Henry Makow

Syndicate content
Updated: 12 hours 24 min ago

Illuminati Using Ukraine to Stop Putin's Eurasian Project

20 hours 3 min ago
(left.Zbigniew Brzezinski)
The Neo Con coup in Kiev drove a stake in Putin's pet project -- an economic sphere stretching from Lisbon to Vladivostok. By alienating Europe from Russia, it kept it dependent on the USA.

Piotr Bein's deduces this from a speech by Zbigniew Brzezinski. It suggests Putin is indeed a genuine obstacle to Masonic Jewish world hegemony, i.e. the New World Order.

by Piotr BeinSenile Brzezinski Raves on Russia(Abridged by henrymakow.com)

"Russia has neither the right to protect its national interests nor the right to be different. A regional power, enclosed in its rigid bounds, Russia is unable to establish viable alliances with leading global players. It should give up its vain hopes of some mythical Eurasian Union development. Its only alternative is to take the role of the Western civilization humble satellite." So thinks an old US hawk Zbigniew Brzezinski, a former National Security Adviser and a prominent geostrategist.
On June 16, professor Brzezinski gave a speech at the Woodrow Wilson Center, dedicated to the ongoing turmoil in Ukraine and the US-NATO political agenda regarding the issue. Referring to a mysterious specter of non-existent "Russian chauvinism", Zbigniew Brzezinski spoke about the mechanics of deterrence and revitalization of containment strategy directed against Russia. The geostrategist is convinced that "deterrence" is the most effective foreign policy tool.
Zbigniew Brzezinski is widely known for his russophobic stance. Stuck irretrievably in a Cold War reality the former National Security Adviser is most likely unable to evaluate correctly and impartially the current situation in the world. Behind the high flown phrases of Dr.Brzezinski about the US global leadership and Russia's weakness his growing irritation is hidden. What is exasperating this old American hawk?

"Russia has to understand that Ukraine will not be a member of some mythical Eurasian Union that President Putin is trying to promote on the basis of this new doctrine of a special position for Russia in the world," says Dr. Brzezinski. He addresses Russia's middle class, saying: "the real place for Russia is as an important country in Europe <...> What does China mean for the future of Russia?"
It should be noted that the rapid development of Sino-Russian alliance as well as ratification of the Eurasian Economic Union Treaty this year dealt a serious blow to the US geopolitical interests and economic plans on the Eurasian continent. Russia's initiative to create a harmonious economic community stretching from Lisbon to Vladivostok is doubtlessly far more favorable than a New Silk Road project developed by the US, which includes some highly volatile regions of Central Asia living under a permanent terrorist threat. 
Due to its geographical position, Russia, a priori has a competitive advantage as a convenient and secure logistic hub, a reliable natural bridge between the West and the East, Europe and the developing Asia, according to experts. 
We can hardly call the Eurasian Union a "mythical one": its economic mechanisms are working and have already born tangible fruits. Needless to say ...the Eurasian Economic Union [is] one of the biggest consumer markets on the planet with a quarter of all the world's proven mineral resources valued of up to $40 trillion. 
Being an open economic community the EEU seamlessly integrates into the global market structure. Speaking disparagingly of the EEU's prospects Brzezinski, however, can't deny the fact that the US is unable to provide its European partners with similar market shares in Eurasia.
There is a serious dilemma: how to maintain control over the EU allies and prevent their integration into apparently profitable Eurasian economic community? Zbigniew Brzezinski's universal solution is deterrence and threatening.
The US politicians and pro-American mass media are inclined to portray Russia's actions towards Ukraine as an unjustified "outrage". The conflict, however, has not been created by Russia and it is not Russia who is responsible for the bloodshed in the East of Ukraine, authoritative political analysts admit. Although Dr. Brzezinski does not have any evidence to back his claims, he insists that Russia is supplying weapons to the militant groups in Eastern Ukraine.
Zbigniew Brzezinski's statement about the US's dedication to the inviolability of post-WWII European borders and "the exclusion of the use of force in resolving territorial issues" looks illogical and may cause a surprise. It seems like the former National Adviser is suffering from a strange form of amnesia that has totally erased the facts of US-NATO violation of the European order from his memory. Let us name a few: a gradual splitting of Yugoslavia supported by the US and its European allies in 1990-2008 that drastically changed the map of Europe, the NATO military aggression against Yugoslavia in 1999 and the occupation of Kosovo. 
Dr. Brzezinski is blatantly demonstrating a double-standards approach: international laws breach is fully justified in the eyes of the US if it serves the American interests.
Predictably enough after a preamble devoted to the prominent threat posed by Russia to the Eastern European countries, Dr. Brzezinski calls to increase of NATO's military presence in Europe and to start weapon deliveries to Ukraine.-----
Related- Russia Giving Up on the West
Categories: Authors and Bloggers

<div><br /></div><div><br /></div><img

Sun, 09/14/2014 - 11:49

L.The Vikings' Adrian Peterson

Football player charged with child abuse - for disciplining his son  by Dan

Here's an example of a father being treated like a criminal for behaving like a father. 
First a little history.  In my grandparents day before WWII parents use to discipline small children with a 'switch'.  Nobody seems to know that work meant a thin green branch from a tree, about the width of a pencil, and about three feet long.   It's not a weapon. it can't do any damage, no matter how strong the arm is that wield's it.  But it sure can smart. 
The flexibility of a switch made it good for 'whipping'.   I got a 'whupping' once when I was six for being half an hour late coming home from school.   That was nothing compared to the PADDLING I got from my first grade teacher for talking with another student during her lecture.  The latter experience included humiliation of being dominated by the teacher in front of the class.   
It never occurred to me that I'd been 'abused' or 'assaulted'.  I knew exactly what I'd done to warrant the punishment, and I learned to take warnings seriously.  If it hadn't been allowed, I would have started coming home whenever I felt like it, and disrupting class.  The whippings worked. The thing about whippings was, it's something that only had to be experienced a few times at most, and then you never needed it again because you'd been taught to think about consequences before you act. 
The following clip of a typical American 'wuppin' scenario isn't from a story by Marquis de Sade, but from Mark Twain.  Tom took the blame for something Becky did, and gets whipped with the teacher's switch. It's a manly thing to do.  It shows us that Tom is courageous, chivalrous, and a good man in tight corner. 
"Tom Sawyer Whipped for Becky "
So this big media scandal this week is about a football player disciplining his son with a switch, while the boy was on loan to him for visitation from his ex-wife.    When she found out about it, she filed charges.  Now it's a media circus.
Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Rampant Racism & Sexism in Zionist Grants

Sun, 09/14/2014 - 02:35

(left, Females of color favored. Amanda Rampertab, 2014 Schulich Leader)

Illuminati Jewish re-engineering
of society continues unabated.

"We are mere subjects in an occult world empire based on control of money (credit) ..."

by Henry Makow Ph.D

Recently, a full-page ad featured pictures of  40 high school students who won $60,000-$80,000 scholarships to study science, technology, engineering or math at 20 Canadian universities. I was struck by the disproportionate number of females and minorities among the 40 faces. 

These are the "2014 Shulich Leaders" -- beneficiaries of one Seymour Schulich, a Canadian Jewish financier who has ten schools of education, law, business, medicine etc. named in his honor. 

According to the 2001 Canadian census, racial minorities make up about 18% of the population. Let's round it up to 20% for growth to date. In the last three years, 120 students received this scholarship. Fifty six of the 120 or 47% were given to racial minorities.

In other words, 80% of the population of European descent got 53% of the scholarships, and I am including Jews with the Europeans. Otherwise, more than half of the winners would be racial minorities. (Look for yourself.)

The results were also skewed along sexual lines. The Illuminati have always wanted to remove women from the home, where they might raise more children properly and be dependent on their husbands. The Illuminati have been frustrated by the lack of women going into technology. Generally speaking, females represent 10-20% of these fields.

In the words of the Schulich ad, they are "creating the next generation of technology innovators" and damn it, they're going to be women!

Even though females have shown a clear disinterest in technology and engineering etc, 65 of the 120 scholarships went to young women, i.e. almost 55% of the total. Again, compare this to the 10-20% that naturally enter these fields.

In contrast, have you ever seen a program to address disparities in professions where females are dominant? For example, only 20% of primary school teachers in Canada are male. 35% of high school teachers are male.


Why are the Illuminati Jews so anxious that females displace males in technology? They want females to displace males in general because females are more docile. Feminism is all about emasculating males by empowering women.

This is a little off topic but I had a realization about why Ray Rice knocking his fiancee out  (after she spit on him and hit him) is such an anathema. Where do we see that happening any more? What we see on TV is females beating up men, and that's what they want us to see. If Ms. Palmer had knocked Rice out cold, she would have been a symbol of female empowerment and a national hero. "You go girl!"

Cabalists think they can redefine reality just because they own the media, the politicians and everything else. They can make women stronger than men whether they are or not. They can make women smarter than men in technical fields even if they're not. They can overrule nature. They can erase gender and make us sexless. They think they're God and humanity can be re-engineered to serve them.

Just as they think women are more malleable than men, they think minorities are a lesser threat than whatever vestigial white racial consciousness remains. That's why they inundate European nations with racial minorities, and empower them beyond justification. No wonder minorities are anxious to come.The Illuminati will show them to the front of the line!


We are mere subjects in an occult world empire based on control of money (government credit.) This empire is run by the Illuminati, i.e. Cabalist Jewish bankers and their Freemason lackeys who serve as colonial administrators. These are your "leaders"- politicians, journalists, educators, writers etc.  The "War on Terror " and police state surveillance consolidate their control.

The Schulich scholarship is another example of how the Illuminati Jews use control of  money to turn the world upside down so that they, and not God, can shape human destiny.


Related- Multiculturalism: Agenda of Organized Jewry

------------ Barbara Spectre on Jews Leading Multiculturalism in Europe--------------Apple criticized for lack of "Diversity"
First Comment from Amar:
Thank you for your recent article.  I have also wondered why Indians make up the majority of doctors in America, and the majority of programmers as well.  It does make sense now that for years, Bollywood films and culture promoted "western" education in India.   The movie scenes depicted doctors saving lives using "western" medicine.  The movie scenes also depicted boy going to USA / Europe to get educated and then come home and marry a beautiful village girl.  Over the years, this became glamorized into Indian minds and they lost their natural roots. 
In addition, under British Rule we have been kept dirt poor and dependent on British Education for British Industries for so called good jobs.  When you come from dirt poor neighborhoods, you are likely to be more deciplined to listen to educational instruction and follow orders of the profession because it has given you an opportunity for a good life.   In addition, you start to be engrained in the education that you are smart and smarter than others because you went to medical school and residency for 10 years. 
In conclusion, all these high paying jobs require intelligence to follow complex instructions but not too much awareness to question the subject matter.  A cancer doctor is not allowed to use natural medicine as treatment, an engineer is not allowed to question the need for super bomber planes, etc.  All these high paying, high educational jobs are for work needed to create and manage a superstructure for the elite / illuminati/etc, and this is now a global superstructure.  I have always wondered why intelligent people cannot survive on their own anymore.  Farms have been superfarms and under eminent domain.  We are all crowded in cities and require these "good" jobs to survive.  In essence, we are being trained from the day we are born into a new world order.  We just don't know better anymore. 
Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Living on the Edge: Update from Tel Aviv

Sat, 09/13/2014 - 01:55

"Saul" is an American Jew who emigrated to Israel six years ago
with his wife and children. He is not allowed to leave because,
 after a divorce, he cannot pay exorbitant child support.
In Israel, the father is 100% responsible.

Here is an update on his life, and the recent war
on Gaza as seen from israel.

by "Saul"

Thanks Henry for sending this article about another American trapped in Israel. I thought about escaping Israel "illegally" but knew I'd face the same dilemmas as the author faces, losing my children possibly forever.

I chose to fight for my children; thus I am still at the mercy of the corrupt and heartless Israeli police and anti-family court.

I was back in jail before the summer for a two-day stint as my bitch ex falsely accused me of vandalizing her car. I was out in two days thanks to a friend posting bail but the criminal judge granted my ex a restraining order preventing my seeing my children for most of the summer. I expect to serve another two or three weeks in jail for failing to pay the impossible child support the adulterous greedy bitch was awarded for wrecking our family. It is what it is. I'd rather do time occasionally than give that bitch a single shekel.

That being said I am doing well and quite happy in my minimalist life. I was earning $75,000 to $100,000 a year in the States as a real estate agent. I've gone from math teacher and soccer coach to the sleazy underbelly of criminal Israeli on-line pharmaceuticals and casinos to my current job as a cook. I love it. My brothers and I used to fantasize about having our restaurant so working in a kitchen is a real pleasure. The pay is peanuts - 1000₪ a week ($325 roughly) - but the perks of the job are great. Food, drinks and social life with English speakers in similar situations.

The restaurant industry is a cash industry making it basically impossible for a greedy bitch ex-wife to get her hands on the money. No doubt she would if she could, even if that meant me living homeless in the streets. She'd like that, using it in court to possibly block my visits with the law on her side. She does so now illegally.

