, Seligman, the Speyers, Mirabaud, Mallet, Fould, and above all Rothschild and Morgan. ...
Pg. 324: The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.
The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.
Pg. 326-327: It must not be felt that these heads of the world's chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down. The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called "international" or "merchant" bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks.
First Comment by Dan:
For those who are just hearing of Carroll Quigley, here's additional information to underscore the value of his revelations.
Bill Clinton studied with Quigley atthe School of Foreign Service at Georgetown. (He got a 'B'). Clinton mentioned Quigley as a mentor in his 1992 Presidential nomination acceptance speech at the Democrat National Convention in 1992. (it was televised).
Quigley was not a whistle blower. He was just so enthusiastic about the New World Order that he didn't understand that the American public would be shocked if he'd had the ability and backing to write a best seller in 1966. As it happened the first edition of Tragedy and Hope was yanked from the shelves shortly after publication. It's my understanding that the publisher not only destroyed recalled copies, they destroyed the printing plates too. The second half of the original was put out in 1968. The editor cut everything prior to 1939. An abridged edition went out in 1975.
The book didn't raise the slightest blip in mass market consciousness because Quigley lacked talent as a story teller. He wrote in long runon sentences, digressing and meandering to the extent that reading him requires great patience. HIs books finally got on the radar as millions of people in the 1990's began to realize that George H W. Bush wasn't kidding in his 'New World Order' speech on September 11th, 1991.
Left, It's not Ebola that will get you. It's the vaccines.
The Ebola Epidemic is a hoax on the scale of 9-11 and Sandy Hook. The purpose is to frighten the masses into accepting martial law measures and to send troops to occupy West Africa.
"IT IS INDISPENSABLE TO... UTTERLY EXHAUST HUMANITY WITH DISSENSION, HATRED, STRUGGLE, ENVY AND EVEN BY THE USE OF TORTURE, BY STARVATION, BY THE INOCULATION OF DISEASES, BY WANT, SO THAT THE "GOYIM" SEE NO OTHER ISSUE THAN TO TAKE REFUGE IN OUR COMPLETE SOVEREIGNTY IN MONEY AND IN ALL ELSE." Protocols of Zion, 10:19
by Richard Evans
Please note these facts: Ebola isn't airborne. Whenever speaking officially, CDC has to tell the truth that any doctor or nurse will tell you. "This is not like flu. It's not like measles, not like the common cold. It's not as spreadable, it's not as infectious as those conditions," That's from Dr. Tom Frieden, director of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. People don't get exposed by sitting next to someone on the bus or an airline. The infection is contracted through ingestion (or injection) of infected fluids entering the body through porous membrane tissue, or open cuts.
To date, they say the death toll approaches 5000 in West Africa, and ONE in the United States. Did you know that at least 98,000 people died last year from medical negligence in hospitals? That's 270 a day! Where is CNN for THAT story? Does Obama Care? 
When did the current Ebola media blitz enter public perception? Answer: Media kicked it off on March 19th with a report of 23 deaths in Guinea from a "mystery hemorrhagic fever". Note: they weren't calling it Ebola yet, and nobody paid attention till they did a month later.
The media sensation started with a bang on July 27th with the headlines that Dr. Kent Brantly, 33, and missionary Nancy Writebol had contracted Ebola near Monrovia, Liberia. Brantly was quoted saying "I held the hands of patients while they were dying".
The handsome white doctor was flown with much drama to the United States Center of Disease Control flagship, Emory Hospital in Atlanta Georgia.
I don't own a television, so i witnessed the TV coverage at a gym. The news reports appeared during 'The Young and the Restless' soap opera, so at first I had trouble telling the difference between two stories. Doesn't "Dr. Kent Brantly' sound like a soap opera character? He looks like one too. The story certainly sounded like a soap opera: Valiant white doctor holding the hands of dying natives in Africa, contracts killer virus, flown back to the States. TV viewers all over the world were asking, "Will he survive?"
He did, of course, and so did Nancy Writebol. Brantly was saved by the only Ebola serum dose on Earth. Wow. That's a real cliff hanger. (see my August 11th article, Ebola - Another Illuminati Psy Op?) I still stand by that article when I wrote "The mass media has been EXAGGERATING the hell out of Ebola".
But here it is almost Halloween and they're still at it. Media psyops usually have a half-life of about 3 weeks. They've sustained this one so long I even began to wonder whether it's 'real', till I'd spent a week researching up to date.
"EBOLA CRISIS, ACT TWO, SCENE ONE was the Liberian national who got a commercial airliner and flew to Dallas, Texas, to his destiny as the first person to die of Ebola in the Western Hemisphere, right here in the good 'ol United States.
'Thomas Eric Duncan' (TED) was a bit of mystery at first. An Oct. 2nd CNN story that says, "according to the friend, this was Duncan's first trip to America." In the UK Guardian October 8th obituary, "Thomas Eric Duncan fled Liberian war years before fatal Ebola infection". So how did he get Ebola? The story goes he was visiting a son and relatives who live in Dallas.
Within a week I noticed the Duncan story memes were being blended with the St. Louis (Ferguson) psyop that had been 'playing in theater two'. Relatives of Duncan were suddenly produced, and the first thing his alleged nephew said on Breakfast Television was "Duncan died because he was black". "U.S. Ebola patient Thomas Eric Duncan was treated differently because he was black, his nephew says" Then on cue, "Jesse Jackson Claims Racism: "Why Is Black Ebola Patient The Only One To Die?"
I don't want to digress into this aspect of the media sensationalism. It's just one of many facets of the overall Ebola Psyop.
Let's stop for a moment.
Something else about the Ebola human interest stories IS like a soap opera. We've seen no photos of these very photogenic Ebola poster people disfigured with the horrible effects of advanced Ebola. What to make of that?
Luckily there are many very astute researchers who have been working on this. I found these three videos to be gold.
CNN + NYT caught using CRISIS ACTORS! Oct 10, 2014 "Boston bombing and Sandy Hoax pales in comparison to the theatrics we are seeing in the media." "It's not Ebola that will get you. It's the vaccines."
De Facto Martial Law In Connecticut?...Ebola!!!! Oct 11, 2014
Ebola Hoax: Agenda 21 Green Psyop FULLY EXPOSED! Oct 11, 2014 Using the color green to program people. Even Africans are saying Ebola is fake.
I've been coming the same conclusion, at least insofar as the Dallas tale. I also noticed the day-glow green shirts cropping up in lots of Ebola related stories. Not to mention too many creepy obviously posed 'Hazmat' costumed images. Yes, it smacks of another Sandy Hoax, Boston Bombing, etc.
However, AFRICOM is real. Obama is actually President of the United States, and those weren't 4000 GI JOE dolls he's been deploying to West Africa.
Something is killing people in isolated villages in Liberia, Sierra Leon, Ivory Coast, and Nigeria. The photographic evidence we've been shown is FAKE. That means we're not being show what's really been going down over there.
Guinea: "Health officials killed by mob who believed they were infecting people with the virus".
"On 17 September 2014 a mob of villagers killed an 'Ebola Awareness team' in a village about 900 km from Guinea's capital. The Guinea correspondent reported that locals attacked the team, which comprised local administrators, two medical officers, a preacher, and the three journalists.
According to the correspondent, the villagers instigated this attack because they thought Ebola "is a political lie orchestrated by the authorities and that the disease is not real." This follows previous riots in Nzérékoré in August after rumours that health officials who were disinfecting a market were infecting people with the virus."
One Guinea native said that Ebola is being spread by Doctors Without Borders, a charity with Zionist connections.
Is it coincidental that the death toll in Guinea stopped growing after these incidents prompted their government to stop sending in such 'teams'? 
Obama deploys Special Forces fight a virus?
Look at all this troop deployment to Africa - and Iraq -- within the last week. Not just our 'ol pal the UK, but SPAIN.
I had a flash memory of something I noticed back summer of 2004. The G8 Summit was at Sea Island Georgia that summer (near the infamous Jeckyl Island). Most Americans didn't know about it because media overshadowed this meeting with the week long Apotheosis Rituals of Ronald Reagan (aka, President Reagan's State Funeral).
At the time the American public still believed that the EU, Russia and the UN opposed US/UK aggression in the Middle East.
This was not the case. The 2004 Summit is relevant because that's when they signed a joint (international) military treaty to commit troops to the "Global Peacekeeping Force" they created.
'suspected of carrying Ebola' - UK sending troops to West ...
4 days ago - Spanish authorities kill dog 'suspected of carrying Ebola' - UK sending troops to West Africa - U.S. authorities begin screening air passengers. Britain sending 750 soldiers and medics to Western Africa -
www.independent.co.uk › ... › Health News - private
The Independent 5 days ago - Britain will send 750 troops, three helicopters and a military vessel to support the ... In Spain, there was criticism of the authorities over the ...
Spain to send 300 troops to Iraq to train ISF - Iraqi News
... New ISIS map includes Europe, half of Africa, 25% of Asia and ...
(Ignore the real epidemics...)
There can be no Ebola epidemic in countries with toilets and good hygiene. When the UK and France also deployed soldiers a few days ago, I reached the conclusion that Ebola is quite simply the pretext for "medical" martial law. I've also collected the documentation to show the international treaties and Executive Orders to enable the Pandemic Quarantine cover for martial law were put in place between 2004-2008. Actually, it goes back much further than that, but we don't need to go back any further than 2004. I'm talking about recolonization of Africa by the former Colonial powers. Only this time they're in lockstep as the New World Order.
When a hoax is sustained for as many weeks as Ebola, be sure and keep checking the back page news, 'cause this is when the most treasonous legislation is passed, among other things.
 US National Institutes of Health (NIH) Pushing to Vaccinate Entire Countries with Ebola Vaccine
Related - Lots of Ebola is a Hoax articles (google search)
----------- Firestone Contains Ebola on its Plantations in Liberia
------------Jon Rappoport - Fixing the Numbers
------------- and Defining Ebola
--------------"Ebola, AIDS Manufactured by Western Pharmaceuticals, US DoD? Scientists Allege
NOTE: I asked Richard about the google images of Ebola victims;
I saw all those photos when I was researched. It turns out they're file photos from the real Ebola epidemic in Zaire in 1976.
That strain was eradicated at the time. http://www.itg.be/internet/ebola/ebola-31.htm
That's why they don't use those photos in today's news, and use the silly green T-shirt photos instead.
Also, I was surprised to see the Protocols have a line "...EXHAUST HUMANITY....EVEN BY THE USE OF TORTURE, BY STARVATION, BY THE INOCULATION OF DISEASES".
I thought inoculation wasn't developed till the 1920's to combat the syphilis epidemic. Looking into it this morning I find Voltaire wrote in detail about women in some Arab place inoculating their children with a homemade smallpox vaccine. If Voltaire was aware of it, the Illuminati knew about it too.
First Comment by GF:
The statistics tell the tale:
Global deaths from Ebola since 1976 = 4,521 (That includes the 3,019 deaths in 2014, as of the end of September 2014.)
Global deaths from influenza in 2009 = 284,000 (CDC data)
Global deaths from malaria in 2012 = 627,000 (WHO data) - 90% of malaria deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa.
Ebola epidemic = exaggerated propaganda. Purpose - to provide an excuse for US and NATO military intervention in resource-rich Africa.
A great article by Richard Evans, I agree 100%.
