………..

The argument they have deceptively presented is based on Freemason Adam Smith’s delusion that greed is good. That, giving reign to the pursuit of self-interest is in the good for us all. It’s patently absurd, but as a result of the collapse of the Soviet experiment, has managed to attract increasing swaths of society.

But since Adam Smith, this has been a ploy to prevent industrial societies from curbing the rapacious appetites of private interests.

The philosophical basis of this creed is “Libertarianism”. It dates back to another Freemason, John Stuart Mill. It is perceived to mean that governments are illegal, because, inherently, no other person has the right to tell you what to do. This derives from the Luciferian maxim of “do what thou wilt”, disguised by adding the clever conditional of, “as long as you don’t harm anyone else”. Readers will likely recognize this as identical to the guiding principle of the Wiccans.

And so, everywhere, dupes of the Libertarian conspiracy are calling for an end of “Big Government”. While government was originally intended to protect them from the monopolization of power by the few, and to guarantee fair redistribution of wealth, they now blame this entity for the crimes that have been perpetrated by these same few, who have cleverly managed to usurp control of this government for their own advantage, and are thus furthering the transfer of that power.
=====================================

You know, I don’t much like Paul either. However, with enemies like you he may actually have a chance. This is really classic stuff that gets printed out and put in the same file as material from The National Reinaissance Party, The American Eugenics Party and various Klan groups.

Libertarians are affiliates of the Patriot movement and Neocons. [Sure they are, in a world where one has ceased to take his meds. But you left out their derivation from the Bavarian Illuminati.]

Libertarians are derived from J.S. Mill [Well, give or take 200 years. You might look up the words “Enlightenment” and “English Revolution.”]

Adam Smith was a freemason supporter of big business and unrestrained self-interest. [Sure he was. That Presbyterianism was just a mask. And thats why there are those chapters in the Wealth of Nations ranting against the big trading monopolies that had been granted by the Crown and what he says about social ethics in his Theory of Moral Sentiments]

Big government was founded to protect people from big business. [You’re right, that’s exactly what Mussolini says in his Doctrine of Fascism]

So please keep writing. I have a somewhat trying job situation and can always use the comic relief.

David said: “Readers will likely recognize this as identical to the guiding principle of the Wiccans.”

Yes. But more precisely: Satanism, the modern kind invented by Anton LaVey. I’d identify the tenants of the modern Church of Satan as being most compatible with Objectivism above any ostensible “occult/esoteric” philosophy. And, as you know, Rand’s philosophy cannot exist without its foundation, Libertarianism. To their credit, Lew Rockwell and Mises writers, and Libertarians such as Justin Raimondo, have written extensively on the perils and dangers of the Cult of Objectivism.

I’m not sure what ideology (policy, belief or dogma) you’d most like a leader to extol, but I’m afraid I agree with EEkman: “guarantee fair redistribution of wealth,” is socialism, and it doesn’t work. History’s most valuable lesson (and its most bloody), in fact, teaches us that it doesn’t work - unless enforced by totalitarianism.

Youre asking for socialism. This system does not work. It does not conform to human nature and you simply trade 1 deadly sin for another, in this case - greed for envy. Socialism provides no incentive to innovate because there is no competition. Youve simply moved the monopoly from a private one, where customers have a choice as to whether they buy their goods or services, or a state owned monopoly, where its customers MUST buy its goods and services through sanctioned coersion.

By deregulating the market you lower the barrier of entry for competition, thus eliminating monopolies in a manner that benefits us all.