There is a definite freedom living without a bank account, or ANY account. My one luxury is an iPhone with an anonymous pre-paid account for phone and internet. Nothing is in my name in this country, except perhaps the taxes my employer withholds and for a pension I will never receive even if it amounted to something significant, which it won't.


The Gaza operation (Protective Shield I think the Israeli propagandists called it) was and is a total farce. It killed business this summer. Every industry dealing with tourism was shit out of luck, and even businesses relying on local patronage suffered as the sheeple here continued to run for cover each time Big Brother sounded the sirens to indicate an inaccurately fired rocket was about to be shot down by Iron Dome. The entire society has been basically numb and stuck in their homes for the summer, stupidly supporting their criminal government in the massacre sold as a war.

The Gaza operation was launched on the heels of what I believe was a false flag murder of three settler teens including one American Jewish immigrant. Despite Hamas denying any involvement Netanyahu launched the campaign as planned first with a "Bring back our boys" PR campaign and then the military action, "Brothers Keeper."

It surfaced here that the police knew the boys were murdered hours after they were abducted from a phone call one made; however, Bibi carried on with the two PR shams for a few weeks, letting people assume the boys were captive and alive like Gilad Shalit.

An FBI analysis of the murder tape concluded that the boys were shot to death, ten shots from a gun with a silencer. Who knows if they were even killed. Maybe they're Mossad trainees now. I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if the Israelis killed the kids themselves OR faked it to give themselves a pretext for the summer of "fun."


I am currently enjoying my forced mid-life crisis, looking for a good woman while enjoying the very Israeli lifestyle of friends with benefits. This place is so immoral it's not funny, though it is fun. Sodom and Gomorrah were probably tame and moral relative to this Satanic capital of the world. I have stripper friends who frequent BDSM clubs in Tel Aviv. I was recently invited to join one at a place called "The Dungeon." Some Holy Land, eh?

Luckily we have the NFL package at the restaurant and neighboring bar do I can stupefy myself with an idiotic distraction to get my mind off the reality that I live in the devil's den.

Still, the beach is the beach, the sea the sea, the moon the moon and the sunset always beautiful. Life could be worse. I'll keep you posted if I go to prison again.

My first stint a year ago resulted in some interesting musings and interviews with other unfortunate men going through what I am. I got halfway through transcribing those notes written in the margins of a few Israeli newspapers before my computer stopped working. My next stint will no doubt result in something similar as there's not much else to do other than read and write during a two or three week "holiday."


Also by Saul

Israel A Prison for US "Deadbeat Dad"
The Dark Underbelly of Israeli Business
Doing Business in Israel- Dishonesty Expected

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Why is Israel Absent from ISIS Fight?

Fri, 09/12/2014 - 02:57
(left, Netanyahu waxes eloquent Thursday)

Why do we suspect that
Israel's opposition 
to ISIS is for show only?

by Henry Makow Ph.D

What's wrong with this picture?  
Israel gets $3 billion a year in military aid from the US. Over the last 60 years, the Jewish state has received about $250 billion worth of airplanes and armaments. 
Yet when Obama appeals for a "a broad international coalition" to fight ISIS, which supposedly threatens the whole Middle East,  Israel is not asked to join.  Canada, Germany, Australia, France, Turkey ..all are asked..but not Israel. 

Israel is the strongest military power in the region. But apparently it bears no responsibility to help contain this "threat." 
How serious could Obama (or Israel)  be about combating the Islamic Caliphate? 
However, don't count Israel completely out. Netanyahu will contribute large quantities of hot air: 
On Thursday, an Israeli website reported,  Netanyahu said that "Israel fully supports Obama's call for a united action against ISIS."


The Likud leader stressed that all terror groups "present a clear and present danger to the peace and security of the world and to our common civilization" and that if "they gain ground somewhere, they gain ground everywhere."

Fighting these groups "requires weapons, defensive and offensive, but above all it requires - I believe - clarity and courage. Clarity to understand they're wrong and we're right. They're evil and we're good. No moral relativism there, at all," insisted Netanyahu.


Apparently things haven't always been so black and white.

(The "new face of terror": Mossad agent al-Baghdadi. Our Zionist colonial elite conspires against us..)
Netanyahu showed us his true colors last June, after ISIS captured Mosul.
"ISIS is good for Israel," he told Tel Aviv University's INSS think-tank. Washington should stay out of the Iraqi conflict - and let the Sunni militants defeat the Shia-dominated government of prime minister al-Maliki and break-up Iraq. "This will weaken Iranian influence in the Arab region." he said.
Apparently Israel's fondness for ISIS is reciprocated: 

He said that "In the Qur'an, Allah ordered us not to fight Israel or the Jews."

In response to Israel's "Operation Protective Edge," ISIS said that they were simply too busy killing fellow Muslims to bother with a war on Jewish people. "The greatest answer to this question is the Qur'an, where Allah speaks about the nearby enemy-those Muslims who have become infidels-as they are more dangerous than those which were already infidels," explained an ISIS spokesman

As readers of this site know, ISIS was created by the CIA, the Mossad and Saudi Arabia to get rid of Assad of Syria. Has it gone rogue? I doubt it.   

Israel has admitted to treating 1,000 wounded Syrian rebels in its hospitals over the last 14 mos. How many of these were ISIS?  Do you think this is the extent of their involvement? 
The question remains, just how serious is Obama about stopping ISIS, a group Israel, the US and Saudi Arabia started in the first place?
Is this just a back door way to help "moderate" rebels and finally eliminate Assad? 
What is the Illuminati's hidden agenda? Terror attacks on America by ISIS? Albert Pike's World War Three pitting "Islam" against the Zionist West, minus Israel, who shall be protected? 
----Related-Palestinian Parody of ISISTen Signs ISIS is a Scripted Psyop Russia Warns US Against Air Strikes in Syria
First Comment from Dan: 
Let's not overlook a bit of news that media mostly suppressed.  August 26th UK Guardian:

Syria offers to help fight Isis but warns against unilateral air strikes

Walid al-Moallem, the Syrian foreign minister, said his government was ready "to co-operate and co-ordinate" with any side, including the US, or join any regional or international alliance against Isis. But he said any military action inside Syria should be coordinated with the Syrian government.

"Any strike which is not co-ordinated with the government will be considered as aggression," he said.

Sound reasonable?  Obviously "ISIS" is Assad's enemy.  Our State Department and politicians have condemned Assad for fighting them as a 'Tyrant'. 
This announcement followed the "Dictators" recent re-election by Syrian voters, August 25th.   
I live in one of the largest American cities, and 'international' city - absolutely everybody is here.  This is where I keep my finger on the pulse of American public perception.   Yet NOT ONE person I've asked has heard of either of these news items. 

The Administration never publicly responded to the Syrian government's rational offer to co-operate with the US and NATO insofar as breaking up ISIS. 

Exactly one year ago, Sept. 11 anniversary week, or officially "Patriot (act) Day", Obama withdrew his demand for Congressional approval to bomb Syria. 
The web of lies had gotten a bit crossed when Media was reporting we were backing 'the rebels', who turned out to be the same 'Al Queda' (now ISIS) the sheeple thought we were fighting.   They blew their cover.  Worse, they were already massacring the indigenous Syrian Christians who lived there unmolested since the first century.  

The Administration is so Christian-hating that they seemed to believe their own propaganda that 'this is not a Christian nation'.  They thought they had all the Churchians under televised hypnosis, but people noticed.   More importantly,  military combat CO's noticed and might have mutinied if they'd been ordered to fight FOR Al Queda and blow up Christians.  

The Administration lost that round.  During the months of October and November all the presidents and prime ministers flew to meet with Netanyahu or vice versa to 'huddle' and get the new play.  Including Putin.   

I can only conclude that the same scenario that former Gen. Wesley Clark explained in this clip.  

General Wesley Clark: Wars Were Planned - Seven Countries In Five Years 

Everything that's happened since 911 was due to a plan to 'take out' Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Libya and IRAN.   It's not ALL about Israel.  Zionists have a big stake it but the plan is a combine of the powerful ancient mafias behind Globalism. 

Israel is hardly 'missing' from the war on Syria.  They've already carried out missile attacks on strategic targets in Syria for years.  Four days ago the IAF stepped up sorties on the Syrian border.  http://www.algemeiner.com/2014/09/07/iaf-bolsters-sorties-along-syrian-border-any-spillover-will-cost-them-dearly/

Keep in mind Israel seemed 'missing' from the 2002 Baghdad Blitzkrieg and Iraqi occupation too.  They won't squander their US supplied jets and missiles so long as the US is willing to assume the high costs of war in budget deficits and lives. 

Comment from Steve:
Thursday morning, NBC rebroadcast their live Today Show coverage of the events of 9/11/01.  Video, such as is posted on your site is always debunked as having been "altered."  But, this morning, they showed the "real" events. Or at least the "real" events as they were presented that fateful day. Being able to watch the shots of the plane entering and exiting the tower on a modern HD plasma screen leaves little doubt that "nose in/nose out" is exactly what was shown.
I recorded it with a modern DVR and have replayed it multiple times. I made the mistake of posting an observation of that on Dailykos. I have been suspended from that site for three days because they do not allow anyone to question the "established facts" of that day.
Given that we are about to be dragged into yet another war which can be directly traced to 9/11, somehow the American public needs to become aware of what really happened. Otherwise intelligent people act exactly like those who deny the reality of climate change because they simply do not want to recognize THE TRUTH. It isn't pretty, but it is still the reality of that event.

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Feminist Claim to Female Suffrage is Bogus

Thu, 09/11/2014 - 05:19

Half the British men who went to the trenches in France in 1914 didn't have a vote either. Women finally got the vote in the context of both sexes getting it for the war effort.

"Women were not really disenfranchised. They had the right to vote in local politics as much as most men, and they were able to take part in civic affairs too. They could even stand for local political office such as mayors. The suffragettes were not the heroines up at the cutting edge of social change as feminists would have us believe today. They were a group of middle-class activists, widely regarded at the time as trouble-makers."

by Herbert Purdy
Did Feminists Really Win the Vote for Women?
(Abridged by henrymakow.com)

At the beginning of the 20th century, women were neither oppressed nor disenfranchised as claimed by the feminists.

The truth is, women got the vote as part of the development of the universal franchise. The Representation of the People Act in 1832, (better known as 'The Great Reform Act') instigated the process of reform. Even then, however, only about one-in-six adult males were given the vote... The vast majority of men were just as much the victims as women.

It is true that the Great Reform Act only enfranchised, 'male persons', although John Stuart Mill MP, attempted to replace the term 'male persons' with just 'person' in a second reform bill of 1867 but was defeated... because at the time, women's interests were considered to be synonymous with those of their menfolk.

Not only that, but women were elevated by men, society, by the law and even in the application of the law. Put simply, women were on a pedestal and accorded enormous rights over property as well as being protected legally from civil law in terms of that property, far more than men. The crusade by the suffragettes took place in the context of women being highly privileged already, and there was little stomach for the fight being stirred up by these extremists.

Married women were insulated from legal liability in a wide range of civil matters. Indeed, they were even protected from the consequences of certain breaches of the criminal law. A woman's husband stood between her and the world, protecting her as men had always done for women under the ancient system of couverture that placed enormous burdens on men: burdens, they often could not sustain.

That is just the way things were. Society was seeking the best it could given the prevailing circumstances, and that meant women were highly privileged, and men held highly responsible for that privilege.

Another factor in the resistance to Mill's reform was that, by then, feminism was rearing its head on the back of the emerging Marxist/Socialist movement. This was known as 'The Woman Question' in socialism, and it was feared as a force that could radically change society.


However, the First Word War had changed everything. As the soldiers returned, millions of them did not have the vote. It had been said 'If they are fit to fight they are fit to vote', to which the Prime Minister at the time, Herbert Asquith, responded 'My hon. Friend puts it in a nutshell', and this is the primary reason why the Representation of the People Act of 1918 was passed.

This Act widened the franchise enormously and it fairly included women. It increased the overall electorate from about 7.7 million to 21.4 million, and women became 43% of those eligible to vote . To all intents and purposes, they had achieved near parity. However, the age restrictions for voting were different. For men it was 21 years and for women, it was 30 years of age provided some minimal property criteria were met in both cases. I will explain the reason for this in a moment.

Then, in the same year, the Qualification of Women Act 1918 was passed, largely in recognition of women's effort during the war. This provided the right for women to be elected to parliament even if they hadn't reached the age where they could vote. Women were being recognized. They were not being excluded.

But everything had changed. To put it bluntly, there were too few men left in society to allow women exactly the same voting rights as men. Even before the war, in 1911, females outnumbered males in England and Wales by 1.2 million. By 1921 the difference was 1.7 million. A whole generation of men, young men in the flower of their youth, had been wiped out in the trenches of France and Belgium.

To have granted women the vote then would have meant totally unbalancing politics, and society, and that was the main reason why there was resistance to the suffragettes' claims. Discrimination against women had nothing to do with it.