But there's another angle. This is also a proxy war between London and Beijing. Look at the 4 victim countries, and ask who the main trading partner is now (China) and was until now (Britain)
Case in point, here's an article about how Chinese companies are driving London mining interests out of Sierra Leone, and building up local infrastructure. How do they do it? By giving Africans a better deal:
You also need to look at who is the beneficiary of Ebola, which turns out to be London-based Glaxo Smith Kline. The timeline goes like this:
May 2013 GSK teams up with Save the Children to pay for the training of non- prof healthcare workers to deliver vaccinations throughout West Africa.
July 2014 As Evans points out, the Ebola panic begins with all the made-for- tv storylines.
August 2014 GSK starts fast-track trials for its experimental Ebola vaccine (well that was awfully quick!) http://www.gsk.com/en-gb/media/press- releases/2014/ebola-vaccine-trials-fast-tracked-by-international- consortium/
September 2014 The first British volunteer gets an Ebola vaccine http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/09/17/uk-health-ebola-vaccine- idUKKBN0HC17K20140917
October 2, 2014 GSK and Save the Children are the featured participants at the "Defeating Ebola" conference, jointly hosted by the UK and Sierra Leone governments.
Yes, there's ample reason to be concerned about forced vaccinations, etc. But ultimately, I suspect this is about the British empire re-asserting control over its former colonial holdings, where the uppity Chinese have something better than eternal slavery on offer.
Look for a lot of real Africans to die from Ebola shots, but also for a UN-controlled crisis zone that will allow guys with blue helmets and rifles to expel Chinese mining, oil and construction companies.
(left, Holocaust Temple on the Prairies, funded by Canadian taxpayers)
Breathtaking Jewish hypocrisy seen in
Canadian Museum of "Human Rights"
Racism for Israel; miscegenation, multiculturalism
and "tolerance" for the goyim.
Holocaust replaces Crucifixion as symbol of civilization;
Jews replace Christ
"And strangers shall stand and feed your flocks, and the sons of the alien shall be your plowmen and your vinedressers. But ye shall be named the Priests of the LORD: men shall call you the Ministers of our God: ye shall eat the riches of the Gentiles, and in their glory shall ye boast yourselves." Isaiah 61-5-6
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
The Asper family knew the Canadian government wouldn't fund a "Holocaust Museum" in Winnipeg so they re-branded it a "Human Rights Museum." The Zionist-controlled Harper government agreed to provide $21 million in annual operating costs.
After six years and $350 million in capital costs, and $71 in operating costs to date, the "human rights" museum finally opened last month. Now, it can revert to its true purpose.
On Oct.7 we learned that, "The Canadian Museum for Human Rights and The Asper Foundation have formed a partnership to bring [thousands of] students from across Canada to Winnipeg to learn about human rights and the Holocaust....The students will visit the museum as part of the foundation's Human Rights and Holocaust Studies Program, which was created in 1997 to promote respect for others and to teach the consequences of racism."
It appears that "human rights" are being presented as synonymous with reverence for the Jewish genocide. Isn't this a narrow and reductive focus? What about the "human right" to food and shelter when one percent own 48% of the world's wealth? What about freedom from government surveillance? What about genuine democracy when most politicians are Freemasons?
JEWS OPPOSE ALL RACISM BUT THEIR OWN
The CMHR will be a tireless campaigner against any kind of "racism."
Israeli professor Shlomo Sand recently wrote that Israel is "one of the most racist societies in the western world. Racism is present to some degree everywhere, but in Israel it exists deep within the spirit of the laws. It is taught in schools and colleges, spread in the media, and above all and most dreadful, in Israel, the racists do not know what they are doing and, because of this, feel in no way obliged to apologize."
He added that Israel has become a model to racists worldwide: "This absence of a need for self-justification has made Israel a particularly prized reference point for many movements of the far right throughout the world, movements whose past history of antisemitism is only too well known."
Is there a gallery at the "human rights" museum dedicated to the only truly Apartheid state left on earth? No.
Palestinians groups have already remarked on the museum's silence on their plight. Apparently driving a million Palestinians out of their homes and off their land, or recently slaughtering 2000 Gazans and rendering another 65,000 homeless, does not qualify as genocide if Israel does it.
A plethora of other groups ranging from aboriginals to Ukrainians have also complained that their suffering does not fit the Jewish definition of genocide.
Clearly, the Canadian Museum of Human Rights is there to advance the Illuminati Jewish (Zionist) agenda, which is to grant rights to some but not others. Racism for Israel. Multiculturalism and miscegenation for the goyim. Rights for homosexuals and transgendered people. No rights for heterosexuals, fathers and nuclear families. Rights for minorities. No rights for majorities. Rights for perverts, atheists and Satanists. No rights for Christians.
WHY KEEP POUNDING THE HOLOCAUST DRUM?
There are about 60 holocaust cathedrals around the world, including 24 in the US. In spite of the fact that over 60 million people died in the Second World War, most in conditions as horrific as the Jewish victims, the Illuminati are using Jewish victimhood to elevate Jews to a special sacred ruling-class status. Judaism is all about Jews ruling the world. (See Isaiah 61 above)
They promote the holocaust in order to take the place of the Crucifixion of Christ.* God's Chosen People replace the Son of God. Jews are Divine martyrs.
"Ye shall be named the Priests of the LORD: men shall call you the Ministers of our God.
Ye shall eat the riches of the Gentiles, and in their glory shall ye boast yourselves."
In a brazen reversal, the goyim not Jews are responsible for Divine martyrdom. The guilt of the goyim God-killers disarms resistance to Zionist control.
The hypocrisy is galling since Illuminati Jews were instrumental in initiating the Second World War and the holocaust.
Non-Zionist Jews were a strategic sacrifice.
Tonight (Oct. 14) in Toronto, an event will be held at a trendy downtown bookstore: A reading from a new book "Miracle at the Forks" about the struggle to build the Canadian Human Rights Museum. I was struck by the fact that the opening remarks will be given by Gail Asper (Jewish); the authors Peter Newman (Jewish) and Alan Levine (Jewish) will speak; and the closing remarks will be made by Moe Levy (Jewish.) The owner of the bookstore chain is Heather Reisman (Jewish.) Are the only people concerned with "human rights" Jewish?
Of course not. While claiming to combat racism, they are advancing the original and ultimate racism, "the Chosen People" i.e. the anachronistic notion that Jews are better than other people, and should rule the world. Everyone else should yield their wealth in tribute.
While accusing everyone who resists servitude of "hate", they are in fact the original progenitors of hate. Their sacred Talmud fulminates against Christ and Gentiles. All the while, these pathetic hypocrites wrap themselves in an aura of self righteousness and piety.
The bottom line is that these champions of "human rights" are bent on destroying genuine human rights. Organized Jewry, and the "establishment" in general, are instruments of the central banking cartel whose aim was described by Illuminati insider, Georgetown University Professor Caroll Quigley in his book Tragedy and Hope (1966).
"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences." (p. 324)
* This idea was first suggested by Israel Shamir, in his book Pardes
Related- Makow - The Hypocrisy of the CMHR
-----------------Israel is an Apartheid State
-----------------30% of Israelis Wish they Could Leave
we are today nothing else but the world's seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, its executioners...I look at this world, and I shudder at its ghastliness; I shudder all the more as I know the spiritual authors of all this ghastliness. . ."
Oscar Levy (1867-1946) was a British Jewish physician, Nietzsche scholar and son of a banker.
This is from his Preface to George Pitt-Rivers's The World Significance of the Russian Revolution,
a denunciation of the dominant Jewish role in Communism.
Makow Comment: More evidence that Judaism (Cabalism) is a satanic cult that aims at world domination by
destabilizing the world. Its leaders, the Cabalist (Illuminati) bankers, have duped many Jews and Freemasons
to become their instruments. (Cabalism maintains that God is "formless, unknowable and not in the universe." This is a prerequisite for Cabalists to replace God- i.e. Satanism.)
[Abridged by Henry Makow, originally posted April 7, 2011]
From OSCAR LEVY to Mr. George Pitt-Rivers, July 1920
Every writer, who, like yourself, is oppressed by the subject of the present and embarrassed by his anxiety for the future, MUST try to elucidate the Jewish Question and its bearing upon our Age.
For the question of the Jews and their influence on the world - past and present - cuts to the root of all things, and should be discussed by every honest thinker, however bristling with difficulties it is, however complex the subject as well as the individuals of this Race may be.....
KEY TO UNDERSTANDING HISTORY
But first of all, I have to say this: There is scarcely an event in modern Europe that cannot be traced back to the Jews. Take the Great War that appears to have come to an end, ask yourself what were its causes and its reasons: you will find them in nationalism.
You will at once answer that nationalism has nothing to do with the Jews, who as you have just proved to us, are the inventors of the international idea. But no less than Bolshevist Ecstasy and Financial Tyranny can National Bigotry (if I may call it so) be finally followed back to a Jewish source -- are not they the inventors of the Chosen People Myth? and is not this obsession part and parcel of the political credo of every modern nation, however small and insignificant it may be?
And then think of the history of nationalism. It started in our time and as a reaction against Napoleon;
Napoleon was the antagonist of the French Revolution; the French Revolution was the consequence of the German Reformation; the German Reformation was based upon a crude Christianity; this kind of Christianity was invented, preached and propagated by the Jews: THEREFORE the Jews have made this war!
Please do not think this a joke: it only seems a joke, and behind it there lurks a gigantic truth, and it is this, that all latter-day ideas and movements have originally sprung from a Jewish source, for the simple reason, that the Semitic idea has finally conquered and entirely subdued this only apparently irreligious universe of ours.
There is no doubt that the Jews regularly go one better or worse than the Gentile in whatever they do, there is no further doubt that their influence today justifies a very careful scrutiny, and cannot possibly be viewed without serious alarm.
The great question, however, is whether the Jews are conscious or unconscious malefactors. I myself am firmly convinced that they are unconscious ones, but please do not think that I wish to exonerate them on that account. . . A conscious evildoer has my respect, for he knows at least what is good: an unconscious one -- well, he needs the charity of Christ -- a charity which is not mine -- to be forgiven for not knowing what he is doing.
But there is in my firm conviction not the slightest doubt that these revolutionary Jews do not know what they are doing; that they are more unconscious sinners than voluntary evildoers.
I am glad to see that this is not an original observation of mine, but that you yourself have a very strong foreboding about the Jews being the victims of their own theories and principles.
On page 39 of your pamphlet you write: "It may be that the Jews have always been instrumental in bringing about the events that they most heartily disapprove of; that maybe is the curse of the Wandering Jew".
If I had not the honor, as well as the pleasure, of knowing you personally, if I were not strongly aware of your passionate desire for light and your intense loathing of unfairness, this sentence, and this sentence alone, which tells the truth, will absolve you in my eyes from the odious charge of being a vulgar anti-Semite.
No, you are not a vulgar, you are a very enlightened critic of our Race. For there is an anti-Semitism, I hope and trust, which does the Jews more justice than any blind philo-Semitism, than does that merely sentimental "Let-them-all-come Liberalism" which in itself is nothing but the Semitic Ideology over again. And thus you can be just to the Jews without being 'romantic about them.
You have noticed with alarm that the Jewish elements provide the driving forces for both Communism and capitalism, for the material as well as the spiritual ruin of this world.
