Israel Created Hamas to Stall Peace

How Israel and the Americans foster Islamic fundamentalism to stall peace with the Palestinians and other imperialistic objectives

The Israelis created Hamas.  But before we explore that question, let's start with a more important one.  Let's be honest with ourselves.  If we can look at the situation from beyond the confines of current political discourse, and look at the emperor without his "new" clothes, we all know that Israel does not want peace.  They want all of Palestine, and their belligerent settlement practices confirm that.

But the Israelis are taking advantage of the world's ignorance of the realities in Palestine, and posturing as being willing to talk "peace", only to actually stall that very peace process, so as not to interrupt the further colonization of Palestine.

So anything that can be offered as an excuse, will be.  The most convenient ploy, presented with the sycophantic assistance of the media, is that of "terrorism".

But the masses are naive, and fail to suspect the Machiavellian extremes that certain leaders will resort to to aggrandize their power.  This includes creating a false enemy, in this case, Hamas, whereby the right-wing leadership of the Israelis can point the finger to some "enemy" to blame otehr than themselves for supposedly stalling the process.

The use of Islamic terrorism for the political ends of Western nations is nothing new.  After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in 1924, the British and Americans stepped in to fill the vacuum by providing their own versions of "Islamic" leaders.  This started with the creation of the Muslim Brotherhood, which was created through a grant from the British.  Under British sponsorship, the Brotherhood flourished, and today represents a sizeable and powerful force in the Islamic world, but most worryingly, as the institution behind almost every act of terror in the name of Islam. 

More correctly, the Brotherhood has been a tool shared my numerous Western intelligence agencies, starting with the Nazis, followed by the CIA, but also the Russians, French, Germans and Israelis.

Since the Truman and Eisenhower administrations, it has been a staple of foreign policy of the Cold War to exploit the Muslim Brotherhood to rally naive Muslims to reject "atheistic" Communism as an arch enemy of Islam.  Ever since, the Americans and others have been able to manage the Brotherhood like a rabid dog on a leash to keep the Communist threat at bay.

With the collapse of the Cold War however, the Brotherhood has been used for new imperial objectives, where they pose as the bogey man which the Americans can chase with their armies into the Middle East and Central Asia, starting with Iraq and Afghanistan.

But, as NSC official Sheila Haslin explained, in a testimony at Senate hearings into illegal fund-raising activities, US policy in the region was to "promote the independence of these oil-rich countries, to in essence break Russia's monopoly control over the transportation of oil from that region, and frankly, to promote Western energy security through diversity of supply."

Israel has also maintained a long-standing relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood, with its most recent manifestation being its participation in the founding of an offshoot organization, Hamas.

According to Robert Dreyfuss, who details the US' troubling relationship with Islamic fundamentalism, in "Devil's Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam":

"And beginning in 1967 through the late 1980s, Israel helped the Muslim Brotherhood establish itself in the occupied territories.  It assisted Ahmed Yassin, the leader of the Brotherhood, in creating Hamas, betting that its Islamist character would weaken the PLO."

According to Charles Freeman, a veteran US diplomat and former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, "Israel started Hamas. It was a project of Shin Bet [Isreali domestic intelligence agency], which had a feeling that they could use it to hem in the PLO."

In 1965, Yassin had been arrested by Egyptian intelligence, but after 1967, when Israel took control of the West Bank and Gaza, Yassin was freed.  In 1973, under approval from Shin Bet, Yassin founded the Islamic Center, and began to establish effective control over hundreds of mosques.  In 1976, Yassin created the Islamic Association, which membership branches throughout the Gaza Srip, and the movement grew.

Israel's formal support for Islamic fundamentalism came with the election of the right-wing Likud party.  In 1978, Begin's new government formally licensed Yassin's Islamic Association, as part of a strategy to undermine the power of the PLO.  One aspect of that strategy was the creation of the Village Leagues, over which Yassin and the Brotherhood exercised much influence.  Up to 200 members of the Leagues were given paramilitary training in Israel, among whom Shin Bet recruited many paid informers.