In fact, the suffragettes were a spent force on the fringe of society by then. Most women wanted nothing to do with them. The truth is, the suffragettes were actually a hindrance to the advancement of women's suffrage, not a help. Nevertheless, the Equal Suffrage/Franchise Act was passed in 1928 finally granting universal suffrage to all citizens. Needless to say, it was passed by men.


The Suffragettes did not achieve votes for women: the victory was achieved by men. The fight for women's votes and equality has not and never has been the sole prerogative of women. The suffragettes only rode on the back of a trend toward equalizing society as a whole - and all driven by men of conscience who were adapting to changing times.

Thanks to Mike B for sending this. 

Makow Comment:  Our democracy is a sham because of private campaign financing. Essentially all the politicians are for sale.  For the price of a couple of fighter jets, we could have public campaign financing and genuine democracy. But we need those two jets to defend "freedom" elsewhere when we don't have freedom here. 

First Comment from Anthony Migchels:

A very interesting article, confirming what should be apparent by now: that Feminism unrighteously claimed victimhood, while both men and women suffered equally, both from oppression by Capital and calcified social roles. Amazing to hear the myth of the suffragettes busted in such a convincing manner.

The article does not deal, however, with the question of desirability of the female vote.

For instance: young women are well known to be the most gullible members of society. What is the use of them voting? They are easily swayed by propaganda and marketing and since propaganda always aims at the 20% dumbest of the population, it's not very likely that society benefits from young women voting. To a lesser extent, this also applies for young men.

Also: women tend to be far more inclined to collectivism. The growth of Big Government undoubtedly was caused to at least some extent the female vote.

Today women account for 55% of the vote, while men pay more than 100% of taxation: women gain more from State hand outs than they pay in tax. Clearly this is a huge imbalance in society: those best equipped, contributing most, are disenfranchised.

Interestingly, the Protocols claim they want everybody to vote. It lessens the quality and makes the unfit co-responsible. Sounds like the Government as usual 'grudgingly' acquiesced to the changes they were already planning.

Voting should not be considered a right, but a responsibility. It should be left to those fit to vote. For instance: heads of the household, where both spouses can decide together who this head might be.

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Dutch Royalty, Notables Accused of Child Killing

Wed, 09/10/2014 - 11:20

This is incredible. A woman claiming to be the wife of the Mafia leader in Holland has implicated Queen Beatrix and many Dutch notables, including Geert Wilders and possibly George Soros (not Dutch) in the satanic ritual abuse, rape and murder of children. Normally I would reject such outlandish claims. But given what we know of the Illuminati, anything is possible.

(See additional info from Fred below)

Transcript of Anne Marie van Blijenburgh's testimony (above) about child murders in Belgium

My name is Anne Marie van Blijenburgh. I have been married for twenty four years to Kees van Korlaar. Together with his three brothers, Kees van Korlaar forms a criminal organization known as the Octopus Syndicate (ed. Note: This is a slang term in Holland for Ndrangheta, the modern Italian -based Mafia). They have worked from 1960 on to today. By order of Queen Beatrix they have organized the murder, torture, rape and killing of children in a public setting. They organized that through youth detention centers in the Netherlands.

 The youth detention centers were told by the criminals that they were asking the Dutch court for children who could work for the Dutch Queen for a certain period. The detention centers were very happy; they thought that Queen Beatrix was a very social person, and they gladly volunteered in giving files of certain children to the criminals. When they wanted to verify what the criminals told them, they were given a name and a phone number of a high ranking officer in the court of Queen Beatrix, and that high ranking officer would tell them that indeed the criminals were seeking children to work for a certain period at the Dutch court.

 After receiving files of approximately three children every time, the criminals selected a child that had no relative or family. They told the youth detention center that those are the ones we want; the youth detention center would give clothes to the child and put the child on the train to Zwolle.

 In Zwolle, the criminals fetched the child from the station and brought it to a building that was equipped like a hotel but was not working as a hotel, although there were people in the lobby as if the hotel was working. The child was put on a table and was given something to drink and with that drink the child was drugged. Beside that hotel was a building where the performance took place.

In that building there were people were sitting down and at a certain moment the child was brought into that building by the criminals, was tortured, raped and brutally murdered in front of those people.

The audience was around Prince Johann Friso, the second son of Queen Beatrix. I was told that Johann Friso was quite insane and had an unhealthy interest in young children and had a psychiatrist with him every day of his life. That psychiatrist's name was Guus Pareau Dumont. The criminals organized those killings in accordance with Queen Beatrix. She paid for the killings.

And the criminals asked Johann Friso to bring his relatives and friends with him, so the whole building was filled with very important people from the Netherlands: ministers, high ranking officers and all kinds of people that the criminals could photograph so they could blackmail those people and get criminal advantages from that.

 Question: Could you name some of the people who were present?

 The people who I recognized there were Prince Johann Friso, his psychiatrist Guus Pareau Dumont; I recognized Johann's wife Mabel Wisse Smit; she was there with an old man, I think it was George Soros. I recognized a Herr Donner, a former minister of the law department, the viceroy of the Netherlands. I recognized Ernst Hirsch Ballin, a very important former Minister of Justice; I recognized a Mr. van den Emster, he was for years the head of all judges in the Netherlands; I recognized Dick Berlijn; he's a former head of the military department in the Netherlands. I recognized a very important journalist. I recognized Carla Eradus, the wife of Friso's psychiatrist Guus Pareau Dumont, Carla is the President of the Court in Amsterdam, a judge. I recognized Mark Rutte, he's at this moment the President of the Netherlands. I recognized Geert Wilders; he is at this moment the head of the political party PVV and head of the Dutch Parliament.

Important New Info from Fred:

The article about the woman who accuses the royal family of murder, is in the netherlands well known by people who look a bit behind the scene.

There is another video of her where she tells in details about these criminal activities. One family of 4 brothers control the neterlands and more.

On another site is information that the head of the family tells he is pride to be a  member of the illuminati.

Here ist he site, you have to translate it,:


in 3 parts


here is the video of this woman of more then 4 hours detailed info(in dutch):




my opinion: she tells the truth


Comment from Dan:

What's to doubt?   Look at Jimmy Seville's photos chumming it up with Prince Phillip and Prince Charles.  Another brief exposure was the Detroux Affair - the child trafficking/snuff ring implicated Prince Laurent, Prince Albert and other members of the Belgian aristocracy/nobility and the 'elite'

Accusations of this most open secret activity of the Black Nobility runs back through the centuries. 

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

MI-6 Hired Nazi who Killed 100-300 British Agents

Tue, 09/09/2014 - 13:08

(left, SS Sturmbannfuehrer Horst Kopkow,1910-1996. This account mentions 300 agents killed.)

Wonder why NATO is trying to start a war with Russia? Or why the West created ISIS?

All wars are really between the Illuminati on one hand,
and all combatants on the other.
This is why they finance both sides of every war.

The Illuminati arrange wars so that patriots of every nationality--
British, German, Russian, American etc. -- kill each other.

This is again seen in the fact that, after WW2, MI-6 protected and
then hired the mass murderer of its own agents, the majority of whom
MI-6 treasonously betrayed in the first place. (See second article below) 

The "Secret Masonry" is setting up "our own, to all appearance, off position, which in at least one of its organs will present what looks like the very antipodes to us.[i.e. the Nazis] Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards." (Protocols of Zion 12.11)

The author of the Protocols writes that if any state raises an objection to Rothschild domination, "it is only pro forma, at our discretion, and by our direction, for their anti-Semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren." (Protocols of Zion 9)

"The Kopkow case is uniquely chilling because the MI6 men who spared him were colleagues and "handlers" of his victims. Among those whose torture and death he sanctioned were men and women of the SOE and MI6 agents."

London Times   May 15, 2005

"ONE of Hitler's top intelligence officers, who ordered the murders of more than 100 British secret agents in concentration camps, was spared execution as a war criminal and selected to work for MI6.

Newly opened papers contain startling evidence that in the postwar scramble to secure information about Russian communists, British Intelligence "turned" Horst Kopkow, faked his death and used him to fight the Cold War.

Evidence emerged in the 1980s that Britain had become a refuge for suspected war criminals, but few would have believed that the Government had gone even further and put a man like Kopkow on its books.

Details of how MI6 snatched Kopkow, 35, from war crimes investigators, inventing his fake death from "bronchopneumonia", are revealed in private papers made public only now. The papers belonged to Vera Atkins, a senior officer of the Special Operations Executive (SOE), Britain 's secret wartime body. After the war she mounted a one-woman investigation into the fate of her agents behind enemy lines.

The Atkins documents have been corroborated by newly declassified secret papers in the British and American National Archives. MI6 declined to comment on the Kopkow case.

However, intelligence sources indicated yesterday that the service itself was taken aback by the evidence. To date, Britain has denied that it engaged in the dark arts used by the Americans, whose employment of Nazis to catch Communists has been well-documented. British intelligence sources pointed out that Kopkow was not in the league of "the butcher of Lyons", a reference to Klaus Barbie, the most notorious war criminal employed by the Americans.

The Kopkow case is uniquely chilling because the MI6 men who spared him were colleagues and "handlers" of his victims. Among those whose torture and death he sanctioned were men and women of the SOE and MI6 agents.

While Kopkow's information may have been considered valuable, it was in fact useless. The head of MI6's Russian desk when Kopkow was captured was Kim Philby, exposed as a Soviet spy more than 15 years later.

Precisely how long Kopkow was employed by British Intelligence remains murky. German records state that he adopted the name Cordes and died in Gelsenkirchen in 1996."

Illuminati British and Nazis Collaborated
by Henry Makow Ph.D.

In the wake of D-Day June 6, 1944
, hundreds of acts of sabotage were committed by the French Resistance --- with one exception.

There were none in the north and north west where they mattered most.

There, the "Prosper" and related "Scientist" networks had been mopped by the Gestapo in 1943. Prosper's courageous young leader, Francis Anthony Suttill, 34, was languishing in a concentration camp.

He and scores of British agents were later executed, along with over 10,000 members of the French Resistance. One hundred and sixty plane loads of armaments --2600 containers -- including tons of sten guns and explosives, were seized by the Nazis. (193)

Who was responsible for this debacle?

According to BBC Producer Robert Marshall's thoroughly documented book, "All The King's Men" (Collins, 1988) the culprit was none other than the homosexual and Freemason, Deputy Head of MI-6, Sir Claude Edward Marjoribanks Dansey (1876-1947.)

Dansey deliberately placed a double agent, Henri Dericourt, at the heart of the Prosper organization. Dericourt, a French pilot, was responsible for organizing the nighttime shuttling of agents and materiel in and out of France.

He kept his handler, SS Sturmbannfuhrer Karl Baumelburg, head of counter sabotage in France, apprised of all the comings and goings, including the mail that passed back and forth. In return, the Gestapo allowed the operation to unfold which made Dericourt look very good indeed.

MI-6 placed their own man Nicolas Bodington in SOE  to vouch for Dericourt and block all efforts by SOE to uncover the traitor. Bodington actually met with Baumelburg on a visit to Paris in 1943. They all had known each other before the war. It was Bodington who introduced Baumelburg to Delicourt.

After the war, Dericourt confirmed that he worked for Dansey. (151)

Why would MI-6 engage in this kind of treason?


Makow- Hitler a Traitor? Testimony of his Closest Aides
 Makow-  Hitler and Bormann Were Traitors

Thanks to Hamad Subani's The World War Deception for alerting me to Horst Kopkow.

First Comment by Al Thompson

The whole purpose is to make war a continual part of the landscape.  All nations are subject to the idiocy of the new world order freaktards.  Their main weapon is that they lie.  They'll even lie to their own people if it puts forward their disgusting agenda.  People who join the military are just asking for trouble.  Who would want their body parts blown up for the moneychangers?  These wars a satanic in nature and the wars fulfill the goal of Satan; war, war, and more war. The main tool for mind control is the lie.

The problem in this instance is that it is difficult to discern who is lying and who is not.  Even the most careful "patriot" will soon find the proverbial knife stuck in his back.  When young men and women decide not to join the military, then maybe the world will have some peace.

Now, when I hear anyone from the "government" I automatically assume that they are lying.  And rather then fill my mind with a bunch of lies, I just don't listen to it anymore because I don't trust the source of the information.  I try to separate out to the extent possible.  I haven't figured out how to jump off the planet yet.


Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Ray Rice: Domestic Violence Whipping Boy

Tue, 09/09/2014 - 08:22

(Left, Ray Rice, wife Janay Palmer  and daughter Rayven, age 3)

An unfortunate altercation has allowed the Illuminati
to trot out one of their favorite hobby horses,
domestic violence.

"How do you claim to empower women when you take the decision to prosecute out of their hands?"

(Tuesday statement from Janay Palmer below vindicates my argument.)

By Henry Makow Ph.D.

The NFL suspended Baltimore Raven running back Ray Rice "indefinitely" Monday after a video surfaced showing him knocking his then-fiance unconscious in an altercation in an Atlantic City casino elevator February 15, 2014.

Rice had been suspended for two games and fined $500,000. He had been charged with aggravated assault and was facing legal consequences. However the severity of the punch and the image of him dragging her unconscious body out of the elevator touched off a firestorm which resulted in the suspension which probably will end his football career.