But then you have at the same time, the profound suspicion that the reason of all this extraordinary behavior may be the intense Idealism of the Jew. In this you are perfectly right. The Jew, if caught by an idea never thinks any more in watertight compartments as do the Teuton and Anglo-Saxon peoples whose right cerebral hemisphere never seems to know what its left twin brother is doing; he, the Jew, like the Russian, at once begins to practice what he preaches, he draws the logical conclusion from his tenets, he invariably acts upon his accepted principles.
It is from this quality, no doubt, that springs his mysterious force -- that force which you no doubt condemn, but which you had to admire even in the Bolshevist. And we must admire it, whether we are Jews or whether we are Christians, for have not these modern Jews remained true to type? Is there no parallel for them in history? Do they not go to the bitter end even in our day?
Who stirred up the people during the late war in Germany? Who pretended to have again the truth, that truth about which Pontius Pilate once shrugged his shoulders? Who pleaded for honesty and cleanliness in Politics, that honesty which brings a smile to the lips of any experienced Pro-counsel of to-day? Writers who were mostly Jews: Fried, Fernau, Latzko, Richard Grelling -- the author of J'accuse', who was killed and allowed himself to be killed for these very ideas and principles. Men and women of the Jewish Race: Haase, Levine, Luxemburg, Landauer, Kurt Eisner, the Prime Minister of Bavaria.
From Moses to Marx, from Isaiah to Eisner, in practice and in theory, in idealism and in materialism, in philosophy and in politics, they are today what they have always been: passionately devoted to their aims and to their purposes, and ready, nay, eager, to shed their last drop of blood for the realization of their visions.
MANKIND SUFFERS FOR JEWISH FOLLY
"But these visions are all wrong", will you reply. "Look where they have led the world to. Think, that they have now had a fair trial of 3,000 years' standing. How much longer are you going to recommend them to us and to inflict them upon us? And how do you propose to get us out of the morass into which you have led the world so disastrously astray?"
To this question I have only one answer to give, and it is this: "You are right".
This reproach of yours, which -- I feel it for certain -- is at the bottom of your anti-Semitism, is only too well justified, and upon this common ground I am quite willing to shake hands with you and defend you against any accusation of promoting Race Hatred: If you are anti-Semite, I, the Semite am an anti-Semite too, and a much more fervent one than even you are. . .
We (Jews) have erred, my friend; we have most grievously erred. And if there was truth in our error 3,000, 2,000, nay, 100 years ago, there is now nothing but falseness and madness... a madness that will produce an even greater misery and an even wider anarchy.
I confess it to you, openly and sincerely, and with a sorrow whose depth and pain an ancient Psalmist, and only he, could moan into this burning universe of ours. . .
We who have posed as the saviours of the world; we who have even boasted of having given it "the" Saviour; we are today nothing else but the world's seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, its executioners.
We who have promised to lead you to a new Heaven, we have finally succeeded in leading you into a new Hell. . .
There has been no progress, least of all moral progress. . . And it is just our Morality, which has prohibited all real progress, and -- what is worse -- which even stands in the way of every future and natural reconstruction in this ruined world of ours. . .
I look at this world, and I shudder at its ghastliness; I shudder all the more as I know the spiritual authors of all this ghastliness. . .
Related: Oscar Levy's Obituary
Livingstone - Cabalist Creative Destruction behind Syrian "Civil" War
First Comment by Lynda:
As much as I would like to see Jews interrupt their regularly scheduled programming from the Kabal, its Golems and instrumentalities, I do not think this letter of Oscar Ludwig Levy to George Pitt-Rivers (July 1920) is an example of someone who follows the Law of Moses. With respect, I don't think it belongs in the 'Righteous' file. His comments and reflections are amoral in the strict Nietschean sense.
The only way, Oscar Levy could be considered 'righteous' is if that is translated into Greek and encrypted into the 'eu' sun code of the secret societies. Many Greek words carry the eu prefix that translate into good, well, fair, glory, righteous, godly. The Secret Societies - the Masonic Agentur or the Gentile social Masonry of the Kabal - often codes 'helios / sun' with the Greek prefixes io; eo; eu etc to signify some aspect of the sun. Such glyphs, sigils and codes come from the ancient Babylonian priesthood of Sumer which stretched the length of the EU-phrates River from Eridu (South) to Babylon (North). Euphrates means: EU - righteous (eg helios in the sense of righteousness) and Phrate (brotherhood). The brotherhood of the sun-righteousness was the ancient Babylonian priesthood. Their mystery schools (for example the Eleusian Mystery Schools of Greece were all over the empires that succeeded ancient Babylon from Lydia to Egypt) - these were just schools. Modern Freeamasonry is the successor to these schools.
But in the pages of the New Testament we have the discourses of a branch of the ancient priesthood, itself, the Pharisees, who worked their ancient law of the Tradition of the Elders (and cloaked it in the teaching of Moses) as well as their Babylonian magecraft: the Kaballah. In his Letter, Oscar Levy gets a score of 100% in both Law and Kaballah. He is a priest and an elite of the Kabal, a master of the rabbinic dialectic and like his Pharisaic antecedents in the Kabal, he voids the Law of Moses.
One of the defining marks of the Elders of Zion - descendants of this ancient Babylonian Kabal is that they always cloak their true religion which true POV they think none can discover. They cloak it in the teaching of Moses. But as the discourses of Jesus of Nazareth in the NT clearly bear witness, they void the Law of Moses by their Tradition of the Elders - later written down as the Talmud.
We have a few transcripts from men who were on the interface of the Kabal - men like Chaim Rakovsky who was a commander of the Bolshevik front raised up by the Kabal for the destruction of Czarist Russia and the creation of a globalist Golem that would be a major vector for the ordo ab chao. We have the writings of Theodore Herzl who was a commander of the Zionist front raised up by the Kabal for the taking of Palestine. All very instructive.
But with this letter of Oscar Ludwig Levy, I think we have a letter from one of the Elders. He is the real deal. He is straight out of the pages of the New Testament.
The Mosaic Law of Israel is not dialectical. The Mosaic Law sets out prohibition in terms that refer to the character of God Himself. The reasoning of the Mosaic Law is based on non-contradiction in terms. There is no thesis <--> antithesis ---> synthesis about it The 'love your neighbour as yourself' can have the limited interpretation in the sense of command to love fellow members of the Covenant - in this case, the Circumcision. But even taken and limited in this sense, the attitude of Dr Levy voids the Law of Moses. He is engaged in "lesser brethern" management strategy, not the second commandment of Moses. His assistance to the publication of facts of matter on the 'Jewish Question' will serve to create the backlash [ aka 'anti-semitism ] they want. The Protocols are very clear about this.
Dr Levy is merely assisting this process from the Chesed [compassion] side of the dialectic. He does not oppose Gevurah [severity]. He himself says he has no charity for the Jews, his own people, who as committed idealists are working to create the "ghastliness" he deplores. To the Kaballistic mind this is a necessary phase of the Great Work. The Ordo, the Pax Judaica, can only be harvested out of the Chao.
Contrast this with the great Jewish American Chess Master and Truth-teller: Bobby Fisher, who exemplified so much of what America could have been (and the Jewish role in it, I might add). Now. Bobby was definitely on the side of the second commandment of Moses. He was prepared to deliver the bad news [and he did with both barrels] and take the consequences if it would de-programme his own people, get them out of this thing and help America.
I was at university during the Fisher / Spassky matches. One of the refectories set up a closed circuit tv system so that students between lectures could follow the match. This place was packed out. I usually came in just before commencement. I was usually at the back standing in the cafeteria line when the deafening shout of "Pawn to E2" went up. If you were two blocks away, you knew that Fisher had opened his game. This is the America that might have been.
Look at how Levy nails 400 years of dialectical history in a single paragraph. His analysis of "Napolean" as an "antagonist of the Revolution" is masterful. Not even Rakovsky who used the same example of Napoleon in criticising Stalin as a "Bonaparist" - one who had hijacked the Revolution for his own political objectives" - managed to just nail it as deftly as Levy.
Clearly, Oscar Levy does not command or serve any of the vectors created by the Kabal and workshopped in its social Masonry for their Great Work of the Ordo ab Chao. His remarks are the remarks of one who sits above the dialectical positions that the Golems of the Kabal and their ideologies must play out in terms of the Sephiroth on the Grand Chessboard. Using the pillars of the Kaballah, I think it would be fair to say that he is neither Chesed or Gevurah. He speaks as one who lives, works and thinks in the balance of those who operate the dialectic itself - a member of the Kabal.
This is a page straight out of the Protocols of Zion written by one who was a member of the ancient Babylonian priesthood, a Kabal that surfaced as the Elders of the Pharisees with their Babylonian oral law (the Tradition of the Elders) in the pages of the New Testament.
The Illuminati, a satanic cult based on Jewish Cabalism, have subverted humanity
by finagling control of government credit (currency) which gives them control of
banking and thereby everything else of importance. Our satanic possession requires that
they sever our connection to reality via language. Jewish philosophers like Jacques Derrida (1930-2004) promoted the occult idea that language is a separate reality, and all that is knowable.
According to Wikipedia, Derrida's concepts of "deconstruction" and "semiotics" have
infected the humanities and social sciences, including--in addition to philosophy and literature--law, anthropology, historiography, linguistics, music, art, architecture, psychoanalysis, political theory, feminism, and queer studies. Derrida is one of the major figures associated with post-structuralism and postmodern philosophy.
Deconstruction- a philosophical and critical movement, starting in the 1960s and especially applied to the study of literature, that questions all traditional assumptions about the ability of language to represent reality and emphasizes that a text has no stable reference or identification because words essentially only refer to other words and therefore a reader must approach a text by eliminating any metaphysical or ethnocentric assumptions through an active role of defining meaning, sometimes by a reliance on new word construction, etymology, puns, and other word play.
"The result this Sephardic (i.e. Cabalist) tint to language have given us is not a deconstruction, but a destruction, of sane thought, thought that is governed by the way things are and not by society's demands upon words and how they are to be used. Derrida has accomplished exactly what [the Illuminati] needs to have established in order to promote the insanity that breaks down society and prepares it for easy pickings and subjugation." -Arnold Palmer
by Arnold Palmer
Moral relativism, the position that we don't know what is really right or wrong, or that no standards are available to make that judgment, received a strong impetus from Jacque Derrida's "deconstructionist" pronouncements in the last century.
Simply put, deconstructionism is the view that words are how we think, and they do not reflect reality. First society puts us in a language setting, and from that language comes our ability to think and speak.
With such a view, if you can mold a word, make it shift in what is specifies, you are able to make the language fit a moral argument.
In other words, language creates rather then reflects reality. This is perfect for Cabalist Jews who believe God speaks through them, and they have a right to impose their subjectivity on humanity.
Deconstructionism is the notion that words need their context, their setting, their usage, their flavor, their ambiance to be broken down, "deconstructed," so that we can understand what the one who is pronouncing the word is saying.
This also applies to sentence structure. Sentence structure is not governed by things as they are. Rather, it emerges from society's hit and miss usage over the centuries. Subject-predicate thought in the West has no equal in some primitive languages deconstructionism claims, and this should be evidence enough that language is not based on what is actually in the real world, but how we put nouns, verbs, adjectives together. This is the syntactical side of deconstructionism called semiotics, or semi-idiotics by critics.