David Shipler, a former reporter for the New York Times, cites the Israeli military governor of Gaza as boasting that Israel expressly financed the fundamentalists against the PLO:

"Politically speaking, Islamic fundamentalists were sometimes regarded as useful to Israel, because they had conflicts with the secular supporters of the PLO.  Violence between the two groups erupted occasionally on West Bank university campuses, and the Israeli military governor of the Gaza Strip, Brigadier General Yitzhak Segev, once told me how he had financed the Islamic movement as a counterweight to the PLO and the Communists.  'The Isreali Government gave me a budget and the military government gives to the mosques,' he said."

As Dreyfuss notes, "during the 1980s, the Muslim Brotherhood in Gaza and the West Bank did not support resistance to the Israeli occupation.  Most of its energy went to fighting the PLO, especially its more left-wing factions, on university campuses."

US diplomats and CIA officials were aware that Israel was fostering Islamic fundamentalism among the Palestinians, but, as noted Martha Kessler, a senior analyst for the CIA, "we saw Israel cultivate Islam as a counterweight to Palestinian nationalism", but neither the CIA nor the State department did anything about it.

It was primarily Israel's far right, Begin, Shamir and Ariel Sharon who pursued this policy.  It is with them that we see the very cynical basis for the exploitation of Islamic fundamentalism in the region.  This was explained by Victor Ostrovsky, a former Mossad officer who left the agency and became a strong critic, and wrote two books about the service:

"Supporting the radical elements of Muslim fundamentalism sat well with Mossad's general plan for the region. An Arab world run by fundamentalists would not be party to any negotiations with the West, thus leaving Israel again as the only democratic, rational country in the region.  And if the Mossad could arrange for Hamas… to take over the Palestinian streets from the PLO, then the picture would be complete."

Very suspiciously, in 1983, Yassin was arrested by Israeli authorities, but although he was sentenced to 13 years in prison, he was released after only a year.  Then in 1986-7, Yassin founded Hamas.  According to Philip Wilcox, counterterrorism expert a former US ambassador who headed the US consulate in Jerusalem at the time, "there were persistent rumors that the Israeli secret service gave covert support to Hamas, because they were seen as a rival to the PLO."  Wilcox said the US officials in Jerusalem dealt "regularly and intensively" with Hamas.

After the Palestinian uprising of 1987, the PLO accused Hamas and Yassin of acting "with the direct support of reactionary Arab regimes… in collusion with the Israeli occupation."  Yasser Arafat complained to an Italian newspaper: "Hamas is a creation of Israel, which at the time of Prime Minister Shamir, gave them money and more than 700 institutions, among them schools, universities and mosques."  Arafat also maintained that Israeli prime minister Rabin admitted to him in the presence of Hosni Mubarak that Israel had supported Hamas.

Essentially, as analyst Ray Hannania pointed out, in "Sharon's Terror Child", published in Counterpunch, "undermining the peace process has always been the real target of Hamas and has played into the political ambitions of Likud.  Every time Israeli and Palestinian negotiators appeared ready to take a major step forward achieving peace, an act of Hamas terrorism has scuttled the peace process and pushed the two sides apart."

This pattern continued throughout the shifting developments of the stalled peace process.  In 2001, when the PLO secured a Hamas pledge to halt its terrorist attacks, then prime minister Ariel Sharon ordered the assassinations of one of their top officials.  As Alex Fishman commented in the Israeli newspaper Yediot Achronot, "whoever gave the green light to this act of liquidation knew full well that he was thereby shattering in one blow the gentlemen's agreement between Hamas and the Palestinian Authority".

In "Hamas and the Transformation of Political Islam in Palestine", for Current History, Sara Roy wrote:

"Some analysts maintain that while Hamas leaders are being targeted, Israel is simultaneously pursuing its old strategy of promoting Hamas over the secular nationalist factions as a way of ensuring the ultimate demise of the [Palestinian Authority], and as an effort to extinguish Palestinian nationalism once and for all."