I do not condone men beating up their women or vice versa. I find what Rice did repugnant. However, as usual, the Illuminati media are using this case to advance their heterophobic agenda designed to instill fear of men in women.

They tailor everything to their agenda. When Michael Brown was killed by a white cop, he was a Black man, better to promote racial division. But Ray Rice is not a Black man, part of a hip hop culture that encourages domestic violence and makes millions for the Illuminati. He is just a "man" better to demonize men and promote homosexuality.

When a man preys on young boys, he is a "pedophile." He is never a "homosexual" because homosexuality is good.


Women attack men as often as men attack women but you won't hear that now. You'll hear that a man kills a woman every six days, as one TV newscast reported.

You also won't hear that six weeks after this altercation, Janay Palmer married Ray Rice. They had been going together for six years and have a three-year-old child. You won't hear that Janay took some responsibility for the altercation and asked the public to forgive them and leave them alone.

It seems to me that prosecution should depend on a woman's complaint. How do you claim to empower women when this decision is taken out of their hands and placed in the hands of the marriage-hating Masonic state?

How is society protecting and respecting women like Janay Palmer by ignoring their wishes, taking away their husband's livelihood, and even putting him in jail?  This is typical of the way feminism has stabbed women in the back. It is designed to destroy the institution of marriage.

Rice and Palmer had expressed contrition and mended their ways. But political correctness and media hysteria are not going to allow a second chance.  "Tolerance" for the politically correct.  Zero tolerance for them.

The bottom line is that heterosexuality is based on an exchange of female power for male power expressed as love. If that loving male power is sometimes expressed physically, and it's what the woman respects and wants, who are we as a society that condones bombing helpless civilians into the stone age, to tell them how to live?

There is plenty of protection for a woman who wants out of an abusive relationship. She will usually end up with everything, especially if there is a child.

Ultimately, domestic violence hysteria is about emasculating men and wrecking marriages, not empowering women.

Statement Tuesday by Janay Palmer:
"I woke up this morning feeling like I had a horrible nightmare, feeling like I'm mourning the death of my closest friend," she wrote. "But to have to accept the fact that it's reality is a nightmare in itself. No one knows the pain that the media & unwanted options from the public has caused my family. To make us relive a moment in our lives that we regret every day is a horrible thing. To take something away from the man I love that he has worked his ass of for all his life just to gain ratings is horrific. "THIS IS OUR LIFE! What don't you all get. If your intentions were to hurt us, embarrass us, make us feel alone, take all happiness away, you've succeeded on so many levels. Just know we will continue to grow & show the world what real love is! [Baltimore] Ravensnation we love you!"

First Comment from Dee:

You know, I've seen, over the past week or so, dozens of on-air reports about Rice and his now-wife on multiple networks. I say now-wife because no matter what we in the public think, she married the man. And in not a single one of these reports did they fail to report that this was his "then-fiancee", or that they had subsequently married. Yet not a single report questioned the fact that since they still got hitched, perhaps there might be more to this than met the eye, and the hysteria needed a cap on it.
Interestingly, no matter which network you tuned in to, you got the same buzz words.  It didn't matter what channel you picked, you were subjected to the same opinions voiced as "news".

I was struck by the feeling that, no matter how much I was revolted by the video of Rice clobbering his woman, there was a niggling at the back of my head screaming "OVERKILL".  I did note that he picked up her dropped shoe for her when exiting the elevator, which told me he was personally horrified by what he had done... but we are not privy to what happened afterward. All we see is what went on in the elevator before the door closed. We are left to speculate. Did he haul her off by the hair like a cave man? Did he pick her up and try to undo the damage? We don't know; we are only given one side, incomplete evidence, with which to judge.
And then, they got married. Hmm.
Here in Canada, police are empowered to lay charges in a case of domestic violence, if they see any sign of physical altercation, and will do so. The details, presumably, are to be ironed out after the fact. But victims are no longer allowed to be the decision-maker as to whether or not their abuser goes free: the police can, at their will, override their refusal and lay charges anyway.
That law was ostensibly put into place because of the many women who are experiencing what is called "Battered Wife Syndrome" (note that a "syndrome" can have many symptoms, depending on what sort of abuse is being inflicted); such women tend not to lay charges, and the reality of that is quite frightening. Some of these women die for that mistake.
So on which side of caution should we err here?  Well, for my part I think that the enforcement issue is moot:  I'd much rather see a man (or woman) go through the humiliation of being charged and having to sort all that out in front of a judge, than bury another woman who stupidly thought it was all her fault and took back her apologetic abuser with open arms.  And that, for me, is a no-brainer.
But, that said,  this Rice thing is reminiscent of the recent kerfuffle over the LA Clippers owner, Donald Sterling, forced to sell his team, vilified by half the planet, for words he used in a private conversation. While ripping the man's life apart publicly, nobody bothered to mention that while his words may have been abhorrent, they were indeed private, until little Missy there chose to make them public. "Hell hath no fury", indeed.
So my beef with the whole thing is this: We are dealing here with a public evisceration of prominent people for not toeing the line, I think, more so than furthering the feminism plot (which I do not deny exists).  The same thing has essentially been done to two major sports figures, and although their offences were very different, the common denominator was that they stepped out of line; they did not conform.  And if there is one thing we know the elitists want of the sheeple, it is conformity... to whatever they say.
I remember the old movie "They Live" from about 1990, starring wrestler-turned-actor Roddy Piper, and the words he saw when he put on the strange sunglasses he found in an alleyway:  Words like "Conform" and "Obey" were posted subliminally everywhere.  And in my humble opinion,  I'm thinking that Mr. Rice and Mr. Sterling were exemplified and scapegoated in terms of how "honorable" people (i.e. the sporting community, the NBA, the NFL etc.) handle those who do not conform.
Millions of pro-sports fans have been intimately affected by this: Conform to the norm, or the world will turn against you! Talk about using peer pressure to make a point!


Related:  Timeline of Ray Rice Case

Makow -- Domestic Violence Hysteria is Political
---------    The Dawn of the Feminist Police State
W.F. Price     Do Women's Sexual Choices Contribute to Domestic Violence?

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

"Jack the Ripper" was Winston Churchill's Father

Mon, 09/08/2014 - 00:40

According to John Hamer, the Masonic ritual murder of four prostitutes was carried out by Winston Churchill's father, Lord Randolph Spencer Churchill, 1849-1895 (left.) The prostitutes were blackmailing the royal family.  

"Churchill was not only the 'brains' behind the entire operation, but he was also personally responsible for the cutting of Masonic emblems and symbols into the bodies of the victims, whilst William Gull's surgeon's hands  performed the organ removals."

I am re-posting this story in response to this ridiculous story in the Daily Mail Saturday that DNA has identified a Polish immigrant "Aaron Kosminski" as the killer.

Obviously the Illuminati go on covering their tracks for decades, even centuries.

John Hamer, 59,  has a horse-racing business in Yorkshire. This is an excerpt from his book, 'The Falsification of History - Our Distorted Reality' 2012.  John can be contacted at john@pegasusracingclub.com


by John Hamer

First Posted Jul 21, 2011

The story begins in the late summer of 1888, the heyday of Queen Victoria's reign, in the gas-lit streets of London, when a woman's horrifically mutilated body was discovered in a tawdry slum street in the Whitechapel area of East London....

On the evening of the 31st August 1888, the body of Mary Ann Nicholls, a common prostitute, was found prostrate on a pavement. She had been brutally hacked to death, her throat having been slit. Devastating cuts to her torso exposed her internal organs.  She was the first of five victims of the now legendary killer, 'Jack the Ripper'.

The so-called 'Ripper' murders came under the jurisdiction of the London Metropolitan Police Force and in particular an Inspector by the name of Frederick George Abberline.

It is important to note that the diaries of Frederick Abberline did not see light of day until around 70 years after the unsolved murders. They were in the possession of Walter Sickert, art tutor to Prince Albert Victor, the Duke of Clarence, otherwise known by his colloquial name of 'Prince Eddy'. 

Eddy was the eldest son of Albert Edward the Prince of Wales (later King Edward VII) and Princess Alexandra (later Queen Alexandra), the grandson of the reigning monarch, Queen Victoria and older brother of the future king of England, King George V and as such would have been first in line to the throne. 

Unfortunately, due to centuries of Royal in-breeding, Eddy was partially deaf and of well below average intelligence and was thus shunned by the majority of his cold-hearted family.

Queen Victoria, the reigning monarch at the time was a great supporter and patron of Freemasonry as were all the Royal males of the age (and as they still are today).  Indeed it was the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family (the current British royals) had sponsored the rise of Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Illuminati, originally a Freemasonry offshoot, in Bavaria in the 18th century.   Weishaupt was indeed born and raised in the Bavarian town of Gotha.

There are several Masonic lodges in the Royal palaces of Britain, the most significant one perhaps being the Royal Alpha Lodge in Kensington Palace.  In 1885 Prince Eddy was initiated into the Royal Alpha Lodge at the behest of his father.


As well as his membership of the lodge, Eddy was also a regular 'customer' at a homosexual-paedophile brothel in Cleveland Street, London and indiscreetly instigated a series of explicit love-letters with a young boy employed at these most vile of premises. 

The well-known Satanist, Aleister Crowley had these letters in his possession for many years but eventually they were lost or more likely destroyed.  Eddy had also made a young Catholic 'commoner' of Irish descent by the name of Annie Elizabeth Crook, pregnant with his child. 

Eddy had foolishly married her in a clandestine church service and this in effect barred him from ever becoming king as British royals are not permitted to marry Catholics, let alone a commoner bearing an illegitimate child.

In 1883, Eddy's mother, Princess Alexandra, had asked the young painter Walter Sickert to introduce Eddy to the artistic and literary life of London. 

Sickert's studio was at 15 Cleveland Street near to Tottenham Court Road in north London.  He duly introduced the teenage Prince to many of the area's 'bohemian types', including the theatrical friends he had made when he had been a minor member of the Lyceum Company. 

Sickert also introduced Eddy to one of his models, a pretty Irish Catholic girl, the afore-mentioned Annie Crook who lived nearby at 6 Cleveland Street and who worked by day in a local tobacconist's shop. 

They fell for each other and, according to Sickert, went through two clandestine marriage ceremonies, one Anglican and one Catholic.  Soon afterwards Annie became pregnant and her employer needed someone to fill in for her during her confinement.

Walter Sickert was asked if he knew anyone suitable and, after consulting friends, found a young girl called Mary Jean Kelly from the Providence Row Night Refuge for Women in Whitechapel.

For some months, Mary worked alongside Annie Crook in the shop and the two became friends.  In due course, on the 18th April 1885, Annie gave birth to Eddy's daughter, Alice Margaret, in the Marylebone Workhouse. 

When she returned home, her new friend Mary Kelly moved in as the child's nursemaid.  Mary also worked as a prostitute in the evenings to supplement her meagre income.

Naturally, Eddy absolutely enraged the establishment with his 'illicit' marriage which threatened to  spark a constitutional crisis of major proportions.  So, as is always the case, the monarchy set in motion a huge cover-up operation.

Annie was kidnapped from the shop where she worked and at the same time Eddy was confined to Buckingham Palace.

Fortunately, fearing the worst, Annie had given the child, Alice to Walter Sickert for safekeeping shortly before she was forcefully taken to Guy's Hospital in London. 

She remained there for five months and whilst she was there, Sir William Gull, the Queen's personal physician performed a partial frontal lobotomy on her, in effect rendering her docile and compliant and thus easily controlled by these inhuman monsters. 

Certified insane by Gull, Annie lived for the rest of her life in institutions, spending her last days in the Lunacy Observation ward of St George's Union Workhouse, Chelsea and dying there in obscurity in early 1920 at the age of 57.


There the matter might have ended, but for Mary Kelly's greed.  Back in Whitechapel, Mary had befriended three other local prostitutes to whom she boasted of her 'royal connections.'  In the spring of 1888 the quartet hatched a plan to demand money from Walter Sickert, threatening to otherwise make the story public. 

She had not fully comprehended the fact that not only was she in effect attempting to blackmail royalty but because of the Freemasonic connection she was also holding-to-ransom a group of psychopathic murderers who would literally stop at nothing and had the means to kill with impunity whilst enjoying the 'protection' of people in high places.

Sickert immediately passed word to Eddy who informed his father.  The Prince of Wales discussed the threat in the greatest secrecy with trusted fellow Masons in the Royal Alpha Lodge. A special meeting was arranged at the Lodge by the Royal Masons known as the 'Princes of the Blood Royal.' They agreed to form a 'hunting party' to literally hunt-down and kill the hapless girls as punishment for their audacity and as a Masonic blood-sacrifice.

The 'hunting party' was drawn exclusively from the Royal Alpha Masonic Lodge and included Sir William Gull, Eddy's former Cambridge University tutor J. K. Stephen and Sir Charles Warren, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police (who took no active part in the killings but who helped facilitate the plot and expedite the cover-up.)  To drive them about their sordid business, they recruited a coachman who had previously betrayed Prince Eddy's indiscretions to the Royals, one John Netley.