The simplest way to have a society believe that words, not concepts, are how we interpret reality is to propose "archeological" models of language where it is held development of language structure can be examined. Ancient Hebrew, e.g., when it wants to express "there is a tree" eliminates the copulative. It simply utters "tree" and the listener is supposed to realize that it means in our way of twenty-first century speech "there is a tree." But the Ancient Hebrew or Ugaritic has no copula. Taking this example deconstructionism moved into our everyday usage of words and nihilistically "deconstructs" words as to what they actually say when they are used.
ORWELLIAN DOUBLE SPEAK
So developed, Orwellian double-speak is a neat follow though for the deconstructionists, whose own works, books, lectures on the subject of how words, and not concepts, are what govern how we think are almost unintelligible to the normal reader or listener. In stating, however, that society is the arbiter of word usage and syntax, deconstructionism has slowly been able over the last fifty years argue that our moral universe is not "out there" but in fact doesn't exist.
The way we use words,.e.g, "pro-choice" replaces "pro-abortion," "same-sex marriage" replaces "same-sex partnership" (while "marriage" is the term used to indicate a couple who can procreate and will do so in a committed relationship, thus making "same-sex marriage" a bizarre elocution) calling "terrorism" "workplace violence," etc.
All these twists of language usage have respectability because of the notion Derrida, a Sephardic Jew from Algiers, decided to argue, that words, not concepts which the mind takes from things as they are, is what makes for social interaction and understanding.
Deconstructionism is the next easy step to argue that "concepts" have no basis in things, but actually it is words and how one can get to their usage in a societal setting that makes for how society should govern and live.
The result this Sephardic tint to language have given us is not a deconstruction, but a destruction, of sane thought, thought that is governed by the way things are and not by society's demands upon words and how they are to be used. It is peculiar that the deconstructionist school has Sephardic roots. Given how many see this Sephardism as originator of the way to make society think its way, and no other, that Derrida, a Sephardic himself, would have come up with such destruction of the language should surprise no student of what language really means, and how it originates from the world.
First Comment from Gary:
When I returned to graduate school in the mid-80s to earn a Ph.D. in English, after an 18-year hiatus (during which time I had taught English and American Literature in the US and Japan), I was amazed to discover the impact "deconstructionism" was having on literary criticism and on literature itself. It seemed to me that the deconstructionists were very much about elevating the role of the critic over that of the writer; to the extent that they minimized and practically eliminated the writer, but focused attention, instead, on what the critics had to say about other critics! This became a roundabout game of building reputations of fluff--fluff based on mistiness!
Of course, symbolism has always been important in the Arts, but when it is paramount and works to exclude the concrete, palpable, flesh and blood realities of life in favor of the smoky musings of self-bemused "intellectual" con-artists, then we are all in deep s*it! (Quick! Hand me that life-line!)
Gertrude Stein (not the most concrete of authors!) once complained about the city of Oakland, California: "There is no there there!" That's the real situation with deconstructionism--with it, we wander through a self-referential and non-referential sort-of Oakland!
Facing a tough re-election vote next month,
Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber, 67,
has been blindsided by the discovery that
Oregon's "First Lady" his longtime girlfriend,
and now fiancee, "environmental activist"
Cylvia Hayes, 47, had entered into a sham marriage
in 1997 in return for $5000.
This opens some wounds for our contributor, Philip Wyeth of Portland,
who indulges in a soothing mix of misogyny and schadenfreude.
"Any man can fall victim to a woman's duplicity and sins of omission."
by Philip Wyeth
Women's Secret Biographies
(abridged by henrymakow.com)
When my best friend's wife left him out of the blue, it sent shockwaves through us all, because as he phrases it, "She was vetted."
In the six years since that paradigm-shifting day, he and I have kept an ongoing dialogue about the mysterious underbelly of human nature in order that neither of us should be so badly blindsided again. A local news story this week in Oregon brings the lesson home writ large that any man can fall victim to a woman's duplicity and sins of omission.
Apparently Cylvia Hayes's third marriage in 1997 was to an 18-year-old Ethiopian student who paid her $5,000 so he could get a green card. Hayes, 29 at the time and also a student, claims it was "an unstable period in my life" and that "I was associating with the wrong people." Hmm, what people were these exactly?
Not only did she sweep this illegal marriage under the rug while building up her meticulous façade, she never once revealed it to Kitzhaber during all the years they've been together. He only learned about it this week after Willamette Week started digging into the court records--which always seem so dirty--and now all her big talk about the "work that I do on behalf of our environment and trying to make people's lives better" will have to wait because "I need to take some personal time to reflect and address this difficult situation and to focus on my relationship with John."
Walking home after breakfast I kept chewing over this most revealing fact: she already had three divorces under her belt by the age of 35. Now 47 and engaged to Kitzhaber as of August after years as "life partners," Hayes must have envisioned the next four years as her "rags to riches" coronation should he, a man twenty years her senior no less, win reelection next month, with nuptials sure to follow.
But in life high drama sometimes lies in wait near the finish line.
WELCOME TO THE CUCKHOLD CLUB
It sure is instructive to all us Joe Nobodies that a man at the top with life experience and the winning smile can get the wool pulled over his eyes by a say-anything gold digger just like the rest of us.
I believe that somewhere deep in every woman's subconscious there is a microchip that employs Outcome Based Logic to justify any type of bad behavior when it is exposed. In sweet Cylvia's own words: "My decision to marry illegally felt very, very distant and far removed from the life I was building. I was ashamed and embarrassed. Therefore I did not share this information even with John once we met and started dating." And there it is.
To paraphrase the logic: "I am an unaccomplished woman in my 30s with a sketchy past, so as I try to infiltrate respectable society I must keep my new identity squeaky clean, particularly in the eyes of this successful man whose coattails I intend to ride. Oops, now it's ten years into our relationship and I never bothered to tell him so that he at least could politically strategize in advance to protect his reputation should my dark secrets come to light--not to mention his feelings! Oh well, I'm going to take some time off... don't forget to vote Kitzhaber!"
Now let's see her in action. First, in this patronizing little speech [last April], her delusions of grandeur about saving the environment intertwine perfectly with a public figure's self-aggrandizing life story narrative--just remember that this impressively put-together professional woman yukking it up with the crowd is at the core really just another sexy little scammer taking advantage of people's gullibility while keeping her own agenda moving forward. The whole thing is just so full of shit!
(Wah! Wah! Got caught. Time for the perp walk)
And now video of this week's heartbreaking press conference where behind the crocodile tears we witness as the dreams of a poor child "who would bathe in Old Man Green's pond up the road" are crushed by the Angel of Accountability, that cruel judge who inevitably ... settle accounts. Even clever little girls who... walk away from their sins of expediency, who pause only to touch up their makeup before rounding the corner to see what new doors their pretty face can open.
Century after century, men both great and poor fall for the mindless charming guile that nature has bestowed upon women. They smile at us and whisper promises, so we open our gates and dare to trust--and afterwards we somehow always find ourselves trampled on the ground, penniless, our reputations torn to shreds, our hearts crushed and confused.
There's no clever out here--we're looking at a stark and sometimes brutal part of life... We have to ask ourselves hard questions beforehand. How vulnerable am I willing to make myself? How thoroughly would I investigate a woman whose company I enjoy? Would I even have the strength to leave her if I didn't like what I found out?
All kidding aside, a part of me sympathizes with John Kitzhaber right now. Not the politician, not the savvy public figure, but the man deep down inside who got played just like Samson, just like my friend, just like a billion other unknown men throughout history. It's heavy stuff and all we can do is look at it right in the eyes.
Gentlemen! if you were John Kitzhaber, would you call off your marriage to Cylvia Hayes? Send replies to firstname.lastname@example.org
First Comment by Jack:
My wife pulled the "I love you but im not in love with you" bullshit 3 months ago... she then left our home, and is currently fucking another man, and it seems, had at the very least carried out an emotional affair w/ him online for a 6 month minimum prior to conessing and leaving. There are many more heinous details. My poor daughter's life has been rocked... she's only 5 and in kindergarten. Over and over I ask my wife (soon to be ex) how she could be so absolutely selfish. Shes thought about no one but herself and "finding my happiness in life" as she says...
One thing is certain. We need to begin working at the judicial level to change the laws. Women like my wife should be punished harshly. Infidelity and abandonment should be a felony offense. But as the laws are currently written, ill probably end up PAYING her a ridiculous sum each month. For what?!?!
Wade: "No matter how egregious their behavior is, IT IS ALWAYS JUSTIFIED. We must also remember that truth is relative and subjective [to them]"
Men are far from being perfect...that said, my heart goes out to most men involved in a divorce. I have been through two divorces with two kids involved both times. Both former wives were adulteresses. Under the old laws in California neither would have gotten a penny out of me and their contact with the children would have been severely restricted.
Thanks to the no fault divorce law, my kids were subjected to much suffering, and my finances were devastated. THE ONLY WINNER IN CALIFORNIA FAMILY LAW IS THE FORMER WIFE, no matter what a whore she has been, or how much money she has stolen from her husband and rat-holed in a joint account with her mother (as my second wife did). Everyone suffers except the guilty party who deserves to suffer.
There are sleazeball men out there and I have no sympathy for them. However, no fault divorce is not a good thing. My aunt on my mother's side, had a divorce before no fault divorce was passed. Her former husband (a farmer) hired a private detective and had the goods on her, for she was very much involved in an adulterous relationship with another man. In the divorce she got nothing, and her visits with her daughter were severely restricted, and of course, the farmer husband got custody of their only child.
This did not stop the selfish immoral behavior of my aunt. She married the guy she was sleeping with and then went on to do the same thing to him she had done to her first husband. All together she ended up being married five times. Always looking for the greener grass, always totally selfish.
This article and the first comment are both right on. Guys...we must always remember that women not only hate to fess up and tell the truth, they also flatly refuse to do it. No matter how egregious their behavior is, IT IS ALWAYS JUSTIFIED. We must also remember that truth is relative and subjective even to most good and faithful women. It is the way they are. Truth is objective to men...so there we have a problem.
As men we have two major issues: First...most of us do not understand women at all, and this makes us very vulnerable. Secondly...no fault divorce should never be the law in any state.
Good husband and wife relationships are, of course, possible. But not very common or easily achieved. The man, who is a politician in the article, should run as fast and as far away from this woman as he can. Just one man's opinion, derived from painful and costly experience.
Part Mother Theresa/Part Nelson Mandela - Malala Yousafzai fills an icon vacuum. Teacher called her out of high school Chemistry class to inform her she had won the Nobel Prize. Oy vey! She joins such peacemakers as Barack Obama and Henry Kissinger.
Malala is another Illuminati Psy Op
("Educating girls will change the world," Malala,17, told the UN in July 2013. "Change" is satanist code for social & cultural degradation. "Peace" is code for total submission to Illuminati world tyranny.)
Malala has the hallmarks of an Illuminati psy op: The mass media rush as one to sanctify her; Illuminati whores, politicians and celebrities alike, endorse her. Canada offers honorary citizenship. The article below by Zahar Bangash outlines the Illuminati connection to Malala and confirms once again we live in a de facto Communist regime.
Malala is a champion of education for girls. "Education" today is gendercide (feminism.) The Illuminati use this toxin to destroy traditional societies and reduce population by alienating women from their natural instincts, i.e. marriage and motherhood.
