Finding the Tomb of Jesus and True Christianity
There’s a lot of hoopla these days about the possible discovery of the tomb of Jesus. It if were ever at all possible to even prove, however, it would not discredit “Christianity” in the least. But it would completely dismantle the Gnostic version that was created by Paul, which much of Christianity has adhered to for much of the last 2 thousand years. Ideally, it will lead to a rediscovery of the true meaning of Jesus’ message.
First of all, it’s perfectly to be expected that this strategy was to be eventually implemented, along with the recent assault on our perceptions of history and truth perpetrated by The Da Vinci Code, or the movie The Book of Secrets, and so on.
But the version of “Christianity” that the Illuminati claim to be discrediting is that same distortion of it for which they are themselves responsible.
I don’t mean to disparage any Christians, and I respect the light they may derive from that interpretation of Christianity. However, the evidence has suggested to me that Paul was a willing agent in the corruption of Jesus’ original message, and I suspect he may have been an agent of that family who were the prime instigators of the conspiracy, over the last 2000 years, to topple religion on this planet, and replace it with their Luciferianism. I mean the House of Herod the Great.
What is very fascinating about this family is that they were closely associated with 3 other families who were central in the origination and dissemination of Mithraism, that cult which so eventually pervaded the Roman Empire, and for which there have been numerous attempts to suggest that Christianity was merely a derivation of it.
The truth is that Mithraism belonged to the many and varied black magic rituals of the Kabbalah, ostensibly dedicated to the dying-gods of antiquity. In this case, they were purportedly dedicated to the god the Persian Magi, those sorcerers who were identified by the ancient world and the founders of all their occult doctrines, but were mistaken as the pupils of Zoroaster, the founder of Zoroastrianism. They were Kabbalists.
This is a very obscure area of history, so it may be difficult for readers to follow me, but the first evidence of the cult of Mithraism is found in the House of Commagene, in what is now Turkey, who were connected with the Herodians. The full network of these families also included the Claudio-Julian dynasty of Rome, who were emperors from the time to Caesar to Nero. Nero was the first emperor to have been initiated to Mithraism by a Magi. The other family were the Priest-Kings of Emesa in Syria, a hereditary family who for several centuries came to maintain the worship of Sol Invictus, which was interchangeable with Mithraism.
But it was also the Magi who through their astrological skill discovered the coming of the Jewish Messiah, and then reported it to Herod, who then implemented the infamous “slaughter of the innocents”. The evil mission failed. But this did not deter the Herodians in their mission to supplant Judaism with their own mystery religion.
When they failed to suppress the advent of the Jewish Messiah, they attempted to kill him, and then to co-opt his message. Their agent in this corruption was Paul. Robert Eisenmen, a leading scholar of the Dead Sea Scrolls, has written an excellent article which reveals the numerous pieces of evidence which lean to suggest that Paul was indeed such an agent.
But what is most incriminating about Paul, the Thirteenth Apostle, is his decidedly Gnostic interpretation of Christianity. As I discuss in my book, I think the Herodians attempted to kill Jesus as a form of human sacrifice, as a way, in accordance with their mysteries, that the victim would “die for their sins.”
Paul then became the missionary of this version of Christianity, without revealing its true esoteric meaning.
And so here is the complete justification as touted by Paul:
If Christ is not risen, then is our preaching in vain, and your faith also is in vain. Yes, and we are found false witnesses of God; because we have testified of God that He raised up Christ… if Christ is not raised… you are yet in your sins. Then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished. If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable.” (1 Cor. 15: 12-19).
But, it is only Paul’s version of Christianity that is dependent on the death of Jesus. But maybe Jesus’ message was not in his death. The majority of early Christians did not believe that Jesus was God or son of God, until they were suppressed by the emerging Christian establishment, and finally by the Nicene conference of 325 AD. In fact, the Early Church, which was composed of Jesus’ immediate followers, were orthodox Jews, and were in conflict with Paul’s repudiation of the Law.
As another example, Islam, while hailing Jesus as the Messiah and a true prophet of God, denies that Jesus was crucified, and denounces his equation with God or the son of God as pagan influence. The evidence corroborates the claim.
No, Jesus was an orthodox Jewish reformer, in the tradition of the many reformers mentioned in the Bible. He tried to reproach the Jewish priesthood of his time for their corruption, xenophobia and misanthropy. He tried to remind them that the meaning of piety was not to be found in mindless and detailed adherence to ritual, but in the implementation of justice. Above all, he wanted to teach the meaning of loving your neighbour, even your enemies.
This was a great and powerful message. It is by estranging us from this supreme tenet, and inducing us to equate religion with ritual, and patriotic association to our fellow co-religionists, that the Illuminati have managed to lull us into a degree of apathy by which we simply stand by and watch them rape and pillage their way across much of the rest of the world.
February 6th, 2008 at 2:32 am
Thankyou for such a great article!