Warren provided information on the girls' whereabouts using his privileged position in the police force. Sir William Gull prepared grapes injected with opium, which would be offered to the victims to subdue them so that the dastardly deed could take place with a minimum of fuss.

It was arranged that John Netley, the coach driver and a particularly nasty character was to be the 'getaway driver.' The 'lookout' would be J.K. Stephen, a cousin of Virginia Woolf and another Freemason with royal links. The murders were planned to occur within Gull's carriage - away from prying eyes.

It should be noted that Abberline's diaries confirmed that the modus operandi was that the murders were planned and performed by more than one person according to Masonic ritual, similar to a fox-hunt.  These are facts which were never allowed to come to light.


So, who was the ringleader of this murderous gang?  None other than the prominent Freemason, Secretary of State for India, the Leader of the House of Commons and the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lord Randolph Spencer-Churchill, father of the future prime minister, Winston Churchill. 

Churchill was not only the 'brains' behind the entire operation, but he was also personally responsible for the cutting of Masonic emblems and symbols into the bodies of the victims, whilst William Gull's skilled surgeon's hands of performed the organ removals.

The assassins set about discovering the blackmailers' whereabouts with 'insider' help from Warren and then systematically plotted their executions.  The ritualistic, murderous spree began on the 31st August 1888 with Mary Ann Nicholls as their first victim and continued with the killing of Annie Chapman on the 8th September.

In turn each woman was lured inside the coach, then killed and mutilated in the ritualistic way that the three 'Juwes', Jubela, Jubelo and Jubelum, the murderers of Hiram Abiff, were executed in the old Masonic legend.  Their throats were 'cut across', their bodies torn open and their entrails 'thrown over' the left shoulder.  

On the 30th September, there were two further killings but on that night things did not go smoothly.  As the murderers were dumping that night's first victim, Lizzie Stride, in Berner Street, they were interrupted and had to abandon her corpse before its ritual mutilation had been completed. 

More alarming still, the night's second victim, Catherine Eddowes, was, according to Sickert, killed in error.  It was learned that poor Catherine had for some time lived with a man called John Kelly, had often used his surname and so had been wrongly identified as the blackmailer-in-chief, Mary Kelly.

That mistake nearly led to the group's undoing.  In the belief that this was to be the climactic move of their campaign, the group had already arranged Catherine's corpse, more completely mutilated than any of her predecessors, in Mitre Square opposite the Masonic Temple and close to the Whitechapel Road. 

They had chalked on a nearby wall a Masonic slogan to act as a postscript to the whole sordid affair.  A policeman copied it down into his notebook and it said:

"The Juwes are    
the men that    
will not    
be blamed    
for nothing."

Arriving on the scene Sir Charles Warren, to the acute surprise of his underlings, ordered that the chalked epitaph, presumed by observers to be in the killer's hand, should be immediately washed down and erased.  The reason he gave was that he did not want anti-Jewish sentiment to be inflamed, but Sickert suggested the real reason was that too many insiders would recognize that the message referred not to the 'Jews' but to the 'Juwes' of Masonic legend, and would therefore identify the killers as Freemasons.

After this setback there was a pause of more than a month, the longest interval between the killings, while the group redoubled their efforts to find the real Mary Kelly. Meanwhile, rumours of the killer's associations with Freemasonry and with the Royal family continued to grow.  It was not until the 9th November that Mary Kelly was finally tracked down.  To use the coach again was deemed too dangerous now, so she was dispatched in her own Dorset Street lodgings, more bloodily mutilated than any of her fellow-conspirators, her throat slashed, her body brutally cut apart and her intestines arranged ritually about the room.

There is in existence a police drawing of the last person to be seen with Mary whilst she was still alive and this bears an uncanny resemblance to no less a person than Lord Randolph Spencer-Churchill himself.  Of course, this particular 'lead' was never followed-up by the Masonic-controlled and run Metropolitan Police. 

J.K. Stephen, again according to Abberline's diaries, actually went to the police, made a full confession and surrendered himself in a fit of guilt but of course no arrests were made and Stephen was also released without charge. Abberline resigned his position with the force and retired forthwith as a direct result of his disgust at the inaction and cover-up on the part of the police.  Indeed there are still files in existence in Scotland Yard that have been sealed forever to prevent the truth from ever being revealed.

When Prince Eddy found out that his wife had been lobotomised he had a nervous breakdown and was never the same again thereafter.

Sickert fled the country upon hearing the news of Annie Crook's abduction and took up residence in Dieppe, France in an attempt to protect the child, Alice.  When Alice grew up, she and Walter Sickert became lovers and in turn had a child themselves who went by the name of Joseph Sickert -  who kept Inspector Abberline's diaries unpublicized for 50 years after inheriting them from his father.


In the meantime, Prince Eddy, his mental health by now completely shattered, was given into the care of the Earl of Strathmore who owned Glamis Castle in Scotland.  The royal family then blatantly lied to the world and announced that Eddy had sadly passed away at the age of only 28, on the 14th January 1892 due to influenza, but of course Eddy was still alive and being held in Balmoral Castle having not yet made the final move to Glamis.

Balmoral is approximately 1000 feet (300 metres) above sea-level and as such is partly surrounded by steep cliffs.  This was the intended site for the planned murder of Eddy to be undertaken by Randolph Churchill and John Netley the coachman.   The prince was pushed from the cliff-top but somehow managed to survive his fall and after the passage of two days had endeavoured to crawl all the way back to Balmoral where he was found at the door by his disbelieving hosts.

 It was decided after this that the best option would be to just incarcerate him at Glamis for the rest of his life and the Earl of Strathmore agreed to undertake this task on behalf of the royals in return for one simple favour.  The favour he stipulated was that one of his daughters be allowed to marry a future king of England.

Poor Eddy died in 1933, forty one years after his 'official' death date and during this time, his mother visited him only once, but took a photograph of him which she apparently sent to her cousin.  This photograph is still in existence and shows a much older Eddy thoughtfully painting a picture which would sadly never be seen by anyone outside the walls of Glamis Castle.

The pact between Strathmore and the royal family was eventually fulfilled in 1923 when Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon (his daughter, b. 1900) married the future King George VI of England after originally being betrothed to his brother, the former King Edward VIII (he of abdication fame).

 In 1936 George ascended the throne upon his elder brother's abdication and Elizabeth became his queen consort.  Elizabeth of course was more commonly known as the Queen Mother and the mother of the current incumbent of the family firm, Queen Elizabeth the second.  She went to her grave in 2002 without ever revealing the secret and thus the world was never aware of this unholy pact.

Princess Diana was also a member of the 'Spencer' dynasty, a family that has pledged to serve the monarchy for generations.  She shared a common ancestry with Lord Randolph and Winston Churchill.  Randolph was also known to be a proficient and efficient occult practitioner. It was he who had carefully draped the organs of the murder victims, over the left shoulder in accordance with occult, Masonic ritual.

This then is the real story of Jack the Ripper, straight from the 'horse's mouth' .  These facts must be known by the current establishment but as always, they close ranks to prevent the truth from becoming known.  All of the multiplicity of theories that abound as to the identity of the killer and the many films, documentaries and TV programmes that portray an unending search for the 'truth' are nothing more than elaborate smokescreens, born from the deliberate confusion engendered by the Elite to protect the guilty, as is their usual modus operandi.  This is another tiny example of how easy it is for these psychopaths to provide us all with a completed distorted view of both the past and our existing reality.

A further legacy of this sorry affair was that the payoff for the Spencers was two terms as Prime Minister for Lord Randolph's son and two generations later, Lady Diana Spencer became the wife of the future King Charles III and mother to the future King William V and his brother Harry, only to be famously discarded once she had produced an 'heir and a spare.' In 1997, she was brutally and ritually murdered herself in Paris.

c.2011 John Hamer

Note: The 1991 book, "The Ripper and the Royals" by Melvyn Fairclough covers the diary as well. John Hamer is indebted to  the research of Chris Everard, a British alternative film maker who made a film about the depravity of the royals throughout the ages.


Categories: Authors and Bloggers

In Defence of Video Games

Sun, 09/07/2014 - 02:49

Michael Shaw, 44, has a wife, three kids and a rewarding full time job.
But as a nerdy kid, video games were always
a friend, hobby and escape from family problems.
He has never had trouble separating illusion from reality.

by Michael Shaw

I was introduced to video games, a la "Pong," around 1978ish.  I was a natural.  Whereas the boys I grew up with were into baseball and football, etc., I was never athletically inclined.  Oh, I tried to fit in, but I was never successful at it. 

Fast forward to 1984 and the movie "The Last Starfighter," the first movie to integrate CGI effects into the movie. I was fascinated beyond all belief.  I wanted to know everything I could about computers, and video games, and how they worked. 

In order to gain this understanding, I spent my newspaper route money in the arcades, or saving up for the state-of-the-art computers and game systems of the time (I had 4 paper routes in my neighborhood in Brooklyn, NY).  I tore the systems apart and successfully put them back together.  I learned how to double the RAM (Random Access Memory) of my TRS-80 Color Computer II, learned how to solder, taught myself some BASIC, COBOL and Machine Language computer languages (long since forgotten)...

...and somewhere along the line, I became (in theory, at least) a world class video game player.  Had I known at the time that there were world records for playing video games, I would undoubtedly hold a few, flipping the score of the classic game "Missile Command" nine times on one quarter and playing "Asteroids" for more than 50 hours straight on one quarter.

When my father's mental health started coming apart around 1985 and he started using cocaine, the video arcade was a haven for me (when I wasn't hanging out in the public library or sneaking into the Brooklyn Aquarium). 

Drop a quarter in a game and I could put my reality on hold for an hour or so before going back to my dismal life.  In 1986, I dropped out of high school and worked full-time at McDonald's on West 12th St in Brooklyn, NY, picking up double shifts just so I would not be around the apartment that had become a crack-den (before that was burned out on the inside and we became homeless).  The little money I earned was used on food (I became responsible for grocery shopping, etc. at age 16) and video games.  

I played them ALL, and mastered as many as I could, because the sweet release and mild escape actually did me good.  I mean, I raced with the best and fastest, out-shot the ultimate snipers, wiped out hordes of hungry monsters, protected an endangered Earth.  I was a superhero, a cop, a crook, a martial arts master, fighter pilot, sword wielding warrior, race car driver.  I was unbeatable, and on the rare occasion that someone bested me in a game, I played and played and played until I was better, until all the arcade games in the area had my initials at the top of the Best Scores.

Even after I joined the US Navy and was stationed in Scotland, I saved my money to buy the best computer at the time (IBM-PC Jr), modified that, and introduced some of my shipmates to the wonders of video games.

Somehow, however, no matter how much I immersed myself in the games, I never lost sight of who I was, and even with my head in the clouds I never lost touch with reality.  I never forgot that the game was a game and not tied into reality.  I've never pointed a gun at anyone, nor had the urge to mow down a real-life crowd.  I don't speed when I'm traveling, always use my turn signals, and even try to practice common courtesy on the road when traffic flow permits.  I don't have the need to fly a drone and bomb people, and never mistake my coworkers for Orcs or aliens from the moons of Jupiter.

At 44 years of age, I still play video games.  I find them to be a wonderful outlet to release anger and frustration, or to put my everyday concerns to the side for a short time.  While my muscle memory and puzzle-solving skills are actively trying to, say, complete a lap on a circuit at 217 miles per hour, my subconscious mind is cycling through more serious issues and providing me with "A-ha!" and "Eureka" moments to no end. 

Perhaps I'm exceptional; perhaps being told from an early age that things on the screen (television, movie, computer) are make believe helped ensure that I wouldn't get "lost" in fantasy. I don't know, but whatever it is, I still know the difference between reality and make believe.

 As a parent, if I think a game (or movie, or book, or television show) is inappropriate for my children, I will just not allow my children to view this material.  Its up to parents, and not critics, or governments, or schools, to raise their children with awareness of reality, and when a child (or adult, for that matter) starts to lose touch with reality, the parent is supposed to step in and "ground" (not in the disciplinary sense, necessarily) the child back to the real world.


Although there is some truth to video games being addictive and possibly changing the chemistry of one's brain (especially as a youngster), video games can be a wonderful outlet for creativity and angst.

 As long as a person has a strong grip on the real world, using video games (or movies, or books, or...) as a form of temporary escapism is not a bad thing.  Like all things in life, generalizing is wrong; these things should be looked at on a case-by-case basis.


First Comment from Wade:

One 44 year old man's experience with his carefully selected video games is hardly relevant in the video game debate.

There are three things that have the capacity to to destroy any young man today. 1. Drugs, 2. video games, 3. pornography. The problem with video games (as the 44-year-old author of the article should know) is that they have changed 1,000 % since their inception. Now they are filled with blood flying, sex, violence, and cultist satanic themes. Even the Disney, so called cartoons, many times fall into the category of dark Satanic influence.

I have done some research into many mass shootings like Columbine and many others. Numbers one, two, and three listed above were very present in the lives of ALL the men who did the killing. All of this phenomenon is driven by money and the Illuminati plan to destroy our society.