Who says learning only takes place in a classroom, and not in a home where the Illuminati can't control the message?
Liberal (i.e. Masonic) education has degraded Western society and created many generations of lost souls.
As usual, the Illuminati "do well by doing good." Malala's father owns a chain of private schools and huge UK/US education corporations are vying for a share of the "Malala Fund" cash grab.
Anyone who watches the Malala hagiography that passes for TV news can confirm that Western society is run by hypocritical, sanctimonious, shameless intellectual whores and liars.
"Let us be clear: the West and its corporations are not in the business of doling out cash to third world countries or caring much about the children there unless there is a hidden agenda behind the façade of their good work. One is clearly to re-route the billions of dollars to their own pockets. The other equally sinister plan is to promote Western culture, thoughts and values by using the label of education. "
by Zafar Bangash
(The Crescent, Nov 2012)
(Edited/abridged by henrymakow.com)
The attack on Malala Yousafzai [in Oct. 2012] evoked worldwide condemnation. From US President Barack Obama to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, all condemned the attack. The question is: why is Malala given so much prominence when other attacks on girls in Pakistan and Afghanistan go virtually unnoticed?
The attempt on the life of Malala Yousafzai, a 15-year-old Pakistani schoolgirl from Mingora in Pakistan's Swat Valley on October 9 has aroused worldwide outrage. Two other girls were also injured in the attack as Malala was returning home in a school bus. There were rallies in her support not only in Pakistan but some very high-powered global players also weighed in on her case. In what must be a first, US President Barack Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown all condemned the attack on Malala as did most politicians in Pakistan. Hollywood actress Angelina Jolie suggested Malala should be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize while Madonna put Malala's name on her bare back!
Let us get the basic facts straight before we proceed. She was attacked and badly injured when a gunman boarded the school bus she was riding home from school. The gunman demanded to know who Malala was. When another girl student pointed to her, the gunman opened fire, hitting Malala in the head and neck. The gunman also shot and wounded two other girls before escaping. The badly wounded girl was rushed to Peshawar, capital of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.
After initial treatment at a hospital in Peshawar, Malala was airlifted to the Combined Military Hospital (CMH) in Rawalpindi where Pakistan's top neurosurgeons treated her. Once her condition stabilized, she was flown to Britain where she is now receiving rehabilitative care at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham. Doctors have given a good prognosis of her recovery and say she will be able to resume normal life after some reconstructive surgery to her skull.
It is impossible not to sympathize with Malala, a young girl with large beautiful hazel eyes peering from her innocent face, and her naturally distraught parents. It is shocking that a young girl would be targeted for simply wanting to go to school to acquire education, which is her birthright as it is of millions of other young girls in Pakistan as indeed elsewhere in the world. What kind of beasts would want to harm a young girl doing no more than acquiring education?
But who exactly is Malala Yousufzai to attract so much international attention? What about the two other girls that were injured in the same attack? Even their names are not widely known, much less information about their parents. Apart from the fact that they are out of danger, there is little that we know about their plight. Are they not worthy of attention and sympathy? Within days of the assault on Malala, American troops killed three Afghan children on October 14 in an aerial attack in the Nawa district of Helmand Province in Afghanistan. It may not be adjoining Swat Valley but is not very far either from where Malala was attacked and injured.
(Father with exploited daughter)
DAUGHTER OF A PRIVATE SCHOOL MOGUL
Malala was born on July 12, 1997. Her father, Ziauddin Yousufzai, owns a number of for-profit schools. While almost everything else in Pakistan is going down the drain, for-profit schools and the closely related non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that are generously financed from abroad are thriving businesses. [Guess where the money from the Malala Fund is going. ]
It was a BBC reporter [Abdul Hai Kakkar who discovered Malala in early 2009. His assignment was to find a courageous schoolgirl willing to share her experiences of the threats by Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP) against girls getting education. The TTP led by Mullah Fazlullah was shutting down schools in Swat Valley as it flexed its muscles. Kakkar approached Ziauddin Yusufzai for help and he willingly offered his own daughter's experiences.
The plan gelled into Malala, then 11 years old, writing her diary that the BBC World Service would put on its website under the title, "The Diary of a Pakistani School Girl." In order to protect her identity, Malala was given the pseudonym "Gul Makai" (corn flower). The diary detailed Malala's life under Taliban rule, their attempts to take control of the valley, and her views on promoting education for girls. One cannot help but wonder whether her father's motive was in promoting girls' education or he feared his income dwindling if the girls' schools he was running were shut down.
ENTER THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
Malala's cover, however, was blown that summer when Adam B. Ellick of the New York Times featured her in two videos describing her family's life as well as showed her at school. This was the time the Pakistani military was about to launch an attack on Swat Valley. What was the reason for the Times to go public with this information and who is Adam Ellick?
Scott Creighton, a war veteran who writes for the blog the American Everyman, had this to say about Ellick, left, on October 17. "Meet Adam Ellick, the Council on Foreign Relations member and apparent CIA mockingbird stationed at the New York Times. He's the guy who helped create the Malala Psyop in the first place, the plan to bring for-profit school systems to all of Pakistan."
The Times' videos led to Malala gaining instant international fame. For the Pakistani media -- print and electronic -- this was a great opportunity to project their loyalty to America. That is where the dollar pipeline comes from. In the WikiLeaks cables released in 2010, the US embassy messages to the US State Department say Pakistani journalists are easily bought and can be made to do anything for a mere invitation to the US embassy. Despite such insulting revelations about their low character, the US-doting Pakistani journalists are not deterred.
Malala's Times videos brought the Pakistani media flocking to her door. She began giving interviews in the print and electronic media. We need to keep in mind that she was barely 11 or 12 years old at the time. At the same time, she was appointed chairperson of the District Child Assembly Swat. Further accolades followed when the Nobel Peace Prize winner, Bishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa, nominated her in October 2011 for the International Children's Peace Prize. But there was something else that was even more striking. Richard Holbrooke, the US special envoy for Pakistan and Afghanistan who died on December 13, 2010, had also discovered Malala, or her enterprising father. Their picture together has gone viral on the internet. Why would Holbrooke, a no-nonsense diplomat, be interested in Ziauddin Yousafzai unless there was a larger plan at work? Two months after Bishop Tutu's nomination of Malala, the Pakistani government came up with its own award: the "National Youth Prize Award," a first for Pakistan, that was given to Malala.
(April 2013- One of TIME's 100 Most Influence Illuminati Pawns in the World)
Even when reminded of the risks she was courting, Malala said her father, who worked for women's education, supported her fully. Her mother was equally supportive, she said but the irony is that Malala's mother is kept inside the house while the young girl is projected internationally. As Adam Ellick tells us, Ziauddin Yousafzai "was a bit traditional, and as a result, I was unable to interact with her [Malala's] mother. I used to chide Ziauddin about these restrictions, especially in front of Malala. Her father would laugh dismissively and joke that Malala should not be listening. Malala beamed as I pressed her father to treat his wife as an equal." (emphasis added).
For decades, the Pakistani establishment has been obsessed with the Indian intelligence agency RAW. In the last decade, Pakistan has become a battleground for the CIA, British MI6, Germany's BND and the Israeli Mossad, to name only a few, whose agents roam every nook and cranny of the country, mostly disguised as journalists, aid workers or businessmen. So it is not surprising to learn that poor Malala was used as a pawn by these monsters that will stop at nothing to advance their nefarious agenda. It does not require a genius to figure out what the US-British-Zionist and their allies' agenda in Pakistan is: to entangle Pakistan in a never-ending conflict with its own people from the tribal area to provide the pretext for grabbing Pakistan's nuclear weapons. For proof of this, one only has to read the October 21 piece published in the British daily, the Guardian, by Bruce Riedel, a former CIA analyst. He warned, on the eve of the third and final presidential debate that Pakistan's nuclear weapons posed the "greatest security threat" to the US and urged both Obama and his Republican rival Mitt Romney to pay close attention to this.
(Pedophile Gordon Brown, "UN Special Envoy for Education" with Malala)
There is one other dimension worthy of attention and that is what the former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has done. He has launched a United Nations petition using the slogan "I am Malala" demanding that all children in the world should be in school by 2015. He plans to present the petition to Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari later this month. Brown's activities on behalf of Malala and indeed other children would sound more noble were it not for the fact he heads the "global campaign for charter, for-profit school systems." There is tons of money to be made in this enterprise.
Brown's campaign is supposed to work in tandem with the UN's scheme run under the alluring title, "Education First." This is a global public/private partnership scheme whereby not-for-profit institutions would be privatized. The "not-for-profit" institutions are run under the label, "Global Business Coalition for Education," and set up by such Western -- mainly American -- corporations as Accenture, Hess, Chevron, Pearson International and others. Their targeted countries are Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Ethiopia and Nigeria. One is constrained to ask, what interest do these multinationals have in promoting education in the third world, especially Muslim countries?
Let us be clear: the West and its corporations are not in the business of doling out cash to third world countries or caring much about the children there unless there is a hidden agenda behind the façade of their good work. One is clearly to re-route the billions of dollars to their own pockets. The other equally sinister plan is to promote Western culture, thoughts and values by using the label of education. The third and equally sinister plan is to force targeted societies -- in this case Pakistan -- to launch military operations against its own people in North Waziristan to achieve America's geo-political objectives.
Whether Malala knows it or not, if her father has any sense he would realize that his family is being used as dupes for America's criminal enterprise. Malala is a tiny piece in this jigsaw puzzle.
More details - Malala - Neo Liberal Martyr by Scott Creighton (We don't agree that the attack on her was staged.)
"Charities"Gearing Up for Big Malala Haul
Huffington Compost (Illuminati Mouthpiece): 10 Things about Malala Speech that gave us Goosebumps
(left, The Anti Christ?)
First Comment by AA:
The locals of Swat also have a very different story to tell from what the media is telling us. Here's an interview (less than 10 minutes) of a woman who grew up in Swat and was there when Malala was shot: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuG7DKF8TMQ
The main points being:
- the people of Swat were living peacefully under Taliban rule, with their girls going to school without any problems
- the Taliban were in the process of implementing Shariah (Islamic law), and had no issues with girls' education
- around this same time the Malala issue exploded
- the woman was shocked and had no idea why Malala should be struggling for a right that she wasn't deprived of in the first place
- her conclusion is that the whole situation was manufactured in order to push for military aggression in Swat against the implementation of Islamic law
Ah yes. The girl whose fame literally started out with a bang in 2012. Shot in the head by the Taliban!
I usually reach for a loaded gun when people try to write current events into the Bible, but Revelations 13:3 is too close to pass up:
"And I saw one of the heads of the Beast as it were wounded to death; but his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast."
I don't believe Revelations was prophecy for our time, it was all fulfilled long ago. The notion that it's for our time came of the the 'Dispensation theology' of John Neslon Darby, Joseph Smith, and Scofield, that's spread through Churchianity like a virus in the 20th century.
But I do believe this malevolent cult that gives us out 'leaders' love to write themselves into the Bible and the Qur'an when they can. If you believe Revelations is happening today that's alright, but at least read the book and get it right. A lot of people think the one that gets the head wound is the Antichrist, but all John said is "one of the heads of the Beast" - and the Beast is the System, not a person. So it really does fit: Malala is definitely one of the heads of the Beast.