Essentially, the Muslim Brotherhood, with its many manifestations like Al Qaeda and bin Laden, serve as a Samuel Goldstein of Orwell's Nineteen-Eighty-Four, an ever-present and manufactured "terrorist" threat, used constantly as a pretext to justify repressive measures at home and expanded imperialistic objectives abroad.

Because, despite all the rhetoric employed in the War on Terror about the threat of "political Islam", unbeknownst to the general public, the manipulation of the Muslim Brotherhood throughout the world is still a mainstay of American foreign policy.

According to Reuel Marc Gerecht, a former CIA officer with experience in Iraq and the Middle East, as well as a neo-conservative hardliner with the notorious American Enterprise Institute:

Most American liberals and conservatives will strongly resist the idea that Islam's clergymen and lay fundamentalists, who usually dislike, if not detest, the United States, Israel, and progressive causes like women's rights, are the key to liberating the Muslim Middle East from its age-old reflexive hostility to the West.  There men, not the much admired liberal Muslim secularists who are always praised and sometimes defended by the American government and press, are the United States' most valuable potential democratic allies."

As Robert Dreyfuss ends his book, "the devil's game continues."
 

 

This article was originally published as "Reflections on the 'Peace Process'" on 2011-05-28.

Comments

Hamas a creation of Israel

hi,i see how this could have been the case initially,because Israel needed a scapegoat,but in light of recent activities i fail to see the plot because Israel lost at least 80 of its soldiers and that is one thing they are not prepared to do,is to give their lives and the lives of their young men to achieve their goal,although 2 things keep bothering me,firstly as was mentioned-the sending of rockets from Hamas to Israel knowing that the damage will be absolutely minimal if nothing(perhaps Iran is supplying them with duds) and secondly-of the many IDF soldiers purpoted to be killed by Hamas,i have yet to see a single body,yes what we see are coffins being paraded by the Israelis but who knows?any suggestions people.thank you

US anti-Communist? Israel expansionist?

You write as though the US and Israel are being driven by nationalistic impulses, as in US wants to counter Communism and Israel is enlarging her territory. Nothing could be further from the truth in both cases. They are driven by international objectives to build a New World Order and New World Religion. The US created over 80% of the Russian and military industrial complex (Antony Sutton, 1972) and has saved both the USSR and China from collapse innumerable times. If at any time it wanted to counter Communist influence anywhere in the world, it had the weapon of technological and financial dependence with which to do that. As for Israel's expansionism, exactly the opposite is true - it is giving up territory rightfully hers under international law and the rules of war - not adding territory. International law says that Israel's boundaries are based on the same post-WWI mandatory authorities that set up the boundaries of all the other countries of the region, which have never been challenged by anyone; the countries of Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Syria, etc., a total of over 20 countries. This gave Israel all of the West Bank and Gaza. All the more recent "lines" do not have the legitimacy of international law. For example, the 1947 UN Partition Plan was issued by the UN General Assembly, which has no binding power. The 1949 Armistice line was merely the line that Israel pushed back her enemies after winning a defensive war - it had no force of law. During the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel captured the West Bank, Sinai, the Golan Heights, and all of Jerusalem. Israel had the right to annex all those territories since they were achieved in a defensive war. If they had territorial ambitions they would have done that. They gave back the Sinai, and have not taken it back, even though Egypt was obligated to keep it demilitarized. They gave back control of the Temple Mount area, which they were not required to do. They initially created a 25 km buffer zone along the border with Lebanon because of the constant shelling of Israeli cities by Hezbollah, but eventually withdrew, even though the threat was not eliminated. As a result of this withdrawal, Hezbollah has positioned oever 100,000 missiles in the area which can virtually destroy all of Israel. They kept the Golan, a small region around the Sea of Galilee, for security reasons, since their cities were under constant attack from Syria, and the Sea of Galilee watershed area is Israel's most important water supply. They gave back Gaza, even though they were not required to do so under international law, and the Palestinians had made no concessions for peace. They lured Israelis to settle in Gaza and then uprooted them. You say that the settlements in the West Bank are an example of Israel's territorial ambitions. It is actually just setting the stage for a repeat of Gaza, only on a much larger scale. Israel is luring religious settlers into the West Bank only to hand over the area to a future Palestinian state, and dispossess all the settlers. This is how Israel is making war on its religious citizens, because Israel is a creaton of, and firmly in the grip of, the anti-religious Labor Zionists Sabbataians. Israel's end game is to take major losses in a future war with its fundamentalist Islamic neighbors, just as the US goal is to take heavy losses to a Russia/China axis which will rain nukes down on the US, with the full knowledge and participation of the US leadership, who will be safe in their bunkers. The outcome of the war both in the US and in Israel will be to welcome in the UN international peace-keeping forces to their countries, to agree with all sides to hand over all national armed forces and military arsenals to the UN, for the Freemasons to rebuild the temple in Jerusalem, and for the Jesuits/Vatican to setup the New World Order political-economic world-wide dictatorship, with the Antichrist as the leader of the New World Religion, based from Jerusalem. This will be the beginning of the Great Tribulation, culminating with the return of Jesus Christ to destroy the New World Order and reign as King of the Jews and of all the peoples of the world for a thousand years. It is only then that the power games, wars, oppressions, and mass murders of the leadership of not only the US and Israel, but of Europe, Russia, China, and the rest of the world, will finally come to a merciful end.