The first amendment to the Constitution gives the citizens of this nation the right of free speech, and yet free speech does not allow yelling FIRE in a crowded theater. Using the first amendment to justify video games that fall into the same category as yelling FIRE in a crowded theater is, of course, an egregious perversion of our Constitutional rights, that is doing serious damage to our society and costing innocent lives. It is not enough to simply blame the parents. Many of the mass killing shooters were adults. We do not allow parents to decide when a kid is old enough to vote, drive a car, smoke, or drink alcohol. Just as child pornography is illegal to view (for kids and adults alike) so should many of the current video games be illegal.

Michael Replies:

Wade:  First off, I'd like to let you know that I'm not defending the industry; since my "awakening" in 2007 (some of us take longer than others to snap out of the hypnotic state), I've come to understand some of the symbolism and messages that are planted in every-day media, such as movies, music, video games, etc.  It is rife with corruption.  However, until the last few years, where I've stayed away from games that prominently feature human-on-human violence, I was NOT picky, nor did I carefully select the games I played.  If it looked fun, I played it, no matter the genre.

I agree that the First Amendment to the Constitution has been used as a green light for pornography, graphic violence, and all sorts of debasing materials.  However, I was not raised in any type of wholesome environment, and indeed it is a miracle that I have not ended up as a criminal or dead, and not because of video games.  My father smoked as much as $1,800 in crack per day, and my mother (divorced from my father since I was two years old) was a "go go" dancer and a madam to a whorehouse for Italian mobsters.  I had very few directions to turn to for something wholesome, and yet, here I am today.

Video games aren't necessarily the problem, its the parents that allow their children to view and interact with filth.  Play around in poop, and you're going to gave stinky hands and get an infection.  Its up to the informed adults (parents, guardians) to ensure that their children aren't playing with filth, not the children, since they don't know any better.

Plus, the common denominator for the so-called mass shootings (I say so called, because many of them come off as staged events) was pharmaceuticals.

However, I'd like to thank you for your thought provoking comments, and its nice that people can disagree without losing their heads or trolling, and I appreciate that very much.

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

University - Machine of Judeo Masonic Indoctrination

Sat, 09/06/2014 - 03:19

The mortar board is a symbol of Freemasonry.

As students return to university,
I re-post this reminder that humanity 

has been colonized by a satanic cult.

This colonization includes the mind.

"In order to effect the destruction of all collective forces except ours we shall emasculate the first stage of collectivism, the universities, by re-educating them in a new direction."  Protocols of Zion, 16

By Henry Makow Ph.D.

(This revised article was first posted Aug. 29, 2004 under the title "How Universities Betray Students.")

I'd only send my son to university if he had no talent.

He went anyway, for the social life and the certificate. I warned him that after studying the humanities and social sciences, he'll be unable to think independently or absorb information that didn't fit his programming.

The modern university is not devoted to truth, quite the opposite. Feminism and homosexuality are rampant on campus but this is just a symptom of a more profound problem.

Modern Western "culture" is based on the fraudulent assumptions of the "Enlightenment," a Judeo Masonic (Illuminist) movement dedicated to creating a new(secular) world order by denying the existence of God and immutable natural and spiritual laws.

In practice this means Arts students are taught the ideas of atheists as if they were Gods. Pius professors are high priests in this secular cult.

Like deaf men tuning a piano, they try to explain the human condition without any reference to the Creator, Design or man's Divine Spirit.

They portray mankind as a forlorn animal in a mechanistic universe, characterized by a merciless, amoral struggle for survival.

They celebrate human "freedom" by which they mean the freedom to reject God's Order, indulge animal appetites, and create an alienated and dysfunctional personal reality.

Illuminism is the Luciferian doctrine of Freemasonry. (Communism is another product of Illuminism. All leading Communists were Freemasons.) The mortar board that university graduates wear is a symbol of Freemasonry. Black gowns symbolize the occult. Arts students are unwittingly being inducted into a Luciferian/Communist cult.

God represents moral and spiritual absolutes like love, truth, goodness, harmony and justice. Belief in their reality is essential for our healthy development. While our culture pays lip service to them (this is how fraud works), it is frankly devoted to their demise.


Modern education and culture is designed to make us dysfunctional. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion confirms this. The Protocols is not an anti Semitic diatribe. (They say that because they don't want you to read it.) It is the blueprint of the New World Order, which is now in place.

Someone like Baron Lionel Rothschild wrote it between 1875-1895 for a Masonic Secret Society, the Illuminati. The Illuminati represents a continuation of the feudal alliance of Jewish bankers and European aristocrats.

The Illuminati is bound by a devotion to Lucifer, the rebellious angel who defied God and said man will define reality. He is called "the bringer of light." Now do you understand the "Enlightenment"? The super rich want to be God and reshape reality to fit their interests. To do this, they need to sever our links with Reality, i.e. God (absolute truth, love and justice.)

Their means are unlimited, so are their ambitions. Here are some relevant statements from Protocol 16.

"In order to effect the destruction of all collective forces except ours we shall emasculate the first stage of collectivism, the universities, by re-educating them in a new direction."

"We must introduce into their education all those principles which have so brilliantly broken up their order."

"Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism, Marxism, Nietzsche-ism.... it should be plain to see what a disintegrating importance these directives have had upon the minds of the goyim. " (Protocol 2)

"We shall erase from the memory of men all facts of previous centuries which are undesirable to us..."

We shall turn them into "unthinking submissive brutes waiting for things to be presented before their eyes in order to form an idea of them..."

Let me remind you of a passage from a 1930's Communist manual on brainwashing. "In the United States, we have been able to alter the works of William James, and others, ...and to place the tenets of Karl Marx, Pavlov, Lamarck, and the data of Dialectic Materialism into the textbooks of psychology, to such a degree that anyone thoroughly studying psychology becomes at once a candidate to accept the reasonableness of Communism."

"As every chair of psychology in the United States is occupied by persons in our connection, the consistent employment of such texts is guaranteed... Educating broadly the educated strata of the populace into the tenets of Communism is thus rendered relatively easy." (II, Ch. 11)


Students encounter "The Cult of Great Men" the pantheon of modern pretenders who have usurped God's place.

Their every utterance is treated as Holy Writ. Scholarly articles are devoted to words that later turn out to be typos. In a graduate seminar, I witnessed a student read filthy obscenities that had been censored from William Faulkner's novel "Sanctuary." After each expletive, the other students gasped with horror as though a religious artifact had been desecrated.

Professors are the overpaid priests of this secular cult. They have a vested interest in maintaining its shibboleths. They initiate students into a lifelong habit of mental servility. All knowledge comes from Great Men. Students can only aspire to analyze their meaning. A professor told me I had failed an exam because "only great men can say things like that."

The students' state-of-mind becomes passive and disoriented. He struggles to reconcile contradictory world-views.

One day I had an awakening. Don't these "great men" live in the same world? Isn't it the one I live in?

Dare I think for myself?

Dislocation takes place in time as well as space. By continually studying the past, the student thinks nothing remains to be done. No manifestos remain to be written, no Bastilles need to be stormed.

While the world cries out for leadership, the new generation is buried in musty manuscripts writing footnotes to dead men.


As you've gathered by now, a humanities education is not intended to uplift or empower. The world is owned and run by a secretive banking cabal and their inbred allies. Its goal, in the words of Cecil Rhodes, is to "gradually absorb the wealth of the world." Naturally it must obscure this plan. They want to make students their tools. Professors who don't play the game are fired.

 The Rockefellers regard human beings as domestic animals. This is implied in  "Occasional Paper #1" of their General Education Fund:

"In our dreams, we have limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our moulding hands. The present educational conventions fade from our minds, and unhampered by traditions, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsible rural folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning, or of science. We have not to raise up from them authors, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians, nor lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen of whom we have ample supply. The task we set before ourselves is very simple as well as a very beautiful one, to train these people as we find them to a perfectly ideal life just where they are."  ("The Rockefeller Empire" in Josephson, "The Strange Death of FDR" 1948, p. 69)

If you haven't noticed, universities are not places of invigorating inquiry and debate. They are stagnant backwaters that reek of moral compromise and disillusionment. There are hundreds of them we have never heard of - comfortable sinecures and sports hotbeds.

Mankind is groping in the dark. "All we know is the wind that blows," Thoreau wrote. Our false confidence is based on material progress and technology, which Thoreau calls "improved means to unimproved ends."

"We have turned the brainless head of the goyim with progress," says the Protocols( XIII). With the exception of "material inventions" progress "like a fallacious idea, implies a departure from truth in all cases."

In other words, the Illuminists have infected mankind with the illusion that they are building a humanist utopia based on reason, when in fact they are constructing a neo feudal tyranny. Progress means we are closer to satanic possession. This is the essence of "globalism" and the principle behind world events.


God is a Spirit or state of consciousness where ideals of justice goodness truth and love are self-evident. The Illuminists' first priority is to destroy Christianity and belief in God. They have to sever humanity from its metaphysical moorings in order to substitute a false reality conducive to their rule.

Humanities education today is a placebo, a substitute for a true education. It is indoctrination which qualifies you for employment.

Students should only take programs like sciences, engineering, computers, pharmacy, commerce etc. which have a practical application and are less ideological. Avoid humanities and social sciences.

The world will not be saved by acts of God but acts of men representing God. Our duty is to take spiritual ideals seriously in our personal lives and bring them into the world. The cost of rejecting God is to become slaves of very bad men. 


Read Noam Chomsky "The Fate of an Honest Intellectual"

First Comment from Dan:

This sums it up: "If you haven't noticed, universities are not places of invigorating inquiry and debate. They are stagnant backwaters that reek of moral compromise and disillusionment."

Back in 1973 I couldn't wait to start college.  After years of feeling held back by public school, I thought I'd get smarter faster.  It turns out that college courses slow learning down rather than speeding it up. There was much time getting to and around campus interspersed with 50 minute blocks to classes. Actual learning accumulates at a snail's pace.   With the advent of internet and search engines looking back at college seems like a joke in terms of time and money spent to learn a fraction of what I'm now able to learn at home.

My advice to 'me' at 20 is that having a PLAN is more valuable than a college degree - and it's free.

At least when I went to college you could get through on state grants and work study.  The costs today are ridiculous - student loans have become nothing but a racket.

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Help! A Cult Stole My Wife

Fri, 09/05/2014 - 02:11
(left, Crusading chiropractor, Joe Hawkins)

 While society mostly has turned a blind eye to the Twelve Tribes cult,
 Joe Hawkins, a Winnipeg chiropractor, doesn't have this option.
Last November, his common law wife left him to join this group and took their
two-year-old son. While Joe has joint custody, he says he can't allow his child
to be exposed to a criminal organization involved in child abuse.
His impressive website question12tribes.com documents his claims.

"My wife whom I still love does not want to talk to me. She says she will now live her life according to her "convictions" and i should do the same. Well i my convictions tell me to fight for my son , and fight for the woman I love even if she verbally tells me she does not want me."

by Joe Hawkins D.C.
My wife of four years, common law, and I visited "Twelve Tribes" in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada many times in the Spring-Summer of 2013. My wife, a stay at home mom in her early 20's, warmed up to the group. Foolishly I didn't think much about it, imagining it was a good social outlet for her. I trusted that they were a general community who wanted an alternative lifestyle from the immoral mainstream way of life. I could see the attraction. No one in Winnipeg had exposed them since they arrived in 1994. They were very good at covering a false impression of who they are and what they are about.
(A wedding. Group pretends to espouse Biblical values, wholesome living.)

I have done nine months of serious investigation and to my horror this organization is not known to anyone even though the police and media did expose them upon their arrival. Since then, nothing has been said. That's going to change. They have hit my son, turned my wife against me, stole my car, and attacked me in the courts to take my son permanently.

They claim to be people of 'god'.  What a joke. They all have Hebrew names, but no one speaks Hebrew, one of many tactics they employ to cause a person to be confused.

After 9 months of research I discovered this shocking video  CBC news show "The Journal."   The video exposes the cult through interviews with children explaining how they are hit if they make noise, how the cult leader took /kidnapped a child, how they bury dead babies in the back yard. the CBC informed the police. The police dug up the grave and found a dead baby. Ex members world wide report this is common practice. Ex members started this web site.
As result of this German undercover documentary, showing child abuse,  German police raided the cult in Sept. 2013 and took 41 children into protective custody.  26 are still in custody a year later.   A 'child training manual" that I obtained from a ex-member clearly shows that any child can be beaten by any adult for pretty much anything including not answering the question fast enough. Children are taught to inform on other children or adults. The "elders" (clearly the people that are doing the manipulation) are considered as 'god" and cannot be challenged.

My wife whom I still love does not want to talk to me. She says she will now live her life according to her "convictions" and i should do the same. Well i my convictions tell me to fight for my son , and fight for the woman I love even if she verbally tells me she does not want me.

My parents and grandparents who were each married for more then 50 years taught me to do the right thing. The right thing to do here is to do is to fight for my son, my wife and the 31 children in Winnipeg that i know are being abused.