So let's not get excited. Zafar Bangash is exactly right: little girls get shot, in Pakistan all the time - whether by the Taliban, or Obama's drone strikes that splatters Pakistani women and girls all over sidewalks. (see Obama's boast, "I'm really good at killing people".) When Malala had her summit meeting with the President of the United States she only complained that drone warfare "fuels terrorism".
We don't need Bible prophecies or Nostradamus to know who Malala is. Just look at the company she keeps.
See TIME Magazine, April 2014, HILLARY CLINTON (an essay by) Malala Yousafzai
Sen. Rand Paul is a frontrunner for the 2016 Republican
Presidential nomination. "Randy" attended the world's largest Baptist University but felt it necessary to join a secret society, "the NoZe" that had been banned by the university as anti-Christian and subversive. Why does this matter? It confirms our belief that most politicians are Freemasons and politics is a charade.
The following is an excerpt dealing with his NoZe membership
from a Rand Paul profile in the current New Yorker.
It's worth remembering that the Illuminati created Libertarianism as part of their strategy of dialectic control.
"I was a little bit irked by him making himself out to be all about God and country and all about conservative values, because he was clearly not promoting that when I knew him,"-- Kristy Ditzler
by Ryan Lizza
The Revenge of Rand Paul
"...George, now a teacher and consultant living in Austria, drew Rand into a secret society at Baylor known as the NoZe Brotherhood, which had recently been banned from campus. The group was founded in the nineteen-twenties mostly to mock Baylor's clubs and fraternities and to satirize its earnest religiosity. In 1982, Baylor's president condemned the group for its "sacrilegious, vulgar, obscene, and sometimes tasteless crudities." For initiation, called "unrush," Rand was required to submit a satirical essay of "10,622 words or less." ...
(left, Ron Paul applies Masonic handshake to guest on Bill Maher show)
The brothers liked Rand's essay, and he moved on to the next stage in the initiation, the Raz. According to George, the brothers put a bag over Rand's head and spirited him away to their "sanctum sanctorum," a garage behind the group's off-campus headquarters, known as Xanadu. It was decorated with items that George, whose secret name was KleptoNoZe, had stolen, including "a box full of human skulls" that he said he'd found in a science building and a jacket he'd taken from a police officer.
Rand was placed in a claw-foot bathtub while the brothers gathered around him in absurdist costumes they called "undress," shone a bright light on his face, and tested his wits by shouting ridiculous questions. ("What effect did orthodontics have on nineteenth-century Romanticism?") Rand excelled at the Raz and advanced to a more serious interview--conducted under a highway bridge--before being confirmed for membership. The brothers gave him his secret name: SpoonNoZe.
AQUA BUDDHA (MOCKING CHRIST)
Paul must be aware that his past will attract minute scrutiny if he runs for President. Just as he was gliding to victory in the 2010 Senate race, an episode from his days in the NoZe Brotherhood threatened to upend his campaign. GQ.com posted a report in which an anonymous source said that Paul and another NoZe brother had taken her from her apartment, encouraged her to smoke pot, and asked her to pray to something called Aqua Buddha. The source for the story was Kristy Ditzler, Paul's friend from the Baylor swim team. His collaborator in the prank was George Paul. Ditzler and George Paul agreed to talk to me about the controversy.
(left, a recent picture of Kristy Ditzler, with son)
Paul and George had driven to Ditzler's apartment and asked her to put a bandanna around her eyes. "They did pretend they were abducting me, but it wasn't a forced sort of thing," Ditzler said. They took her to another apartment and removed the blindfold. "It was weird, with all of these tents with bongs inside and piles of clothing. Completely bizarro." Ditzler said that George and Rand asked her to go into one of the tents and smoke pot, but when she declined they drove to a creek in Elm Mott, north of Waco, and told her to wade into the water and worship Aqua Buddha. "They never explained what was going on, but that's the way they were about everything--vague and mysterious."
George offered a slightly different version--they took her to a dark pub, where they had an easel set up and pretended to sketch a portrait of her while reading Kant--but he insisted that no drugs were involved, not even his nitrous pleasure units. He also said that the Aqua Buddha incident took place on another night, when he and Paul blindfolded Ditzler and several other members of their swim team by putting cotton in their goggles, and then loaded them into the back of a pickup and drove to the creek, where they were asked to "pay homage to the Aqua Buddha, and then we all went swimming." He explained that Aqua Buddha was an inside joke on the swim team. During practice, George, Rand, and others would descend to the bottom of the pool and strike a Buddha pose, creating an amusing sight for swimmers at the surface. "It broke the monotony and helped us get through the workout," he told me.
(left, Rand Paul pays homage at Wailing Wall)
When the anonymous version of the story emerged, Paul quickly tracked down George. "I had just gotten off a sailboat and I saw a bunch of calls," George told me. "He said someone may try to contact me, and he said, 'Do you recall anything about that?' "
Buy or license »
Rand's Democratic opponent, Jack Conway, and his allies alleged that Paul had kidnapped Ditzler, and they described the NoZe Brotherhood as an anti-Christian cult. But nobody else could find George, and Ditzler refused to discuss the event on the record, so the story faded away.
Ditzler, who is a Democrat, was appalled by how Rand's political opponents mischaracterized the GQ.com interview. "I would not use that as a specific reason not to vote for him," she told me, but she thought the incident raised a larger question, one that many others are now asking about the Senator. "The only reason I felt like speaking up was that I was a little bit irked by him making himself out to be all about God and country and all about conservative values, because he was clearly not promoting that when I knew him," Ditzler said. "I mean, we all change, we all have a past. If he's changed, why can't he just say that he's changed?"
The Satanic Core of Libertarianism
The Satanic Core of LibertarianismThe Satanic Core of LibertarianismThe Satanic Core of LibertarianismThe Satanic Core of Libertarianism
Rand Paul Debate Interrupted by Aqua Buddha
Rand Paul's college group mocked Christians
Ron Paul's Betrayal
First Comment from Dan:
Henry, Stuart's defense of Ron Paul (see comments) made me think of the old song, "Breaking up is hard to do". I remained in denial of Ron Paul's fraud for too long myself. I'd leave it alone, but it's clear that Ron led millions of Americans down another road than the one they started upon. He payoff was to catapult his son Rand into the Senate. I must say to those who are supporting Rand just because they got hooked on Ron Paul's rhetoric back in 2007 - why? Rand is a Globalist tool.
Ron Paul has always been chameleon. He's been different things to different audiences.
Compare the persona he displayed on Morton Downey Jr.s talk show in 1988 with the folksy, Will Rogers character he assumed for the 2008 Presidential election. Go back further before he ran as Libertarian Presidential candidate of 1988 to see another incarnation of Ron as Reagan Republican. He has a great talent for "articulating the public rage". Ron studied the old school American 'Populist' politicians. But isn't clear by now the serves the Elite?
He named his son Rand after AYN RAND for cryin' out loud. What more do ya want?
Why do so many people still think 'Masonic' means the boys at the local Blue Lodge. Albert Pike said himself that's the 'Outer Portal', the decoy, the alibi. Nobody knows anything in the Blue Lodge.
We're speaking of 'high Masonry'. The movers and shakers don't belong to the Blue Lodge Mickey Mouse Clubs. You'll often find they have grandfather or great grandfathers that were high rankiing Scottish Rite or York Rite (or both). But there's 360 degrees in a circle, the membership above the 33° are secret to the uninitiated.
The Satanic Core of Libertarianism
Udo Ulfkotte, left, a former editor of Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (one of Germany's largest and most respected newspapers), has confirmed that he and fellow journalists are bribed and controlled by intelligence agencies.
We know that intelligence agencies like the CIA, BND, MI-6 and Mossad are arms of the Masonic Jewish Illuminati banking cartel. Utflotte says he went public because the Illuminati is prepping for a war with Russia by using the media to incite hostility.
by Udo Ulfkotte
Interview transcribed with comment by Eric Zeusse
Abridged by henrymakow.com
I've been a journalist for about 25 years, and I've been educated to lie, to betray, and not to tell the truth to the public. ... The German and American media tries to bring war to the people in Europe, to bring war to Russia. This is a point of no return, and I am going to stand up and say ... it is not right what I have done in the past, to manipulate people, to make propaganda against Russia, and it is not right what my colleagues do, and have done in the past, because they are bribed to betray the people not only in Germany, all over Europe. ...
I am very fearful of a new war in Europe, and I don't like to have this situation again, because war is never coming from itself, there is always people who push for war, and this is not only politicians, it is journalists too. ... We have betrayed our readers, just to push for war. ... I don't want this anymore, I'm fed up with this propaganda. We live in a banana republic, and not in a democratic country where we have press freedom. ...
The German media, especially, my colleagues ..., day by day, write against the Russians, [these journalists] who are in transatlantic organizations, and who are supported by the United States (CIA) to do so. ...
I became 'honorary citizen of the state of Oklahoma,' ... Why? Because I write pro-American. I was supported by the Central Intelligence Agency, the CIA. Why? Because I am pro-American. I am fed up with it; I don't want to do it anymore; and so I have just written a book, not to earn money, no, it will cause a lot of trouble for me. [I wrote it instead] to give the people in this country, Germany, in Europe, and all over the world, just a glimpse of ... what goes on behind the closed doors. ...
[4:40 on the video] Most of the journalists you see in foreign countries ... European or American journalists ..., like me in the past, are so-called non-official cover. ... Non-official cover means what? You do work for an intelligence agency, ... but ... when they [the public] find out that you are not only a journalist but a spy too, they [the CIA] will never say this was one of our guys. ... So, I have helped them in several situations, and I feel ashamed for that. ... I feel ashamed that I ... was bribed by billionaires, I was bribed by the Americans, not to report exactly the truth. ...
I was just imagining in my car while I was driving to this interview, I just try to work out in my brain what would have happened if I had written a pro-Russian article, in the Frankfurter Algemeine. Well, ... we were all educated to write pro-European, pro-American, but please not pro-Russian. ... But this is not what I understand for democracy, for press freedom, I am very sorry for that. ...
[6:30] Germany is still a kind of a colony of the United States, you'll see that in many points; like for example, the majority of Germany do not want to have nukes in our country, but we still have American nukes; so, we are still a kind of an American colony, and, being a colony, it is very easy to approach young journalists through (and what is very important here is) transatlantic organizations. All journalists from respected and big German newspapers, magazines, radio stations, TV stations, they are all members or guests of those big transatlantic organizations, and in these transatlantic organizations you are approached to be pro-American, and ... they invite you for seeing the United States, they pay for that, they pay all your expenses and everything. So, you are bribed, you get more and more corrupt, because they make you good contacts. ... So, you make friends, you think they are your friends and cooperate with them. They ask you, 'will you do me this favor,' 'will you do me that favor,' so your brain is more and more brainwashed, through these guys. ...
Is this only the case with German journalists? No, I think it is especially the case with British journalists, because they have a much closer relationship. It is especially the case with Israeli journalists. Of course with French journalists. ... It is the case for Australians, [with] journalists from New Zealand, from Taiwan, well, there is many countries, ... like Jordan for example. ...