fundamentally wrong

You write as though the US and Israel are being driven by nationalistic impulses, as in US wants to counter Communism and Israel is enlarging her territory. Nothing could be further from the truth in both cases. They are driven by international objectives to build a New World Order and New World Religion. The US created over 80% of the Russian and military industrial complex (Antony Sutton, 1972) and has saved both the USSR and China from collapse innumerable times. If at any time it wanted to counter Communist influence anywhere in the world, it had the weapon of technological and financial dependence with which to do that. As for Israel's expansionism, exactly the opposite is true - it is giving up territory rightfully hers under international law and the rules of war - not adding territory. International law says that Israel's boundaries are based on the same post-WWI mandatory authorities that set up the boundaries of all the other countries of the region, which have never been challenged by anyone; the countries of Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Syria, etc., a total of over 20 countries. This gave Israel all of the West Bank and Gaza. All the more recent "lines" do not have the legitimacy of international law. For example, the 1947 UN Partition Plan was issued by the UN General Assembly, which has no binding power. The 1949 Armistice line was merely the line that Israel pushed back her enemies after winning a defensive war - it had no force of law. During the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel captured the West Bank, Sinai, the Golan Heights, and all of Jerusalem. Israel had the right to annex all those territories since they were achieved in a defensive war. If they had territorial ambitions they would have done that. They gave back the Sinai, and have not taken it back, even though Egypt was obligated to keep it demilitarized. They gave back control of the Temple Mount area, which they were not required to do. They initially created a 25 km buffer zone along the border with Lebanon because of the constant shelling of Israeli cities by Hezbollah, but eventually withdrew, even though the threat was not eliminated. As a result of this withdrawal, Hezbollah has positioned oever 100,000 missiles in the area which can virtually destroy all of Israel. They kept the Golan, a small region around the Sea of Galilee, for security reasons, since their cities were under constant attack from Syria, and the Sea of Galilee watershed area is Israel's most important water supply. They gave back Gaza, even though they were not required to do so under international law, and the Palestinians had made no concessions for peace. They lured Israelis to settle in Gaza and then uprooted them. You say that the settlements in the West Bank are an example of Israel's territorial ambitions. It is actually just setting the stage for a repeat of Gaza, only on a much larger scale. Israel is luring religious settlers into the West Bank only to hand over the area to a future Palestinian state, and dispossess all the settlers. This is how Israel is making war on its religious citizens, because Israel is a creaton of, and firmly in the grip of, the anti-religious Labor Zionists Sabbataians. Israel's end game is to take major losses in a future war with its fundamentalist Islamic neighbors, just as the US goal is to take heavy losses to a Russia/China axis which will rain nukes down on the US, with the full knowledge and participation of the US leadership, who will be safe in their bunkers. The outcome of the war both in the US and in Israel will be to welcome in the UN international peace-keeping forces to their countries, to agree with all sides to hand over all national armed forces and military arsenals to the UN, for the Freemasons to rebuild the temple in Jerusalem, and for the Jesuits/Vatican to setup the New World Order political-economic world-wide dictatorship, with the Antichrist as the leader of the New World Religion, based from Jerusalem. This will be the beginning of the Great Tribulation, culminating with the return of Jesus Christ to destroy the New World Order and reign as King of the Jews and of all the peoples of the world for a thousand years. It is only then that the power games, wars, oppressions, and mass murders of the leadership of not only the US and Israel, but of Europe, Russia, China, and the rest of the world, will finally come to a merciful end.