The cult uses the same teachings through out the world, this cult by definition of who they are and what they do, is to be a carbon copy of the leaders teachings. Half the teachings come from the bible, the other half from the cult leader Gene Spriggs, left, an American and Eddie Wiesman (second in command.) 

I cannot fight this cult alone. Some ex-cult members are leading the charge like this lady who got out after 20 years and still has a daughter inside. Here is her video.  Some of the ex members i have spoken with, tell of their sexual abuse, and it is so gut wrenching I can not help but cry.

A copy of this letter/article will be provided to all Child and Family Services, and to all police agencies, but please DO NOT think that will make the difference. The cult has had a mountain of bad press, but they are still allowed to exist. They are con artists at best; at worst they are a organized criminal gang. They have their own ocean going boat to transfer cult victims world wide with no trace, they move people across borders. 

Meanwhile , this cult just continues to dish up food at their restaurants in Winnipeg and Nelson B.C. and the public is none the wiser, but people are starting to catch on. I am told WWOOF Canada, an organization that provides free farm workers to the cults farms woke up and stopped doing just that, stopped helping to create more victims. When you join the cult, they take everything you have, rip apart your family and turn you against your family. It is insane this is going on really.
(left, Winnipeg group)

I will continue to try to help the mother of my child and all the children that are being systematically abused by these men who claim to be god fearing, and denounce the troubles of the world as they create the worst troubles anyone could imagine. They take hypocrisy to an absurd and extreme level. Beyond hypocrisy they are simply criminals pretending to be pious and pure. Where have we heard that before?
If you can help with information or ideas, please contact me at:  drjohawkins@gmx.com

Mother's Testimony Lifts Lid on Commune

Makow comment-  I suggest Joe raise money for a good lawyer and go for full custody on the basis that his son is in danger.

First Comment from Austin:

I sympathize very much with Joe Hawkins, as I spent two-and-a-half years in a communal situation myself as a younger man. The commune was Bible-based, and it looked at first, like a piece of heaven on earth - because that's what everyone is looking for - peace, nirvana, 'garden of Eden' type setting, but such places do not exist in this life.

Nobody wants the humdrum daily reality of life in the suburbs, with huge problems - crime, transport and housing issues, cost of living hikes, insecurity about what the future holds. So many opt out of the burbs, and go out bush to a retreat or commune or whatever is on offer, because of their vulnerability towards modern living.

Cult leaders recognize these perceived needs and wants, and take advantage of them. Towards the end of my time on the commune, I realized that the leaders had been virtually deified by the followers. No one could speak against them, but after I had gotten out from under their mesmerizing influence, I could see clearly how wrong the whole setup was. It was a complete con job that controlled people's lives and money, so that the leaders could build their own 'country club' style existence, at the expense of their followers. They paid no rent and shared in no costs - everything was prepaid for them, and they were worshiped by the followers for their gross wrongdoing.

I still have strong Christian beliefs to this day, but cannot deny that as a young believer, I was totally deceived by the "Farmily" as the locals used to call them. Jesus Christ Himself gave us strong warnings about false prophets, dressed in sheep's clothing - take the warnings seriously, as these places do exist, and they wreak havoc on unsuspecting but well meaning people.

Keep your friends and family safe from cults and the occult - read Matthew 7:13 to the end of the chapter, and realize that God does care about you - all of you. Joe - I will say a prayer for you and pass on the link to your story as a warning to others, and I do hope that you are able to recover your family situation and start over again. My thoughts are with you.

Mathew 7:13 "Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it.

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

<img alt="thumbnail.jpg" src="http:/

Thu, 09/04/2014 - 08:08
Black women mating choices are the root cause of black dysfunction in America

Black Americans had it MUCH worse in the past, and they still managed to create relatively strong communities, businesses, and families. So, what changed between then and now?

1. Female sexual selection within the black community was altered by the mass expansion of the Welfare State.

2. Sexual access, marriage, and reproduction was removed from stable, productive beta males with jobs and transferred to "alpha" douchebag criminals.

3. Most of the black ghetto dysfunction in America today is rooted in dysgenic mating on the part of black women, (i.e. mating that promotes degenerate traits.)

It's Bad Boy Gina Tingles on a cultural scale.

When women are no longer forced to rely on the stability of the beta male and his productive capacities for sustenance and the survival of their offspring, and can instead collect easy money from the State, they quickly revert to a pre-Agricultural Revolution mating strategy in which the meanest, most violent men are rewarded with the greatest level of reproductive access.

Such men do not stick around to raise their children, they move on to the next ho and knock her up too.

Such men not build communities, they poison them with violence and crime.

Such men do not create progress, they destroy it by creating a downward spiral in which each generation is more dysfunctional than the previous one.

Over 70% of black children in this country are born out of wedlock. Most of them are fathered by thugs and criminals, because that is what black women choose to reproduce with.

It's a numbers game: black American men who are stable, intelligent, and productive are simply being bred out of existence. The same principle is found in the movie Idiocracy, which most people consider to be less of a comedy and more of a prophesy.

40% of ALL American children are now being born into the same circumstances which have destroyed the black community, and that number will continue to rise as women double-down on the bad boy cock carousel, celebrate bastardy, and claim their cash and prizes from the State.

If this nation collapses into dystopian nightmare in the future, it will have exactly fuck all to do with transdimensional space aliens and everything to do with the fact that American women have spent the last 20+ years (longer in the black community) creating hordes of fatherless thug spawn.

Advice for young American women: Stop having your children out of wedlock with the first "totally hawt" convicted felon with a neck tattoo you come across, and try reproducing with men who have positive attributes like, I don't know, a job and an education and the desire to raise a family


Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Male Video Gamers Blast Feminist Critics

Thu, 09/04/2014 - 02:01

The culture war comes to videogames. a $70 billion industry worldwide.

"Feminists" like Anita Sarkeesian, left, have touched off a firestorm by claiming video games are promoting "sexism" and violence against women. The industry seems to be taking her side against their own customers. Males are being demonized. Paul Eric Bazinet wonders if this is all an Illuminati plot.

(Editor's Note- Be sure to read the comments by Dan and James below)

"If you have any criticism against the gaming industry journalism, Quinn, or Sarkeesian, it is simple: you are a misogynist pig, guilty of hate crimes, a terrorist, a tin foil hat nutter. "

Eric Bazinet, 36, a factory worker from Quebec "has an interest in truth and is appalled by secrecy and tyranny."

by Paul Eric Bazinet

Recently, an event "happened" in the independent video gaming industry, referred to as the "Quinnspiracy".

 An ex-boyfriend publicly accused a prominent female indie game developer, Zoe Quinn, left, of cheating on him with five persons in the industry/gaming journalism.

This exposed many conflicts of interests in gaming journalism, which already had a stained reputation from apparent circle-jerking corruption. Many gamers and developers had been vocal about this for a while. This event blew into huge proportion. It is instigating a war on two fronts -- namely journalistic integrity and sexism-- between gamers and video game websites. Needless to say, it provoked an emotional response from gamers. It seems tailor-made to incite male outrage.

Then this degenerated into what is known as "gamergate" (not to be confused with video gaming website "gamer's gate")

The Quinn bee then claims to have been "doxxed" which means she was hacked and her personal information including bank info and all sensible details about her released on the web by hackers.

She claims harassment and death threats to her and her family by a horde of misogynistic man gamers. (This is a laughable and badly executed deception.) 


Then, on a massive scale, and I mean a landslide, gaming sites started censoring and attacking all critics of feminists, flagging them as sexist, misogynists etc.

Crying "hate crime," gamer men were as a whole just branded "terrorists" even called "worst than ISIS" based on this false hacking/harassment campaign by "men gamers" a.k.a. "virgin nerds".

Not only are polite and pertinent questions/comments about journalistic integrity turned into accusations of misogyny and hate crimes but most websites involved in the "coverup" publish pieces that supports Quinn and insult men gamers.

The gaming industry's most outspoken feminist, Anita Sarkeesian enters the fray. She is nothing more than an "agent provocateur" who raised $150,000  from feminists to make five short videos to "explore sexism in video games". These videos could be made for nothing.

She uses half-truths, exaggerations and outright lies about games she exposes, arousing lots of angry criticism. The response to this is more accusations of bigotry and aggressive name calling by the whole liberal cabal.

She......claims to have been "doxxed" which means she was hacked and her personal info including bank info and all sensible info released on the web by hackers, cries harassment and death threats to her and her family by a horde of misogynistic man gamers. (This is a laughable and badly executed deception, once again)

Then, on a massive scale, gaming sites are censoring all critics and attacking them..... you get the idea, the very situation is a literal and lame copy/paste of Zoe Quinn's harassment claims. If you have any criticism against the gaming industry journalism, Quinn, or Sarkeesian, it is simple: you are a misogynist pig, guilty of hate crimes, a terrorist, a tin foil hat nutter.

You get censored, your account gets banned. Gamers are outright called scum as a whole and told they aren't wanted by websites that profit from them. The message is clear: gamers are being demonized.

Another person in gaming related to this is a petty man known as Phil Fish, which is deservedly and by far the gaming world's most hated public person. He's fueling the flames of sexism too. He called everyone who criticized Zoe Quinn rapists in a blanket statement on twitter, among other things he says that seem to never have any other purpose other than cultivating hate from gamers towards himself. (He also pretends to have been "doxxed" at the same time as Zoe did.)

Here is evidence of Sarkeesian possibly is faking threats to herself.

She claims she had to leave her home due to these threats, but no police report was ever filed, just the same way Quinn and Fish didn't either.

This is the overview of the story. We are now over two weeks into the conflict, and as fickle as people's attention is, (particularly gamers, please forgive the generalization) this is not going away. It has already generated by far the biggest and most heated discussions ever in video gaming history, and it is an understatement to say gamers love to fight on forums.

 So maybe I am losing it but this has the stench of Psy Op all over it. I really needed to come out with this and the only person who could bring awareness about this that I think I can trust is you. I am looking forward  to hear from you about this matter.

Evidence Anita Sarkeesian is a Fraud - Not a Real Feminist. Involved in Furry porn.
Anita Sarkeesian Destroyed  Provides no evidence for her assertions.
Gamergate-The Community is Eating Itself (The Guardian)

Makow Comment-  The violence portrayed in videogames is not healthy. Men need to focus their thoughts on uplifting things. Nevertheless Sarkeesian is an opportunist making big bucks by applying the tired old Marxist-feminist critique to videogames, as feminists have done to the detriment of culture in general. We live in a world where males are not allowed to have any space of their own. Witness female intrusion into football and hockey broadcasts. The gaming industry is a big businesses. It answers to banks. Banks answer to the Illuminati. Do I think this is a psy op? No. It's just the way things are these days. I congratulate men for fighting back so effectively.

First Comment by Dan:

"Journalistic integrity"?   We're talking about the industry that inspired half the mass murders and nearly ALL school shootings since 1999.
They've even made video games based on real mass murders inspired by other video games:  'Super Columbine Massacre RPG!'  and 'School Shooter: North American Tour 2012' . 

Know what the creator of 'Muslim Massacre: The Game of Modern Religious Genocide' said when Muslim groups complained?  He said "Muslims need to suck it down and stop getting offended by everything".  (The aim of the game is blow every Muslims head off that appears on the screen.)

Though I may think the whole video industry is "of the Devil" and should be banned to begin with, since we all know that's never going to happen, Anita Sarkeesian should take a number and get in line behind Muslims and everybody else that's dehumanized in games.  Oh, "Just suck it up, Anita."

Of course, Anita and Zoe are only fronting the 'must be' agenda.   Everybody in gaming well knows the industry RIDES on selling sex and violence fantasy primarily to boys, underage to 30.   The greater the sense of emasculation in their 'real' world, the greater the susceptibility to chronic addiction to sex and violence fantasy games.  

bOiNGBOiNG - Addressing the stupid, intellectually dishonest critique of Anita Sarkeesian

Everyone knows that girl from high school. She's angry, bitter, and emotionally manipulative. She is a bully who lives to tear people down to build herself up. She's the girl you expect to leave behind at graduation. But what happens when these women go to college and enter the workforce? Well, they become feminists, of course!    ----  Rachel Edwards

Comment from James T

As someone who has played video games since the atari 2600 and pong on computer, I can say the golden age of gaming is definitely over. This newest bit isn't the worst of it; sadly, video games are definitely being used to sell doctrine and agendas, and prepare people for "externalization of the hierarchy" so to speak, satanism/gnosticism (they truly are the same) are major concepts in some of the "hottest" new games ("Darksiders 2", "Dark Souls 2" etc.)  Very popular games of recent years have been peppered with corrupted concepts. For example, "Fable 2" espousing homosexual relationships & marriages, as well as sexual promiscuity, vegan "all meat is evil" doctrines, and many Japanese games espousing killing of "god" as a concept, often JRPGs. "Final Fantasy" is notorious for this. Indeed the violence is actually not the worst the games have. From doctrines of devils/gnosticism to sexual themes and content, as well as grandiose lack of morality of any sort, modern games are vectors for mental and spiritual disease, and are seriously dangerous to youngsters.