[9:17] Sometimes the intelligence agencies, they come to your office, and want you to write an article. ... I just remember [for example] that the German foreign intelligence agency, the Bundesnachrichtendienst -- it is just a sister organization of the Central Intelligence Agency, see it was founded by the American intelligence agency -- ... came to my office, and they wanted me to write an article about Libya and about Colonel Muammar Gaddafi. ... They gave me all these secret informations, and they just wanted me to sign the article with my name. I did that. It was published in the Frankfurter Algemeine, ... it was about how he secretly tried to build a poison gas factory, ... it was a story that was printed worldwide days later, but I had no information on that [the CIA wrote it].
[11:25] A very good example [what happens] if you say no [to the CIA]: ... So [regarding the particular employee who said no], what happened is that he lost his job.
[12:40] Six times my house was searched, ... I have [had] three house attacks, [but] I have no children, so ... it's worse for the truth [for other journalists, whose family can be threatened, not only themselves].
Eric Zeusse: Ulfkotte has become a turncoat. He had originally been a conservative Christian German, who opposed the increasing presence in Germany of Muslims. He then came to feel so guilty as a German having discovered as a journalist the role that a major German company played in helping Saddam Hussein to gas Kurds, [using German poison gas] but which his newspaper never published, so that Ulfkotte briefly converted to Islam. Perhaps he was dealing with the shame he felt about his not bucking his newspaper's top management by simply ignoring them and going public about what he had found, his letting it remain hidden.
But then, he co-founded a Christian peace-movement against the Islamic extremism emerging in Germany. And now, he has come out with a book which argues that the U.S. is actually the biggest of all threats to peace. The book is available only in German, Gekaufte Journalisten, meaning "Purchased Journalists."
Now that he has abandoned not just the anti-Islamic but the anti-Russian elements of traditional German culture, he no longer is welcomed among the conservative Germans who had helped him to build, and then, for decades, to advance, his successful long career as a 'journalist,' but which he now calls "propagandist."
Moreover, a German poll in November 2013 showed increasing public distrust there of America's government. Since Germany is central to the Western Alliance -- and especially to the American aristocracy's control over the European Union, over the IMF, over the World Bank, and over NATO -- such a turn away from the American Government threatens the dominance of America's aristocrats (who control our Government). A breakup of America's 'Alliance' might be in the offing, if Germans continue to turn away from being just America's richest "banana republic."
Related- James Perloff - A Century of Media Deception
---------------- -Makow - Mass Media Collaborated in 9/11 False Flag
First Comment by Paul:
The video you featured, at the 7 minute mark describes exactly how the Masonic influence entered and corrupts the Catholic Church. Bright, ambitious, and pliable young clerics are identified, flattered, wined and dined, and introduced to bishops, cardinals and other clerics of influence. They are compromised incrementally, by small and seemingly meaning less steps to get them into a situation where they owe "favors" to their groomer. At some point, they are asked to do something "useful" to the Masonic powers. If they do, they are trapped. If they refuse, their career is destroyed, and they go nowhere, ever. The holy priests in the Catholic Church are to be found in exile in small parishes, remote mission fields, and hospital chaplaincies. Many of the ones in the hierarchy, monsignors, bishops, and such, are either compromised to one extent or another, or are from small and un-influential foreign countries.
I'm sure this is the way it works throughout the world. In every organization, there is a person with money, influence, and an agenda. When he/she begins to flatter you, you are being played. Real success comes with hard work. The success that comes easy comes because you are perceived as "useful," and is not due to your innate talents. I expect that something similar explains the meteoric rise of the homosexual agenda in the last few decades. Once one or two get into an organization, they support and promote their own. They are very susceptible to luxuries and flattery on the one hand, and dare not "betray" their own on the other. This is the reason there is a lavender mafia in the Church, and why there is such a presence in the universities. Even an unlikely place like the Dept. of Homeland Security has reportedly been taken over by the homosexualists. This corruption has pervaded society to such an extent, I fail to see how it can be reversed, short of a worldwide disaster that forces society to reset and start from zero. I simply cannot envision how honesty, integrity, merit, and other virtues can ever catch up. Especially considering that these values are now discounted, if not blatantly derided. I don't despair, however, because honesty, integrity, merit, and other virtues are their own reward, and make life worth living, regardless of worldly wealth and acclaim. Additionally, should disaster come, these same virtues will once again be essential to survival.
(left, Jewish-born novelist Boris Pasternak, 1890-1960, winner of 1958 Nobel Prize for Dr. Zhivago)
Why do Jewish leaders
They need Jews to be cannon fodder
for their megalomanical plans.
by Henry Makow Ph.D
In 1959, Israel's Premier David Ben-Gurion told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency that Dr. Zhivago was "one of the most despicable books about Jews ever written by a man of Jewish origin... "
What prompted this reaction from Israel's first Prime Minister?
Ben-Gurion was enraged by a character in the novel, a convert to Christianity who asked why Jews need suffer the scourge of anti Semitism:
"In whose interests is this voluntary martyrdom? Dismiss this [Jewish] army which is forever fighting and being massacred, nobody knows for what?... Say to them: 'That's enough. Stop now. Don't hold on to your identity. Don't all get together in a crowd. Disperse. Be with all the rest.
Their national idea has forced the Jews to be a nation and nothing but a nation - and they have been chained to this deadening task all through the centuries when all the rest of the world was being delivered from it by a new force [Christianity] which had come out of their own midst....And they actually saw and heard it and let it go!
How could they let a spirit of such overwhelming power and beauty to leave them, how could they think that after it triumphed and established its reign, they could remain as the empty husk of the miracle they had repudiated?
Come to your senses, stop. Don't hold onto your identity. Don't stick together, disperse. Be with all the rest. You were the first and the best Christians in the world. You are now the very thing against which you have been turned by the worst and weakest among you." -- (Doctor Zhivago, Chapter 12)
PASTERNAK - A CHRISTIAN AT HEART
Pasternak was born in Moscow into a wealthy assimilated Russian Jewish family. His father was the Post-Impressionist painter, Leonid Pasternak, professor at the Moscow School of Painting, Sculpture, and Architecture. His mother was Rosa Kaufman, a concert pianist and the daughter of Odessa industrialist Isadore Kaufman.
In a 1959 letter to Jacqueline de Proyart, Pasternak recalled that his "distinctive way of seeing things" was due to his baptism by a nanny:
I was baptized as a child by my nanny, but ... it was always felt to be half-secret and intimate, a source of rare and exceptional inspiration rather than being calmly taken for granted. I believe that this is at the root of my distinctiveness. Most intensely of all my mind was occupied by Christianity in the years 1910-12, when the main foundations of this distinctiveness - my way of seeing things, the world, life - were taking shape...
Christ's teaching that God is universal love (i.e. the Gospel of Love) is the antithesis of Judaism.
(Israel a powerful force in achieving the Illuminati Jewish mission)
What Pasternak and most Jews (and non-Jews) do not understand is that Judaism is not a religion. It's a satanic cult based on Cabala. Its raison d'etre is world domination. Put simply, the Chosen People's leadership believe their mission is to replace God, monopolize everything worth monopolizing, and redefine reality according to their perversions and self interest. Thanks to their control of credit and communication, and their network of Gentile traitors ("Freemasons,") this goal is within sight.
Judaism's secret tonic is the resistance ( i.e. "anti Semitism") aroused by this hidden but very real agenda. Jews cannot eliminate anti Semitism until they recognize and abjure Judaism's secret agenda.
Most Jews would scoff at the above explanation of Judaism but they don't have another one that is credible. A friend described a Yom Kippur service last Saturday. The rabbi told the congregation that Judaism consisted of two elements: observance of Jewish ritual and "doing good."
1.) Most Jews will tell you that Jewish ritual is largely empty and boring. Holidays are usually a tribal celebration. Passover commemorates the exodus from Egypt. Rosh ha Shonah (New Years) is based on some candles burning longer they should have - a sign of "Divine favor." (Who hasn't seen candles do this?) The "high holiday" Yom Kippur is supposed to be a "day of repentance." But no repentance takes place. Instead the Kol Nidre prayer in Hebrew gives Jews permission to lie and cheat Gentiles for the upcoming year. (Most Jews don't understand it.) Purim celebrates the genocide of "anti Semites."
The reason so many Jews are "secular" and don't believe in God, is because secularism is Judaism in disguise. Secularism is a mask for satanism - the rejection of God and consequently religion. That's why religious people are denied their rights and God cannot be mentioned in "secular" societies.
Apart from the Ten Commandments, there is not much in Judaism by way of moral teachings. There is some worldly advice and exhortations to fear God, but nothing of the self-mortification (denial of earthly enticements) that you find in the Sermon on the Mount. Indeed, the Talmud confirms Arthur Koestler's comment that Judaism "teaches Jews how to cheat God."
2) "Doing good" usually means doing what is good for the Jews. No one would say what Israel did to Gaza last summer was "doing good" but few Jews have condemned it.
Author Grace Halsell gave an example of what "doing good" really means. When Halsell had written books about the plight of Native Americans, African Americans, and undocumented Mexican workers, she was a great favorite of New York Times matriarch Iphigene Ochs Sulzberger. All these causes promoted multiculturalism, which Organized Jewry perceives as beneficial.
When Halsell next wrote a powerful book describing the Palestinian plight, she incurred Mrs. Suzberger's displeasure and was quickly dropped by the Times. Halsell writes: "I had little concept that from being buoyed so high I could be dropped so suddenly when I discovered--from her point of view--the 'wrong' underdog."
Jews eventually must realize they are not engaged in some noble enterprise for which they are unjustly resented. Rather, many Jews (and Masons) are being used to dehumanize and enslave the human race. This is why David Ben Gurion hated Boris Pasternak. He wanted Jews to serve as cannon fodder in this satanic war against God and man. Those who converted or assimilated were beyond his reach. I'm with Pasternak. The sooner Jews assimilate, the better.
First Comment from CF:
This article hits straight on, and makes a great case for following Pasternak's path. Yet, asking for ALL Jews to assimilate seems extreme. Then, again, what Zionist Jews are doing, across the world is ultra-extreme.
Torah-based Jews, who see the Zionist crimes for what they are, DO exist. Could dismantling Babylonian Talmud-based «Judaism»/Zionism be a more direct approach? Education reform, in the area of Jewish history and practices, may be where to start - for everyone.
Unfortunately, the highly developed machinations of the Zionists overshadow and completely dominate true, God-surrendered Jews. As long as Torah-based Jews are kept down, ANY kind of assimilation into mainstream society is unlikely. This is due, of course, to the manipulative tactics of Zionists. Are there just too few Torah-based Jews, to make any such changes possible?
Regardless, readers should always bear in mind that there IS a significant difference between Zionism (which is, ironically, Fascism), and real, traditional Judaism (complete with all its faults). Like the blank faced doctor who pads your bill to your insurance company, thinking you won't notice, and the kind, simple man who returns your lost wallet, with all the contents intact... They are not the same.
The Old Testament teaches, in the negative or prohibitive mode; «Do NOT do to others, as thou would NOT want done to you.» The New Testament teaches in the opposite, affirmative, positive mode; «DO unto others as you would have them DO unto you.»
The wrathful nature of God, portrayed in the Old Testament, is in perfect alignment with the repetition of covenants - made and broken - with the Lord, by the ancestral Jewish people. Yes, «The Chosen People» - chosen to be punished, for disobeying God!