nwo is overrated

nworesister claims that the US has saved China from collapse innumerable times.
The least you might expect would be to examplify some such cases out of the 'innumerable'
During the Chinese civil war and the Corean war the anglophile branch of the USG and the so called Cambridge ring undoubtedly acted to weaken Chiang Kai Chek/enable the Chinese advances but that was most likely to prevent the emergence of a US backed capitalist China from becoming a too powerful competitor. It was the usual british balance of power politics. In the 1970s when De Gaulle had called the US bluff economy Nixon badly needed cheap labour to keep the dollar as reserve currency and China began its rise. It was purely selfish motives from the US and they hate that they needed China so much. The nwo concept is overrated.
Its all about weakening the competition. Russia was to be held in a colonial status, delivering raw materials, purchasing technology thus handicapping the Russians and the eastern block as much as possible. When Germany in 1953, Hungary in 1956 and Chechoslovakia in 1968 tried to break free it was the americans who wanted them back under red power. This guaranteed continued lower competitiveness. Anthony Sutton confirms in a quote from 1919 that the aim of backing the bolsheviks was to make sure Russia would have an inefficient economy. Before WWI Russia was the nr 1 oil producer and the most rapidly industrialized nation in the world.

Hamas is a Creation of Mossad

"Hamas is a Creation of Mossad" at globalresearch.ca (2004)

"How Israel Helped to Spawn Hamas" at WSJ (2009)

Even more important than the

Even more important than the fact that the Jews do not want peace....the Jews are NOT the nation of Israel. If so-called evangelical Christians would stop singing long enough to actually read their bibles, they would know that. When unable to infiltrate the Catholic church with their false doctrine, the zionists turned their focus to the "evangelical" churches in the early 80s. The zionists have been entirely successful in taking over churches, controlling the message and channeling all resources to the synogogue of satan, which is what the Jews really are.

unfortunately you are all

unfortunately you are all being mislead. The living God of the Bible protects Israel and has gathered her people once more to her. The Jewish people are in their land has proclaimed by God Almighty. He will not move an inch and if you are foolish enough to follow after men who wish nothing more than to destroy his people then you are in for a rough ride at the end of the age. I guarantee you God is watching and not one more inch of Israel will he let go.

Biblical Explanations and Encouragement

The Jewish people and Israel are not one and the same. The Jews running the country
are the Ashkenazim, who are the false Jews of Revelation chapters 2 and 3,
whom the Eternal says that He hates what He calls the Synagogue of Satan.
They are not the legitimate descendants of Judah. They are Edomites.
Judah is just one tribe of the 12 tribes of Israel. Before you speak about the so called
Jews as being the people of God, I suggest that you have a look at the fact, that their
primary book is the Talmud. You will find it in synagogues. Then see what they say about Christ and Christians.
You can read about it here: http://www.peterjamesx.com/docs%202011/Synagogue%20Of%20Satan%20Updated%... In the Talmud they say
They say "Extermination of a Christian is a necessary sacrifice" (Zohar, Shemoth).
"Jesus is in hell and is being punished by being boiled in hot semen.
Christians are boiled in shit." Sanhedrin 105a-b. The Talmud is more important to them
than the Torah, (The Old Testament). Please having checked this out, now explain how you are not actively supporting Satan's servants, Thank you.