The feminists trying to get on the bandwagon seem to be a bit of a distraction from the rest of these themes which tend to be unmentioned (after all "Tomb Raider" was clearly feminist-oriented)... but one does wonder, if this is indeed a psy op and not just a symptom of society's moral decay, to what ends is it intended? These are strange, and sad times, but though things look grim, this does present many opportunities for folks to do good for God's glory, opportunities that shouldn't be missed.

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Illuminati Promote Both Sides of Ukraine Crisis?

Wed, 09/03/2014 - 03:05

Left, Ukraine Truth Where You'd Least Expect It  - The Sept-Oct issue of Foreign Affairs

Since its inception in 1921,  the Council on Foreign Relations has been
a key instrument of Illuminati control. From the start, Foreign Affairs has been
its house organ.

When Illuminati errand boys David Cameron and Barack Obama
compare Vladimir Putin to Hitler and castigate Russia for "its aggression," 
an article in Foreign Affairs, Why the Ukraine Crisis is the West's Fault,
totally discredits them.

Is the Illuminati promoting both sides of this conflict?

John Mearsheimer, a West Point grad and US Air Force veteran, is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago.
His 2007 book with Stephen Walt, The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy was a best seller. 

by John Mearsheimer
Why the Ukraine Crisis is the West's Fault
excerpt by henrymakow.com

According to the prevailing wisdom in the West, the Ukraine crisis can be blamed almost entirely on Russian aggression. Russian President Vladimir Putin, the argument goes, annexed Crimea out of a long-standing desire to resuscitate the Soviet empire, and he may eventually go after the rest of Ukraine, as well as other countries in eastern Europe. In this view, the ouster of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014 merely provided a pretext for Putin's decision to order Russian forces to seize part of Ukraine.

But this account is wrong: the United States and its European allies share most of the responsibility for the crisis. The taproot of the trouble is NATO enlargement, the central element of a larger strategy to move Ukraine out of Russia's orbit and integrate it into the West. At the same time, the EU's expansion eastward and the West's backing of the pro-democracy movement in Ukraine -- beginning with the Orange Revolution in 2004 -- were critical elements, too.

Since the mid-1990s, Russian leaders have adamantly opposed NATO enlargement, and in recent years, they have made it clear that they would not stand by while their strategically important neighbor turned into a Western bastion. For Putin, the illegal overthrow of Ukraine's democratically elected and pro-Russian president -- which he rightly labeled a "coup" -- was the final straw. He responded by taking Crimea, a peninsula he feared would host a NATO naval base, and by working to destabilize Ukraine until it abandoned its efforts to join the West.

(Putin greeting Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko last week. What's with the obsequious expression on Putin's face? Is Petro a 35 degree Mason and Putin only 32?)

Putin's pushback should have come as no surprise. After all, the West had been moving into Russia's backyard and threatening its core strategic interests, a point Putin made emphatically and repeatedly. Elites in the United States and Europe have been blindsided by events only because they subscribe to a flawed view of international politics. They tend to believe that the logic of realism holds little relevance in the twenty-first century and that Europe can be kept whole and free on the basis of such liberal principles as the rule of law, economic interdependence, and democracy.

But this grand scheme went awry in Ukraine. The crisis there shows that realpolitik remains relevant -- and states that ignore it do so at their own peril. U.S. and European leaders blundered in attempting to turn Ukraine into a Western stronghold on Russia's border. Now that the consequences have been laid bare, it would be an even greater mistake to continue this misbegotten policy.


U.S. and European leaders blundered in attempting to turn Ukraine into a Western stronghold on Russia's border.  Imagine the American outrage if China built an impressive military alliance and tried to include Canada and Mexico.


The United States and its allies should abandon their plan to westernize Ukraine and instead aim to make it a neutral buffer.

Thanks to Krister for bringing this to my attention


Israel and Putin Maintain Close Ties - Israel Did Not Condemn Crimea Annexation
Putin Gentle on Israel Pounding of Gaza- Jews find him sympathetic

Remember Iraq? Former US intel officers warn Merkel against NATO images of Ukraine

The Downing of MH17 - Is Israel Involved?


First Comment from Barry

The Illuminati have a history of promoting both sides of major wars, but is this the case in Ukraine?  Going back to the chemical weapon attack in Syria, Putin appeared as the saviour on the world stage and offered a solution.  His statesman-like approach and body language gave the impression that he was truly resisting the NWO.   Then came the coup d'état in Kiev and the overthrow of a democratically government.  Putin responded with the annexation of Crimea, a move to secure Russian strategic interests, which seemed like a reasonable response.  The people of Crimea voted to join Russia and the separatists took up positions in Eastern Ukraine.  The stage is now set with the Zionist-controlled puppets on one side and Putin on the other.  

I hope that Putin is truly resisting the NWO and his speech in Munich certainly gave that impression.  But one thing does not make sense in this story.  Kiev did not fall in a day.   According to Zionist, Victoria Nuland, $5 billion of US cash had been spent to facilitate the transition of Ukraine into the EU.  Also, George Soros set up a Foundation in Ukraine, which he has admitted, played a part in events happening today.   This raises several questions.  Did Putin not see this coming?  Surely he was aware of the process taking place to promote the EU and ferment anti-Russian sentiment in Ukraine?   It seems that for whatever reason, he did little to counter this subversive process and allowed it to develop. 

For sure, we would all like to see Superman appear out of the blue and demolish the evil technocrats who plan to dominate the world.  It's a frequent theme in Hollywood movies, and as much as I would like to believe Putin is that man,  I am yet to be convinced.

Categories: Authors and Bloggers

Incest Survivor Exposed Illuminati Satanists (Updated)

Tue, 09/02/2014 - 02:12

In 1989, on national TV, a courageous
young woman exposed the satanic
Jewish forebears of the Illuminati
who dominate the West.

from March 31, 2009

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

On May 1, 1989, a "nice Jewish girl", age 29, Vicki Polin  appeared on the Oprah Show and said her family was part of a Satanic cult that dates back to the 1700's.

Although they appear to be upstanding citizens --lawyers, doctors, police officers etc. -- they engage in Satanic ritual human sacrifice, incest and cannibalism, often in synagogues. They drink blood and eat babies.

She is describing the Illuminati which originated in the Frankist Movement in the Eighteenth Century. Jacob Frank, born Jacob Leibowitz (1726-1791) led a major Satanic heresy that shook the Jewish world. They believed that the Messiah would return if the world went over to evil completely, so they encouraged all sexual licence and satanic evil as the ultimate good. Financed by the Frankist Rothschild banking syndicate, they subverted all religions and national elites by assuming every religious and political hue. They took over Freemasonry and are now in the final stage of establishing their world government, a.k.a "globalization."

The abuse Polin suffered is a textbook example of how Illuminati families --Jews and non-Jews-- treat their children. George W. Bush and Barack Obama may have suffered similar trauma and, (like Polin) have multiple personality disorder. Vicki is from Chicago and there is no telling how many Chicagoans surrounding Barack Obama are part of this satanic cult. Think Rahm Emanuel and Valerie Jarrett.


Polin told Oprah that she witnessed babies sacrificed and consumed for the "power" this gave. These babies are bred within the extended family for this purpose.  She said she was raped several times, and elsewhere says she had five abortions due to intercourse with her father.

Polin said her family was "extremely involved" in these practices. Her mother is "on the human relations commission of the town that she lives in, and she's an upstanding citizen. Nobody would suspect her. Nobody would suspect anybody involved in it. There's police officers involved in it. There's, you know, doctors, lawyers..."

"I mean, to the outside world, everything we did was proper and right, and then there were the nights that things changed, that things just got turned around. What was wrong was right, and what was right was wrong. That's what helps to create some of them to develop MPD."

Polin's therapist, Tina Grossman was on the show but not the YouTube. She told Oprah she had treated over 40 survivors from many states and Canada. They have never met each other yet say the "identical same things."

Ms. GROSSMAN: They are describing identical rituals, just the same as, since I'm Jewish, you could go to New York or California and describe a seder in one state or another and, as a Jew, you would recognize it. This is the belief system in evil and the power that evil gives you, and so it has these certain rituals, so they are very similar with all of the survivors.

OPRAH: See, but I am very surprised because the Jewish faith is the Jewish faith. and worshiping the devil is not a part of the Jewish faith. I mean, Jewish people do not worship the devil.

Ms. GROSSMAN: But before there was Christ and before there was a system of one God, there was Paganism- and it still exists in the world, and in many cultures, you still find the belief that there is strength and power in the actual consumption of human flesh or animal flesh.


In spite of the fact that both Vicki and Oprah said many times this behavior was not typical of most Jews, the B'nai B'rith-ADL attacked the show as "anti-Semitic."  Oprah did her penance and obviously has been forgiven.  Vicki was stopped on the street and told her testimony would start "another holocaust." Vicki's response was that denying these crimes was akin to holocaust denial. In July of 1989, she penned this statement and sent it to all concerned:

"Our society believes the myth that Jews can't be pedophiles, or abuse their own children. This is a "MYTH, they do abuse children. There are even those who practice cannibalism, and perform human sacrifices. Believe me I saw it with my own eyes. I've come to the point in my life where I feel I need to bear witness. I have and will continue to until I'm sure what I had to endure as a child is believed by you and others like you. I will do whatever is possible so what happened to me doesn't happen to anyone else!"

Vicki became a therapist herself, moved to Baltimore and opened "The Awareness Center" to help other victims of satanic abuse.   She has articles about the Frankists on her website. I attempted to contact her without success. But I found an extensive profile  with interviews on Luke Ford's website. There is an Affidavit from a rabbi Vicki contacted in 2004 regarding an exorcism of her cult upbringing. She described their intent to him in these terms:  

"The essence of her story was that there are currently many rabbis involved in this cult who brought their satanic rituals with them to the USA from Europe. That she was born into one of the Jewish families owing allegiance to the cult. She claimed to have been used as part of an organized child sexual abuse ring organized by the rabbi of her synagogue, and that the sexual abuse took place on Sifrei Torah Scrolls laid out on the floor of the synagogue. That the abuse began in early childhood and continued over a period of many years, through her teen years and into adulthood, and that she was only one of the many young children, boys and girls used in this manner. I did not ask for specifics of the rituals but she mentioned cannibalism, defecation and the sacrilege of sacred objects."


A friend believes that the Illuminati want power but he can't believe they worship Satan and eat babies.  I certainly wouldn't invent such an implausible scenario. As J. Edgar Hoover said, "We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them. ... The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst."  (Elks Magazine, August 1956.)

People like my friend have little knowledge of history. Does he really think over 180 million people could be massacred in the 20th century merely by accident? Hiroshima, the holodomor, the holocaust and 9-11 were the products of a single Satanic mindset. Does he think the steady decline of popular culture into degeneracy and obscenity is a coincidence? Does he think the gradual mainstreaming of incest homosexuality, pederasty and the occult is random? Does he think the destruction of higher education (in the humanities) and the family is coincidence too? (Forty per cent of US kids were born to single mothers in 2007 compared to 4% in the 1950's.) Mankind is in the thrall of a powerful Satanic cult intent on destroying and enslaving it.

As the therapist Grossman said, Vicki's claims are corroborated by many others. I have reported on them in articles like "Illuminati Sex Slaves Paint Horrifying Picture;" "The Root Problem: Illuminati or Jews?"  and "Illuminati Defector Details Pervasive Conspiracy." I have an audio interview with Mary Anne on my site which refers to human sacrifices eight times a year. Both Svali and Fritz Springmeier have described Illuminati trauma brainwashing and satanic rituals. These activities are also practised by high level Masons and members of intelligence agencies like MI-5 and MI-6.

As long as we deny that society has been subverted by a Satanic cult, that our leaders are dupes or agents, we won't be able to address our predicament. As long as we smear truth tellers like Vicki Polin, we will either implicate ourselves, or continue to be accomplices in our own demise.

The logical outcome of this demented ideology is the destruction of everything we hold dear.

Obviously society needs a major cleansing but this won't happen as long as the levers of power are in Illuminati hands and the masses remain apathetic. Hopefully the economic crisis will alert many more people to the danger we all face.

Rahm Emanuel & Obama Members of Same Chicago Gay Bathhouse

Ongoing controversy over Sexual Abuse in Jewish Community

MTV's Satanic Christmas Commercial

More on Blood Sacrifices

Petition to Stop Oklahoma City Black Mass

First Comment from Dan:

I recommend a novel 'Satan in Goray', (1955) by Isaac Singer. NYT Review Here

This novel should definitely be read by anyone involved in the 'Christian Charismatic' movement.   In any case, anyone interested in how a community seeking salvation can fall into Satanism.

The egregious practices of this network of Jewish Satanists that Vicky Polin described are identical in all generational Satanist families.  The Dönmeh is just a part of that network that's been exposed, just as Weishaupt's Bavarian Illuminati was just a branch.  Weishaupt and Jacob Frank were actually backed by money from from the House of Saxe-Gotha through Illuminati bag man Mayer Amschel Rothschild.  Can't people see that Weishaupt and Frank were prophets of the same esoteric cult?

Categories: Authors and Bloggers