February 11th, 2008 at 10:30 am
David,
I think that this article contains your most thoroughly thought out, incisive, concise, and important pieces of historical analysis. I agree that the Pauline and Nicene post hoc deification of Jesus Christ is a keystone in the overarching luciferian game plan.
Beside all of the occult overlays with Mithraism and associated practices, it works quite simply to corrupt the masses in this way: If Jesus can be God, then it opens the door to the concept of the deification of any man. Hence, if Jesus could be God, why not you, or me? Why not Crowley, or Bush, or Hitler, or a Rothschild?
The idea that man could become God, or that God is weak and incomplete and in need of man’s help, are the quintessences of the luciferian and cabalistic inversions. And, indeed, such ideas are the very antitheses of Islam, wherein “shirk”, placing anything or anyone, even an idea, on an equal footing with God is the worst sin or blasphemy, and constitutes one of the most utter forms of self-abasement to which a human being might fall. To confess to being muslim means to exercise one’s free will in complete submission to, and surrender before, God, the One, the Only, the Manifest, the Hidden.
God the One is ultimately reality, the Truth, of which there is no second or partner, of which evil and all its manifestations are but themselves partial attributes of God’s creation. Thus, Unity is all encompassing. And this ineffable Reality is what the cabalists and luciferians fear most, because it represents the diminution or loss of their own aggrandized and overweaning egos, which they must strive to prop up with all manner of nefarious, duplicitous, and despicable deeds. So that they might seem real or meaningful to themselves in the vacuum of their denial of God. So they marinate themselves in an evil of their own relative creation as an, albeit futile, attempt to stave off their own recognition and acceptance of the Infinite.
It might be said that “they can’t handle the Truth.”
February 12th, 2008 at 1:43 am
If the canonical gospels as handed down through the millenia to us are tainted by doctrinal and textual additions, emendations and coarse edits made to suit various political ends at the time these changes were made, wherein might we have faith in the story of Jesus of Nazareth, prophet of God? Among the words in the Bible that we might trust that Jesus actually said, as you noted, constitute perhaps his most profound teaching:
“Love God with all thy heart and all thy mind and all thy soul, and do thou love thy neighbor as thou love thyself.”
That is true wisdom, regardless of whether it comes to us via the prophethood of Jesus.
And yes, our neighbors include our “enemies” as well, such as we may conceive of them.
But going the extra mile and turning the other cheek are often likely to result only in terminal soreness and finding oneself somewhere in a place not of one’s own choosing.
Wisdom certainly does not demand the passive acceptance of injustice and war as a means of bypassing the potential suffering that might result from one’s confrontation with these and other harsh realities in favor of staying on some imagined “higher road” to personal happiness. This is nothing but a crock of new age nonsense. Such a course is, at best, simply selfish and hedonistic idiocy and, at worst, a way of delusional solipsism in collusion with the forces of exploitation and degradation that are all ultimately bound to be defeated and destroyed.
And if, historically, Christianity does claim to stand for such avoidant quiescence, then what about the allegedly Christian doctrines of those men who brought us the Crusades, and missionaries and pederast priests in Africa, the Americas, Australia and Asia?
Not very God-fearing, God-loving, or Jesus-like, those, I venture to say. Something critical has clearly been lost in translation and grossly distorted with the passage of time.
I agree completely with the idea you expressed that piety or faith in God Almighty is central to a life of peaceful co-existence and social justice for humankind, as Jesus said.
Therefore I suggest as a guide to useful action towards those ends, to raise us out of the torpor into which we have been lulled, the idea expressed in the following hadith:
We shoud each have such deep and abiding faith in God that we trust and know that all things depend solely on God…. but, nevertheless:
We should each act in such a manner as if everything were to depend solely on the quality and extent of our actions.
This is my understanding of wisdom brought forward into the realm of deeds.
It is not all that different from the wisdom expressed in the Bhagavad Gita, which is: to act with full intention, mindfulness, vigor, intelligence and courage, but not to be attached to the outcome, or fruit, of one’s actions.
For only God controls the ends.
But thanks to our free will, we do have a choice as to the means by which we act, or fail to act. And so for us, the means do in fact constitute the end. Truly, then, the means by which we choose to act must be just within and of themselves.
For, as a mercy, God gives us this most precious gift - the freedom of will to choose, to make moral choices. And the outcome of our actions depends upon God’s mercy, as well.
From God we arise and to God we must return.
March 9th, 2008 at 9:51 am
Jesus called Paul into the ministry and Paul constantly reveres Jesus. Jesus predicted the future. Jesus stated that the scriptures bore witness to him as the source of their salvation. Jesus is called the Word of God in Rev. Jesus is the lamb slain from the foundation of the earth. Satan obeyed Jesus. The devils asked for permission to enter the swine. Jesus performed miracles before his death. God AND the Lamb are the light of the new heaven and earth. Man was created as a triune being just like God. Go back and read Genesis. Jesus didn’t rebuke after being worshiped. Believe what you will, but don’t be hasty about it. Ye do err not knowing the scriptures.