God? Satan more likely!

God? Satan more likely!

I t is extremely complex and

I t is extremely complex and at the same time extremely simple. The complex is mind control. The simple is also mind control. The control controls all levels of the pyramid of which no one is at the top although he or she or it may thinks so.

Dialectical Frauds

David,

All correct, but. A wider overview for context - sidestep Illuminati dialectics left/right, Zionism/Islam.
While you say 'peace' will destroy Palestine, BarryChamish.com says 'peace' will destroy Israel.
And you're both right.

Chamish details Israel's occult founders. The top judicial court edifice tells you who's in charge.
Chamish explains, Satanic Sabbatean Zionists wanted to wipe out religious Bible Jews; and originally, planned Israel as a Satanic utopia.

But missed. Israel became too godly, too moral for their taste. So Chamish concludes 'peace processes'
are CFR farce to destroy Biblical Judaism - settlers, patriots, etc.

Chamish, Israeli war veteran, explains, Israel does nothing proper to defend herself, and punishes her own patriots. He bemoans the utter political stupidity of Israelis about their CFR leadership. He revealed how Kissinger once ran both left and right parties, and even planned military defeats with her defense minister.
http://thebarrychamishwebsite.com/newsletters/alon.htm

Chamish just interviewed Joel Skousen. Skousen said nothing over there aims for 'workability' but for 'provocation.' Chamish got bewildered, but didn't argue.
Chamish sees the farce but gets confused on the end game - like you, he needs wider overview.

A Rothschild called Israel their family toy. That family runs the Council of 13 Illuminati Luciferian druids.
http://www.equalparenting-bc.ca/funstuff/na_todd-john-illuminati.htm
http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1052.html

Israel and Palestine are at each other's throats by plan.
The conflict is internationalized and mass-media promulgated for generations now. Does any other land squabble have such long tv attention? Many exist. We forget all but one.

This occult dialectic sets up World War Three. CFR 'peace processing' is cocking the gun. Both sides must hang in mortal peril with religious overtones. There must be lots of weapons on both sides.

When the final trigger pulls, Islamic nations will fight holy jihad to rescue Palestine; propagandized Western Christian nations will do Battle of Armageddon to rescue prophetic Israel. Now you get it? The Luciferians want moral people to kill each other off. So they pander to patriotic and religious impulses. From these ashes, they will mold world government, HQ Jerusalem, with ecumenical syncretic NWO Luciferian religion.

The Luciferian CFR planners will blame war on 'outmoded religious fundamentalism' or some such made-for-tv NLP soundbite formula, and issue UN 'hate' laws for Luciferian dogmatic Inquisition, complete with quack science like homophobia diagnoses, and Soviet-style reeducation camps.

We may get a nice End Times, Blue Beam show, involving Maitreya, or flotillas of man-made, secret-tech space ships, posing as alien rescue brigades, to 'save us from our backward religious belief systems', i.e., conquer us for the NWO and impose 'cosmic religion' from afar, but really, from the bowels of the earth.
http://wovoca.com/controversies-black-science-black-operations.htm

Doesn't surprise me...

Dear David

I really appreciate all your thorough research and for showing us the truth with evidence and detailed analysis.

Considering Hamas is an off-shoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, nothing surprised me of its complicity with Israel. Hamas has always been the convenient and servant scapegoat for Israeli mass terrorism in killing Palestinian civilians. Why would Hamas send rockets into Israel, knowing they would do no damage, so then Israel could use this as the very reason to bombard Gaza? Anyone with a grain of sense knows that Hamas has no interest to protect its own people. No matter how big an enemy or opponent, if you know countless hundreds and thousands will be killed or severely maimed by sending in rockets or belligerence you would stop to save your people. Hamas continued remorselessly.