Thus, God's repeated exhortations to the Jewish people to cease and correct their errors. Some Jews, as Jews, got it, and still «get it.» The Kabbalah Practitioners/Zionists, however, did not, only to continue and develop more of the «same old, same old.» A «correction» is forthcoming. Will the punishments to come be more of the so-called same old? I doubt it.
Satan has infested nearly all of the so-called "Entertainment Industry.* Disney is certainly no exception. most of the "entertainment industry" is run by secular luciferians, if not outright satanists, who ascribe to the Freemasonry "philosophy" of luciferianism.
- 19:51 DISNEY'S SATANIC SYMBOLISM/SUBLIMINAL SEXUAL PERVERSION HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT by ADRENALINEJUNKY -JASON HENDRICKS 526,532 views
Disney subliminal evil that most people never knew about...see for yourself: this is not made up, btw:
Published on Sep 20, 2014
Disney is the initial introduction to satanic indoctrination in the world
through movies like Frozen, Beauty and the beast, the little mermaid,
monsters inc , dumbo, through subliminal and satanic ideas,
thoughts, and the sexualization of our children. see the documentation for yourself.
Walt Disney was a 33 degree Mason.
- 7:18 Disney's Secret Sexual Messages Conspiracy - Conspiracy Cinema by CineFix 6,017,240 views
- 7:36 Disney New Subliminal Message by Danizudo 2,636,596 views
- 7:53 Alice in Disneyland. Walt had his own Alice Liddell by joemusic2012 68,889 views
- 8:37 Illuminati Stars - Before And After by chris Palmer 4,982,381 views
- 10:01 What are we really watching? by TruthMovement74 960,076 views
- 14:19 9/11 Satanic Magic & One World Tower "Demonic Portal"? by TheScariestMovieEver 116,759 views
(left, Beto O'Rourke)
El Paso has 862,000 people. 4000 are Jews - less than half of one percent.
But for a moment last July their Congressman Beto O'Rourke, 41,
forgot whom he really represented, and voted "on principle."
He was quickly reminded that principles no longer apply.
Organized Jewry subverts the political, cultural and economic life of host countries.
It helps to institute the New World Order. But, remember, anti Semitism is "irrational hate."
(Editor's Note: Although unstated, stories in the Jewish press like this one indicate that many Jews
are embarrassed by their Zionist cousins. They resent being associated with the Zionist juggernaut, which
in fact is a tool of the Illuminati central banking cartel. The Jewish Lobby has a tendency to overdo it.
What do they care if eight of 435 Congressmen still have some principles? Can't they allow a handful of US legislators
a fig leaf of self respect?)
by Nathan Guttman
The Jewish Daily Forward
It took only one wrong vote to teach a freshman Democrat from Texas how sensitive, and even wrathful, the Jewish community can be when it comes to Israel.
But the real story of what happened to Rep. Beto O'Rourke did not stop with the angry reaction he got when he cast one of only eight votes in Congress against special funding for Israel's Iron Dome rocket defense system during the recent Gaza war.
What is notable is how quickly the carrot followed the stick.
It was almost a textbook case of how the establishment pro-Israel lobby works its magic -- and a story not yet completed in early September, when The New Yorker magazine took note of what had happened to O'Rourke.
In an in-depth report on the work of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, AIPAC, during the Gaza war, New Yorker writer Connie Bruck recounted the blasts that rained down on the El Paso congressman following his vote.
The reactions, as Bruck reported, included a mass email blast labeling O'Rourke as "an anti-Israel congressman" and denouncing his vote as "shameful." Critical local press coverage included a public comment by one of his own Jewish donors to the El Paso Times that in voting as he did, O'Rourke "chooses to side with the rocket launchers and terror tunnel builders" of Hamas.
But since then, behind the scenes, what has followed is a long process of mutual outreach and hours of hashing out differences, until the final act, which is now in the works: an El Al flight to Tel Aviv on the pro-Israel lobby's dime.
"He's a good guy, but he didn't know how the Jewish community would react," said Daniel Cheifec, executive director of the Jewish Federation of El Paso. "Now he knows that this community is not going to be very happy if he screws up again."
O'Rourke, in fact, had no prior record of criticizing or voting against Israel. He did not even oppose more funding for the Iron Dome system. He only opposed rushing through the large appropriation with no debate as members of Congress were hurrying home for the summer recess when a more considered vote to boost the program was coming in October.
Israel, which receives more than $3.6 billion per year in various forms of aid from Washington, is already the single largest recipient of American largesse. But the August 1 House vote appropriating $225 million to Israel above and beyond its usual aid was meant to allow the Jewish state to restock on Iron Dome interceptors that had proved effective in countering Hamas rocket attacks into the country.
Congressional leaders squeezed the vote into the legislative schedule just as members were packing up to leave for their summer recess. The overwhelming support of 395 representatives with only eight voting against was not unusual for a pro-Israel piece of legislation, especially one that deals with military assistance at a time of war.
"I really don't understand how he makes his decision," Rabbi Stephen Leon of Congregation B'Nai Zion, a local synagogue, told the El Paso Times even before The New Yorker piece picked up on the pushback. "It's a great, great disappointment to the Jewish community here. We had meetings with him prior, to talk to him about the importance of Israel, and the way he voted makes very little sense."
El Paso, a city with a 70% Hispanic majority, has a relatively small Jewish community, estimated at 4,000, amid a population of some 862,000. But Jews are well represented on O'Rourke's donor list, with local businessman Stephen L. Feinberg among the top contributors to his campaign.
O'Rourke, in a Facebook posting, tried to explain his vote. "I could not in good conscience vote for borrowing $225 million more to send to Israel, without debate and without discussion, in the midst of a war that has cost more than a thousand civilian lives already, too many of them children," he wrote. He also stressed that with an aid package for Israel up for a vote in two months, he felt no need to rush more spending without adequate debate when Congress was all but empty.
To members of the Jewish community who later spoke with him, O'Rourke also explained that he was one of the last to vote in the roll call, at a point at which it was clear the bill was cruising toward passage. He consequently felt free to cast a vote on principle, knowing it would not impact the final outcome. O'Rourke believes that every appropriation should be properly debated.
Veteran Democrat Jim Moran of Virginia, who is known for refusing to vote along the lines of the pro-Israel lobby, tried to warn O'Rourke. "I tried to find him on the floor, but I couldn't," he told The New Yorker. "I'm afraid he may have a tough race in November."
At O'Rourke's office, emails flooded his inbox. The El Paso Jewish federation sent out an alert to members, urging them to take action. It contained O'Rourke's contact information and a suggested sample letter. Another email, for which no one will now take responsibility, circulated among Jewish activists urging supporters not to re-elect him.
This threat is all but empty, since O'Rourke faces no real challenge in his strongly Democratic district.
Beto (short for Robert) O'Rourke, 41, is a fourth-generation El Paso native who started off his career in a teenage rock band. He studied at Columbia University and returned to his hometown, where he ran for city council before moving on to the national scene. His political focus has been on immigration and veteran affairs, two key issues for a border town that hosts a large army base. But he won more recognition for his call to legalize marijuana, an uncommon voice in the state of Texas. Foreign policy has never been a top priority.
Hours after the controversial vote, O'Rourke launched a damage-control campaign that proved to be effective. He reached out to Jewish donors and friends who were more than happy to start the healing process.
(left, a reminder that ISIS is about divide and conquer- Sunni vs Shite) )
A meeting was arranged with a group of 10 pro-Israel local leaders, including key members of AIPAC, along with heads of the local synagogues and of the Jewish federation. "We didn't ask him to apologize for his vote," Stuart Schwartz, a former county commissioner and longtime AIPAC supporter, told the Forward. "He is a very principled man, and he believed that his vote was justified under these circumstances." It was Schwartz who earlier denounced him for having sided with "the rocket launchers and terror tunnel builders."
"We explained that it was particularly painful for us," Schwartz added, "and he understood there is a lot of emotion here."
After the first meeting came another and then a third one. In between, pro-Israel activists sent O'Rourke articles explaining Israel's position. O'Rourke also met with the Israeli consul general to the Southwest, Meir Shlomo, and invited federation leaders to meet with him in Washington when they come to the capital for the Jewish federations' General Assembly in November.
The talks, participants said, were friendly and open. O'Rourke, they reported, took real interest and noted that his voting record makes clear he had never opposed American aid to Israel. He even doled out an anecdote about some Jewish ancestry in his family. Pro-Israel activists came out satisfied, attributing the vote against Iron Dome to a freshman's mistake rather than to a pattern of anti-Israel voting. "A bump in the road," in the words of Schwartz.
O'Rourke, according to Cheifec, even absorbed some of the pro-Israel activists' skepticism regarding talks aimed at dismantling Iran's nuclear capabilities. "He told us he is a lot less optimistic about a diplomatic solution with Iran than he was in our first meeting, and that was only a month and half ago," he said. "This means he is doing his homework."
O'Rourke initially agreed, but then later he declined to be interviewed for this article.
The final chapter in his run-in with the pro-Israel lobby will be written soon. In the spring, or perhaps even sooner, O'Rourke will join a group of lawmakers going to Israel on a trip arranged by an AIPAC-affiliated organization.
"We're very pleased he will be setting aside time to visit Israel," Schwartz said.
Related- The Politics of Jewish Lobbies
Texas - Few Jews Wield Much Influence
Two NY Jewish Groups Want to Stop US Military Aid to Israel
First Comment by Dan:
It's just that my impression of O'Rourke is of a studied career politician*. For one thing, he's not Chicano, so why go by the name "Beto"? His name is Robert - not Roberto. Anyone versed in real Texas politics knows you don't get elected to the House of Representatives if you don't support Israel. "Support Israel" doesn't mean "like" or "only when they behave", or "only when it's in our national interests". It means even more than "absolute obedience"
They want it "with FEELING" these days. Say nasty things about Muslims a lot. Sneer when you say "Iran". And when anyone is criticizing Israeli thuggery, climb on your high horse and curse them - for the camera.
Like Ted Cruz for example - another Texas newbie in the Senate. Here's Ted demonstrating how AIPAC expects their "friends" in Congress to behave.
It's no longer enough for politicans to merely apologize for the Holocaust, or acknowledge the right of Israel to exist. You have to behave like a concentration camp kapo.
* "Beto" looks more like a Kennedy than an O'Rourke. Specifically Robert Fitzerald Kennedy. His bio says his family goes back four generations in El Paso, but that's not as important as his family's East Coast political connections. He graduated Columbia U. in New York. He was convicted of drunk driving in 1998. And he's Roman Catholic. Yep, I'd say he's a crypto-Kennedy. Political dynasties have always engaged in the practice of siring offspring in other families. Kennedy men are born with a target on their back if they go into politics, so it makes perfect sense that the famous Kennedy promiscuity has included secret arrangements with political class families to breed a few crypto-Kennedys.
The whole problem here is that there are no laws against Israeli intimidation of Congress or the office of the Presidency.
This is just another case of "bullying" by AIPAC against one more American Congressman that voted his conscience over Israeli tyranny.
If Washington really thinks that AIPAC is either going to get tired of beating up on them or show them some mercy they might be waiting a long time if ever for that to happen.
It's really sad that it has gotten to this level of surrender by Washington without much of a fight at all.
The "Camelot " years of John F. Kennedy are long gone and 'profiles in courage' are now 'profiles of cowardice'.