The fact that it is far more effective to create your own (puppet) enemies, control and direct them whilst the masses are duped is now an out in the open tactic that is a no brainer.

Impostors at work

Thanks for the excellent comments Sapphire.  Here's something else I learned from reading Dreyfuss' book.  I've covered in detail in my book the curious history of Jamal ud Din al Afghani, the founder of the Salafi  movement, out of which grew the Muslim Brotherhood, and thererfore Hamas.  I've gone into great detail about his work for the British and his very important role in the history of the occult.

But while he evidently worked to undermine Islam, I had never heard him articulate that as a consious strategy.  According to Nikki Kedourie, here is how he described his mission:

"We do not cut the head of religion except with the sword of religion. Therefore, if you were to see us now, you would see ascetics and worshippers, kneeling and genuflecting, never disobeying God's commands and doing all that they are ordered to do."

Thanks David - I have read

Thanks David - I have read about Jamal Ud Din Al Afghani as well as his sidekick Mohammed Abduh and how the hypocrites work especially within this example of the "Muslim Brotherhood". How Lord Cromer had described them as instrumental in aiding "their" cause. They show all the outwardly signs of "Islam" but mix it with a million perversions and then exhult in their own satanic schism.

I must delve further into your book on the subject of Ibn Taymiyyah - that certainly arose my curiosity as he is an oft quoted scholar.

This information needs to get out to the masses as the first battle is raising awareness.

Keep up the great work.

Thank you Sapphire

I'll admit, I was offended the first time I heard someone criticise Ibn Taymiyyah.  That's just an indication of the thoroughness of the Wahhabi propaganda.  He was all but forgotten until the advent of these "Revivalist" movements, like the Wahhabis and Salafis.  In fact, devotion to Ibn Taymiyyah seems to be the underlying element these modern movements all have in common.

It was only when I started to acknowledge my ignorance of traditional islam, meaning the Mathhabs, that I could begin to see the incongruence of the Wahhabi/Salafi insistence on Ibn Taymiyyah.

Most importantly, it has been Ibn Taymiyyah who has been used as the authority for all those modern deviations in Islam that have most directly served Western interests.  Primarily: the precedent of pronoucing other Muslims "kaffir" or apostate to sanction "Jihad" against them; in Saudi Arabia to advance Saudi coloization of Arabia; and through the Muslim Brotherhood, to justify assassinations of designated Arab rulers; and finally to recruit Muslims for the "defence of Muslim lands" like in Afghanistan.

An article I wrote on the subject is here:  

Ibn Taymiyyah and the Occult Roots of Islamic Terrorism 

The big question would be,

The big question would be, did Hamas have knowledge that what it was doing served the Zionist agenda. this is a very difficult question to answer because many Hamas leaders including Ahmed yassin were gunned down by the Israelis. Salafism is an ideology, when we look into history we find that ideologies lead people like the Sicarii Jewish community at Masada or the Jim Jones peoples temple to commit mass suicide. could it be that Hamas were just mislead under the influence of Salafism. it is very clear that the Muslim Brotherhood is a masonic society, it is also very clear that the different masonic societies work constructively to accomplish supreme goals and are all bound with fraternity. if the leaders in Hamas were killed by the Israelis before why would they continue to serve the same Israeli agenda.

Every side in conflict with

Every side in conflict with each other do serves the opposite's agenda without selfknowledge, this is the agenda of the only hidden "God" they all devote to serve. "God" maintains the balanced conflict to drink both and all other side's blood for its eternal existence.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <p> <span> <div> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <img> <map><iframe> <area> <hr> <br> <br /> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <table> <tr> <td> <em> <b> <u> <i> <strong> <font> <del> <ins> <sub> <sup> <quote> <blockquote> <pre> <address> <code> <cite> <embed> <object> <param> <strike> <caption> <embed>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options